Another screw up by Trump and the GOP!

[Dragonlady]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

I do get news from both sides. I read Foreign Policy, Forbes, and several truthful conservative commentators. But only sources which have a record of sound journalism, and fact checking.

FOX News, and really any of the Billionaire Media, are not credible of reliable.

Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually and borderline Questionable based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however, straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Sources with "numerous failed fact checks", "spreading of conspiracy theories", "poor sourcing" are not among them.

From "dangerous and deadly caravans", to Seth Rich - a story which FOX had to retract, apologize for, and then defend in court after both the "private detective" and the Rich Family sued for slander, to Benghazi, Benghazi Benghazi, FOX had promoted lies, distortions and bullshit to smear Democrats.

Hospital workers are reporting that elderly FOX News viewers are arriving at their hospitals with no idea of what to expect. They believed, right up until they were admitted, that covid19 is a hoax, or at best, it's been blown out of proportion. When they arrived at the hospital and they thought their family could be with them, and that it was no big deal. The reality was both overwhelming and frightening for them, which didn't help their treatment.

There are good conservative sources out there, but they're not owned by the Billionaire Media who want a Republican in the White House because it's to their personal financial benefit, when Republicans crash the economy, time after time.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

 

[Papageorgio]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

Then post links and be done with it. Many pay sites are as paying for a site doesn't make it any more truthful than non-pay sites. The NYT is a pay site, to me it is a left leaning organization that slants news that way. WSJ is another source and it leans to the right. You still pay for the slant. When you mentioned free shit sources you forgot to name, CTV, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, Politico, Daily KOS, Huffington Post, NPR and Alternet.

Wonder why you only mentioned right leaning sources and not left. Oh, wait you are a lefty nut job, with left wing bias and you are a bigot.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

Sure they do. That's why when somebody makes such a claim, they can't prove it.

While I don't watch the commie news, Laura Ingraham has clips from their shows every night, usually about a half-dozen or so. If they're not lying, they are twisting things so out of shape they are hardly recognizable.

They are less news organizations than they are brainwashing organizations.

CNN, MSNBC said ‘racist’ more than 4,100 times from July 14-21

CNN and MSNBC said the word “racist” more than 4,100 times from July 14-21, according to a tally by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.The tally is based on…

thehill.com

 

[Papageorgio]

Because you file a more honest return and don't lie to the Banks about your worth and income to get loans.

People like Donald Trump get audited all the time. It's a constant thing with them. If anybody is encouraged to cheat on their taxes, it would be people like me that the IRS doesn't even bother with, and I have a lot of deductions every single year.

Remember his excuse for not showing his taxes?? He was getting audited What a load of fine trump bullshit He still could have showed them

What were you looking for in Trump's taxes that would have made you vote for him?

I wasn't looking for anything I'm a New Yorker and know him to be a cheating lying swine Every President since I believe Nixon ,showed their taxes Need to prove they weren't doing anything illegal Trump couldn't show his and you guys can't figure out why?? I'd guess because he might end up in jail instead of the WH

If the IRS can't catch him doing anything illegal, what makes you think that you can find what they didn't?

We know why President Trump didn't show his taxes. The only reason you want him to release his returns is so you can find something to bash him on like being cheap to charity or paying a low percentage compared to other Americans. It has nothing to do with you thinking you can find out if he's cheating or not.

The IRS isn't looking for things that are "illegal". They look at whether or not the figures are accurate and you declared ALL of your income, and your deductions are proper. They don't look at who you're borrowing money from or where you income came from. Al Capone was convicted of tax evasion - failure to disclose his bootlegging income. He wasn't convicted of being a bootlegger or a murder, or any other of the crimes he committed.

Trump tax returns will likely reveal that he's not a billionaire, or even close to it. Former Deutches Banke employees who worked on his account, have said he's worth $300 million, at best, which is the amount Fred left him, and which is still held in a family trust with his siblings. Trump has tried to get his siblings to sell Fred's properties and they have steadfastly refused. Those properties are the only business investments that have kept Trump solvent all these years.

American banks stopped lending to Trump after his 4th bankruptcy, and they still won't give him any money. Trump initially promised that his company wouldn't buy or build outside the USA during his Presidency, but he ran into a brick wall with US bankers who still refuse to lend to him. Given that he's presided over 3 more international bankrupcies since the first 4, their wisdom in avoiding his scams has been wise.

So who does Trump owe money to. A contractor who worked on Trump Tower in Toronto said that the Trump Corporation called the shots, but the Saudi's signed the checks. Is that why Trump is offering the Saudi's nuclear technology? Because he owes them massive amounts of money?

Who Trump owes money to is of no import to the IRS, but it sure as hell is important to the American people. THAT's why Americans need to see Trump's taxes.

Trump tax returns will likely reveal that he's not a billionaire, or even close to it.

Which line on his return shows his net worth?

His audited statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth, that supports his statement of income.

You think assets, liabilities and net worth "statements" are attached to his tax return? LOL!

In order to prove his income - yes. This tells me that YOU don't know anyone, who makes enough money to have an audited financial statement attached to their tax return. Audited financials are income statements for millionaires/billionaires with privately held corporations. Unlike you or I, these guys and gals don't have T4 slips, or their American equivalents, to attach to their returns to prove income.

That's not correct. Business owners get some sort of statement from our privately held corporations that summarize gains and losses for the year. That is an input into our personal financial statement. My accountant gives me K-1 forms for each of my corporations.

Also, business INCOME STATEMENTS don't include the value of the company either. Assets are only listed in the balance sheet, not the income statement. And they are book value, not marked to market.

No, this still doesn't tell you his net worth. Fail

". . . . some sort of statement"????? Well that speaks volumes about your knowledge of business doesn't it. How many corporations do you own? You know the words, but not what they are or what they mean.

As a business owner, you would have received a full Financial Statement - Income and expenses, which would income from all sources, including sales, disposal of fixed assets, and income from subsidiary corporations. Expenses would also include current obligations under long term liabilities; A statement assets, liabilities, and equity; Notes to the Financial statements which would provide details on long term liabilities, and includes the effect of any transactions outside of the "normal course of business", along with an explanation of the terms of the accountant's engagement - audited or unaudited, and his certification of the accuracy of the information.

"... book value, not marked to market"??? I think you mean "book value, not fair market value".

You can't even fake it well.

Your taxes in the US at least, don't show a person's net worth, just their income and expenses to figure out your tax liability. I have never submitted a P&L or a "Full" financial statement on any of my taxes. They aren't interested it my net worth, they are only interested in if I owe money to them.

 

[Dragonlady]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

And you do get what you pay for. You pay for articles that side with your beliefs. Sites that don't charge make their money on viewership. If a lot of people are reading, then a lot of people see those ads.

Pay sites also disable you from posting any evidence of your claims. You can believe them if you'd like, but without being able to post them, you have no argument. Sure, you can post an article from the New York Slimes, but if I can't read it, it's pretty much worthless in forums like this one.

I don't always get opinion I agree with. But I do get well reasoned opinion I can respect and honest reporting, even if I don't agree with what they're saying. What I don't get is inflammatory lies, distortions and pieces to gin up outrage in the base.

Breitbart is losing money and advertizers. Robert Mercer just keeps pumping money into it because he makes HIS money off Republican Tax Breaks. FOX staff are given a "point of view" and told to "sell it" to the viewers. Like Caravans of Death are coming!!!! Fear and outrage is the basis of their sales.

The right wing media exist to distract voters from the corporatism, transfer of wealth and vast amounts of money flowing to the top. Pay no attention to the Murdochs, Mercers and Sinclairs behind the curtain who are getting richer from the tax cuts for billionaires and using social programs as income supports to underpaid workers. It's those damn illegals who are stealing your jobs, not the billionaires who hire them over American workers, and pay shit wages. It's the blacks, the browns, the poor.

Follow the money. That's how you get to the rotten core of American politics. Follow the money. 80% of the income and wealth are flowing straight to the top. Trump has been accelerating the process like never before.

Right wing billionaire media is free because it's selling you something. It's selling you the idea that the poor are your problem, not the mega wealthy who have been getting all of the money since Reagan was in office.

 

[Dragonlady]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

Sure they do. That's why when somebody makes such a claim, they can't prove it.

While I don't watch the commie news, Laura Ingraham has clips from their shows every night, usually about a half-dozen or so. If they're not lying, they are twisting things so out of shape they are hardly recognizable.

They are less news organizations than they are brainwashing organizations.

CNN, MSNBC said ‘racist’ more than 4,100 times from July 14-21

CNN and MSNBC said the word “racist” more than 4,100 times from July 14-21, according to a tally by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.The tally is based on…

thehill.com

I don't watch CNN. I have the same negative eyerolling reaction to CNN as I do to FOX. I can't tolerate more than 10 minutes of either network.

 

[Papageorgio]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

Fact-checks | PolitiFact

PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

www.politifact.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

And you do get what you pay for. You pay for articles that side with your beliefs. Sites that don't charge make their money on viewership. If a lot of people are reading, then a lot of people see those ads.

Pay sites also disable you from posting any evidence of your claims. You can believe them if you'd like, but without being able to post them, you have no argument. Sure, you can post an article from the New York Slimes, but if I can't read it, it's pretty much worthless in forums like this one.

I don't always get opinion I agree with. But I do get well reasoned opinion I can respect and honest reporting, even if I don't agree with what they're saying. What I don't get is inflammatory lies, distortions and pieces to gin up outrage in the base.

Breitbart is losing money and advertizers. Robert Mercer just keeps pumping money into it because he makes HIS money off Republican Tax Breaks. FOX staff are given a "point of view" and told to "sell it" to the viewers. Like Caravans of Death are coming!!!! Fear and outrage is the basis of their sales.

The right wing media exist to distract voters from the corporatism, transfer of wealth and vast amounts of money flowing to the top. Pay no attention to the Murdochs, Mercers and Sinclairs behind the curtain who are getting richer from the tax cuts for billionaires and using social programs as income supports to underpaid workers. It's those damn illegals who are stealing your jobs, not the billionaires who hire them over American workers, and pay shit wages. It's the blacks, the browns, the poor.

Follow the money. That's how you get to the rotten core of American politics. Follow the money. 80% of the income and wealth are flowing straight to the top. Trump has been accelerating the process like never before.

Right wing billionaire media is free because it's selling you something. It's selling you the idea that the poor are your problem, not the mega wealthy who have been getting all of the money since Reagan was in office.

The wealthy have never caused me many problems in my life. It is the poor that do. Once again, I had to summon the police last night at 10:30 to quiet down my worthless HUD neighbors. Yes, they use their food stamps to throw parties on work nights which not only destroy my peace and quiet, but are a threat to my business as well.

This was about the tenth time I had to call the police on them in the three years they've lived here. In fact, I had to call them for a third time one night about three weeks ago. I finally signed a complaint against them, and their court date was July 23. Whether they showed or not, I don't know. But just three days after their court appearance, they threw another Fn party.

The wealthy build all those wonderful high buildings downtown. The wealthy contribute to charitable causes. The wealthy is why most people are working in our country today. The wealthy didn't cause my property values to sink. The wealthy don't prohibit me from enjoying a nice summer evening on my back porch. The wealthy never stopped me from getting or staying asleep at night. The poor does that to me.

 

[kaz]

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Hannity doesn't kiss Trump's ass any more than you idiots kiss Biden's ass.

He also says he's a Republican. He doesn't lie like your talking heads on CNN and MSNBC who pretend their leftist hate media reporting is not partisan

 

[kaz]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

MSNBC doesn't lie to your face?????



eddiew: baa, baa, baa, baa, baa, baa ...

 

[kaz]

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

I do get news from both sides. I read Foreign Policy, Forbes, and several truthful conservative commentators. But only sources which have a record of sound journalism, and fact checking.

FOX News, and really any of the Billionaire Media, are not credible of reliable.

Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually and borderline Questionable based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however, straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Sources with "numerous failed fact checks", "spreading of conspiracy theories", "poor sourcing" are not among them.

From "dangerous and deadly caravans", to Seth Rich - a story which FOX had to retract, apologize for, and then defend in court after both the "private detective" and the Rich Family sued for slander, to Benghazi, Benghazi Benghazi, FOX had promoted lies, distortions and bullshit to smear Democrats.

Hospital workers are reporting that elderly FOX News viewers are arriving at their hospitals with no idea of what to expect. They believed, right up until they were admitted, that covid19 is a hoax, or at best, it's been blown out of proportion. When they arrived at the hospital and they thought their family could be with them, and that it was no big deal. The reality was both overwhelming and frightening for them, which didn't help their treatment.

There are good conservative sources out there, but they're not owned by the Billionaire Media who want a Republican in the White House because it's to their personal financial benefit, when Republicans crash the economy, time after time.

More of your brain dead Democrat party rhetoric. When you talk, Nancy Pelosi's lips move

 

[eddiew]

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Hannity doesn't kiss Trump's ass any more than you idiots kiss Biden's ass.

He also says he's a Republican. He doesn't lie like your talking heads on CNN and MSNBC who pretend their leftist hate media reporting is not partisan

I Don't deny they're partisan I deny that they outright lie like Hanitty and FOX do Trump uses him as an adviser ? One liar advising another??

 

[kaz]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

FoxNews is the ONLY major news source that allows both sides to present their views. Fake News presents nothing but what Democrat's think

 

[kaz]

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

Sure they do. That's why when somebody makes such a claim, they can't prove it.

While I don't watch the commie news, Laura Ingraham has clips from their shows every night, usually about a half-dozen or so. If they're not lying, they are twisting things so out of shape they are hardly recognizable.

They are less news organizations than they are brainwashing organizations.

CNN, MSNBC said ‘racist’ more than 4,100 times from July 14-21

CNN and MSNBC said the word “racist” more than 4,100 times from July 14-21, according to a tally by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.The tally is based on…

thehill.com

I don't watch CNN. I have the same negative eyerolling reaction to CNN as I do to FOX. I can't tolerate more than 10 minutes of either network.

Well, again, Fox is right, sure. But they have leftists on all day long to speak for themselves. They are the only channel that does that. You're proving yet again you only want to hear the leftist hate filled vitriol that you already think, you don't want to hear both sides

 

[kaz]

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Hannity doesn't kiss Trump's ass any more than you idiots kiss Biden's ass.

He also says he's a Republican. He doesn't lie like your talking heads on CNN and MSNBC who pretend their leftist hate media reporting is not partisan

I Don't deny they're partisan I deny that they outright lie like Hanitty and FOX do Trump uses him as an adviser ? One liar advising another??

MSNBC doesn't outright lie????

eddiew: baa, baa, baa, baa, baa, ...

 

[eddiew]

Oh, give it a break. It's already been listed in here. Your trolling is noted, Rumpster.

So in other words. you are making it all up. Like I really have time to go through each and every topic to find this "supposed" list of yours. Trust me, if the commies in the House thought that Trump did one thing out of line between government and his businesses, they would have been on him in a heartbeat.

I've seen several leftist news stories on it and the accusations were extremely lame. It's like OMG, Trump owns Morton stock and he uses SALT at dinner. Hang him!

According to the left, that really is the standard for Trump. Any connection no matter how trivial is impeachable

What they don't realize is they are being played for saps. These magazines and news sites make their money by attracting readers and viewers. If there is nothing worth reading, they lose readers which means they lose money. It doesn't matter if the story is true or not, if it gets people there, that's what they need to do.

The past couple of years, news organizations want you to sign up or pay a fee for a subscription to their internet sites. Mind you it's mostly the leftist sites that do it. They are losing readers and viewers all the time.

Have you ever heard the expression "You get what you pay for"? I pay for quality reporting, fact checking, and information I know is accurate and verified. Real journalism costs money. The free shit you get from sources like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit is worth exactly what you paid for it - nothing. Lies, distortions and outright fake new. Failed fact checks and questionable sources.

I like news that brings in both sides, like Fox. You "pay" to hear only one side of every story, the side you already agree with. It's pretty pathetic. You just pick out the stories that tell you what you already want to think.

You sure are obsessed with Brietbart news. I didn't even know they were still online since Andrew died and their major contributors left. I guess you're keeping them in business

FOX has been designated for years as entertainment , NOT news When you have a Trump kiss ass like the ah Hanitty how can you call it a news station?

Now MSNBC is a DEM station ..with all dem broadcasters difference is they don't lie to your face

And it's about as trustworthy as Foxnews as well. I watch and listen to CBS and ABC news and they factcheck good almost 100% of the time. But they have been known to announce take backs unlike Pauxsnews and MSNBC.

Just because they are reporting accurately doesn't mean they are reporting everything. That's why Fox has the most watched news channel on cable. They give you what the others don't tell you.

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

FoxNews is the ONLY major news source that allows both sides to present their views. Fake News presents nothing but what Democrat's think

Madow doesn't lie Brings the news every night without any bullshit Yes kaz ,many in the media despise Trump And with good reason He's a cancer upon America

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And it they don't that is enough, they just make shit up. Pawxsnnews is an Entertainment Network.

Sure they do. That's why when somebody makes such a claim, they can't prove it.

While I don't watch the commie news, Laura Ingraham has clips from their shows every night, usually about a half-dozen or so. If they're not lying, they are twisting things so out of shape they are hardly recognizable.

They are less news organizations than they are brainwashing organizations.

CNN, MSNBC said ‘racist’ more than 4,100 times from July 14-21

CNN and MSNBC said the word “racist” more than 4,100 times from July 14-21, according to a tally by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.The tally is based on…

thehill.com

I don't watch CNN. I have the same negative eyerolling reaction to CNN as I do to FOX. I can't tolerate more than 10 minutes of either network.

Well, again, Fox is right, sure. But they have leftists on all day long to speak for themselves. They are the only channel that does that. You're proving yet again you only want to hear the leftist hate filled vitriol that you already think, you don't want to hear both sides

One of the more popular shows on Fox news was Hannity and Colmes. There was nothing right about Colmes. He was a lefty through and through. Yet the Fox audience loved the show and tuned in every night to hear both sides. I even enjoyed some of the points Colmes made from time to time. He was very good.