AOC is a socialist. Is that bad?

[Soupnazi630]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Yes because socialism is evil and ends in disaster where ever tried

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

 

[danielpalos]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Yes because socialism is evil and ends in disaster where ever tried

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

 

[danielpalos]

Can anyone say why its bad??

we have a Commerce Clause in our social contract and Constitution; insist we make money not lose money on public policies.

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Yes because socialism is evil and ends in disaster where ever tried

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

 

[Soupnazi630]

Can anyone say why its bad??

we have a Commerce Clause in our social contract and Constitution; insist we make money not lose money on public policies.

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

 

[danielpalos]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Yes because socialism is evil and ends in disaster where ever tried

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

 

[danielpalos]

Can anyone say why its bad??

we have a Commerce Clause in our social contract and Constitution; insist we make money not lose money on public policies.

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes because socialism is evil and ends in disaster where ever tried

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

 

[Soupnazi630]

Can anyone say why its bad??

we have a Commerce Clause in our social contract and Constitution; insist we make money not lose money on public policies.

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

 

[danielpalos]

lousy management does that. capitalism "died in 1929".

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

they are economically clueless and Causeless.

 

[danielpalos]

we have a Commerce Clause in our social contract and Constitution; insist we make money not lose money on public policies.

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

it IS a social contract; why do you believe it isn't?

 

[Soupnazi630]

No government does it

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

they are economically clueless and Causeless.

Compared to you they are brilliant

 

[Soupnazi630]

We have no social contract

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

it IS a social contract; why do you believe it isn't?

It is not a social contract

Your assertion is ignorant foolish and wrong.

I do NOT believe it isn't

It is absolute fact that it isn't

 

[CrazedScotsman]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Cambodia
USSR
Cuba
Communist China
Venesuala

Communism and Socialism equals bad
Pure Capitalism and Anarchy equals bad

There is a happy medium of Capitalism with Socialist Programs.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism "died in 1929". Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

they are economically clueless and Causeless.

Compared to you they are brilliant

that comes so naturally, to you.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Constitution is a social contract; we even got in writing.

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

it IS a social contract; why do you believe it isn't?

It is not a social contract

Your assertion is ignorant foolish and wrong.

I do NOT believe it isn't

It is absolute fact that it isn't

gibberish.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not a contract social or otherwise and no where is it written that it is a contract so no we do not have it on writing

Learn to read dumbass

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

it IS a social contract; why do you believe it isn't?

It is not a social contract

Your assertion is ignorant foolish and wrong.

I do NOT believe it isn't

It is absolute fact that it isn't

gibberish.

Clear and articulate fact

 

[Soupnazi630]

It did not die and everyone takes it seriously

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

they are economically clueless and Causeless.

Compared to you they are brilliant

that comes so naturally, to you.

Much like being dumb does to you

 

[danielpalos]

you are clueless and Causeless; is that, natural, where you come from?

Wrong

I am correct and you are quite dim

Once again

Th Constitution is not a social contract

Then words social contract do not appear in the constitution proving you are an uneducated fool for claiming we have it in writing.

There is no such thing as a social contract

it IS a social contract; why do you believe it isn't?

It is not a social contract

Your assertion is ignorant foolish and wrong.

I do NOT believe it isn't

It is absolute fact that it isn't

gibberish.

Clear and articulate fact

in right wing fantasy.

A social contract is a Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

Government solves all problems for the right wing; why should we take you economically seriously in modern economic times?

I am no right winger.

They are simply smarter than you

they are economically clueless and Causeless.

Compared to you they are brilliant

that comes so naturally, to you.

Much like being dumb does to you

says the guy with naturally inferior arguments.