And The Snakes Speak

[DarkFury]

Nope, the 'clown" called STATS wrote that in a blog a few hours ago.

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

It's in your title...
Carly Fiorina R-CA would neutralize Clinton s gender card US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
I saw it on the recent list. I suppose we could have the time stamp checked to PROVE you are lying.

That not "his" title.

Its the title of his link.

Once again, you can't tell fact from opinion.

Try again.

Carly Fiorina (R-CA) would "neutralize" Clinton's "gender card"
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Statistikhengst, Today at 9:52 AM.

 

[Statistikhengst]

"Strawman" means you're arguing with yourself. No one said "you've got to counter Hillary with a woman" -- you wrote that yourself.

Play with yourself a lot do ya?

Nope, the 'clown" called STATS wrote that in a blog a few hours ago.

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

It's in your title...
Carly Fiorina R-CA would neutralize Clinton s gender card US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
I saw it on the recent list. I suppose we could have the time stamp checked to PROVE you are lying.

How much of a stupid fuck are you? That title is directly from the link and is a quote of what Carly Fiorina herself said. You realize, Great-Grandpa, that Fiorina said "gender card", right? Those were HER words, not mine.

Christ, you are one stupid human being.

You

 

[Pogo]

"Strawman" means you're arguing with yourself. No one said "you've got to counter Hillary with a woman" -- you wrote that yourself.

Play with yourself a lot do ya?

Nope, the 'clown" called STATS wrote that in a blog a few hours ago.

Uh, whutt are you babbling about?

This where YOU the SUPPOSED open minded one TRY and deflect and evade the up coming ass kicking of Hillary..

Carly Fiorina R-CA would neutralize Clinton s gender card US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

YOU are trying to sell conservatives a load of crap to save your frail feeble retard Hillary from a beating.

Uhh..... why don't you just respond in that thread instead of creating a whine cellar about it?

Why point out the sexist thinking to a sexist? They ALREADY know they ARE a sexist.
Carly Fiorina R-CA would neutralize Clinton s gender card US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

You have no clue what "sexism" means, do you?

 

[Statistikhengst]

"Strawman" means you're arguing with yourself. No one said "you've got to counter Hillary with a woman" -- you wrote that yourself.

Play with yourself a lot do ya?

Nope, the 'clown" called STATS wrote that in a blog a few hours ago.

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

Number of days? Really?
Carly Fiorina (R-CA) would "neutralize" Clinton's "gender card"
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Statistikhengst, Today at 9:52 AM.
That time stamp says today, just hours ago. Whose lying YOU or the site?

So, you really are stupid. That is not a blog. You say I posted on a blog, you idiot. That is a thread. You are an absolute idiot and lack the ability to understand even the most simple of things.

I pity you.

 

[DarkFury]

Nope, the 'clown" called STATS wrote that in a blog a few hours ago.

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

Number of days? Really?
Carly Fiorina (R-CA) would "neutralize" Clinton's "gender card"
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Statistikhengst, Today at 9:52 AM.
That time stamp says today, just hours ago. Whose lying YOU or the site?

So, you really are stupid. That is not a blog. You say I posted on a blog, you idiot. That is a thread. You are an absolute idiot and lack the ability to understand even the most simple of things.

I pity you.

Blog/OP all the same. FACT is YOU have been CAUGHT lying to the membership. PUNK.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Why is this silliness in Politics?

Because it's about returning HONESTY into politics NOT that slop brained crap YOU propose.

And right below those lines is a picture of Ted Cruz. The vain-glorious sociopath who shut down the federal government and cost the economy $24,000,000,000.

Here’s How Much The Government Shutdown Cost The Economy
$24 billion.
Here’s a breakdown of some of the economic cost by our calculations:

• About $3.1 billion in lost government services, according to the research firm IHS
• $152 million per day in lost travel spending, according to the U.S. Travel Association
• $76 million per day lost because of National Parks being shut down, according to the National Park Service
• $217 million per day in lost federal and contractor wages in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area alone

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers bore the economic brunt of the shutdown. But small businesses also suffered from frozen government contracts and stalled business loans. Tourism suffered from closed national parks, and military families had to cope without childcare and other services. Federal workers will receive back-pay under the deal, but contractors will probably not get their lost wages. The stall in cash-flow could affect spending during the holiday shopping season."""

Government Shutdown Cost 24 Billion According to Standard Poor s TIME.com

Let's talk reality here. Obama shut down the Government by refusing to sign the spending passed by Congress. Congress is not a tool of the Executive Branch. The job of the Executive Branch is to execute the Laws passed by the Legislative Branch.

Let's talk FACTS here. The Republican Congress voted for all money required to keep the government open except the ACA/Obamacare, which WAS LAW. So factually, the Republicans broke the law and shut the government down. Look it up, clown.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Is opine ILLEGAL content here? NO
Do you have ANY right to DEMAND something be written YOUR way? NO.
Do YOU have ANY right to tell PEOPLE who comment on MY threads to go away? NO.

Now you can leave on the same shopping cart you rode in on.

No more than you have the right to control what people reply in "your" threads.

You don't know the difference between an opinion and a fact.

Learn it or expect people to point and laugh - just like they do now.

I am NOT trying to control what they say YOU ARE by telling them to leave. Now if you are unhappy then move your WND ass to where you ARE happy, SFBs.

DarkFury

Are you confused or still lying? I didn't do either of those things. YOU did.

It was YOU who wrote that people should not post their opinion in your thread.

It was YOU who told people to leave.

Grow up and face FACTS. Its an open board. You can't control who posts or what they say. If you don't like what people are writing, don't read it. Or ask admin to intervene for you. Perhaps they can give you your own private board where you can "OPINE" to your little heart's content and not have to deal with FACTS.

Silly ditz.

YOU told them to leave. I merely SUGGESTED there were other blogs if this one made them unhappy.

Umm...

You don't like it? So what? Move your dumb ass on to the next. The HONEST people will not miss you.

Now you can leave on the same shopping cart you rode in on.

Now if you are unhappy then move your WND ass to where you ARE happy, SFBs.

I didn't even know there was such a thing as a Whirled Nuts Daily Ass.

He really has confused his own posts and thinks I wrote them.

Apparently, he also has trouble with telling the difference between a blog and a message board thread as well as op/ed editorializing and simply quoting the title of an external source.

He's too dumb to learn from his own mistakes and too dishonest to admit them.

 

[Statistikhengst]

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

Number of days? Really?
Carly Fiorina (R-CA) would "neutralize" Clinton's "gender card"
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Statistikhengst, Today at 9:52 AM.
That time stamp says today, just hours ago. Whose lying YOU or the site?

So, you really are stupid. That is not a blog. You say I posted on a blog, you idiot. That is a thread. You are an absolute idiot and lack the ability to understand even the most simple of things.

I pity you.

Blog/OP all the same. FACT is YOU have been CAUGHT lying to the membership. PUNK.

NO, you stupid fuck. A blog and a thread are NOT the same thing.

Furthermore, the title to the thread is the title directly from the news article to which I linked.

See how that works, senile old man?

You need to get a grip on yourself before you break something, old man.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

You're saying somebody else wrote your OP?
Why does it have your name on it?
Dumbass.....

No idiot. Stats wrote saying it SHOULD be woman vs woman. A VERY sexist pig thing to even suggest.

What in the world are you babbling, you stupid assed fuck?

First, you say I wrote something on a "blog" some hours ago. I have not posted on a blog in a number of days.

Are you senile, did you mix me up with someone else, or are you just plain old stupid.

You have every right to be as stupid as you want. But you don't have a right to lie about my content.

See how that works, Great-Grandpa?

Number of days? Really?
Carly Fiorina (R-CA) would "neutralize" Clinton's "gender card"
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Statistikhengst, Today at 9:52 AM.
That time stamp says today, just hours ago. Whose lying YOU or the site?

So, you really are stupid. That is not a blog. You say I posted on a blog, you idiot. That is a thread. You are an absolute idiot and lack the ability to understand even the most simple of things.

I pity you.

Blog/OP all the same. FACT is YOU have been CAUGHT lying to the membership. PUNK.

Oh brother.

No, they are not at all the same.

In point of FACT, you're the one lying - about several things.

You're making an ass of yourself and you really should just stop

 

[Siete]

something tells me blood pressure meds won't help Dankfur much at all. Something stronger maybe. Like a lobotomy and electro therapy.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

No more than you have the right to control what people reply in "your" threads.

You don't know the difference between an opinion and a fact.

Learn it or expect people to point and laugh - just like they do now.

I am NOT trying to control what they say YOU ARE by telling them to leave. Now if you are unhappy then move your WND ass to where you ARE happy, SFBs.

DarkFury

Are you confused or still lying? I didn't do either of those things. YOU did.

It was YOU who wrote that people should not post their opinion in your thread.

It was YOU who told people to leave.

Grow up and face FACTS. Its an open board. You can't control who posts or what they say. If you don't like what people are writing, don't read it. Or ask admin to intervene for you. Perhaps they can give you your own private board where you can "OPINE" to your little heart's content and not have to deal with FACTS.

Silly ditz.

YOU told them to leave. I merely SUGGESTED there were other blogs if this one made them unhappy.

Umm...

You don't like it? So what? Move your dumb ass on to the next. The HONEST people will not miss you.

Now you can leave on the same shopping cart you rode in on.

Now if you are unhappy then move your WND ass to where you ARE happy, SFBs.

I didn't even know there was such a thing as a Whirled Nuts Daily Ass.

He really has confused his own posts and thinks I wrote them.

Apparently, he also has trouble with telling the difference between a blog and a message board thread as well as op/ed editorializing and simply quoting the title of an external source.

He's too dumb to learn from his own mistakes and too dishonest to admit them.

This is probably his first internet message board and he's still learning.....

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm talking about those lying ass quasi "moderates/independents". Not a TRUE independent but one of those scale faced liberals PLAYING independent.
You got one of those scale faced liberals running around right now saying "You have to counter Hillary with a woman".

The scale faced snakes want to make Hillary's run about gender to avoid the REAL issue and that issue is HONESTY. Hillary has NONE and they KNOW it.
Honesty has NOTHING to do with ones race or gender. Hell at this point Islamic State is more honest about their goals and deeds then Hillary.

Why do these scale faced liberals want you to run a woman?
Cruz could wipe the floor with Hillary in debate.
Rubio could wipe the floor with Hillary in debate.
Walker might be able to wipe the floor with Hillary in debate.

Hillary has to face Trey Gowdy TWICE in the coming months. Gowdy will tear her a new one. He will send her into the debates as tore up as possible. That is the ONLY reason why those scale faced liberals WANT you to switch to a same gender fight. Hillary could NOT beat Cruz/Rubio on her BEST day let alone AFTER facing Gowdy.

The target the only TRUE target is placing morals and ethics and honesty BACK in the oval office. Something that has been grossly lacking for six years now. They have spent SIX YEARS plus telling you YOUR complaints were based on bigotry and will spend the NEXT eight if they can telling you YOUR complaints are based on sexist thinking.

It's time the Conservatives the ONLY adults in the room reminded those slimy greedy spoiled scale faced liberals WHAT the oval office was ALL about.
It's NOT race and it's NOT gender It's HONESTY.

Rant much?

 

[Statistikhengst]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

Well, he's using a photo of Charles Bronson for an avatar. So I would lean towards 65+ and a probably a fan of Bronson's revenge films that came out in the 1970s.

 

[DarkFury]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

And Stats is a cowardly liar. But then are not ALL liberals?

 

[Statistikhengst]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

And Stats is a cowardly liar. But then are not ALL liberals?

The best thing to do is to admit that you fucked up. Or you can double down and look like a fool. It's up to you.

 

[DarkFury]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

Well, he's using a photo of Charles Bronson for an avatar. So I would lean towards 65+ and a probably a fan of Bronson's revenge films that came out in the 1970s.

57
Board owner
Dating site owner
Server mod.

An OP be it blog/forum or whatever IS the thread starter. Thus in REAL life terms it IS all the same.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

And Stats is a cowardly liar. But then are not ALL liberals?

Prove it.

All you have posted is a link to a thread where he titled it the same as the op/ed he was posting. That is not the same as his own opinion.

Post a link to HIS STATED OPINION.

That is different than the title of the article he posted.

Then, post a link to where I told people to leave your thread or how they should post.

THEN, learn the difference between FACT and OPINION, a MESSAGE BOARD and a BLOG.

Alternatively, you could just admit you're dumber than a box of rocks and all of this is just too complicated for you.

 

[DarkFury]

So, people, today we have learned that DarkFury is so stupid, he does not know the the difference between a blog and a thread, and he also does not realize that a thread title is not necessarily an editorial comment. These are things that adults know right away, so little dark fury is either 5 or 500 years old. Take yer pick.

And Stats is a cowardly liar. But then are not ALL liberals?

The best thing to do is to admit that you fucked up. Or you can double down and look like a fool. It's up to you.

I don't take advice from PROVEN liars.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

something tells me blood pressure meds won't help Dankfur much at all. Something stronger maybe. Like a lobotomy and electro therapy.

I suspect we're seeing the post-lobotomy version of this bozo.

He really is in over his head.