Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, they said they wiped it after releasing the 55 thousand emails.
After you're done going through those, get back to me with what we're missing. Until then you are full of shit.
In other words, you don't give a shit about Hillary breaking the law.
I'm not satisfied that any laws were broken.
Like I said. Until all of those 55 thousand are vetted, we don't have a clear picture as to what if any emails pertinent to the state dept were not released.
She used a private server to conduct official federal business at the highest level, and her account was hacked by foreign entities.
Is that not enough for you?
It was hacked?
You people are silly.
You skirted the question.
She used a private email server on her property, managed by personal handlers not cleared for security, who would have 100% access to all emails on the server they maintain...for official high level business.
Again, as noted by both the NYT and Washington Post, from day one she never used her official email to conduct business, and soley used her own server which is against federal law.
Is this of no concern to you?
You have no problem with high level officials conducting official business on private servers?
Yes or No. Simple question.
In other words, you don't give a shit about Hillary breaking the law.
I'm not satisfied that any laws were broken.
Like I said. Until all of those 55 thousand are vetted, we don't have a clear picture as to what if any emails pertinent to the state dept were not released.
She used a private server to conduct official federal business at the highest level, and her account was hacked by foreign entities.
Is that not enough for you?
It was hacked?
You people are silly.
You skirted the question.
She used a private email server on her property, managed by personal handlers not cleared for security, who would have 100% access to all emails on the server they maintain...for official high level business.
Again, as noted by both the NYT and Washington Post, from day one she never used her official email to conduct business, and soley used her own server which is against federal law.
Is this of no concern to you?
You have no problem with high level officials conducting official business on private servers?
Yes or No. Simple question.
I have no problem at all with it.
You have absolutely no idea whatsoever what security or protocols were used on that server. It is not or was not against federal law to use a private server. Kerry is the first SoS to only use gov't servers.
Was it hacked? You skirted the question.
I'm not satisfied that any laws were broken.
Like I said. Until all of those 55 thousand are vetted, we don't have a clear picture as to what if any emails pertinent to the state dept were not released.
She used a private server to conduct official federal business at the highest level, and her account was hacked by foreign entities.
Is that not enough for you?
It was hacked?
You people are silly.
You skirted the question.
She used a private email server on her property, managed by personal handlers not cleared for security, who would have 100% access to all emails on the server they maintain...for official high level business.
Again, as noted by both the NYT and Washington Post, from day one she never used her official email to conduct business, and soley used her own server which is against federal law.
Is this of no concern to you?
You have no problem with high level officials conducting official business on private servers?
Yes or No. Simple question.
I have no problem at all with it.
You have absolutely no idea whatsoever what security or protocols were used on that server. It is not or was not against federal law to use a private server. Kerry is the first SoS to only use gov't servers.
Was it hacked? You skirted the question.
It's always against the law to put classified documents on anything but an officially approved government server.
She used a private server to conduct official federal business at the highest level, and her account was hacked by foreign entities.
Is that not enough for you?
It was hacked?
You people are silly.
You skirted the question.
She used a private email server on her property, managed by personal handlers not cleared for security, who would have 100% access to all emails on the server they maintain...for official high level business.
Again, as noted by both the NYT and Washington Post, from day one she never used her official email to conduct business, and soley used her own server which is against federal law.
Is this of no concern to you?
You have no problem with high level officials conducting official business on private servers?
Yes or No. Simple question.
I have no problem at all with it.
You have absolutely no idea whatsoever what security or protocols were used on that server. It is not or was not against federal law to use a private server. Kerry is the first SoS to only use gov't servers.
Was it hacked? You skirted the question.
It's always against the law to put classified documents on anything but an officially approved government server.
That hasn't been shown to have happened at all let alone deliberately or with HRC even being involved.
We get it. You're a reactionary loon foaming at the idea of taking out HRC.
It was hacked?
You people are silly.
You skirted the question.
She used a private email server on her property, managed by personal handlers not cleared for security, who would have 100% access to all emails on the server they maintain...for official high level business.
Again, as noted by both the NYT and Washington Post, from day one she never used her official email to conduct business, and soley used her own server which is against federal law.
Is this of no concern to you?
You have no problem with high level officials conducting official business on private servers?
Yes or No. Simple question.
I have no problem at all with it.
You have absolutely no idea whatsoever what security or protocols were used on that server. It is not or was not against federal law to use a private server. Kerry is the first SoS to only use gov't servers.
Was it hacked? You skirted the question.
It's always against the law to put classified documents on anything but an officially approved government server.
That hasn't been shown to have happened at all let alone deliberately or with HRC even being involved.
We get it. You're a reactionary loon foaming at the idea of taking out HRC.
The FBI claims it has. Who should I believe, you or the FBI?
I'm one of those idiots that doesn't buy the belief that Hillary had no clue she would receive classified information via the computer.I think you should wait and see where it goes instead of being led around by your nose. You idiots did the same thing W/ Benghazi.
Like we didn't know this was going to happen.
Hillary operatives wiped her server before handing over to FBI.
Some would call that interfering with a federal investigation, some would call it covering up....Democrats will look the other way.
FBI reportedly takes possession of blank Clinton email server Fox News
Dude, they said they wiped it after releasing the 55 thousand emails.
After you're done going through those, get back to me with what we're missing. Until then you are full of shit.
In other words, you don't give a shit about Hillary breaking the law.
I'm not satisfied that any laws were broken.
Like I said. Until all of those 55 thousand are vetted, we don't have a clear picture as to what if any emails pertinent to the state dept were not released.
She used a private server to conduct official federal business at the highest level, and her account was hacked by foreign entities.
Is that not enough for you?
And we are all still here breathing and shit? Did anyone get keeled?, Injured?, Have a bad hair day?
If there isn't some red mist involved there really isn't enough for anyone doncha think?
That's the new libturd standard of ethics: if no one got killed, then it's OK.
It's very possible that Americans could get killed if our enemies had access to classified information, dipstick.
I'm one of those idiots that doesn't buy the belief that Hillary had no clue she would receive classified information via the computer.I think you should wait and see where it goes instead of being led around by your nose. You idiots did the same thing W/ Benghazi.
You're also a blind partisan rightwing hack who will believe and propagate any lie you come across about HRC.I'm one of those idiots that doesn't buy the belief that Hillary had no clue she would receive classified information via the computer.I think you should wait and see where it goes instead of being led around by your nose. You idiots did the same thing W/ Benghazi.
Your comment means nothing because that isn't remotely close to what I said. You must be a liberal.While I admire your candor, it means nothing.I'm one of those idiots that doesn't buy the belief that Hillary had no clue she would receive classified information via the computer.I think you should wait and see where it goes instead of being led around by your nose. You idiots did the same thing W/ Benghazi.
You can't convict someone on your hunch.
Hey retard. I said I don't believe she didn't know she was going to get classified info via the computer and you two pussies blew a gasket. Who's the desperate ones here?You're also a blind partisan rightwing hack who will believe and propagate any lie you come across about HRC.I'm one of those idiots that doesn't buy the belief that Hillary had no clue she would receive classified information via the computer.I think you should wait and see where it goes instead of being led around by your nose. You idiots did the same thing W/ Benghazi.
You and others on the right are devoid of objectivity, your arguments, beliefs, and perceptions devoid of merit, you're comprehensively ignorant of the facts and circumstances of the issue, and you have no evidence whatsoever that Clinton 'committed a crime,' because in fact no 'crime' was committed.
You're understandably desperate to derail Clinton's candidacy before the primaries with lies and false accusations because you lack the courage and conviction of your party's agenda and policies to face her during the General Election.
Guess what, the current State Dept. policy wasn't in place until 2005, the year Powell left, and Condi Rice used State Dept. systems. And your claims that he did it too just show how childish you really are.
Sorry, but the Rule of Law is dead. No one will be held accountable. The fact Lois Lerner isn't wearing an orange jumpsuit and in a cell, says it all about where we're at as a nation. Anything goes now.
The rule of law died when Johnson signed the Civil Rights bill and the 1965 Immigration Act.Sorry, but the Rule of Law is dead. No one will be held accountable. The fact Lois Lerner isn't wearing an orange jumpsuit and in a cell, says it all about where we're at as a nation. Anything goes now.
Guy, the rule of law died when Poindexter and North got a pass for selling weapons to Iran and give the proceeds to the contras...
Sorry, but the Rule of Law is dead. No one will be held accountable. The fact Lois Lerner isn't wearing an orange jumpsuit and in a cell, says it all about where we're at as a nation. Anything goes now.
Guy, the rule of law died when Poindexter and North got a pass for selling weapons to Iran and give the proceeds to the contras...
Guess what, the current State Dept. policy wasn't in place until 2005, the year Powell left, and Condi Rice used State Dept. systems. And your claims that he did it too just show how childish you really are.
So when COlin Powell did it, it wasn't a big deal. Probably wasn't a big deal when Hillary did it, either.
I'm still trying to get you guys to tell me why this was a big deal...
We live in a world where 99% use our work e-mails and computers for personal business or our personal e-mails for work business.
How does this make my life any better or any worse. This is the problem you guys have to solve.
Rationalization and equivocation, without those you got nothing, no, you still got nothing.
