Arctic heating up at twice as fast as rest of globe

I love how liberals cite global warming with maps that go back 100 years.

Morons, the earth is 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD. You need to look further back than 100 years to prove ANYTHING.
They start with when there were enough recorded temps.

To say they ignore the older stuff is just you being a dumbass.

They do ignore older stuff, because those trends don't show global warming at all. And even if the globe is warming, doesn't mean man caused it.

Game. Set. Match.


Game set match on that crap post? Ask one of your climategate buddies about it. They can tell you about tree rings.
 
Arctic heating up twice as fast as rest of the globe - CNN.com

MMGW deniers are dumber than shit & the Trump cabinet is full of them.

Our grandchildren are fucked.
Retired climate professor admits global warming will not destroy Earth
A retired professor and glacier expert has publicly declared global warming a good thing. He also refuses to go along with many of his scientific peers who he says have urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster.”

College Prof Retires and Admits Global Warming is a Lie

It's a racket so all the global warming fools bit the bs lie which helped the Global Corporations make billions off this lie.
it spider webs out into multiple areas............. Solar panels, wind farms, think of the productions that go into those, think of the money made creating them, selling them, people buying them...
 
Never seen this sign for whites.

blacks-need-not-apply-44029839847.jpeg
Shitforbrains is in denial of affirmative action. What a putz.
Do your own research instead of just believing the Orange Hack.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

U.S. Concern About Global Warming at Eight-Year High

Do your own research

I'd like to hear yours.

What progress have we made? Be specific.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

Which is why Clinton got Kyoto ratified by the US Senate?
Back when Republicans actually gave a shit about our country instead of now when they only care about their party?

When they cared, how many votes did Kyoto get in the US Senate?
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party
 
Arctic heating up twice as fast as rest of the globe - CNN.com

MMGW deniers are dumber than shit & the Trump cabinet is full of them.

Our grandchildren are fucked.
Retired climate professor admits global warming will not destroy Earth
A retired professor and glacier expert has publicly declared global warming a good thing. He also refuses to go along with many of his scientific peers who he says have urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster.”

College Prof Retires and Admits Global Warming is a Lie

It's a racket so all the global warming fools bit the bs lie which helped the Global Corporations make billions off this lie.
it spider webs out into multiple areas............. Solar panels, wind farms, think of the productions that go into those, think of the money made creating them, selling them, people buying them...
Who said the Earth would be destroyed? Only morons like you. It was clear as to the effects of rising temps & what the possibilities could be.
 
Arctic heating up twice as fast as rest of the globe - CNN.com

MMGW deniers are dumber than shit & the Trump cabinet is full of them.

Our grandchildren are fucked.

As your leaders tell you give up AC, and you are using to much power, gas etc
C'mon They fly off on " JETS" have 10,000 sq ft homes..........
But they tell us we use to much energy it's bs man use common sense.

THEY FLY IN JETS, USE LIMO's SUV's ...
You crock of shit post has already been debunked here on this thread.
 
Do your own research instead of just believing the Orange Hack.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

U.S. Concern About Global Warming at Eight-Year High

Do your own research

I'd like to hear yours.

What progress have we made? Be specific.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

Which is why Clinton got Kyoto ratified by the US Senate?

2014 emissions below 2005.

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: 1990-2014 | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA

Thanks for the link.
What was the largest contribution to this progress since 2005?
What did Obama do to make this progress since 2005 possible?
Your turn. Why do you think no progress has been made?

We have made progress. But it was fought by Obama.
How?
 
Shitforbrains is in denial of affirmative action. What a putz.
Do your own research

I'd like to hear yours.

What progress have we made? Be specific.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

Which is why Clinton got Kyoto ratified by the US Senate?
Back when Republicans actually gave a shit about our country instead of now when they only care about their party?

When they cared, how many votes did Kyoto get in the US Senate?
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party

The Byrd–Hagel Resolution was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997, sponsored by Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Robert Byrd (D-WV). The resolution stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Byrd–Hagel Resolution - Wikipedia

Both parties were concerned.

Yup. They united, 95-0, against Kyoto.
 
Do your own research

I'd like to hear yours.

What progress have we made? Be specific.

US Senate Republicans are the politicians duping your feeble minded ass.

Which is why Clinton got Kyoto ratified by the US Senate?

2014 emissions below 2005.

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: 1990-2014 | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA

Thanks for the link.
What was the largest contribution to this progress since 2005?
What did Obama do to make this progress since 2005 possible?
Your turn. Why do you think no progress has been made?

We have made progress. But it was fought by Obama.
How?

What contributed most to our reduction of CO2 emissions?
 
Arctic heating up twice as fast as rest of the globe - CNN.com

MMGW deniers are dumber than shit & the Trump cabinet is full of them.

Our grandchildren are fucked.

As your leaders tell you give up AC, and you are using to much power, gas etc
C'mon They fly off on " JETS" have 10,000 sq ft homes..........
But they tell us we use to much energy it's bs man use common sense.

THEY FLY IN JETS, USE LIMO's SUV's ...
Yep, when the hysterical warmers start acting like it's a crisis I may start listening.
 
Back when Republicans actually gave a shit about our country instead of now when they only care about their party?

When they cared, how many votes did Kyoto get in the US Senate?
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party

The Byrd–Hagel Resolution was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997, sponsored by Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Robert Byrd (D-WV). The resolution stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Byrd–Hagel Resolution - Wikipedia

Both parties were concerned.

Yup. They united, 95-0, against Kyoto.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on what any agreement should contain. It was not a vote on a signed agreement. So no, Kyota was never voted on.
 

Thanks for the link.
What was the largest contribution to this progress since 2005?
What did Obama do to make this progress since 2005 possible?
Your turn. Why do you think no progress has been made?

We have made progress. But it was fought by Obama.
How?

What contributed most to our reduction of CO2 emissions?
So how was Obama against our emission reductions?
 
When they cared, how many votes did Kyoto get in the US Senate?
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party

The Byrd–Hagel Resolution was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997, sponsored by Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Robert Byrd (D-WV). The resolution stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Byrd–Hagel Resolution - Wikipedia

Both parties were concerned.

Yup. They united, 95-0, against Kyoto.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on what any agreement should contain. It was not a vote on a signed agreement. So no, Kyota was never voted on.
Yet Democrats had a super majority 8 years ago and didn't bother even voting on it.
Maybe because Japan, Canada and Russia said Kyoto was bullshit they were leaving.:rofl:
 
When they cared, how many votes did Kyoto get in the US Senate?
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party

The Byrd–Hagel Resolution was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997, sponsored by Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Robert Byrd (D-WV). The resolution stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Byrd–Hagel Resolution - Wikipedia

Both parties were concerned.

Yup. They united, 95-0, against Kyoto.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on what any agreement should contain. It was not a vote on a signed agreement. So no, Kyota was never voted on.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on

Both parties agreed, we shouldn't be a signatory to Kyoto.....95-0.
 
Thanks for the link.
What was the largest contribution to this progress since 2005?
What did Obama do to make this progress since 2005 possible?
Your turn. Why do you think no progress has been made?

We have made progress. But it was fought by Obama.
How?

What contributed most to our reduction of CO2 emissions?
So how was Obama against our emission reductions?

You really don't know why our emissions decreased?
I can't say I'm surprised.
 
It was never voted on. No one asked it to. Clinton viewed as a work in progress.

When Bush was elected, the dumbing down of the Republican party was on the path to being anti-science.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue.

It was never voted on.


It was voted down, 95-0.

When Kyota was signed, global warming was not a partisan issue

I agree, Dems were still concerned about economic impacts at that time.
No, it was not. Kyota was never voted on. Get better informed. Both parties were concerned. It was later that Republicans decided that their re-election was more important than science & dumbed down their party


The Byrd–Hagel Resolution was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997, sponsored by Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Robert Byrd (D-WV). The resolution stated that it was not the sense of the Senate that the United States should be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Byrd–Hagel Resolution - Wikipedia

Both parties were concerned.

Yup. They united, 95-0, against Kyoto.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on what any agreement should contain. It was not a vote on a signed agreement. So no, Kyota was never voted on.

That was a vote taken before the Kyota was even signed on

Both parties agreed, we shouldn't be a signatory to Kyoto.....95-0.

But it was not a vote to approve a signed agreement like you lied about.
 
Your turn. Why do you think no progress has been made?

We have made progress. But it was fought by Obama.
How?

What contributed most to our reduction of CO2 emissions?
So how was Obama against our emission reductions?

You really don't know why our emissions decreased?
I can't say I'm surprised.
I'm waiting for you. Oh wise one. Tell us Obama fought reductions in emissions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top