Another win for Religious Liberty

[EvilCat Breath]

Religious liberty is used to justify discrimination.
It is used to justify refusing service (medical, pharmacy) to those in need.
But can’t be used for SAVING LIVES?

That is some seriously warped religious values.

The lives of criminals? Really? Would you help some killer reload his gun? Or just disarm the victim?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Matthew 25:35-40 New International Version (NIV)
35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

I missed the part where Jesus helped people commit crimes. Could you point that out.

I missed the part where he refused to help the needy.

Needy? That's a new way to describe the criminal class.

 

[occupied]

Matthew 25:35-40 New International Version (NIV)
35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

I missed the part where Jesus helped people commit crimes. Could you point that out.

In the end the entire ministry of Jesus was judged to be a capital crime and most of he martyrs of Christiandom were judged to be criminals of some sort and put to death, all nice and legal. Sometimes the law is made by evil men for evil purposes.

 

[Coyote]

Religious liberty is used to justify discrimination.
It is used to justify refusing service (medical, pharmacy) to those in need.
But can’t be used for SAVING LIVES?

That is some seriously warped religious values.

The lives of criminals? Really? Would you help some killer reload his gun? Or just disarm the victim?

Jesus hung out with undesirables and criminals.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I did it in the 90s. Groups of us. Some on horseback. Some in ATVs. Some in 4 wheelers. We would clean up the litter.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Our legal system does not see them as foreign invaders, thus your point is not valid.

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

No

Why not? Is this any different than choosing not to bake a cake or take a photo?

You severely LefTarded pukes are so damn fascinating.
LefTard Logic:
“Aiding and abetting criminals and encouraging them to fuck over fellow countrymen is one and the same with a Christian baker refusing to bake a cake depicting men buttfucking each other.”

You dumbmotherfuckers struggle to make the simplest distinctions.
You’ll stoop to any level to justify your filth....haha...good shit, thanks.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Religious liberty is used to justify discrimination.
It is used to justify refusing service (medical, pharmacy) to those in need.
But can’t be used for SAVING LIVES?

That is some seriously warped religious values.

The lives of criminals? Really? Would you help some killer reload his gun? Or just disarm the victim?

Jesus hung out with undesirables and criminals.

Now gee. I was under the impression that these were repentant criminals. Which ones did he help commit more crimes? Which ones did he encourage to commit criminal acts? There must be some or you would not believe there is.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The legal issue is one of trespassing ... are we allowed to cross someone else's land to leave water out for a (maybe) person dying of dehydration? ... I think requiring me to allow bird worshipers into my backyard to tend to the feeders is over the top ... so I think requiring another to allow geography teachers on my ranch land to leave water out for people is also over the top ...

But this is government land ... with clear and distinct rules of use ... the judge got this right ... driving a truck across the wilderness preserve is bad, and Mr. Warren is guilty ... leaving water out for a moral or religious reasons, not-so-bad, as long as Mr Warren walks out there and cleans up the mess ...

He should be given a bucket and a tea spoon to clean up invader shit.

 

[Coyote]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Our legal system does not see them as foreign invaders, thus your point is not valid.

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

No

Why not? Is this any different than choosing not to bake a cake or take a photo?

You severely LefTarded pukes are so damn fascinating.
LefTard Logic:
“Aiding and abetting criminals and encouraging them to fuck over fellow countrymen is one and the same with a Christian baker refusing to bake a cake depicting men buttfucking each other.”

You dumbmotherfuckers struggle to make the simplest distinctions.
You’ll stoop to any level to justify your filth....haha...good shit, thanks.

The Christian baker was not asked to make a cake with men butt fucking each other.

And the Christian Samaritan leaving out food and water in an attempt to prevent deaths is not encouraging anyone to fuck anyone else over.

Your logic is the only thing fucked in this.

 

[Coyote]

Religious liberty is used to justify discrimination.
It is used to justify refusing service (medical, pharmacy) to those in need.
But can’t be used for SAVING LIVES?

That is some seriously warped religious values.

The lives of criminals? Really? Would you help some killer reload his gun? Or just disarm the victim?

Jesus hung out with undesirables and criminals.

Now gee. I was under the impression that these were repentant criminals. Which ones did he help commit more crimes? Which ones did he encourage to commit criminal acts? There must be some or you would not believe there is.

Which did he kill?

Man’s law or God’s law?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Wrong.

Immigrants and migrants entering the country are not ‘invaders.’

That an immigrant might be undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’

Undocumented immigrants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and due process of law.

Like most on the right you’re an ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot.

If they are here without authorization it is the equivalent of having a smoking gun in their hands. Deport immediately and prosecute those who helped.

Leaving food and water is encouraging more to come and those might not be so lucky. It is an argument used by the cartels in shaking down would be invaders. Don't worry. Stupid Americans leave supplies everywhere. More come. More die.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Religious liberty is used to justify discrimination.
It is used to justify refusing service (medical, pharmacy) to those in need.
But can’t be used for SAVING LIVES?

That is some seriously warped religious values.

The lives of criminals? Really? Would you help some killer reload his gun? Or just disarm the victim?

Jesus hung out with undesirables and criminals.

Now gee. I was under the impression that these were repentant criminals. Which ones did he help commit more crimes? Which ones did he encourage to commit criminal acts? There must be some or you would not believe there is.

Which did he kill?

Man’s law or God’s law?

Which law of God's encourages law breaking of any kind?

 

[occupied]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Wrong.

Immigrants and migrants entering the country are not ‘invaders.’

That an immigrant might be undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’

Undocumented immigrants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and due process of law.

Like most on the right you’re an ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot.

If they are here without authorization it is the equivalent of having a smoking gun in their hands. Deport immediately and prosecute those who helped.

Leaving food and water is encouraging more to come and those might not be so lucky. It is an argument used by the cartels in shaking down would be invaders. Don't worry. Stupid Americans leave supplies everywhere. More come. More die.

Irrelevant to the topic. Try making the case that there is no religious basis for helping people.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Our legal system does not see them as foreign invaders, thus your point is not valid.

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

No

Why not? Is this any different than choosing not to bake a cake or take a photo?

You severely LefTarded pukes are so damn fascinating.
LefTard Logic:
“Aiding and abetting criminals and encouraging them to fuck over fellow countrymen is one and the same with a Christian baker refusing to bake a cake depicting men buttfucking each other.”

You dumbmotherfuckers struggle to make the simplest distinctions.
You’ll stoop to any level to justify your filth....haha...good shit, thanks.

The Christian baker was not asked to make a cake with men butt fucking each other.

And the Christian Samaritan leaving out food and water in an attempt to prevent deaths is not encouraging anyone to fuck anyone else over.

Your logic is the only thing fucked in this.

Wrong. The Christian baker was asked to make a cake celebrating men butt fucking each other. The Samaritan leaves out food and water as assistance to invaders to kill people here. Killers like the men who killed Mollie Tibbets, Kate Steinle, Brian Terru, Jamile Shaw Jr and many others. Invaders who fuck puppies to death.

Clean the litter and open the damn border to hunting.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Wrong.

Immigrants and migrants entering the country are not ‘invaders.’

That an immigrant might be undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’

Undocumented immigrants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and due process of law.

Like most on the right you’re an ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot.

If they are here without authorization it is the equivalent of having a smoking gun in their hands. Deport immediately and prosecute those who helped.

Leaving food and water is encouraging more to come and those might not be so lucky. It is an argument used by the cartels in shaking down would be invaders. Don't worry. Stupid Americans leave supplies everywhere. More come. More die.

Irrelevant to the topic. Try making the case that there is no religious basis for helping people.

The Bible makes the case quite well. If the invaders repented and went home, then they can be helped.

 

[occupied]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Wrong.

Immigrants and migrants entering the country are not ‘invaders.’

That an immigrant might be undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’

Undocumented immigrants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and due process of law.

Like most on the right you’re an ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot.

If they are here without authorization it is the equivalent of having a smoking gun in their hands. Deport immediately and prosecute those who helped.

Leaving food and water is encouraging more to come and those might not be so lucky. It is an argument used by the cartels in shaking down would be invaders. Don't worry. Stupid Americans leave supplies everywhere. More come. More die.

Irrelevant to the topic. Try making the case that there is no religious basis for helping people.

The Bible makes the case quite well. If the invaders repented and went home, then they can be helped.

Go back and read the scripture I posted on page one, Jesus did not qualify his commandment to minister to the downtrodden. Quote the biblical basis for letting people die for lack of water.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Quote the biblical basis for helping people commit crimes.

 

[K9Buck]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

I DISAGREE with the concept and the practice of punishing Americans who provide water and food to migrants.

 

[westwall]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Wrong.

Immigrants and migrants entering the country are not ‘invaders.’

That an immigrant might be undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’

Undocumented immigrants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and due process of law.

Like most on the right you’re an ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot.

What's truly sad is this encourages more people to make the hazardous trek through the desert which will lead to more needless deaths.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

Religious freedom is not a license to commit criminal acts.

Giving aid and comfort to foreign invaders is treason, one of the most serious criminal acts that an American citizen can commit. This should not stand, any more than it would stand for someone to claim a religious obligation to rob banks, or murder unbelievers.

Our legal system does not see them as foreign invaders, thus your point is not valid.

Judge's Ruling Shows Religious Freedom Isn’t Just For The Christian Right

For Scott Warren, a 37-year-old geography teacher from Ajo, Arizona, freedom of religion means making sure migrants crossing a treacherous stretch of desert along the U.S.-Mexico border don’t die of dehydration.

What do you all think, does this fall under Religious Liberty?

No

Why not? Is this any different than choosing not to bake a cake or take a photo?

You severely LefTarded pukes are so damn fascinating.
LefTard Logic:
“Aiding and abetting criminals and encouraging them to fuck over fellow countrymen is one and the same with a Christian baker refusing to bake a cake depicting men buttfucking each other.”

You dumbmotherfuckers struggle to make the simplest distinctions.
You’ll stoop to any level to justify your filth....haha...good shit, thanks.

And he wonders why we consider him left leaning