OriginalShroom
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 4,950
- 1,042
- 190
How many of these bridges could have been fixed with the Billions Obama has given his friends and supporters in the name of "Green Energy"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The bridge is not considered structurally deficient but is listed as being "functionally obsolete" a category meaning that their design is outdated, such as having narrow shoulders are low clearance underneath, according to a database compiled by the Federal Highway Administration.The bridge was built in 1953 and was last inspected in June 2011. At that time, the deck condition was listed as satisfactory (6 out of 9), the superstructure conduction rating was satisfactory (6 out of 9) and the sufficiency rating was 54.9 (out of 100).
Uh...at it's last inspection, the bridge in question was rated as Satisfactory. ^^^
A 6 rating = Equal to present minimum criteria.
National Bridge Inventory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No fatalities in I-5 bridge collapse in NW Wash. - CBS News
The bridge was built in 1953 and was last inspected in June 2011. At that time, the deck condition was listed as satisfactory (6 out of 9), the superstructure conduction rating was satisfactory (6 out of 9) and the sufficiency rating was 54.9 (out of 100).
Uh...at it's last inspection, the bridge in question was rated as Satisfactory. ^^^
A 6 rating = Equal to present minimum criteria.
National Bridge Inventory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The bridge was built in 1953 and was last inspected in June 2011. At that time, the deck condition was listed as satisfactory (6 out of 9), the superstructure conduction rating was satisfactory (6 out of 9) and the sufficiency rating was 54.9 (out of 100).
Uh...at it's last inspection, the bridge in question was rated as Satisfactory. ^^^
A 6 rating = Equal to present minimum criteria.
National Bridge Inventory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Er, the Sufficiency rate at 54 suggests the followiing.
Sufficiency Rating
50 79 - Eligible for costs to rehabilitate or refurbish bridge
http://old.post-gazette.com/downloads/20070814PennDOT_bridge_chart.pdf
Also, it was listed as being functionally obsolete.
The bridge is not considered structurally deficient but is listed as being functionally obsolete - a category meaning that their design is outdated, such as having narrow shoulders are low clearance underneath, according to a database compiled by the Federal Highway Administration.
The bridge was built in 1955 and has a sufficiency rating of 57.4 out of 100, according to federal records. That is well below the statewide average rating of 80, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal data, but 759 bridges in the state have a lower sufficiency score.
I-5 bridge collapses north of Seattle; people in water | West Central Tribune
How many of these bridges could have been fixed with the Billions Obama has given his friends and supporters in the name of "Green Energy"?
How many of these bridges could have been fixed with the Billions Obama has given his friends and supporters in the name of "Green Energy"?
More like, if congress could agree on a bill how many bridges could be fixed. The last bill expired in 2009.
With Washington State being such a Deep Blue State, why didn't the Democrats of that State keep the bridge repaired?
How many of these bridges could have been fixed with the Billions Obama has given his friends and supporters in the name of "Green Energy"?
More like, if congress could agree on a bill how many bridges could be fixed. The last bill expired in 2009.
Is it the function of the Federal Government to keep State Bridges repaired?
Why aren't the Democrats who control the Government in Washington State being held responsible?
Upkeep is still by the State, not the Federal Government.
"I saw it. I was less than 50 feet away from the truck when it hit it," witness Dale Ogden told KING 5. "I had just passed it in the fast lane southbound and it had an oversized load. It was approximately 12 feet wide and over 14 feet tall. It was in the slow lane when I came by...I was behind the flag car and in front of the truck in the other lane and I saw the whip - normally tells you how high they can clear - start hitting the bridge. I looked in my rearview mirror knowing this was not going to turn out well."
I-5 bridge collapses over Skagit River | KING5.com Seattle
Imagine how many bridges would eventually collapse, if we had the size government that Republicans insist on!
Let's see if some private company decides to rebuild the bridges for us, with their own money!
Republicans don't believe the government should build and/or maintain bridges? Can you name one who has said that?
None.Some of us have been asking for infrastructure work for a long time. This bridge was "functionally obsolete", as are many others. How many have to die?
Upkeep is still by the State, not the Federal Government.
Actually it isn't
With Washington State being such a Deep Blue State, why didn't the Democrats of that State keep the bridge repaired?
.
Having slept through civics class, I find it pretty gutsy of you to comment on a political discussion board.
.