Another active shooter

I have an answer, liar. Stop releasing violent criminals and arm yourself so when some wacked out pos starts shooting, kill them. As far as you, and the rest of the faggot Canadians go, get you some knee pads.

I have a reply for you. America stopped releasing criminals and thus proved to be the world's worst failure for a justice system. It's resorted to private run prisons for profit and the highest incarceration rate in the world!

Norway releases criminals, has the lowest recidivism rate in the world, and is considered to be the world's leading example for success!

By all means, I agree that Americans need to kill 'them'. (I could care less who 'them' Americans are)

Do you think Canadians are faggots, and if so then why would you think that?

I'm not saying we aren't, I'm just saying that I don't know why an American would think that?

The only explanation that comes to mind is that you're probably a Trumper and you couldn't answer questions so you run for cover.
I answered your question chinaman, now you repeat your lies that I have no answer. I told you that the government needs to stop releasing violent scum and they do. When criminals realize they won't be caught and released that will lower violent crime. I don't give a shit how the commies in Norway do anything because I don't live there.
The fact is, your government needs to release more criminals. They being violent scum would be just your opinion.

Could you be more explicit on 'who' shouldn't be released?
I suspect that would be something on which we can agree!

And then I also suspect that you might agree with me on how Norway is getting it right on releasing more criminals and on their attitude of rehabilitation of criminals.

If only because all Americans are interested mostly in the cheapest solutions, when that can be as successful too.






No, our government needs to realease the RIGHT criminals. Non violent offenders should not be in prison. Only the violent ones, and the seditious ones, and the traitors. Traitors should be imprisoned for life, and all of their ill gotten gains confiscated.
 
And had one of the worst mass shootings in history. You dumbass.

You've gone off and so that'll do it for today. Maybe tomorrow we can start fresh.

No murders or suicides til then agreed?
And especially, no hitting your dog.
 
Norway releases criminals, has the lowest recidivism rate in the world, and is considered to be the world's leading example for success!
Can you take a guess at what race of people is conspicuously absent in Norway?

Don't even bother to google the stats. You and I, as well every other USMB forumer, already intuitively know the answer to that question.
 
I have an answer, liar. Stop releasing violent criminals and arm yourself so when some wacked out pos starts shooting, kill them. As far as you, and the rest of the faggot Canadians go, get you some knee pads.

I have a reply for you. America stopped releasing criminals and thus proved to be the world's worst failure for a justice system. It's resorted to private run prisons for profit and the highest incarceration rate in the world!

Norway releases criminals, has the lowest recidivism rate in the world, and is considered to be the world's leading example for success!

By all means, I agree that Americans need to kill 'them'. (I could care less who 'them' Americans are)

Do you think Canadians are faggots, and if so then why would you think that?

I'm not saying we aren't, I'm just saying that I don't know why an American would think that?

The only explanation that comes to mind is that you're probably a Trumper and you couldn't answer questions so you run for cover.
I answered your question chinaman, now you repeat your lies that I have no answer. I told you that the government needs to stop releasing violent scum and they do. When criminals realize they won't be caught and released that will lower violent crime. I don't give a shit how the commies in Norway do anything because I don't live there.
The fact is, your government needs to release more criminals. They being violent scum would be just your opinion.

Could you be more explicit on 'who' shouldn't be released?
I suspect that would be something on which we can agree!

And then I also suspect that you might agree with me on how Norway is getting it right on releasing more criminals and on their attitude of rehabilitation of criminals.

If only because all Americans are interested mostly in the cheapest solutions, when that can be as successful too.
Wow, this retard is done and dumped. I don't see how anyone could more specific than saying "violent criminals."
 
2019...

Population Houston.....2.1 million...Total murders...275...


Population of Chicago...2.7 million.......463 shot and killed.

Impressive numbers! And the gun violence has escalated under the Trump regime.
The reason being that librul Americans are asking for it. Black lives matter to some Americans but white lives matter more.
In America it's all good.

America has a race problem and also a racism problem and there doesn't appear to be any way of fixing it, aside from more force and deadly force being used against black people.

No....you dumb shit......the democrat party has conducted a war against the police.....and they have reduced the ability of our justice system to keep violent criminals in jail and prison.

America doesn't have a race or racism problem.....we have the democrat party that use racism as a weapon.....if they would stop, we wouldn't have any race problems in this country.
 
Sorry, Mr Racist POS, but fighting for equality does not make one a racist.

2A'a life is all about anger and hating and that's put him on a crash course. Fuel that anger if it pleases you to do such things.
I do, in instances in which the world can be a better place with that sort of individual being dead.

My biggest concern is that he could be a dog owner or be a parent.






Says the psycho who always resorts to violent language. 2A Guy, and pretty much all of the other gun Rights supporters here advocate peaceful battle through the Courts.

Peaceful battle through the courts in America isn't possible. Americans in greater numbers are resorting go violence with their guns instead of appealing to any courts.

You can't win when your country's statistics on gun violence is there to blow your cover.

Do you want to talk about guns and gun violence with a Canadian? I'm not going to avoid the truth so be aware that I feel no reason to make it pleasant to hear.


Dipshit.......are you really this stupid?

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

https://crimeresearch.org/2020/10/n...n-issuing-permits-because-of-the-coronavirus/


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
 
Sorry, Mr Racist POS, but fighting for equality does not make one a racist.

2A'a life is all about anger and hating and that's put him on a crash course. Fuel that anger if it pleases you to do such things.
I do, in instances in which the world can be a better place with that sort of individual being dead.

My biggest concern is that he could be a dog owner or be a parent.






Says the psycho who always resorts to violent language. 2A Guy, and pretty much all of the other gun Rights supporters here advocate peaceful battle through the Courts.

Peaceful battle through the courts in America isn't possible. Americans in greater numbers are resorting go violence with their guns instead of appealing to any courts.

You can't win when your country's statistics on gun violence is there to blow your cover.

Do you want to talk about guns and gun violence with a Canadian? I'm not going to avoid the truth so be aware that I feel no reason to make it pleasant to hear.


Dipshit.......are you really this stupid?

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

https://crimeresearch.org/2020/10/n...n-issuing-permits-because-of-the-coronavirus/


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
If you're not dishonestly juggling statistics again to suit the gun goon agenda then your country could be doing a bit better.

But the US is still far off the charts compared to other modern democracies.

Do we care?
 
And had one of the worst mass shootings in history. You dumbass.

You've gone off and so that'll do it for today. Maybe tomorrow we can start fresh.

No murders or suicides til then agreed?
And especially, no hitting your dog.






I never hit anything unless it tries to hit me first, cupcake. It is violent leftists, like you, who start the violence. We never do.
 
No....you dumb shit......the democrat party has conducted a war against the police.....and they have reduced the ability of our justice system to keep violent criminals in jail and prison.

That could be a part of the problem. Or it could be the entire problem. It's not for me to say

America doesn't have a race or racism problem....

So you say you don't have a race or a racism problem. And I was almost ready to agree with yoiu until I read:

.we have the democrat party that use racism as a weapon.....if they would stop, we wouldn't have any race problems in this country.

Which told me that if I agreed with you I would just be disagreeing with you anyway. You say that if the demo party would stop, you wouldn't have any race problems, and according to you, that sort of says that if they don't stop you will have race problems.

What do you want mt to believe?

You're obviously so fkd up with your hate and your anger that you don't know what you want to believe yourself! LOL

Lets run a new idea up the flagpole and see if you can salute it? If all Americans who arent's pure white could somehow just vanish, you wouldn't have a race or racism problem.

The reason why I like that idea is because it contains some truth in that the race and racism problem you have admitted to, can't be solved any other way than lethal force by police that is supposed to instill enough fear in those non-whites so that they won't dare walk on the streets or be so uppity to suppose they can drink out of your water fountain.

You're one very fkd up kid but you're very useful to serving as an example for most Americans.

You need to deal with pulling the wings off of the rest of your houseflies mr. nasty.
 
Sorry, Mr Racist POS, but fighting for equality does not make one a racist.

2A'a life is all about anger and hating and that's put him on a crash course. Fuel that anger if it pleases you to do such things.
I do, in instances in which the world can be a better place with that sort of individual being dead.

My biggest concern is that he could be a dog owner or be a parent.






Says the psycho who always resorts to violent language. 2A Guy, and pretty much all of the other gun Rights supporters here advocate peaceful battle through the Courts.

Peaceful battle through the courts in America isn't possible. Americans in greater numbers are resorting go violence with their guns instead of appealing to any courts.

You can't win when your country's statistics on gun violence is there to blow your cover.

Do you want to talk about guns and gun violence with a Canadian? I'm not going to avoid the truth so be aware that I feel no reason to make it pleasant to hear.


Dipshit.......are you really this stupid?

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

https://crimeresearch.org/2020/10/n...n-issuing-permits-because-of-the-coronavirus/


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
If you're not dishonestly juggling statistics again to suit the gun goon agenda then your country could be doing a bit better.

But the US is still far off the charts compared to other modern democracies.

Do we care?





Pot, meet kettle. The MASTERS of statistical falsification are you anti gun leftist sociopaths.
 
No....you dumb shit......the democrat party has conducted a war against the police.....and they have reduced the ability of our justice system to keep violent criminals in jail and prison.

That could be a part of the problem. Or it could be the entire problem. It's not for me to say

America doesn't have a race or racism problem....

So you say you don't have a race or a racism problem. And I was almost ready to agree with yoiu until I read:

.we have the democrat party that use racism as a weapon.....if they would stop, we wouldn't have any race problems in this country.

Which told me that if I agreed with you I would just be disagreeing with you anyway. You say that if the demo party would stop, you wouldn't have any race problems, and according to you, that sort of says that if they don't stop you will have race problems.

What do you want mt to believe?

You're obviously so fkd up with your hate and your anger that you don't know what you want to believe yourself! LOL

Lets run a new idea up the flagpole and see if you can salute it? If all Americans who arent's pure white could somehow just vanish, you wouldn't have a race or racism problem.

The reason why I like that idea is because it contains some truth in that the race and racism problem you have admitted to, can't be solved any other way than lethal force by police that is supposed to instill enough fear in those non-whites so that they won't dare walk on the streets or be so uppity to suppose they can drink out of your water fountain.

You're one very fkd up kid but you're very useful to serving as an example for most Americans.

You need to deal with pulling the wings off of the rest of your houseflies mr. nasty.






You love any idea that allows you to mask your violent fantasies under color of law. Every fascist does. Hello fascist!:bye1:
 
And had one of the worst mass shootings in history. You dumbass.

You've gone off and so that'll do it for today. Maybe tomorrow we can start fresh.

No murders or suicides til then agreed?
And especially, no hitting your dog.






I never hit anything unless it tries to hit me first, cupcake. It is violent leftists, like you, who start the violence. We never do.
Neither of us is going to start any violence here, at least on each other.
Pulling the wings off of your housefly collection is not my business. They belong to only you, your sister/wife, and your children.

Keep the sport a family affair and nobody but you psychologist will be the wiser.

Is there anything we disagree about?
 
Sorry, Mr Racist POS, but fighting for equality does not make one a racist.

2A'a life is all about anger and hating and that's put him on a crash course. Fuel that anger if it pleases you to do such things.
I do, in instances in which the world can be a better place with that sort of individual being dead.

My biggest concern is that he could be a dog owner or be a parent.






Says the psycho who always resorts to violent language. 2A Guy, and pretty much all of the other gun Rights supporters here advocate peaceful battle through the Courts.

Peaceful battle through the courts in America isn't possible. Americans in greater numbers are resorting go violence with their guns instead of appealing to any courts.

You can't win when your country's statistics on gun violence is there to blow your cover.

Do you want to talk about guns and gun violence with a Canadian? I'm not going to avoid the truth so be aware that I feel no reason to make it pleasant to hear.


Dipshit.......are you really this stupid?

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

https://crimeresearch.org/2020/10/n...n-issuing-permits-because-of-the-coronavirus/


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
If you're not dishonestly juggling statistics again to suit the gun goon agenda then your country could be doing a bit better.

But the US is still far off the charts compared to other modern democracies.

Do we care?


Other modern democracies allowed 12 million of their citizens to be murdered by the German socialists....and fought two World Wars.........which we had to go in....with guns.....to stop.
 
No....you dumb shit......the democrat party has conducted a war against the police.....and they have reduced the ability of our justice system to keep violent criminals in jail and prison.

That could be a part of the problem. Or it could be the entire problem. It's not for me to say

America doesn't have a race or racism problem....

So you say you don't have a race or a racism problem. And I was almost ready to agree with yoiu until I read:

.we have the democrat party that use racism as a weapon.....if they would stop, we wouldn't have any race problems in this country.

Which told me that if I agreed with you I would just be disagreeing with you anyway. You say that if the demo party would stop, you wouldn't have any race problems, and according to you, that sort of says that if they don't stop you will have race problems.

What do you want mt to believe?

You're obviously so fkd up with your hate and your anger that you don't know what you want to believe yourself! LOL

Lets run a new idea up the flagpole and see if you can salute it? If all Americans who arent's pure white could somehow just vanish, you wouldn't have a race or racism problem.

The reason why I like that idea is because it contains some truth in that the race and racism problem you have admitted to, can't be solved any other way than lethal force by police that is supposed to instill enough fear in those non-whites so that they won't dare walk on the streets or be so uppity to suppose they can drink out of your water fountain.

You're one very fkd up kid but you're very useful to serving as an example for most Americans.

You need to deal with pulling the wings off of the rest of your houseflies mr. nasty.


Dipshit.......

If all Americans who arent's pure white could somehow just vanish, you wouldn't have a race or racism problem.

The democrat party has been the party of racism since it was founded by slave owners........they fought every single time to spread and keep racism alive, and now use racism to keep us separated so they can exploit that separation for their own power......

We don't have a racism problem in this country, we have a political party that lives off of stoking hate between racial groups.
 
Colorado has all the measures that
Because it is. It's an AR-15 Clone. What this is going to do is to have the County reintroduce the bill that reads, instead of "Assault Rifle", it will read "Ar-15 and it's various Clones" and will be legal.
Why do you call it an ASSAULT rifle? It does not do that. It is an inanimate object. It assaults no one. You gun-grabbers are idiots. The government does not want you to own any gun that has even a slight chance of thwarting a hostile government takeover.

I don't call it an Assault Rifle. It's not a military rifle therefore it can't be called an Assault Rifle even though it's a clone of a M-16 Carbine (M-4). It IS an AR-15 Clone though. And if they law reads that the "AR-15 and it's various clones are banned" then it's legal as per the Federal Courts.

Good luck. I hope you're the one who gets to go door to door in order to collect all of them.

There you go again. You didn't pay attention to the history of the Thompson Model 1920 and the 1934 NFA law. There was no door to door collections and in 10 years, the Thompson Model 1920 became a non issue. The problem with you gunnutters is that you are so ill informed by the history of firearms you are dangerous to everyone around you and yourself.

It doesn't require a knowledge of history to blow some fucker's head off when he comes through my door at 3 in the morning.

Nor does it take history to blow anyone away in a Super Market either and that is what we are discussing. Pay attention.

No. What we are discussing is an act of Islamic terrorism committed by a radicalized Syrian refugee who wanted to kill Americans. And you Democrat's idiotic response in calling for more gun control to deny law-abiding Americans from owning firearms.

What you refuse to discuss is your party's failed immigration polices that are putting American citizens at the risk of being murdered, just like we saw today. You continue to ignore mental health issues, always blaming the crime on the gun. You don't even enforce the existing gun laws already on the books, many time letting the criminals walk away scott-free. You even ignore the fact that there are Islamic terrorists in this country who want to kill Americans, while you view conservative Americans as your real enemy.

One of the first things your idiot President did was to scrap President Trump's restrictions against entry to America from terrorist countries, most of which are Middle Eastern countries.

You ignorant fuckers just don't get it, do you? I sincerely doubt if you ever will.

No, that's what you want to steer it to. And Party Politics has nothing to do with the shooting. In fact, the Cops performed well, it's not a governments fault. It's not my fault. Hell, it's not even your fault. It's just a fruitcake that bought a gun to kill a bunch of people because he wanted to. No Hospital or Mental Health Care could have stopped it. There was no real warning. Just Bnagidy, Banidy Banidy, the deed is done.


if the assault rifle ban was still in effect, fewer would have died.


if better screening was in place, the mentally unstable shooter would not have been able to buy the gun.

if the magazine size was limited, fewer would have died.

I don't think so in this case. The features of the AR were never really realized. He was a crappy, inexperienced shooter. He was stopped before the speed and reloading factor of the AR became a factor. He could have done the same job with a 40 SW Semi Auto Handgun loaded with 15 rounds. He only had 15 556 rounds to work with so even a handgun with good killing power could have done the same job. And both weapons would have been legal.

In Colorado, the mag size IS limited to 15 and that is probably what save a lot of lives. He killed 11, wounded X number and ran out of ammo. And before he could swap out to another 15 round mag, got stopped cold. The Cops did their jobs fantastic. No good guy with a gun would have changed anything. Regardless of anything, those 11 would still be dead, those X number would still be wounded and he would still be under arrest. All of this went down in a matter of seconds.
C
NO ONE is claiming to taking away all the guns, except RW's
Does it require a signed confession of intent from the left?

You people are blindly stumbling toward mass confiscation even if many libs like you dont realize it yet
RWNJ conspiracy theories thanks to the NRA, every time a democrat is in office, so the gullible will buy more guns, been happening for decades.
Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds

gun grabbers praise any country that has totally banned firearms and its the obvious goal of the left in America

Yep, for decades that's what the NRA and RWNJ's claim every time a democrat is in office "total confiscation" of guns.

"Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds"?

That gets the morons to buy more weapons, they are convinced will be banned.

If they get banned why are RWNJ's buying more of them?

'Stable geniuses", like their dear leader?

I don't want to do anything to destroy your illusion, but you should ask the former SKS owners in California who had their weapons confiscated if they gave them up willingly.

Not my illusion, RW'S are buying more of them.
As far as the SKS, is an old weapon, not used by any military in the world anymore and has a fixed magazine that only holds 10 rounds.
From what I read they were given $230, IF you refused to register it and complied with a background check.
So, they weren't confiscated, unless the person, let them be.

So, they took a perfectly legal firearm and declared them to be illegal if you didn't ask for their permission to keep it and you don't see that as a problem? Good grief, you're an idiot.

Nothing like the RW morons that buy something convinced it will be banned.
No one is more brain dead than that.
"They gonna ban AR's, I'm a gonna git two".
That's ridiculous. I only got one.
 
Colorado has all the measures that
Because it is. It's an AR-15 Clone. What this is going to do is to have the County reintroduce the bill that reads, instead of "Assault Rifle", it will read "Ar-15 and it's various Clones" and will be legal.
Why do you call it an ASSAULT rifle? It does not do that. It is an inanimate object. It assaults no one. You gun-grabbers are idiots. The government does not want you to own any gun that has even a slight chance of thwarting a hostile government takeover.

I don't call it an Assault Rifle. It's not a military rifle therefore it can't be called an Assault Rifle even though it's a clone of a M-16 Carbine (M-4). It IS an AR-15 Clone though. And if they law reads that the "AR-15 and it's various clones are banned" then it's legal as per the Federal Courts.

Good luck. I hope you're the one who gets to go door to door in order to collect all of them.

There you go again. You didn't pay attention to the history of the Thompson Model 1920 and the 1934 NFA law. There was no door to door collections and in 10 years, the Thompson Model 1920 became a non issue. The problem with you gunnutters is that you are so ill informed by the history of firearms you are dangerous to everyone around you and yourself.

It doesn't require a knowledge of history to blow some fucker's head off when he comes through my door at 3 in the morning.

Nor does it take history to blow anyone away in a Super Market either and that is what we are discussing. Pay attention.

No. What we are discussing is an act of Islamic terrorism committed by a radicalized Syrian refugee who wanted to kill Americans. And you Democrat's idiotic response in calling for more gun control to deny law-abiding Americans from owning firearms.

What you refuse to discuss is your party's failed immigration polices that are putting American citizens at the risk of being murdered, just like we saw today. You continue to ignore mental health issues, always blaming the crime on the gun. You don't even enforce the existing gun laws already on the books, many time letting the criminals walk away scott-free. You even ignore the fact that there are Islamic terrorists in this country who want to kill Americans, while you view conservative Americans as your real enemy.

One of the first things your idiot President did was to scrap President Trump's restrictions against entry to America from terrorist countries, most of which are Middle Eastern countries.

You ignorant fuckers just don't get it, do you? I sincerely doubt if you ever will.

No, that's what you want to steer it to. And Party Politics has nothing to do with the shooting. In fact, the Cops performed well, it's not a governments fault. It's not my fault. Hell, it's not even your fault. It's just a fruitcake that bought a gun to kill a bunch of people because he wanted to. No Hospital or Mental Health Care could have stopped it. There was no real warning. Just Bnagidy, Banidy Banidy, the deed is done.


if the assault rifle ban was still in effect, fewer would have died.


if better screening was in place, the mentally unstable shooter would not have been able to buy the gun.

if the magazine size was limited, fewer would have died.

I don't think so in this case. The features of the AR were never really realized. He was a crappy, inexperienced shooter. He was stopped before the speed and reloading factor of the AR became a factor. He could have done the same job with a 40 SW Semi Auto Handgun loaded with 15 rounds. He only had 15 556 rounds to work with so even a handgun with good killing power could have done the same job. And both weapons would have been legal.

In Colorado, the mag size IS limited to 15 and that is probably what save a lot of lives. He killed 11, wounded X number and ran out of ammo. And before he could swap out to another 15 round mag, got stopped cold. The Cops did their jobs fantastic. No good guy with a gun would have changed anything. Regardless of anything, those 11 would still be dead, those X number would still be wounded and he would still be under arrest. All of this went down in a matter of seconds.
C
NO ONE is claiming to taking away all the guns, except RW's
Does it require a signed confession of intent from the left?

You people are blindly stumbling toward mass confiscation even if many libs like you dont realize it yet
RWNJ conspiracy theories thanks to the NRA, every time a democrat is in office, so the gullible will buy more guns, been happening for decades.
Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds

gun grabbers praise any country that has totally banned firearms and its the obvious goal of the left in America

Yep, for decades that's what the NRA and RWNJ's claim every time a democrat is in office "total confiscation" of guns.

"Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds"?

That gets the morons to buy more weapons, they are convinced will be banned.

If they get banned why are RWNJ's buying more of them?

'Stable geniuses", like their dear leader?

I don't want to do anything to destroy your illusion, but you should ask the former SKS owners in California who had their weapons confiscated if they gave them up willingly.

Not my illusion, RW'S are buying more of them.
As far as the SKS, is an old weapon, not used by any military in the world anymore and has a fixed magazine that only holds 10 rounds.
From what I read they were given $230, IF you refused to register it and complied with a background check.
So, they weren't confiscated, unless the person, let them be.

So, they took a perfectly legal firearm and declared them to be illegal if you didn't ask for their permission to keep it and you don't see that as a problem? Good grief, you're an idiot.

Nothing like the RW morons that buy something convinced it will be banned.
No one is more brain dead than that.
"They gonna ban AR's, I'm a gonna git two".
It's none of your business what anyone buys, commie.
 
And had one of the worst mass shootings in history. You dumbass.

You've gone off and so that'll do it for today. Maybe tomorrow we can start fresh.

No murders or suicides til then agreed?
And especially, no hitting your dog.






I never hit anything unless it tries to hit me first, cupcake. It is violent leftists, like you, who start the violence. We never do.
Neither of us is going to start any violence here, at least on each other.
Pulling the wings off of your housefly collection is not my business. They belong to only you, your sister/wife, and your children.

Keep the sport a family affair and nobody but you psychologist will be the wiser.

Is there anything we disagree about?






Like I said, your trolling attempt to imply I am a sociopath such as yourself is laughable. We all KNOW that when it comes to violence, it is YOU leftists who start it. You wish you had the balls to attack people here, but you don't, instead, your little projecting self will no doubt harm some poor critter because you are fucked in the head.
 
Jeeeeez you preople, allow the Nazis some slack. It was wartime as opposed to *peace time in American where Americans are blowing each others brains out in the thousands!

* as close to peacetime as Ameica gets.
Guns were taken from Jews prior to war.
guns were taken from all Germans after WWI
We aren't the Germans, and better yet we defeated them with (wait for it), guns.

I know, I know, but they were military guns, and they were issued to the soldiers for a purpose... True, but you still had to have a citizenry capable of being trained, and having guns as civilians came in real handy as a starter when going in.
Are we talking all guns? No. We are talking about assault weapon bans & magazine limitations.


An AR-15 is not a military weapon, you dumb ass, and magzine bans are just stupid.......you can't justify magazine bans other than to say..."But we want to ban them..." That is all you have.

You guys want to limit magazines because you know that will make millions and millions of pistols illegal...since their standard magazine is 15-19 rounds.....a gun ban without voting to ban the guns....and lying to the American people about why you want the magazine ban.
Is that all you gunnuts can post. We all know what is being discussed but hey, you assfucks keep posting this crap.

And who knew they can't make a 10 round magazine.

Keep killing innocents & children so you can keep your toys.

What is your specific solution to mass murder?
Mass murder is his solution to us...so there's that...

His final solution?

I like his solution for ME to not have a gun. Why is that?

Cause you're less dead if he cuts off your head with an axe?

Because you can kill more, quicker, from a distance with an assault type weapon you fucking idiot.
26 were shot in gun free Chicago last weekend. Guess how many with rifles.
We are not looking at addressing that type of violence.

Chicago can try to regulate access to guns but all the bad people do is run to a red state and buy what they want.


Moron....the majority of crime guns come from local gun stores...purchased by straw buyers who can pass any background check...you doofus.

So, you are claiming the guns used in Chicago crime are purchased legally in Chicago?


The majority of crime guns are purchased legally through straw buyers for the gangs...or they are stolen....you idiot.....

Nope....if we had stricter gun control, there would be no gun violence.

Mexico has extremely restrictive laws regarding gun possession. There is only one gun store in the entire country, and it takes months of paperwork to have a chance at purchasing one legally.
Not even close to the gun violence in the land of the gun.

But the issue that needs consideration is attitudes of Americans that have been ratcheted up by continuous wars in other countries, that killing with guns has become accepted as normal.

However, on this board it's not possible and so it can serve as a gun forum that can provide ideas on how more people can get more guns. And especially on the possibilities of lowering the age at which little children can have their own guns and use them freely without supervision.

With guns in America, it's all good!
Lowering the age so that little children can have their own gun's ???? ROTFLMBO.... Ok troll boy, take your bullcrap and pack it up, because you just showed what kind of evil devil you are. No one has time for your trolling.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.

Only morons figure guns to be dangerous, not the shooter...thats whats messed up w/you

BOTH
Like drugs, guns in the wrong hands are dangerous.
Liberal policies are inconsistent by legalizing drugs while banning guns.

If you are going to trust people with drugs, then we need to go after the addictions and abuse; and this approach of identifying mental and criminal disorders would solve BOTH problems with abuse of either drugs or guns falling into criminal hands.

The reason Liberal policy is inconsistent is trying to substitute external govt for the internal process of resolving the ROOT causes of mental, criminal and social ills that belong to the PEOPLE on local levels outside govt jurisdiction.

You cannot substitute for parenting and personal changes in attitude, relations or behavior by legislating mandates through govt.

But since the Liberal "secular" approach is to substitute Govt in place of spiritual or church authority, this approach seeks to compete politically AGAINST the effective practices of screening out and correcting abuses DIRECTLY by actually ENFORCING and applying existing laws and practices used effecticely by Christians and Constitutionalists. Instead of uniting on these solutions, the Liberal political bias is to oppose this way of invoking authority by trying to undercut this, and replace it with dependence on Partisan control of Govt, moving the source of authority away from people empowering themselves directly and instead shifting that power to centralized authority in Federal Govt where only the Corporate elite can access representation in decisions.

Again, the real solutions are accessible to all people DIRECTLY by exercising Christian and Constitutional practices and policies on a LOCAL level. That doesn't require going through govt, much less depend on federal govt. People have this power directly, but Liberals without this faith keep teaching the people are helpless and need to donate to Parties to get help through Govt.

* Christian spiritual healing is used to break the cycle of drug abuse, addiction and even criminal mental disorders and free people's minds to be able to comply with authorities and return to normal relations in society.
But Liberals want to demonize and censor Christians, then rely on govt programs when social problems escalate because of the lack of people getting help to solve their own problems with poverty and mental illness.

* Constitutional law enforcement and teaching all citizens to live by the laws, the way police and military veterans do by taking oaths to defend the laws and public as sacred duty, would screen out those who seek to violate laws or have criminal disabilities. But again, Liberals want to blame all police, defund them, and shift control to Federal Govt instead of shifting that power back to people to police our own communities by enforcing the same Constitutional standards directly ourselves. Which empowers us equally as govt, as military and police invoke authority of law by adopting and committing to uphold and defend these laws.

I wish we could discuss and resolve all policy issues over guns and drugs, abortion and mask mandates, in an environment where EVERYONE feels equally empowered to represent themselves in govt, either directly or through their party or media of choice.

If we come at each other as unequal, where some people depend on one party being in govt or others depend on another group to defend and represent their interests, we will only fight over which group will dominate.

We can never freely discuss the problems or solutions, out of fear that more power or influence will go to a competing group.

If we can agree to recognize each party or group as having sovereign jurisdiction over their members obky

Hmmm, I wonder if the legalizing of drugs is for the reason (that if a conservative is killed by a criminal leftist if this is the case), then the offender can claim drugs made him do it, and thus the offender will be able to rejoin the fight when the liberal judge releases the offender based upon the drugs in his system that of course made him do it ?????
 
Colorado has all the measures that
Because it is. It's an AR-15 Clone. What this is going to do is to have the County reintroduce the bill that reads, instead of "Assault Rifle", it will read "Ar-15 and it's various Clones" and will be legal.
Why do you call it an ASSAULT rifle? It does not do that. It is an inanimate object. It assaults no one. You gun-grabbers are idiots. The government does not want you to own any gun that has even a slight chance of thwarting a hostile government takeover.

I don't call it an Assault Rifle. It's not a military rifle therefore it can't be called an Assault Rifle even though it's a clone of a M-16 Carbine (M-4). It IS an AR-15 Clone though. And if they law reads that the "AR-15 and it's various clones are banned" then it's legal as per the Federal Courts.

Good luck. I hope you're the one who gets to go door to door in order to collect all of them.

There you go again. You didn't pay attention to the history of the Thompson Model 1920 and the 1934 NFA law. There was no door to door collections and in 10 years, the Thompson Model 1920 became a non issue. The problem with you gunnutters is that you are so ill informed by the history of firearms you are dangerous to everyone around you and yourself.

It doesn't require a knowledge of history to blow some fucker's head off when he comes through my door at 3 in the morning.

Nor does it take history to blow anyone away in a Super Market either and that is what we are discussing. Pay attention.

No. What we are discussing is an act of Islamic terrorism committed by a radicalized Syrian refugee who wanted to kill Americans. And you Democrat's idiotic response in calling for more gun control to deny law-abiding Americans from owning firearms.

What you refuse to discuss is your party's failed immigration polices that are putting American citizens at the risk of being murdered, just like we saw today. You continue to ignore mental health issues, always blaming the crime on the gun. You don't even enforce the existing gun laws already on the books, many time letting the criminals walk away scott-free. You even ignore the fact that there are Islamic terrorists in this country who want to kill Americans, while you view conservative Americans as your real enemy.

One of the first things your idiot President did was to scrap President Trump's restrictions against entry to America from terrorist countries, most of which are Middle Eastern countries.

You ignorant fuckers just don't get it, do you? I sincerely doubt if you ever will.

No, that's what you want to steer it to. And Party Politics has nothing to do with the shooting. In fact, the Cops performed well, it's not a governments fault. It's not my fault. Hell, it's not even your fault. It's just a fruitcake that bought a gun to kill a bunch of people because he wanted to. No Hospital or Mental Health Care could have stopped it. There was no real warning. Just Bnagidy, Banidy Banidy, the deed is done.


if the assault rifle ban was still in effect, fewer would have died.


if better screening was in place, the mentally unstable shooter would not have been able to buy the gun.

if the magazine size was limited, fewer would have died.

I don't think so in this case. The features of the AR were never really realized. He was a crappy, inexperienced shooter. He was stopped before the speed and reloading factor of the AR became a factor. He could have done the same job with a 40 SW Semi Auto Handgun loaded with 15 rounds. He only had 15 556 rounds to work with so even a handgun with good killing power could have done the same job. And both weapons would have been legal.

In Colorado, the mag size IS limited to 15 and that is probably what save a lot of lives. He killed 11, wounded X number and ran out of ammo. And before he could swap out to another 15 round mag, got stopped cold. The Cops did their jobs fantastic. No good guy with a gun would have changed anything. Regardless of anything, those 11 would still be dead, those X number would still be wounded and he would still be under arrest. All of this went down in a matter of seconds.
C
NO ONE is claiming to taking away all the guns, except RW's
Does it require a signed confession of intent from the left?

You people are blindly stumbling toward mass confiscation even if many libs like you dont realize it yet
RWNJ conspiracy theories thanks to the NRA, every time a democrat is in office, so the gullible will buy more guns, been happening for decades.
Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds

gun grabbers praise any country that has totally banned firearms and its the obvious goal of the left in America

Yep, for decades that's what the NRA and RWNJ's claim every time a democrat is in office "total confiscation" of guns.

"Too bad gun owners are not as gullible as lefties who dont even know their own minds"?

That gets the morons to buy more weapons, they are convinced will be banned.

If they get banned why are RWNJ's buying more of them?

'Stable geniuses", like their dear leader?

I don't want to do anything to destroy your illusion, but you should ask the former SKS owners in California who had their weapons confiscated if they gave them up willingly.

Not my illusion, RW'S are buying more of them.
As far as the SKS, is an old weapon, not used by any military in the world anymore and has a fixed magazine that only holds 10 rounds.
From what I read they were given $230, IF you refused to register it and complied with a background check.
So, they weren't confiscated, unless the person, let them be.

So, they took a perfectly legal firearm and declared them to be illegal if you didn't ask for their permission to keep it and you don't see that as a problem? Good grief, you're an idiot.

Nothing like the RW morons that buy something convinced it will be banned.
No one is more brain dead than that.
"They gonna ban AR's, I'm a gonna git two".
It's none of your business what anyone buys, commie.

Spoken like the true Domestic Terrorist and Traitor to America you really are.
Goodness, is it tampon week already, liar?
 

Forum List

Back
Top