Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, “you prick.” (Those were your words, okwhine.) If you don’t like a return volley, then don’t serve.So, you resort to flaming when it doesn't suit you. Grow up.
Nice of you to fall off about Thomas and the argument. I could care less about about Schiff. He can be voted out. As for a justice ethically, he should recuse himself. That solves any notion of the issue.Ethics? What in hell does the democrat politicians know about ethics?
Maybe you could get Adam Schiff to explain ethics, okay?
No insurrectionists have been arrested.?
Stop acting like over 1000 insurrectionists have not been arrested. I know you’re smarter than this.
SCOTUS judges cannot be on the bench if married to traitors
Only with conservative justices, right?
There is no actual reason in the realm of “ethics” which would support your desire for Justice Thomas to recuse himself. You’re wrong again.Nice of you to fall off about Thomas and the argument. I could care less about about Schiff. He can be voted out. As for a justice ethically, he should recuse himself. That solves any notion of the issue.
There is no traitor, there is no insurrectionist.?
Stop acting like over 1000 insurrectionists have not been arrested. I know you’re smarter than this.
SCOTUS judges cannot be on the bench if married to traitors
Don't bring up ethics, you and your ilk know nothing about ethics. My pointNice of you to fall off about Thomas and the argument. I could care less about about Schiff. He can be voted out. As for a justice ethically, he should recuse himself. That solves any notion of the issue.
Removed from the Supreme Court because you don't like what Judge Thomas' wife said or thinks?He sleeps in the same bed every night as an insurrectionist. Nothing loony about wanting this major conflict of interest booted out of the SCOTUS
She was at the insurrection, she’s an insurrectionistThere is no traitor, there is insurrectionist.
Now if you want to redefine those words to encompass what you think will get Thomas removed.
Feel free....but for now all you get to do is pound sand.
There was no insurrection. She’s still not an insurrectionist.She was at the insurrection, she’s an insurrectionist
www.murphy.senate.gov
"Confirmed" as appointed. Anything else you need help with?No, “you prick.” (Those were your words, okwhine.) If you don’t like a return volley, then don’t serve.
Meanwhile, the point was that for some utterly mysterious “reason,” you said that a Justice gets nominated first and then confirmed. Why you said it, nobody knows. But I had previously said that exact same thing in reply to an ignorant post suggesting that Justice Thomas had been “appointed.”
She was charged with insurrection? How many on that day were charged with insurrection?He sleeps in the same bed every night as an insurrectionist. Nothing loony about wanting this major conflict of interest booted out of the SCOTUS
AOC is a pretty moron. She should have stuck with bar-tending and dancing.
Ohhhh I get it, I’m being trolledThere was no insurrection. She’s still not an insurrectionist.
Oh, of course. Politicizing the issue is your idea.Don't bring up ethics, you and your ilk know nothing about ethics. My point
No she's not, you need to redefine the word to get to where you want to be.She was at the insurrection, she’s an insurrectionist
Nominated by the President. Confirmed by the Senate. Not “appointed” by anyone."Confirmed" as appointed. Anything else you need help with?
