Another lie debunked-Africans did nothing before the white man

You're wrong. Again, I'll use the example of the Congo.

In 1961 the US CIA had president Patrice Lumumba assassinated. We supported a man named Mobutu Sese Soko and armed him to get the job done. We came to know him as Mobutu. We hired him to kill a man, then whites like you want to get self righteous about the corruption our government empowered. There are examples of this all over Africa.





Whitey hasn't been meddling in Africa for two generations. Anything that your black leaders are doing is on them. Get it through your thick skull that whitey is not the cause of the problems now.

It is you.

You're wrong. Just understand that. You been radicalized into whiteys worldwide denial program. Things just don't magically disappear son. When you create divisions, which is what whitey did in order to colonize, you create generations of anger and mistrust. The killing of Democratically elected Lumumba created instability that continues to this very moment. So instead of injecting your dumb ass opinion, try doing some reading about these countries.





No, I am not. I have had to deal with corruption in Africa for decades. I wasn't paying off white dudes, I was paying off black dudes. I have paid tens of thousands of dollars to greedy fuckers who demanded I pay them for the privilege of cleaning up the environmental messes that they made!

When Chernobyl happened I knew a scumbag commodities broker who bought radiated milk to sell the Ethiopia and Eritrea because he figured they wouldn't be able to tell.

They were though, and he crowed about how instead of being arrested and jailed he was able to bribe a few more people and the sale was allowed to continue.

Black people poisoning black people for money.

Just like any other scumbag the world over.
Here's what you are not getting--the system of corrupting..has been in place for a very long time now...and it came to be for the colonial powers benefit. We liked it that way..and it grew..roots--deep into the culture. Beginnings have consequences...and long after the robber's children's children's children came to feel guilt and practice checkbook philanthropy with the profits of their generational thefts--the system remains.





Here's what YOU are not getting. The days of whitey doing the exploitation are long gone. Blacks are doing it now, and have been for two generations, completely on their own.

If any one of the bastards was as enlightened as asslips and im2 claim, those leaders would invest in their population to get them educated and producing wealth of their own, instead of merely accepting the bribes they are given.

At some point they are going to have to take responsibility for themselves.

Until then they are little more than children getting their allowance from dad.
Actually these days it is corporations and the whites behind them of course. Life is tough in Africa which is still in the 2008 GOP World depression.
 
At least 400 years of of generational brainwashing needs to be undone. If our leaders were not consistently killed by whites we would be well on our way. As it is Blacks are beginning to wake up. This is what is frightening you.





I'm not frightened, dumb shit. I want the blacks to succeed. It is essential to mankind's survival that ALL races do well.

Only a fool, like you, doesn't understand that.
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
 
I'm not frightened, dumb shit. I want the blacks to succeed. It is essential to mankind's survival that ALL races do well.

Only a fool, like you, doesn't understand that.
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.
You have a pattern when you get caught in lies West. You make claims I never said. Its ok but just realize I know. Kind of sad you are too weak to to admit you have failed and are simply wrong.




One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.
 
Whitey hasn't been meddling in Africa for two generations. Anything that your black leaders are doing is on them. Get it through your thick skull that whitey is not the cause of the problems now.

It is you.

You're wrong. Just understand that. You been radicalized into whiteys worldwide denial program. Things just don't magically disappear son. When you create divisions, which is what whitey did in order to colonize, you create generations of anger and mistrust. The killing of Democratically elected Lumumba created instability that continues to this very moment. So instead of injecting your dumb ass opinion, try doing some reading about these countries.





No, I am not. I have had to deal with corruption in Africa for decades. I wasn't paying off white dudes, I was paying off black dudes. I have paid tens of thousands of dollars to greedy fuckers who demanded I pay them for the privilege of cleaning up the environmental messes that they made!

When Chernobyl happened I knew a scumbag commodities broker who bought radiated milk to sell the Ethiopia and Eritrea because he figured they wouldn't be able to tell.

They were though, and he crowed about how instead of being arrested and jailed he was able to bribe a few more people and the sale was allowed to continue.

Black people poisoning black people for money.

Just like any other scumbag the world over.
Here's what you are not getting--the system of corrupting..has been in place for a very long time now...and it came to be for the colonial powers benefit. We liked it that way..and it grew..roots--deep into the culture. Beginnings have consequences...and long after the robber's children's children's children came to feel guilt and practice checkbook philanthropy with the profits of their generational thefts--the system remains.





Here's what YOU are not getting. The days of whitey doing the exploitation are long gone. Blacks are doing it now, and have been for two generations, completely on their own.

If any one of the bastards was as enlightened as asslips and im2 claim, those leaders would invest in their population to get them educated and producing wealth of their own, instead of merely accepting the bribes they are given.

At some point they are going to have to take responsibility for themselves.

Until then they are little more than children getting their allowance from dad.
Actually these days it is corporations and the whites behind them of course. Life is tough in Africa which is still in the 2008 GOP World depression.






China is THE dominant player in Africa now.
 
I'm not frightened, dumb shit. I want the blacks to succeed. It is essential to mankind's survival that ALL races do well.

Only a fool, like you, doesn't understand that.
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.
 
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.
You have a pattern when you get caught in lies West. You make claims I never said. Its ok but just realize I know. Kind of sad you are too weak to to admit you have failed and are simply wrong.




One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
 
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.




Oh c'mon dude, you can't really be that stupid can you? China alone has more people than all of Africa.
 
You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.
You have a pattern when you get caught in lies West. You make claims I never said. Its ok but just realize I know. Kind of sad you are too weak to to admit you have failed and are simply wrong.




One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
If that were true why did all those Greeks no one knew about become famous Greeks after they went to Africa to study?
 
I'm not frightened, dumb shit. I want the blacks to succeed. It is essential to mankind's survival that ALL races do well.

Only a fool, like you, doesn't understand that.
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
I do believe that i referred to Britain...where there was no written language..thus the Druids and their reliance on oral history..but i digress.

China's birth rate is decreasing..and to me...it is all about the cultural amalgamation..via social media and the internet.
 
You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.




Oh c'mon dude, you can't really be that stupid can you? China alone has more people than all of Africa.
Of course China has more people than Africa. The problem is that Black people are all over the globe and number more than China.
 
You have a pattern when you get caught in lies West. You make claims I never said. Its ok but just realize I know. Kind of sad you are too weak to to admit you have failed and are simply wrong.




One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
If that were true why did all those Greeks no one knew about become famous Greeks after they went to Africa to study?






What the fuck are you babbling about now

The library at Alexandria was a center for learning for a very long time. Blacks had little to do with it.
 
One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
If that were true why did all those Greeks no one knew about become famous Greeks after they went to Africa to study?






What the fuck are you babbling about now

The library at Alexandria was a center for learning for a very long time. Blacks had little to do with it.
Prove Blacks had very little to do with it.
 
He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.




Oh c'mon dude, you can't really be that stupid can you? China alone has more people than all of Africa.
Of course China has more people than Africa. The problem is that Black people are all over the globe and number more than China.





No, they don't. Asians number well over 3 billion. Blacks are half of that.
 
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
If that were true why did all those Greeks no one knew about become famous Greeks after they went to Africa to study?






What the fuck are you babbling about now

The library at Alexandria was a center for learning for a very long time. Blacks had little to do with it.
Prove Blacks had very little to do with it.




Prove they had ANYTHING to do with it
 
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.
You have a pattern when you get caught in lies West. You make claims I never said. Its ok but just realize I know. Kind of sad you are too weak to to admit you have failed and are simply wrong.




One of you clowns claims cleopatra was black. She wasn't. She was greek.
You met her? Saw a photo?

I thought not....her family was of Greek descent...but how many generations was Cleo away from Greece? Dark-complected does not mean Black...i agree..but it sure doesn't mean White either.
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.
Or a quarter..or maybe just had a good tan! LOL! My point...is that she was not white....since anyone with any knowledge of Egypt knows that with the Assyrian and Hittite admixture....African genes abounded. It is strange to me that this would matter to anyone......but I gotta admit..that the degree that some are resistant to the very idea..is telling!
 
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.




Oh c'mon dude, you can't really be that stupid can you? China alone has more people than all of Africa.
Of course China has more people than Africa. The problem is that Black people are all over the globe and number more than China.





No, they don't. Asians number well over 3 billion. Blacks are half of that.
Show me Blacks are half that.
 
West is just flinging shit hoping something will take the attention off his easily disproven claims. Heres is the rub. Greeks were all manner of races so her mother could have been Black. Either way she was at least half Black.






No, they weren't. Greeks were Greek. One race, several tribes, a written language and high art. Art that you don't see in Africa until they bring it there from ....Greece.
If that were true why did all those Greeks no one knew about become famous Greeks after they went to Africa to study?






What the fuck are you babbling about now

The library at Alexandria was a center for learning for a very long time. Blacks had little to do with it.
Prove Blacks had very little to do with it.




Prove they had ANYTHING to do with it
I already did. You made the claim. Show us how you know Blacks had nothing to do with it.
 
"I want the blacks to succeed."

Thats a hoot. Here you are denying factual history that is waking up Blacks but you claim to want Blacks to succeed? I understand you are like a lot of whites that talk out their ass on one hand but show their true colors when something hits their limbic system.




You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.
LOL..now ya lost me...but is cool...ROTF! I needed the laugh. Race is not ethnicity..as you well know. Genetic heritage..without the concomitant cultural conditioning..is meaningless....***smiles****
 
You have no factual history. You trot out fantasy and claim it is real. You claim Greeks are black. You claim Egyptians and phoenicians were black. They weren't. They were semitic. Not white, not black.

You are so insecure that you hijack everything you see and claim it is yours.

He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.
LOL..now ya lost me...but is cool...ROTF! I needed the laugh. Race is not ethnicity..as you well know. Genetic heritage..without the concomitant cultural conditioning..is meaningless....***smiles****
Well its pretty simple. Whites claim that to be Black you have to adhere to their standard of "sub-saharan" which Blacks reject out of hand. Sub sahran is a location not a race or ethnicity.

Here are some people from Malaysia

Batik.png
 
Last edited:
He's trotted out proven history. This shit whites like you call history has so many holes in it, Jordan Spieth uses it for practice.
Your article's writer does OK...as a trained historian..among other things...I recognize some of the slant..but POV is always present--and can be allowed for. Nothing he says is new..of course..but it is taking a long time for the whole story to be told. As for slaves..oddly enough..Britain and most of the Roman provinces were farmed for slaves..for about 200 years...but it was never profitable to scale up the practice to where it had a deleterious effect. In fact..the Roman occupation gave the Europeans a written language and a nodding acquaintance with learning that was to serve them well...later in their history.

Yes, Blacks like to trot out other 'people of color' to prove the point that history was not so Euro-centric as has been taught. I find little wrong with the practice. Most people don't care about the finer points..and the overwhelming point..that it was not all White folk..is the one the needs to be made.

Africa is lost though...I see little hope for it..sadly. Our scramble for resources is only going to get worse...and Africa cannot resist being raped..again. China...Russia...Iran....Egypt...will take what they want...who is to stop them/ Us? I think not...we will not go to war for Africa....at least not the people of Africa..we might fight for the right to rape Mother Africa one more time..but that's about it.

Our demographic change is accelerating...but as the cultures merge...the desire to take up the African cause will wane. We will be a lot darker in the next hundred years..but the mainstream culture..will remain 'white'..for a very long time. ..no matter the complexion of the populace.





I disagree with you on several counts. The Picts and Celts had a written language, as did the scandinavians.

Slaves have been used by virtually every culture in mans history. Slav, as a culture derives from them being harvested as slaves for over 1000 years. They are white.

The amalgamation of races is indeed accelerating but I see Asia being the dominant racial group. They already outnumber most racial groups and it will only increase.
Blacks outnumber everyone else. The dark gene is dominant to boot. Just because whites refuse to recognize other ethnicities as Black dont make it any less a reality.
LOL..now ya lost me...but is cool...ROTF! I needed the laugh. Race is not ethnicity..as you well know. Genetic heritage..without the concomitant cultural conditioning..is meaningless....***smiles****
Well its pretty simple. Whites claim that to be Black you have to adhere to their standard of "sub-saharan" which Blacks reject out of hand. Sub sahran is a location not a race or ethnicity.
Along with you..i reject that false definition as well.....Hell...I recognize Indian folk from Madras as Black as well.......Just not African. Aborigine's from Australia are black...but not African.

I recognize my African roots....as should all humans...but just cause i like Snoop..don't make me Black...LOL!
 

Forum List

Back
Top