Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the new dem talking point and it's BS . Obamacare is WELFARE and we all agree the welfare rolls need to be reduced. The 22 million who will lose their huge subsidies are free to go out and buy health insurance with THEIR money.
We are a nation of citizens, so the general welfare of the nation means the general welfare of it's citizens. The government exists to serve the people, not the people existing to serve the government or the nation, nor does the government exist to serve itself. National Healthcare programs are in the interest of the 'General Welfare' and are not only Constitutional, but mandated by the Constitution.
Taxation is not 'stealing'. If you do not like paying taxes, then do not accept U.S. federal dollars.
You're wrong. The Constitution is very clea r in its language. The authors went out of their way to use phrases like The People when talking about the Rights of the citizenry. Such language does not exist in Article I, Section 8. If it did, I would be entitled to a soldier to personally defend me on a daily basis.
Taxation is theft when the monies are used for illegal, immoral and unconstitutional expenditures.
There is nothing wrong with it.That's the new dem talking point and it's BS . Obamacare is WELFARE and we all agree the welfare rolls need to be reduced. The 22 million who will lose their huge subsidies are free to go out and buy health insurance with THEIR money.
What is wrong is this..those people are going to lose health care anyway..they are losing it now under obamacare, because obamacare is nothing but a racket. I'm watching people in Oregon lose their coverage and have been watching it for years. If we repeal obamacare, they are going to blame that on us, and pretend that obamacare was working..which is exactly what they are doing.
I'm not sure I care at this point. Repeal it. Fuck replacement. I could care less if people have medical insurance or not. Insurance is a scam.
Republicans are literally the reason it wasn't more successful. It did fine in blue states, but red states stubbornly refused the federal funding provided for the program, making it painfully expensive and out of reach for many people. They are so intent on seeing Obama fail that they're willing to destroy good in the process. All politicians are sketchy and I tend to not trust any of them, but the right wing movement is evil.
There is NO response to this COLLOSSAL Ignorance...........
Did you know universal healthcare is actually cheaper? Once you remove predatory insurance companies from the picture and people aren't scared of going to the doctor because of cost, the effect of preventative care really shines. People start going to the doctor and getting fixed when they notice a problem instead of waiting until it's a catastrophe and 500 times more expensive to fix. I saw the taxes of a friend from England once. He showed me where they deduct for his healthcare. The amount he paid was a small fraction of the cost of my health insurance.
By your logic (or lack of), the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms", applies to the people as a whole and not the individual.
And BTW, there are 1.4 million people in the U.S. military that are defending you every day.
a subset of 23 million based on defined characteristics out of 315 million IS specific.Yep, it seems some individuals cannot distinguish between GENERAL and SPECIFIC when the term "welfare" gets thrown in, oddly enough those same people never seem to give a flying fuck about the people that get screwed over (aka a degradation of the victims welfare) while all this "promoting of the general welfare" is going on.You have a sick notion of what is immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional. Seems that your idea is that anything that doesn't benefit you personally is "immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional". Which means that only you are immoral and disgusting.
The general welfare of the NATION, no t individual citizens. If an action requires harming one group of citizens to benefit another, it does not meet the ideal of "general welfare." As, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA AND The AHCA ALL harm some to herlp others. Thzt makes them ALL unconstitutional.
It is grossly immoral to help those who will noit help themselves, especially when it requires using the Government to steal from those who can and do help themselves to do it.
The welfare of of more than 23 million Americans is far from 'specific'.
You don't appear to give a flying fuck about ANYTHING except your self righteous sermonizing regarding how other people owe you something.And no, we don't give a flying fuck about the super wealthy who have benefited so well under our system of economics that has been created by the government, and built by American workers.
You're morally bankrupt.mental health treatment should not be offered under any plan.
a subset of 23 million based on defined characteristics out of 315 million IS specific.Yep, it seems some individuals cannot distinguish between GENERAL and SPECIFIC when the term "welfare" gets thrown in, oddly enough those same people never seem to give a flying fuck about the people that get screwed over (aka a degradation of the victims welfare) while all this "promoting of the general welfare" is going on.You have a sick notion of what is immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional. Seems that your idea is that anything that doesn't benefit you personally is "immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional". Which means that only you are immoral and disgusting.
The general welfare of the NATION, no t individual citizens. If an action requires harming one group of citizens to benefit another, it does not meet the ideal of "general welfare." As, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA AND The AHCA ALL harm some to herlp others. Thzt makes them ALL unconstitutional.
It is grossly immoral to help those who will noit help themselves, especially when it requires using the Government to steal from those who can and do help themselves to do it.
The welfare of of more than 23 million Americans is far from 'specific'.
You don't appear to give a flying fuck about ANYTHING except your self righteous sermonizing regarding how other people owe you something.And no, we don't give a flying fuck about the super wealthy who have benefited so well under our system of economics that has been created by the government, and built by American workers.
Guess what you dim witted turd...I'm have private insurance thru my employer. What's more is I'm a highly paid systems admin that works for a privately owned company. I'm a person that DOES NOT benefit in any way from government social programs and pay a huge chunk of my salary in taxes.So your entire argument is BULLSHIT!!
I consider caring about my fellow Americans, as well as paying taxes to be my patriotic duty. I know that the quality of life for me and my family depends on the health of the society in which we live - but that's the only benefit I get from the government social programs.
You just can't comprehend that there are people who give a damn about anyone but themselves.
You have a sick notion of what is immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional. Seems that your idea is that anything that doesn't benefit you personally is "immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional". Which means that only you are immoral and disgusting.
The general welfare of the NATION, no t individual citizens. If an action requires harming one group of citizens to benefit another, it does not meet the ideal of "general welfare." As, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA AND The AHCA ALL harm some to herlp others. Thzt makes them ALL unconstitutional.
It is grossly immoral to help those who will noit help themselves, especially when it requires using the Government to steal from those who can and do help themselves to do it.
We are a nation of citizens, so the general welfare of the nation means the general welfare of it's citizens. The government exists to serve the people, not the people existing to serve the government or the nation, nor does the government exist to serve itself. National Healthcare programs are in the interest of the 'General Welfare' and are not only Constitutional, but mandated by the Constitution.
Taxation is not 'stealing'. If you do not like paying taxes, then do not accept U.S. federal dollars.
That's the new dem talking point and it's BS . Obamacare is WELFARE and we all agree the welfare rolls need to be reduced. The 22 million who will lose their huge subsidies are free to go out and buy health insurance with THEIR money.
The 22 million who are "losing" their healthcare are choosing to stop buying it. Th y are not losing it.
Those 22 million people ar currently being forced to buy insurance they do not want because if the penalty. Once the penalty is removed, they won't pay for insurance.
We are a nation of citizens, so the general welfare of the nation means the general welfare of it's citizens. The government exists to serve the people, not the people existing to serve the government or the nation, nor does the government exist to serve itself. National Healthcare programs are in the interest of the 'General Welfare' and are not only Constitutional, but mandated by the Constitution.
Taxation is not 'stealing'. If you do not like paying taxes, then do not accept U.S. federal dollars.
You're wrong. The Constitution is very clea r in its language. The authors went out of their way to use phrases like The People when talking about the Rights of the citizenry. Such language does not exist in Article I, Section 8. If it did, I would be entitled to a soldier to personally defend me on a daily basis.
Taxation is theft when the monies are used for illegal, immoral and unconstitutional expenditures.
By your logic (or lack of), the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms", applies to the people as a whole and not the individual.
And BTW, there are 1.4 million people in the U.S. military that are defending you every day.
That's the new dem talking point and it's BS . Obamacare is WELFARE and we all agree the welfare rolls need to be reduced. The 22 million who will lose their huge subsidies are free to go out and buy health insurance with THEIR money.
The 22 million who are "losing" their healthcare are choosing to stop buying it. Th y are not losing it.
Those 22 million people ar currently being forced to buy insurance they do not want because if the penalty. Once the penalty is removed, they won't pay for insurance.
They all know that, but it doesn't fit their narrative.
Lefties claim that 20 million lost insurance, while in reality government lost 20 million involuntary customers who are happy to get away from Democrat's shackles.
You have a sick notion of what is immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional. Seems that your idea is that anything that doesn't benefit you personally is "immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional". Which means that only you are immoral and disgusting.
The general welfare of the NATION, no t individual citizens. If an action requires harming one group of citizens to benefit another, it does not meet the ideal of "general welfare." As, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA AND The AHCA ALL harm some to herlp others. Thzt makes them ALL unconstitutional.
It is grossly immoral to help those who will noit help themselves, especially when it requires using the Government to steal from those who can and do help themselves to do it.
We are a nation of citizens, so the general welfare of the nation means the general welfare of it's citizens. The government exists to serve the people, not the people existing to serve the government or the nation, nor does the government exist to serve itself. National Healthcare programs are in the interest of the 'General Welfare' and are not only Constitutional, but mandated by the Constitution.
Taxation is not 'stealing'. If you do not like paying taxes, then do not accept U.S. federal dollars.
"General welfare" clause does not give power to Congress to legislate the general welfare of the country, since that reserved to the states thru 10th, but it allows Congress to spend money on duties enumerated in Article 1 Section 8. Further, general welfare should effect everyone equally, and robbing Peter to pay Paul doesn't fall into the category.
You have a sick notion of what is immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional. Seems that your idea is that anything that doesn't benefit you personally is "immoral, disgusting and unconstitutional". Which means that only you are immoral and disgusting.
The general welfare of the NATION, no t individual citizens. If an action requires harming one group of citizens to benefit another, it does not meet the ideal of "general welfare." As, Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA AND The AHCA ALL harm some to herlp others. Thzt makes them ALL unconstitutional.
It is grossly immoral to help those who will noit help themselves, especially when it requires using the Government to steal from those who can and do help themselves to do it.
We are a nation of citizens, so the general welfare of the nation means the general welfare of it's citizens. The government exists to serve the people, not the people existing to serve the government or the nation, nor does the government exist to serve itself. National Healthcare programs are in the interest of the 'General Welfare' and are not only Constitutional, but mandated by the Constitution.
Taxation is not 'stealing'. If you do not like paying taxes, then do not accept U.S. federal dollars.
"General welfare" clause does not give power to Congress to legislate the general welfare of the country, since that reserved to the states thru 10th, but it allows Congress to spend money on duties enumerated in Article 1 Section 8. Further, general welfare should effect everyone equally, and robbing Peter to pay Paul doesn't fall into the category.
The preample to the Constitution is an extremely broad statement, requiring the the government to 'promote the general welfare'. It's not up to you to narrowly define it as convenient for yourself.
Allowing a mass Healthcare crisis to continue is clearly against the interests of the general welfare of this country.
You're morally bankrupt.mental health treatment should not be offered under any plan.
.Allowing a mass Healthcare crisis to continue is clearly against the interests of the general welfare of this country.
