Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Silly little ass, it is 29 F in Seneca, Oregon right now. The temperature there in the past has been as cold as -54 F at this time of the year. The actual average is much colder than the present temperature, but it is not 83 degrees colder. And that average has been much warmer than when I lived in that area as a child.
Silly little ass, it is 29 F in Seneca, Oregon right now. The temperature there in the past has been as cold as -54 F at this time of the year. The actual average is much colder than the present temperature, but it is not 83 degrees colder. And that average has been much warmer than when I lived in that area as a child.
Silly little ass, it is 29 F in Seneca, Oregon right now. The temperature there in the past has been as cold as -54 F at this time of the year. The actual average is much colder than the present temperature, but it is not 83 degrees colder. And that average has been much warmer than when I lived in that area as a child.
No, dear little cretin, that is why there is a 40+ C variation in the Arctic, but only a +0.5 degree anomaly on that particular day. And here is today;Oh so Seneca, OR is why there is a .5 "anomaly" in the Arctic?
I did a little research and you are right the cover is fake but the fact remains that in that time frame predictions were being made that we would soon be in an ice age. The excuse is that in those years scientists did not understand climate as well as they do today. I am not convinced they know much more about climate today either. However one thing that hurts acceptance of Global Warming theories is when outlandish predictions are made that don’t come true. By making foolish predictions Global Warming experts are basically shooting their efforts in the foot.You do realize that the Time front cover you posted is fake. Of course you do, you are a liar, just as is the person that created that is.
proudtobecanadian.ca
longreads.com
I enjoy the opportunity to post article and memes which piss people like you off. It also allows others the chance to read articles on topics they may have only heard liberal propaganda about and might open their minds to truth.I just said he made the prediction. It is drunkeness, stupidity or dishonesty that causes you to keep saying such stupid things?
You said many scientists were saying snow was a thing of the past, yet you can only come up with _one_. You made up some stupid shit, you got caught, and now you're flailing and crying. Who exactly do you think you're fooling? Even your fellow cultists all know you're lying. They just approve of your lying.
So, nice shitposting meme frenzy, cult boi. I do so love seeing cultists get triggered. Now proceed to run from the topic yet another time. No matter, we can always track you down by the smell of your soiled britches.
wattsupwiththat.com
www.aei.org
There were some predictions made, based on the increasing aerosols in the air from the burning of fossil fuels. However, the majority of predictions even at that time was for a warming;I did a little research and you are right the cover is fake but the fact remains that in that time frame predictions were being made that we would soon be in an ice age. The excuse is that in those years scientists did not understand climate as well as they do today. I am not convinced they know much more about climate today either. However one thing that hurts acceptance of Global Warming theories is when outlandish predictions are made that don’t come true. By making foolish predictions Global Warming experts are basically shooting their efforts in the foot.
Another Ice Age?
In Africa, drought continues for the sixth consecutive year, adding terribly to the toll of famine victims. During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst...content.time.com
Newsweek’s 1975 Article About The Coming Ice Age - PTBC
From the good Sweetness & Light blog, posted by blogger Steve Gilbert: From the now notorious April 28, 1975 issue of Newsweek (pdf) [see whole article at link]: The Cooling World By Peter Gwynne 28 April 1975 There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change...
In 1975, Newsweek Predicted A New Ice Age. We’re Still Living with the Consequences. - Longreads
All climate change deniers needed was one article to cast doubt on the science of global warming.
The 1970s Ice Age Myth and Time Magazine Covers - by David Kirtley | ScienceBlogs
This is a guest post by David Kirtley. David originally posted this as a Google Doc, and I'm reproducing his work here with his permission. Just the other day I was speaking to a climate change skeptic who made mention of an old Time or Newsweek (he was not sure) article that talked about...scienceblogs.com
The problem with making extreme climate predictions is if they fail to come true the global warming advocates look foolish. Then when there is really a threat and it is presented to the public it gets ignored because the people see.It as just another “boy who cried wolf” story.There were some predictions made, based on the increasing aerosols in the air from the burning of fossil fuels. However, the majority of predictions even at that time was for a warming;
View attachment 585928
At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gasses that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming – warming that would exert a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects.
By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational 'Ice Age' stories in the press that so many people tend to remember.
What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?
<p>1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.</p>skepticalscience.com
www.foxnews.com
The problem with making extreme climate predictions is if they fail to come true the global warming advocates look foolish. Then when there is really a threat and it is presented to the public it gets ignored because the people see.It as just another “boy who cried wolf” story.
Plus now we have AOC saying the world will end in 12 years.
But then she comes out and states she really didn’t mean it.
AOC says only a 'sea sponge' would believe her '12 years' doomsday remark, but most Dems bought it
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s claim that the world will “end in 12 years” unless climate change is tackled was accepted as a fact by two-thirds of Democrats, even though she said herself that only those with “social intelligence of a sea sponge” could actually believe it.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s claim that the world will “end in 12 years” unless climate change is tackled was accepted as a fact by two-thirds of Democrats, even though she said herself that only those with the “social intelligence of a sea sponge” could actually believe it.
The New York Democrat drew mockery from Republicans after she made the doomsday warning in a bid to convince people that radical action against climate change is needed.
It is you who is desperate.
For one thing unlike what you just stated here are more than just one scientist who have predicted rare snow.
I offered you plenty of articles mentioning bad predictions by scientists but you offer me the opportunity to offer even more.Yet you've been unable to show us more than one, despite being asked over and over. You latest links certainly didn't show any. If you disagree, please write for us the name of this second climate scientist, right here:
<crickets>
You fell for dumb propaganda. And you know it, but you won't admit it.
What? You really thought it wasn't obvious? You actually thought we haven't seen your type here a hundred times before? Come on. Propaganda parrots are a dime-a-dozen. You possess almost no knowledge of the topic here.
I feel a little bad for you. There you were, safely isolated from reality in your right-wing madrassa, learning your religious scripture. Then you went out into the world, so eager to PreachTheGoodWord ... and reality smacked you hard. That must sting, so we're going easy on you.
Oh, I forgot. Gore Rule Invoked. The first one to talk about Gore forfeits the thread for their side. You did that. Those who can discuss the science, do. Those who can't, who are just mindless party hacks, they deflect from their ignorance by demonizing opposition political figures. Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you, including the USMB Home Game.
www.investors.com
www.foxnews.com
cei.org
www.businessinsider.com
www.investors.com
Let's see, we have all the scientists of the world stating that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. Then we have the dumb fucks on this board stating otherwise. Oh, who to believe.
The idiocy posted here by the denialists supplied the script for "Don't Look Up". It was originally a satire of climate denialists, and then Covid came along, and Trump played the part Streep plays perfectly. And hundreds of thousands of Americans have died for his criminal lies.
The idiocy posted here by the denialists supplied the script for "Don't Look Up". It was originally a satire of climate denialists, and then Covid came along, and Trump played the part Streep plays perfectly. And hundreds of thousands of Americans have died for his criminal lies.
