Anti-gun talking points ….

Driving isn't a right shrugs
That's all gun nuts can do, once you apply logic and common sense to guns, "Rights", mouth froth, "Rights".

Vehicles have regs, people are vetted and need a licence, vehicles are not banned.

Why not do the same with guns : GUNS BANNED mouth froth GUNS BANNED, RIGHTS, 2ND AMENDMENT, mouth froth, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, mouth froth.
 
That's all gun nuts can do, once you apply logic and common sense to guns, "Rights", mouth froth, "Rights".

Vehicles have regs, people are vetted and need a licence, vehicles are not banned.

Why not do the same with guns : GUNS BANNED mouth froth GUNS BANNED, RIGHTS, 2ND AMENDMENT, mouth froth, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, mouth froth.
Go ahead. Start a grassroots effort to petition your state legislation to to vote for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. THen make sure you get 2/3s of the state legislations to do the same.

After that you get 3/4s of the state to ratify it. Good luck!
 
That's all gun nuts can do, once you apply logic and common sense to guns, "Rights", mouth froth, "Rights".

Vehicles have regs, people are vetted and need a licence, vehicles are not banned.

Why not do the same with guns : GUNS BANNED mouth froth GUNS BANNED, RIGHTS, 2ND AMENDMENT, mouth froth, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, mouth froth.
Anti Gunners can't handle logic
Guns are a right
Driving is not
 
Go ahead. Start a grassroots effort to petition your state legislation to to vote for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. THen make sure you get 2/3s of the state legislations to do the same.

After that you get 3/4s of the state to ratify it. Good luck!
He's a Brit he has no right to petition anyone
 
Go ahead. Start a grassroots effort to petition your state legislation to to vote for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. THen make sure you get 2/3s of the state legislations to do the same.

After that you get 3/4s of the state to ratify it. Good luck!

My state? We have counties in the UK.
 
Anti Gunners can't handle logic
Guns are a right
Driving is not
Mouth froth Rights cliché Rights Mouth froth.

Many are anti shooting people. It's tricky for you to comprehend because you're programmed to own a gun to shoot others. Laws aren't anti gun, they're anti undesirables owning guns. But you're too thick to grasp this, hence your useless posts.
 
Mouth froth Rights cliché Rights Mouth froth.

Many are anti shooting people. It's tricky for you to comprehend because you're programmed to own a gun to shoot others. Laws aren't anti gun, they're anti undesirables owning guns. But you're too thick to grasp this, hence your useless posts.
More weak ass blather
American patriots kicked your countries ass because they wanted to take guns. Try it bitch
 
You're to retarded to have a gun
Your rights are striped
Do you feel better now ?
no gun for you. Does that make you feel safe?

I find it amusing that you make this comment with no less than five grammatical errors in four sentences.

The enshrinement of constitutional rights - necessarily and intentionally - takes certain policy choices off the table; you don;t get to violate peoples' rights because you think doing so will make you feel safer.

Quite the contrary, the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and no right is an absolute. You can't start a religion that practices human sacrifice. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater.

For most of our history, the Second Amendment SENSIBLY was interpreted as the "Well-Regulated militia clause" allowed gun regulation.

The Mayors of your Dem / Socialist run cities have no issue with gun toting gangs and criminals. Defunding the police, no bail, no charges for entire classes of crimes and release of violent criminals is a great idea, right?

The big cities had sensible gun laws, that the National Rampage Association got overturned. Not surprisingly, the gun murder rate started shooting up after that.
 
I find it amusing that you make this comment with no less than five grammatical errors in four sentences.



Quite the contrary, the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and no right is an absolute. You can't start a religion that practices human sacrifice. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater.

For most of our history, the Second Amendment SENSIBLY was interpreted as the "Well-Regulated militia clause" allowed gun regulation.



The big cities had sensible gun laws, that the National Rampage Association got overturned. Not surprisingly, the gun murder rate started shooting up after that.
Poor idiot I find it cute you don't have any ground to stand on so all you got grammar
 
I find it amusing that you make this comment with no less than five grammatical errors in four sentences.



Quite the contrary, the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and no right is an absolute. You can't start a religion that practices human sacrifice. You can't scream fire in a crowded theater.

For most of our history, the Second Amendment SENSIBLY was interpreted as the "Well-Regulated militia clause" allowed gun regulation.



The big cities had sensible gun laws, that the National Rampage Association got overturned. Not surprisingly, the gun murder rate started shooting up after that.
As you bring up the Constitution. I’ll post this to you:

Go ahead. Start a grassroots effort to petition your state legislation to to vote for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. THen make sure you get 2/3s of the state legislations to do the same.

After that you get 3/4s of the state to ratify it. Good luck!
 
As you bring up the Constitution. I’ll post this to you:

Go ahead. Start a grassroots effort to petition your state legislation to to vote for a convention to propose amendments to the constitution. THen make sure you get 2/3s of the state legislations to do the same.

After that you get 3/4s of the state to ratify it. Good luck!

We don't need to. We just need to replace two knuckle-draggers on SCOTUS, and the Second Amendment is about militias again.
 
We don't need to. We just need to replace two knuckle-draggers on SCOTUS, and the Second Amendment is about militias again.
Ah, nope. You need an amendment. And guess what? Even with a law change you will still have the same amount of legal weapons and legal owners as you do at the time of enactment.

You must be a progressive. You do not believe in the constitutional process.

I’ll check tomorrow to see if you have a realistic, rational solution. But I won’t hold my breath.
 

Forum List

Back
Top