Are Blacks More Racist Than Whites? Most Americans Say Yes

[PoliticalChic]

Do you have a list of laws negatively directed against black Americans?

You've had more than 24 hours and you've posted nothing.

Black Codes
Black Codes (United States) - Wikipedia

Black Codes in the antebellum South heavily regulated the activities and behavior of blacks. North Carolina restricted slaves from leaving their plantation; if one tried to court (date) a woman on another property, he risked severe punishments at the hands of the patrollers or needed a pass in order to pursue this relationship.[8] In many southern states, particularly after the insurrection of 1831, free Blacks were prohibited from the basic constitutional rights to assemble in groups, bear arms, learn to read and write, exercise free speech, or testify against white people in Court.[9][10][11][12] After 1810, states made manumissions of slaves more difficult to obtain, often requiring an act of legislature for each case. This sharply reduced the incidence of planters freeing slaves.[12]
[article]​

List of Jim Crow Laws Listed By State
List of Jim Crow law examples by state - Wikipedia

a few examples

Alabama

• "It shall be unlawfully to conduct a restaurant or other place for the serving of food in the city, at which white and colored people are served in the same room, unless such white and colored persons are effectually separated by a solid partition extending from the floor upward to a distance of seven feet or higher, and unless a separate entrance from the street is provided for each compartment."

Arizona
1864: Miscegenation [Statute] Marriages between whites with "Negroes, Indians, Mongolians" were declared illegal and void. The word "Descendants" does not appear in the statute.

California
An 1850 California statute provided that “no black, mulatto person, or Indian, shall be allowed to give evidence in favor of, or against a white man.” In 1854, the Supreme Court of California held that the statute precluded persons of Chinese descent from testifying for or against a white man. “It can hardly be supposed that any Legislature would . . exclud[e] domestic negroes and Indians, . . . and turn loose upon the community the more degraded tribes of the same species, who have nothing in common with us.”[5]

California's constitution stated that "no native of China" shall ever exercise the privileges of an elector in the state." Similar provisions appeared in the constitutions of Oregon and Idaho.
​

Soooo.....I've forced you to admit that there aren't any.


A good start.

 

[IM2]

Nice moving the goal posts. The claim was that whites did not want blacks to participate. That has been disproved.

You're confusing and conflating two different conversations. I was commenting on Taz whining about black people having their own organizations and events and then erroneously labeling the activities and organizations as racists. I then asked if certain white people did not want and would not allow black people access to their events then why....

And right there is where you keep going wrong.


You are ignoring that white people, have at great pain, long ago opened up their events and awards and ect, to black people.


Other than the elderly, today's whites grew up when this was already normal to them.

Newsvine is not wrong. You are. No one is ignoring anything except you.

The Oscars began in in 1929. Out of 3,072 Oscars handed out since 1929 31 have been awarded to blacks.

You have been asked 2 questions that you ha....

1929? Everyone involved in that Oscars is dead, and you want to discriminate against whites today, to balance that out.


And whites today, agree. Or at least our government does.


That is what AA is.



We need to stop that shit.

From 1929 until now. You'll celebrate anything and everything from hundreds of years ago but come up with these sad sack excuses to anything that shows how racist whites have been. You don't get to do that. Whites shouldn't have done what they did. You being butthurt and not wanting to see it doesn't matter.

 

[IM2]

Do you have a list of laws negatively directed against black Americans?

You've had more than 24 hours and you've posted nothing.

Black Codes
Black Codes (United States) - Wikipedia

Black Codes in the antebellum South heavily regulated the activities and behavior of blacks. North Carolina restricted slaves from leaving their plantation; if one tried to court (date) a woman on another property, he risked severe punishments at the hands of the patrollers or needed a pass in order to pursue this relationship.[8] In many southern states, particularly after the insurrection of 1831, free Blacks were prohibited from the basic constitutional rights to assemble in groups, bear arms, learn to read and write, exercise free speech, or testify against white people in Court.[9][10][11][12] After 1810, states made manumissions of slaves more difficult to obtain, often requiring an act of legislature for each case. This sharply reduced the incidence of planters freeing slaves.[12]
[article]​

List of Jim Crow Laws Listed By State
List of Jim Crow law examples by state - Wikipedia

a few examples

Alabama

• "It shall be unlawfully to conduct a restaurant or other place for the serving of food in the city, at which white and colored people are served in the same room, unless such white and colored persons are effectually separated by a solid partition extending from the floor upward to a distance of seven feet or higher, and unless a separate entrance from the street is provided for each compartment."

Arizona
1864: Miscegenation [Statute] Marriages between whites with "Negroes, Indians, Mongolians" were declared illegal and void. The word "Descendants" does not appear in the statute.

California
An 1850 California statute provided that “no black, mulatto person, or Indian, shall be allowed to give evidence in favor of, or against a white man.” In 1854, the Supreme Court of California held that the statute precluded persons of Chinese descent from testifying for or against a white man. “It can hardly be supposed that any Legislature would . . exclud[e] domestic negroes and Indians, . . . and turn loose upon the community the more degraded tribes of the same species, who have nothing in common with us.”[5]

California's constitution stated that "no native of China" shall ever exercise the privileges of an elector in the state." Similar provisions appeared in the constitutions of Oregon and Idaho.
​

Soooo.....I've forced you to admit that there aren't any.


A good start.

Except NewsVine did show you.

 

[IM2]

Did it ever occur to you that the best of Candidate Pool B far exceeds the worse of Candidate Pool A?
This is a very interesting case but it is not a case where "unqualified" black people took jobs from "qualified" white people. No black people were hired/promoted so no white people were displaced except for the 6 which were unable to qualify for promotion.

I'm starting to remember a little bit more about this case and there were issues with the exam that was used to qualify the firefighters for promotion - part was subjective while the other part was objective. Additionally if I recall correctly some of the white fire fighters had access to materials that appeared on the test so that they could specifically prepare for it which of course allows one to score higher, but I'll have to revisit this later.

There were no issues with the exam.


The black people were not promoted because the white people took action when their civil rights were violated.

The City did discriminate against the white people, because it wanted to promote black people, based on skin color, not merit.

Their stated reason was fear of being sued, under "Disparate Impact Theory".

Whites have never ad their civil rights violated, I have to laugh at the fake indignation of punk ass racist whites talking about somebody getting something based on skin color.

YOu utterly failed to address the example provided.

Which demonstrate that whites are discriminated against when AA and associated programs/laws/ect, are used to favor blacks.


That is the nature of discrimination. You discriminate in favor of some one at the expense of someone else.


Only a liar or a fool would claim to not understand that.

It's funny how you racists see things. You want return to a system hat provided favor to whites which excluded everyone else and you a here talking about discrimination. You're a joke.

I've never said anything about returning to a system of pro white discrimination.


That was the voices in your head. I am not responsible for what they say.

That's exactly what you support when you want to end AA. Because that's what AA was made to stop. And if not for AA we'd still be in a system where only whites got all the jobs, all the admissions, all the contracts and all the promotions with no consideration of merit.

 

[mudwhistle]

You must be one of those folks that thinks Civil Rights only apply to blacks.

Well you obviously know nothing about me if you believe this to be true.

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you have a list of laws negatively directed against black Americans?

You've had more than 24 hours and you've posted nothing.

Black Codes
Black Codes (United States) - Wikipedia

Black Codes in the antebellum South heavily regulated the activities and behavior of blacks. North Carolina restricted slaves from leaving their plantation; if one tried to court (date) a woman on another property, he risked severe punishments at the hands of the patrollers or needed a pass in order to pursue this relationship.[8] In many southern states, particularly after the insurrection of 1831, free Blacks were prohibited from the basic constitutional rights to assemble in groups, bear arms, learn to read and write, exercise free speech, or testify against white people in Court.[9][10][11][12] After 1810, states made manumissions of slaves more difficult to obtain, often requiring an act of legislature for each case. This sharply reduced the incidence of planters freeing slaves.[12]
[article]​

List of Jim Crow Laws Listed By State
List of Jim Crow law examples by state - Wikipedia

a few examples

Alabama

• "It shall be unlawfully to conduct a restaurant or other place for the serving of food in the city, at which white and colored people are served in the same room, unless such white and colored persons are effectually separated by a solid partition extending from the floor upward to a distance of seven feet or higher, and unless a separate entrance from the street is provided for each compartment."

Arizona
1864: Miscegenation [Statute] Marriages between whites with "Negroes, Indians, Mongolians" were declared illegal and void. The word "Descendants" does not appear in the statute.

California
An 1850 California statute provided that “no black, mulatto person, or Indian, shall be allowed to give evidence in favor of, or against a white man.” In 1854, the Supreme Court of California held that the statute precluded persons of Chinese descent from testifying for or against a white man. “It can hardly be supposed that any Legislature would . . exclud[e] domestic negroes and Indians, . . . and turn loose upon the community the more degraded tribes of the same species, who have nothing in common with us.”[5]

California's constitution stated that "no native of China" shall ever exercise the privileges of an elector in the state." Similar provisions appeared in the constitutions of Oregon and Idaho.
​

Soooo.....I've forced you to admit that there aren't any.


A good start.

Except NewsVine did show you.

Which apply to you....or her?


None?


I win again.

 

[mudwhistle]

Quick question: if you're so unhappy here, why not go back to Africa?

Name me a grain of sand or molecule of air on this planet that is not dominated by white supremacy ?

Saudi Arabia. Most of Africa. In the US....most shithole cities are run by Democrats. Philly is mostly run by blacks and so is Detroit. Then there's the state of California.
You would be surprise.
I think you just feel all of the screwed up policies that never work are the fault of white people, but instead what they really are is screwed up liberal policies.

Conservative policies caused one depression and sent us to the brink of a second one. As an entire nation. Done by Republicans who were white.

No conservative policy led to the Depression. Economic policies similar to those Obama instituted led to the Depression. A shortage of cash flow along with a lack of consumer confidence led to the Depression. The Dust Bowl and Socialist policies under FDR made the Depression worse and last longer.

The "Dust Bowl" was a result of a drought that forced many farmers into losing their farms and left witb no ability to pay their debts.

Economic policies with Europe contributed as well.

The stock market collapse further attributed to the depression as the dollar devaluated, but was not the only cause.

Furthermore, the Republicans controlled Congress through 1928.

Within a year the Depression ensued.

When FDR took office, he focused on revitalizing the banking system, enabling consumer deposits to be guaranteed. What "socialist policies" of his prolonged the depression?

He salvaged a mess that was left behind him.

Proving that in a deregulated environment, recklessness and corruption thrives and ultimately leads to dire circumstances.

When Obama took office after Bush, the economy was on the brink of collapsing yet again.

Roosevelt and how he brought us out of the depression of the 1930s

As you pointed out there was plenty of reasons for the Great Depression......yet you blame it all on the GOP.
And the supposed depression in 2007-08 was merely a recession which was caused intentionally by Democrats in congress with the help of a bunch of their billionaire hedgefunder friends like George Soros.

 

[T.E.C. - Iowa]

This is one of the first subjects I talked about when I started posting on message boards. Are Blacks on average more racist than whites?
I've always believed that they are. Something that I discovered growing up was that almost every black in America thinks about race every day, whereas most whites don't. There's a reason for this, but this simple fact is being used by the left to divide America.

A Rassmussen survey asked the question 5 years ago, and my guess is it would be even worse today.

Wednesday, July 03, 2013

Americans consider blacks more likely to be racist than whites and Hispanics in this country.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American Adults think most black Americans are racist, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 15% consider most white Americans racist, while 18% say the same of most Hispanic Americans. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

There is a huge ideological difference on this topic. Among conservative Americans, 49% consider most blacks racist, and only 12% see most whites that way. Among liberal voters, 27% see most white Americans as racist, and 21% say the same about black Americans.

From a partisan perspective, 49% of Republicans see most black Americans as racist, along with 36% of unaffiliated adults and 29% of Democrats.

Among black Americans, 31% think most blacks are racist, while 24% consider most whites racist and 15% view most Hispanics that way.

Among white adults, 10% think most white Americans are racist; 38% believe most blacks are racist, and 17% say most Hispanics are racist.

Overall, just 30% of all Americans now rate race relations in the United States as good or excellent. Fourteen percent (14%) describe them as poor. Twenty-nine percent (29%) think race relations are getting better, while 32% believe they are getting worse. Thirty-five percent (35%) feel they are staying about the same.

These figures reflect more pessimism than was found in April when 42% gave race relations positive marks and 39% said race relations were improving. However, the April number reflected all-time highs while the current numbers are more consistent with the general attitudes of recent years.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted on July 1-2, 2013 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

------------------

Blacks are slightly more optimistic about the current state of race relations in American than whites and Hispanics are. But 37% of blacks and 38% of Hispanics believe those relations are getting worse, compared to 29% of whites.​

Links

Questions - Racism - July 1-2, 2013 - Rasmussen Reports®

More Americans View Blacks As Racist Than Whites, Hispanics - Rasmussen Reports®​

The question, "Are Blacks More Racist Than Whites?" is an interesting question, but I would like to offer a different perspective.

Capitalism creates three classes of people the rich, the favored poor, and the unfavored poor. The rich then create tension and divisiveness between the favored poor and the unfavored poor. In this case, race is simply a convenient way to form an unfavored group - although in the past the rich have used religion (e.g. catholic or Muslim), ethnic heritage (e.g. Irish), or any other distinction that is convenient.

The above question may be reframed as "Do the unfavored poor in America have more resentment and distain for the favored poor? Or alternately, does the psuedo-arrogance of the favored poor do more damage to those designated as an unfavored minority?"

In the end, the rich do not care! They just want the divisiveness, so that they are free to take more of everything!

 

[Correll]

Blacks participating.


Disproving the nonsense that they are not.



Or that whites don't want them too.

It proves nothing. Now try comparing that to the number of whites holding the same award then get back with mw.

Nice moving the goal posts. The claim was that whites did not want blacks to participate. That has been disproved.


Deal with it.

5 blacks in the entire history of the movie industry doesn't prove anything son.

Again, with the "entire history".


You want to look at "the entire history" so that you get to judge current whites based on the actions of long dead people.

The entire history ls the truth.

Never said it wasn't.


What I said was that you want to judge current whites on the actions of long dead whites.


You are arguing against the idea that the Oscars TODAY are inclusive, based on numbers that include awards given decades before any of the current judges were born.


That is completely unfair to the current Oscar organization, and deeply racist of you, to boot.

 

[Correll]

Nice moving the goal posts. The claim was that whites did not want blacks to participate. That has been disproved.

You're confusing and conflating two different conversations. I was commenting on Taz whining about black people having their own organizations and events and then erroneously labeling the activities and organizations as racists. I then asked if certain white people did not want and would not allow black people access to their events then why....

And right there is where you keep going wrong.


You are ignoring that white people, have at great pain, long ago opened up their events and awards and ect, to black people.


Other than the elderly, today's whites grew up when this was already normal to them.

Newsvine is not wrong. You are. No one is ignoring anything except you.

The Oscars began in in 1929. Out of 3,072 Oscars handed out since 1929 31 have been awarded to blacks.

You have been asked 2 questions that you ha....

1929? Everyone involved in that Oscars is dead, and you want to discriminate against whites today, to balance that out.


And whites today, agree. Or at least our government does.


That is what AA is.



We need to stop that shit.

From 1929 until now. You'll celebrate anything and everything from hundreds of years ago but come up with these sad sack excuses to anything that shows how racist whites have been. You don't get to do that. Whites shouldn't have done what they did. You being butthurt and not wanting to see it doesn't matter.

I will celebrate events and actions from the past.


But I will not use those events nor celebrations as an excuse to punish current people.


I am proud that my father served in WWII.


But I do not judge modern Japan as though they are Imperial Japan of the 1940s.


That would be an act of a racist asshole.

 

[Correll]

There were no issues with the exam.


The black people were not promoted because the white people took action when their civil rights were violated.

The City did discriminate against the white people, because it wanted to promote black people, based on skin color, not merit.

Their stated reason was fear of being sued, under "Disparate Impact Theory".

Whites have never ad their civil rights violated, I have to laugh at the fake indignation of punk ass racist whites talking about somebody getting something based on skin color.

YOu utterly failed to address the example provided.

Which demonstrate that whites are discriminated against when AA and associated programs/laws/ect, are used to favor blacks.


That is the nature of discrimination. You discriminate in favor of some one at the expense of someone else.


Only a liar or a fool would claim to not understand that.

It's funny how you racists see things. You want return to a system hat provided favor to whites which excluded everyone else and you a here talking about discrimination. You're a joke.

I've never said anything about returning to a system of pro white discrimination.


That was the voices in your head. I am not responsible for what they say.

That's exactly what you support when you want to end AA. Because that's what AA was made to stop. And if not for AA we'd still be in a system where only whites got all the jobs, all the admissions, all the contracts and all the promotions with no consideration of merit.

Your pretense that the whites of today, are the same as the whites of the 1950s, in noted and dismissed. As stupid. And a lie.


That is just your bullshit excuse for defending pro-black discrimination.

 

[IM2]

You're confusing and conflating two different conversations. I was commenting on Taz whining about black people having their own organizations and events and then erroneously labeling the activities and organizations as racists. I then asked if certain white people did not want and would not allow black people access to their events then why....

And right there is where you keep going wrong.


You are ignoring that white people, have at great pain, long ago opened up their events and awards and ect, to black people.


Other than the elderly, today's whites grew up when this was already normal to them.

Newsvine is not wrong. You are. No one is ignoring anything except you.

The Oscars began in in 1929. Out of 3,072 Oscars handed out since 1929 31 have been awarded to blacks.

You have been asked 2 questions that you ha....

1929? Everyone involved in that Oscars is dead, and you want to discriminate against whites today, to balance that out.


And whites today, agree. Or at least our government does.


That is what AA is.



We need to stop that shit.

From 1929 until now. You'll celebrate anything and everything from hundreds of years ago but come up with these sad sack excuses to anything that shows how racist whites have been. You don't get to do that. Whites shouldn't have done what they did. You being butthurt and not wanting to see it doesn't matter.

I will celebrate events and actions from the past.


But I will not use those events nor celebrations as an excuse to punish current people.


I am proud that my father served in WWII.


But I do not judge modern Japan as though they are Imperial Japan of the 1940s.


That would be an act of a racist asshole.

Excuses. The problem is not about people from the past, that's the excuse those like you use to avoid that we are talking about people like you who have the same attitudes whites had in 1818 and 1918.

 

[IM2]

Whites have never ad their civil rights violated, I have to laugh at the fake indignation of punk ass racist whites talking about somebody getting something based on skin color.

YOu utterly failed to address the example provided.

Which demonstrate that whites are discriminated against when AA and associated programs/laws/ect, are used to favor blacks.


That is the nature of discrimination. You discriminate in favor of some one at the expense of someone else.


Only a liar or a fool would claim to not understand that.

It's funny how you racists see things. You want return to a system hat provided favor to whites which excluded everyone else and you a here talking about discrimination. You're a joke.

I've never said anything about returning to a system of pro white discrimination.


That was the voices in your head. I am not responsible for what they say.

That's exactly what you support when you want to end AA. Because that's what AA was made to stop. And if not for AA we'd still be in a system where only whites got all the jobs, all the admissions, all the contracts and all the promotions with no consideration of merit.

Your pretense that the whites of today, are the same as the whites of the 1950s, in noted and dismissed. As stupid. And a lie.


That is just your bullshit excuse for defending pro-black discrimination.

It's no pretense. All I have to do is read the posts here at USMB, There is no pro black discrimination.

 

[Correll]

And right there is where you keep going wrong.


You are ignoring that white people, have at great pain, long ago opened up their events and awards and ect, to black people.


Other than the elderly, today's whites grew up when this was already normal to them.

Newsvine is not wrong. You are. No one is ignoring anything except you.

The Oscars began in in 1929. Out of 3,072 Oscars handed out since 1929 31 have been awarded to blacks.

You have been asked 2 questions that you ha....

1929? Everyone involved in that Oscars is dead, and you want to discriminate against whites today, to balance that out.


And whites today, agree. Or at least our government does.


That is what AA is.



We need to stop that shit.

From 1929 until now. You'll celebrate anything and everything from hundreds of years ago but come up with these sad sack excuses to anything that shows how racist whites have been. You don't get to do that. Whites shouldn't have done what they did. You being butthurt and not wanting to see it doesn't matter.

I will celebrate events and actions from the past.


But I will not use those events nor celebrations as an excuse to punish current people.


I am proud that my father served in WWII.


But I do not judge modern Japan as though they are Imperial Japan of the 1940s.


That would be an act of a racist asshole.

Excuses. The problem is not about people from the past, that's the excuse those like you use to avoid that we are talking about people like you who have the same attitudes whites had in 1818 and 1918.

LOL!!!

Hollywood is full of whites that have the same attitudes whites had in 1818!!???


YOU LIBS SEEING THIS SHIT?!


This is what your future is.



You will be the best little lefty you can, and you will be judged based on your skin color.


The mob will never be sated.

 

[Correll]

YOu utterly failed to address the example provided.

Which demonstrate that whites are discriminated against when AA and associated programs/laws/ect, are used to favor blacks.


That is the nature of discrimination. You discriminate in favor of some one at the expense of someone else.


Only a liar or a fool would claim to not understand that.

It's funny how you racists see things. You want return to a system hat provided favor to whites which excluded everyone else and you a here talking about discrimination. You're a joke.

I've never said anything about returning to a system of pro white discrimination.


That was the voices in your head. I am not responsible for what they say.

That's exactly what you support when you want to end AA. Because that's what AA was made to stop. And if not for AA we'd still be in a system where only whites got all the jobs, all the admissions, all the contracts and all the promotions with no consideration of merit.

Your pretense that the whites of today, are the same as the whites of the 1950s, in noted and dismissed. As stupid. And a lie.


That is just your bullshit excuse for defending pro-black discrimination.

It's no pretense. All I have to do is read the posts here at USMB, There is no pro black discrimination.

You lie. YOu have had links and excerpts repeated presented to you proving widespread and massive pro black discrimination.


You are a liar and a racist.

 

[IM2]

It proves nothing. Now try comparing that to the number of whites holding the same award then get back with mw.

Nice moving the goal posts. The claim was that whites did not want blacks to participate. That has been disproved.


Deal with it.

5 blacks in the entire history of the movie industry doesn't prove anything son.

Again, with the "entire history".


You want to look at "the entire history" so that you get to judge current whites based on the actions of long dead people.

The entire history ls the truth.

Never said it wasn't.


What I said was that you want to judge current whites on the actions of long dead whites.


You are arguing against the idea that the Oscars TODAY are inclusive, based on numbers that include awards given decades before any of the current judges were born.


That is completely unfair to the current Oscar organization, and deeply racist of you, to boot.

Not according to some of the people in the industry who are white.



I am judging whites today on what they do today. I read the posts here, you guys are racists.

You talk a lot of crap, but you are unable to produce this:

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you’ve addressed the end of anti-Black racism you’ll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.

 

[IM2]

Newsvine is not wrong. You are. No one is ignoring anything except you.

The Oscars began in in 1929. Out of 3,072 Oscars handed out since 1929 31 have been awarded to blacks.

You have been asked 2 questions that you ha....

1929? Everyone involved in that Oscars is dead, and you want to discriminate against whites today, to balance that out.


And whites today, agree. Or at least our government does.


That is what AA is.



We need to stop that shit.

From 1929 until now. You'll celebrate anything and everything from hundreds of years ago but come up with these sad sack excuses to anything that shows how racist whites have been. You don't get to do that. Whites shouldn't have done what they did. You being butthurt and not wanting to see it doesn't matter.

I will celebrate events and actions from the past.


But I will not use those events nor celebrations as an excuse to punish current people.


I am proud that my father served in WWII.


But I do not judge modern Japan as though they are Imperial Japan of the 1940s.


That would be an act of a racist asshole.

Excuses. The problem is not about people from the past, that's the excuse those like you use to avoid that we are talking about people like you who have the same attitudes whites had in 1818 and 1918.

LOL!!!

Hollywood is full of whites that have the same attitudes whites had in 1818!!???


YOU LIBS SEEING THIS SHIT?!


This is what your future is.



You will be the best little lefty you can, and you will be judged based on your skin color.


The mob will never be sated.

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you’ve addressed the end of anti-Black racism you’ll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.

 

[IM2]

It's funny how you racists see things. You want return to a system hat provided favor to whites which excluded everyone else and you a here talking about discrimination. You're a joke.

I've never said anything about returning to a system of pro white discrimination.


That was the voices in your head. I am not responsible for what they say.

That's exactly what you support when you want to end AA. Because that's what AA was made to stop. And if not for AA we'd still be in a system where only whites got all the jobs, all the admissions, all the contracts and all the promotions with no consideration of merit.

Your pretense that the whites of today, are the same as the whites of the 1950s, in noted and dismissed. As stupid. And a lie.


That is just your bullshit excuse for defending pro-black discrimination.

It's no pretense. All I have to do is read the posts here at USMB, There is no pro black discrimination.

You lie. YOu have had links and excerpts repeated presented to you proving widespread and massive pro black discrimination.


You are a liar and a racist.

There is no pro black discrimination. There have been no such examples.

What Is "Reverse Racism"? Here's Why It Doesn't Actually Exist in the United States

The questions have come up before: Why isn't there a White History Month? Why isn't there a network for White Entertainment Television, like BET? Black Girls Rock? What about White Girls Rock? What about the critically acclaimed Broadway play Hamilton's call for nonwhite actors?

Clearly, these few examples demonstrate "reverse racism," or the discrimination against members of a dominant racial group. Right?

Not quite.

Source: Julia Craven

"Things like BET, Black Girls Rock or Black History Month are not reverse racist against white people," Zeba Blay, a Huffington Post Black Voices writer, illustrates in a video. "Because remember, in a society where white is seen as the default race, all history is white history. But racism isn't just someone feeling superior to another race and then discriminating against them."

Racism and prejudice aren't quite the same thing. Racism, rather, is best known as a system in which a racial majority is able to enforce its power and privilege over another race through political, economic and institutional means. Therefore racism can be described as "prejudice plus power," as the two work together to create the system of inequality.

More.

But in reality, the United States has a long legacy of racism that makes it difficult for people of color to receive quality health care, access affordable housing, find stable employment and avoid getting wrapped up in the justice system. These examples of institutionalized racism don't quite match with the examples of reverse racism, such as "Why don't WE have a White History Month?"

"There has never, ever, ever been a national set of laws or system put in place to systematically oppress white people or push them to a status that is 'less than,'" senior editor Alexia LaFata wrote for Elite Daily. "Not once. Ever. So 'reverse racism' can truly never exist."

What Is "Reverse Racism"? Here's Why It Doesn't Actually Exist in the United States

So just be quiet and:

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you’ve addressed the end of anti-Black racism you’ll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.

 

[IM2]

This is one of the first subjects I talked about when I started posting on message boards. Are Blacks on average more racist than whites?
I've always believed that they are. Something that I discovered growing up was that almost every black in America thinks about race every day, whereas most whites don't. There's a reason for this, but this simple fact is being used by the left to divide America.

A Rassmussen survey asked the question 5 years ago, and my guess is it would be even worse today.

Wednesday, July 03, 2013

Americans consider blacks more likely to be racist than whites and Hispanics in this country.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American Adults think most black Americans are racist, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 15% consider most white Americans racist, while 18% say the same of most Hispanic Americans. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

There is a huge ideological difference on this topic. Among conservative Americans, 49% consider most blacks racist, and only 12% see most whites that way. Among liberal voters, 27% see most white Americans as racist, and 21% say the same about black Americans.

From a partisan perspective, 49% of Republicans see most black Americans as racist, along with 36% of unaffiliated adults and 29% of Democrats.

Among black Americans, 31% think most blacks are racist, while 24% consider most whites racist and 15% view most Hispanics that way.

Among white adults, 10% think most white Americans are racist; 38% believe most blacks are racist, and 17% say most Hispanics are racist.

Overall, just 30% of all Americans now rate race relations in the United States as good or excellent. Fourteen percent (14%) describe them as poor. Twenty-nine percent (29%) think race relations are getting better, while 32% believe they are getting worse. Thirty-five percent (35%) feel they are staying about the same.

These figures reflect more pessimism than was found in April when 42% gave race relations positive marks and 39% said race relations were improving. However, the April number reflected all-time highs while the current numbers are more consistent with the general attitudes of recent years.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted on July 1-2, 2013 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

------------------

Blacks are slightly more optimistic about the current state of race relations in American than whites and Hispanics are. But 37% of blacks and 38% of Hispanics believe those relations are getting worse, compared to 29% of whites.​

Links

Questions - Racism - July 1-2, 2013 - Rasmussen Reports®

More Americans View Blacks As Racist Than Whites, Hispanics - Rasmussen Reports®​

The question, "Are Blacks More Racist Than Whites?" is an interesting question, but I would like to offer a different perspective.

Capitalism creates three classes of people the rich, the favored poor, and the unfavored poor. The rich then create tension and divisiveness between the favored poor and the unfavored poor. In this case, race is simply a convenient way to form an unfavored group - although in the past the rich have used religion (e.g. catholic or Muslim), ethnic heritage (e.g. Irish), or any other distinction that is convenient.

The above question may be reframed as "Do the unfavored poor in America have more resentment and distain for the favored poor? Or alternately, does the psuedo-arrogance of the favored poor do more damage to those designated as an unfavored minority?"

In the end, the rich do not care! They just want the divisiveness, so that they are free to take more of everything!

Race was used even when America was a British colony. Other than that I agree with what you say here.

 

[katsteve2012]

Name me a grain of sand or molecule of air on this planet that is not dominated by white supremacy ?

Saudi Arabia. Most of Africa. In the US....most shithole cities are run by Democrats. Philly is mostly run by blacks and so is Detroit. Then there's the state of California.
You would be surprise.
I think you just feel all of the screwed up policies that never work are the fault of white people, but instead what they really are is screwed up liberal policies.

Conservative policies caused one depression and sent us to the brink of a second one. As an entire nation. Done by Republicans who were white.

No conservative policy led to the Depression. Economic policies similar to those Obama instituted led to the Depression. A shortage of cash flow along with a lack of consumer confidence led to the Depression. The Dust Bowl and Socialist policies under FDR made the Depression worse and last longer.

The "Dust Bowl" was a result of a drought that forced many farmers into losing their farms and left witb no ability to pay their debts.

Economic policies with Europe contributed as well.

The stock market collapse further attributed to the depression as the dollar devaluated, but was not the only cause.

Furthermore, the Republicans controlled Congress through 1928.

Within a year the Depression ensued.

When FDR took office, he focused on revitalizing the banking system, enabling consumer deposits to be guaranteed. What "socialist policies" of his prolonged the depression?

He salvaged a mess that was left behind him.

Proving that in a deregulated environment, recklessness and corruption thrives and ultimately leads to dire circumstances.

When Obama took office after Bush, the economy was on the brink of collapsing yet again.

Roosevelt and how he brought us out of the depression of the 1930s

As you pointed out there was plenty of reasons for the Great Depression......yet you blame it all on the GOP.
And the supposed depression in 2007-08 was merely a recession which was caused intentionally by Democrats in congress with the help of a bunch of their billionaire hedgefunder friends like George Soros.

I did not "blame it all on the GOP". I stated the FACT that republicans were in power at the time that the Depression began.

And a democratic president led the country out of it.

So what policies passed by democrats caused the Depression, as you stated?