AOC is a socialist. Is that bad?

[jc456]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Anyone who doesn’t even know what socialism is will automatically call it bad. That’s just how simple minds work.

Wrong
Those who know what it is know it is evil and wrong.

It is always defended by idiots who claim to have special insight but are in fact delusional

And it destroys life

Lol oh my god. You people are such dimwits.

I don’t fall for bullshit, destroys life

 

[Slyhunter]

gibberish.

Clear and articulate fact

in right wing fantasy.

A social contract is a Constitution.

No it is not.

That is not what social contract or constitution means

The meaning of such terms is cleverly hidden in dictionaries

There is no social contract and the Constitution is not one

Your ignorant opinion is meaningless

social contract is a term in encyclopedias. only the right right get their entire understanding from dictionaries; how natural, for them.

It is also in dictionaries and neither they nor encyclopedias call a constitution a social contract, they are two different things.

Left or right wing only a pompous fool conflated the two

You realize you're arguing with a moron right? He posts the same talking points over and over again on these threads and can't hold up his end of an argument. I would put him on ignore but then I'd still have to read the replies to his post and wonder what everyone is talking about.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Uh, well, let's see: Cuba, Venezuela, Spain, Italy, Greece, England, etc.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

socialism leads to misery and death .
now only if you could get rid of the establishment govcorp globo homo inc cronys

free markets feed and create and yes their will always be winners and losers.


the problem with socialism is just about everyone is turned into a scavenging loser

Experimentation is a major tool in the scientist’s arsenal. We can put the same strain of bacteria into two Petri dishes, for example, and compare the relative effects of two different antibiotics.

What if we could do the same with economic systems? We could take a country and destroy its political and economic fabric through, say, a natural disaster or widespread pestilence – or a war. War is the ultimate political and economic cleansing agent. Its full devastation can send a country back almost to the beginning of civilization.

We could then take this war-torn country and divide it into two parts. It would have similar people, similar climate, similar potential trading partners, similar geography – but one part is rebuilt using capitalism as its base, while the other rebuilds using socialism and its principles. We’d let the virtues of each system play out and see where these two new countries would be after, say, fifty years.

Don’t you wonder what the outcome might be? Well, as it turns out, we have already performed The Experiment. It’s post-war Germany.

The Experiment: Capitalism versus Socialism | CFACT

 

[Flash]

[


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

You mean like this filthy bitch's "need" for an Obamaphone?




How about these idiots in Venezuela that voted for Socialism and now has the "need" for food and water?

 

[danielpalos]

in right wing fantasy.

A social contract is a Constitution.

No it is not.

That is not what social contract or constitution means

The meaning of such terms is cleverly hidden in dictionaries

There is no social contract and the Constitution is not one

Your ignorant opinion is meaningless

social contract is a term in encyclopedias. only the right right get their entire understanding from dictionaries; how natural, for them.

It is also in dictionaries and neither they nor encyclopedias call a constitution a social contract, they are two different things.

Left or right wing only a pompous fool conflated the two

i may agree with you with a social compact; our social contract is in writing and termed and styled, a Constitution.

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

 

[danielpalos]

says the guy with naturally inferior arguments.

Better arguments which consistently defeats yours

only in right wing fantasy are you always right.

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism leads to misery and death .
now only if you could get rid of the establishment govcorp globo homo inc cronys

free markets feed and create and yes their will always be winners and losers.


the problem with socialism is just about everyone is turned into a scavenging loser

Experimentation is a major tool in the scientist’s arsenal. We can put the same strain of bacteria into two Petri dishes, for example, and compare the relative effects of two different antibiotics.

What if we could do the same with economic systems? We could take a country and destroy its political and economic fabric through, say, a natural disaster or widespread pestilence – or a war. War is the ultimate political and economic cleansing agent. Its full devastation can send a country back almost to the beginning of civilization.

We could then take this war-torn country and divide it into two parts. It would have similar people, similar climate, similar potential trading partners, similar geography – but one part is rebuilt using capitalism as its base, while the other rebuilds using socialism and its principles. We’d let the virtues of each system play out and see where these two new countries would be after, say, fifty years.

Don’t you wonder what the outcome might be? Well, as it turns out, we have already performed The Experiment. It’s post-war Germany.

The Experiment: Capitalism versus Socialism | CFACT

The right wing has to rely on so much special pleading to make their point, they have to appeal to ignorance to do it.

Government is Socialism. Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

Capitalism "officially died in 1929".

 

[Papageorgio]

Better arguments which consistently defeats yours

only in right wing fantasy are you always right.

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

You have never given a superior argument. Hell, you can’t even explain your ideas in common English.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not.

That is not what social contract or constitution means

The meaning of such terms is cleverly hidden in dictionaries

There is no social contract and the Constitution is not one

Your ignorant opinion is meaningless

social contract is a term in encyclopedias. only the right right get their entire understanding from dictionaries; how natural, for them.

It is also in dictionaries and neither they nor encyclopedias call a constitution a social contract, they are two different things.

Left or right wing only a pompous fool conflated the two

i may agree with you with a social compact; our social contract is in writing and termed and styled, a Constitution.

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

 

[danielpalos]

[


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

You mean like this filthy bitch's "need" for an Obamaphone?




How about these idiots in Venezuela that voted for Socialism and now has the "need" for food and water?

only if you major in minors.

Our federal doctrine expresses promotion and provision for the general welfare, not the general malfare, or the general warfare.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Better arguments which consistently defeats yours

only in right wing fantasy are you always right.

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

Which is why my argument is superior to your argument

You stated fallacy

 

[danielpalos]

social contract is a term in encyclopedias. only the right right get their entire understanding from dictionaries; how natural, for them.

It is also in dictionaries and neither they nor encyclopedias call a constitution a social contract, they are two different things.

Left or right wing only a pompous fool conflated the two

i may agree with you with a social compact; our social contract is in writing and termed and styled, a Constitution.

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

 

[danielpalos]

only in right wing fantasy are you always right.

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

Which is why my argument is superior to your argument

You stated fallacy

Men have arguments not gossip.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is also in dictionaries and neither they nor encyclopedias call a constitution a social contract, they are two different things.

Left or right wing only a pompous fool conflated the two

i may agree with you with a social compact; our social contract is in writing and termed and styled, a Constitution.

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

It is a document defining government structure and law.

It is not a voluntary agreement between two parties which is what a contract is strictly limited to

 

[Soupnazi630]

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

Which is why my argument is superior to your argument

You stated fallacy

Men have arguments not gossip.

I have facts you have gossip

 

[Flash]

[


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

You mean like this filthy bitch's "need" for an Obamaphone?




How about these idiots in Venezuela that voted for Socialism and now has the "need" for food and water?

only if you major in minors.

Our federal doctrine expresses promotion and provision for the general welfare, not the general malfare, or the general warfare.

Fuck welfare Moon Bat.

The General Clause has been explained to you many times and it has nothing to do with the filthy welfare state but since you are an uneducated low information Moon Bat you are unable to comprehend.

 

[Papageorgio]

I am often wrong

In reality both left and right wing I do consistently destroy your claims with facts

Not every one who proves you a fool is right winger boy

you need more than fallacy. even wo-men can do that. men have superior arguments.

Yes we do which is why women like you are always defeated

simply claiming that without a valid superior argument to back it up is a fallacy. Men have superior arguments.

Which is why my argument is superior to your argument

You stated fallacy

Men have arguments not gossip.

Are you saying you are a woman?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Are you saying you are a woman?

I think it means he's never been with one.

He only conducts his pillow talk with real men -- manly men who know how to take charge of the conversation and other important matters..

 

[Flash]

California is the most socialist of all the states and it is slowly turning into a socialist shithole.

Socialism creates poverty and California has the most poverty of all the states. AOC wants all of the US to be a socialist shithole.