Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
The sentence to which you are responding:did what occur???
Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
time is everything since the claim is it happened over millions of yrs that humans evolved from lower forms of life,,and the geo column is theyre basis for the time frame
and the common ancestor thing is bullshit since it can also apply to intelligent design by using the same box of parts,,,
side note
ford and chevys are from common parts, it takes intelligent design to make them different
and to claim the lower form are less complex requires you to ignore other current forms
the eye of a bee is far more complex than a human eye, are they ahead of us in the evo scale???
Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
time is everything since the claim is it happened over millions of yrs that humans evolved from lower forms of life,,and the geo column is theyre basis for the time frame
and the common ancestor thing is bullshit since it can also apply to intelligent design by using the same box of parts,,,
side note
ford and chevys are from common parts, it takes intelligent design to make them different
and to claim the lower form are less complex requires you to ignore other current forms
the eye of a bee is far more complex than a human eye, are they ahead of us in the evo scale???
You are not the product of intelligent design. Those gods, they have such a wry sense of humor.
Re: did what occur???did what occur???Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
and time is everything since the claim is it happened over millions of yrs that humans evolved from lower forms of life,,and the geo column is theyre basis for the time frame
and the common ancestor thing is bullshit since it can also apply to intelligent design by using the same box of parts,,,
side note
ford and chevys are from common parts, it takes intelligent design to make them different
and to claim the lower form are less complex requires you to ignore other current forms
the eye of a bee is far more complex than a human eye, are they ahead of us in the evo scale???
He, a guy named Jesus, may have been crucified and he may have been a prophet whatever that means.
Or a martyr. The story embellished over time.
I just can’t believe the Greeks believed Paul but it really is the greatest story ever told.
The Jews were actually there and they supposedly saw it yet they are still Jews. Very few ancestors of Jesus actually converted to Christianity. It was whites and Greeks and Mexicans who swallow this story. But not the Jews who were there? Their ancestors don’t deny they crucified some guy name Jesus but they don’t corroborate the miracles.
Don’t you find that interesting?
He, a guy named Jesus, may have been crucified and he may have been a prophet whatever that means.Notice how Bond the shameless charlatan liar freely and easily changes lanes from "it's faith!" to "it's based on evidence!". This lying moron has lied so much he doesn't even know what he thinks or has said.
Are you really going to try and prove Jesus didn't exist? Atheists are delusional about him not existing. Yet, in the same breath claim aliens exist.
Or a martyr. The story embellished over time.
I just can’t believe the Greeks believed Paul but it really is the greatest story ever told.
The Jews were actually there and they supposedly saw it yet they are still Jews. Very few ancestors of Jesus actually converted to Christianity. It was whites and Greeks and Mexicans who swallow this story. But not the Jews who were there? Their ancestors don’t deny they crucified some guy name Jesus but they don’t corroborate the miracles.
Don’t you find that interesting?
Your mocking tone misses a lot of Jesus' non-fiction and historical story.
So let's get to your Paul statement. Paul was a person of talent. He wasn't an ordinary person, so he was able to do extraordinary things. However, he had his dark side. Paul's story is one of redemption in Jesus Christ and is a testimony that no one is beyond the saving grace of the Lord.
That’s all very nice but Paul never met Jesus.
. It was explained in the vid, Hollie ignoramus. Have you met Taz? He's one, too.That’s all very nice but Paul never met Jesus.
We have discovered you don't know and will not know -- an ignoramus
That you never watched a single second of and of which you could not summarize a single argument, if your life depended on it. Because this is what shameless little frauds like you do.It was explained in the vid
And Paul himself never wrote the works of Paul.That’s all very nice but Paul never met Jesus.
We have discovered you don't know and will not know -- an ignoramus
No reason to get angry and emotive. It’s just a fact that Paul never met Jesus and didn’t pen anything until long after the death of Jesus.
He, a guy named Jesus, may have been crucified and he may have been a prophet whatever that means.Notice how Bond the shameless charlatan liar freely and easily changes lanes from "it's faith!" to "it's based on evidence!". This lying moron has lied so much he doesn't even know what he thinks or has said.
Are you really going to try and prove Jesus didn't exist? Atheists are delusional about him not existing. Yet, in the same breath claim aliens exist.
Or a martyr. The story embellished over time.
I just can’t believe the Greeks believed Paul but it really is the greatest story ever told.
The Jews were actually there and they supposedly saw it yet they are still Jews. Very few ancestors of Jesus actually converted to Christianity. It was whites and Greeks and Mexicans who swallow this story. But not the Jews who were there? Their ancestors don’t deny they crucified some guy name Jesus but they don’t corroborate the miracles.
Don’t you find that interesting?
Your mocking tone misses a lot of Jesus' non-fiction and historical story.
So let's get to your Paul statement. Paul was a person of talent. He wasn't an ordinary person, so he was able to do extraordinary things. However, he had his dark side. Paul's story is one of redemption in Jesus Christ and is a testimony that no one is beyond the saving grace of the Lord.
That’s all very nice but Paul never met Jesus.
He, a guy named Jesus, may have been crucified and he may have been a prophet whatever that means.Notice how Bond the shameless charlatan liar freely and easily changes lanes from "it's faith!" to "it's based on evidence!". This lying moron has lied so much he doesn't even know what he thinks or has said.
Are you really going to try and prove Jesus didn't exist? Atheists are delusional about him not existing. Yet, in the same breath claim aliens exist.
Or a martyr. The story embellished over time.
I just can’t believe the Greeks believed Paul but it really is the greatest story ever told.
The Jews were actually there and they supposedly saw it yet they are still Jews. Very few ancestors of Jesus actually converted to Christianity. It was whites and Greeks and Mexicans who swallow this story. But not the Jews who were there? Their ancestors don’t deny they crucified some guy name Jesus but they don’t corroborate the miracles.
Don’t you find that interesting?
Your mocking tone misses a lot of Jesus' non-fiction and historical story.
So let's get to your Paul statement. Paul was a person of talent. He wasn't an ordinary person, so he was able to do extraordinary things. However, he had his dark side. Paul's story is one of redemption in Jesus Christ and is a testimony that no one is beyond the saving grace of the Lord.
That’s all very nice but Paul never met Jesus.
Is that true Paul isn’t one of jesus’ 12? Why are you saying he never met jesus?
Why are you saying he never met jesus?
Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
No, evolution can be seen on a scale of a couple of hundred years. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ago, they are all smaller than what we have now. meaning that humans are evolving to be taller beings.Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
I hope you see that without the millions of yrs evolution falls apart
No, evolution can be seen on a scale of a couple of hundred years. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ago, they are all smaller than what we have now. meaning that humans are evolving to be taller beings.Fossil grave yards don't require a global flood but that is a subject for another time.thats why I said on a small scale,,,and a global flood could be that larger scale and it would also explain a lot of other things like fossil grave yards
and the span of time is everything since the claim is millions of years and its also the basis for evolution theory,
going off your theory how long between those layers??? 5 minutes or 50 million yrs???
it does make a difference
they claim coal takes millions of yrs but we can do it in hours
If you want to attack the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection, then you are correct, time matters. The evolutionary theory I'm talking about, decent from a common ancestor, has numerous lines of evidence and time is not really one of them. The descent could have happened in 50 million years or in 5 minutes, that is irrelevant, the only relevant issue is did it occur or didn't it?
I hope you see that without the millions of yrs evolution falls apart
What I see is someone without a clue as what evolution is and, what is much worse, no desire to understand it. Thanks for your time, it's been fun in a sad kind of way.I hope you see that without the millions of yrs evolution falls apart
What has been the selection pressure to grow taller? I'm pretty sure our increased tallness is due to better childhood nutrition.No, evolution can be seen on a scale of a couple of hundred years. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ago, they are all smaller than what we have now. meaning that humans are evolving to be taller beings.
