Are GOPers and righwtingers really conservatives?

[sangha]

I never copy and paste without a link.

And you never post substance without a cut and paste

And you never post substance.

CG posts "I know you are but what am I?" to prove that she does post substance

 

[California Girl]

And you never post substance without a cut and paste

And you never post substance.

CG posts "I know you are but what am I?" to prove that she does post substance

I don't need to prove anything. Your opinion of me is inconsequential. In fact, I am quite happy that you find no substance in what I say. If you agreed with me, I'd worry. You're an idiot. You agree with stupid. I'm not stupid. Ergo, you will not agree with me.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Harry is full of shit. In other threads, Harry will say that *I'm* the worst of the lefties, and now he wants to WHINE about how Marc isn't calling out lefties (as if Harry calls out the righties)

...you show me a post were i said you were the Worst of the Lefties.....Dean has that title hands down.....two of your Ballsacks could not fill Deans Jock....your a Dean wannabe.....a piss poor pretender at best....when guys like you stand before Dean you have to Avert your eyes.....dont EVEN think you are in the same league with Dean.....your pretty far Left....but your King Dean is the Master of that Domain....your just a Serf in that Kingdom ...........

 

[MarcATL]

Also, I openly disagree with many of my fellow Lefties on religion and on matters of homosexuality. However, I don't get attacked or "bitched it" by my fellow Lefties for any particular subject, because we do not operate that way. We realize that we're all individuals with common goals and aspirations and that its OK to disagree with on another from time to time.

The fact that your fellow Righties feel the need to "bitch at you" whenever you divulge from the day's talking point, to me, speaks volumes about that side of the fence.

the thing that gets me Marc is when a Jerk like Dean will throw a blanket over ALL Conservatives/Republicans only a few on the left call him on it....like Ez or Sallow....the rest of you guys say he is way to Left and kinda out of there but never tell him that.....you just let him talk dis-honest Bullshit......and as far as im concerned he is the worst of the lefties here.....Pubis In. and Namvet were the worst on the Right....this guy named Revere seems to be taking their spots.....

Fair enough, let's do this. Going forward you point out when you see it going on. There's no feasible or logical way to backtrack and check who did what and when. However, going forward we can point it out as it goes on.

When you see some "Far Radical Left Wing" posting going on and me supporting it and perhaps say, bashing a rightie for their RW radical extremism while giving a pass to my fellow Leftie's radical positions, please point it out and we'll go from there.

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

For instance, I'll ask a question in a thread or OP like "Should We Start Testing People's Mental Capacity Before Allowing Them To Own Guns"

And IMMEDIATELY some Far RW radical extremist will chime in something like, "NO! We don't believe in abolishing the 2nd amendment!"

It's like that BS question..."Did you stop beating your wife?" No answer is good, because its based on a false premise...then they argue from their false premise onward, not what we said, but what they want us to have said, or believe we have said for those that are slightly more honest in their debates.

Will you call that out when you see it too?

 

[sangha]

And you never post substance.

CG posts "I know you are but what am I?" to prove that she does post substance

I don't need to prove anything. Your opinion of me is inconsequential. In fact, I am quite happy that you find no substance in what I say. If you agreed with me, I'd worry. You're an idiot. You agree with stupid. I'm not stupid. Ergo, you will not agree with me.

More "substance" from CG

CG is filled with "substance"

 

[California Girl]

Also, I openly disagree with many of my fellow Lefties on religion and on matters of homosexuality. However, I don't get attacked or "bitched it" by my fellow Lefties for any particular subject, because we do not operate that way. We realize that we're all individuals with common goals and aspirations and that its OK to disagree with on another from time to time.

The fact that your fellow Righties feel the need to "bitch at you" whenever you divulge from the day's talking point, to me, speaks volumes about that side of the fence.

the thing that gets me Marc is when a Jerk like Dean will throw a blanket over ALL Conservatives/Republicans only a few on the left call him on it....like Ez or Sallow....the rest of you guys say he is way to Left and kinda out of there but never tell him that.....you just let him talk dis-honest Bullshit......and as far as im concerned he is the worst of the lefties here.....Pubis In. and Namvet were the worst on the Right....this guy named Revere seems to be taking their spots.....

Fair enough, let's do this. Going forward you point out when you see it going on. There's no feasible or logical way to backtrack and check who did what and when. However, going forward we can point it out as it goes on.

When you see some "Far Radical Left Wing" posting going on and me supporting it and perhaps say, bashing a rightie for their RW radical extremism while giving a pass to my fellow Leftie's radical positions, please point it out and we'll go from there.

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

For instance, I'll ask a question in a thread or OP like "Should We Start Testing People's Mental Capacity Before Allowing Them To Own Guns"

And IMMEDIATELY some Far RW radical extremist will chime in something like, "NO! We don't believe in abolishing the 2nd amendment!"

It's like that BS question..."Did you stop beating your wife?" No answer is good, because its based on a false premise...then they argue from their false premise onward, not what we said, but what they want us to have said, or believe we have said for those that are slightly more honest in their debates.

Will you call that out when you see it too?

Lead by example, Marc. Stop thanking people who name call and pretend you have the moral highground.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

thats the 257th time that you've used the f-word CG, I've been keeping track and you know what I said was right, I haven't seen you take on the right, you're hiding something CG, but at least you have courage, unlike that bootlicking coward sodomite Oddball, who refuses to state his positions.

holy shit
obsess much?

Isn't it interesting how many people who disagree with me are, at the same time, totally obsessed with me!

Yay!

Pointing out that you have the biggest pottymouth in USMB isn't being obsessed with you, its just a small flaw, I haven't said a cuss word in almost 13 years, you're worst that AGayBikerfailure.

 

[Ravi]

I have been attacked for not truly being a real "conservative" because I don't ride the bandwagon of the far right and the GOP who like to pretend they're conservatives yet they are not true conservatives themselves. True conservatives believe in lower taxes and smaller government that ultimately benefits *ALL* people not just the rich so when GOP Republitards ask for lower taxes and advocate supply side voodoo trickle down economics they're going against what real conservatives stand for. The best example of a true conservative is Colin Powell, someone who didn't mind giving more to all people and not just the rich and elite that fake conservative GOP Republitards stand for.

No, the GOP is basically made up of social conservatives and disgruntled and bitter objectivists.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

That's fucking bullshit. And you make yourself look stupid.

thats the 257th time that you've used the f-word CG, I've been keeping track and you know what I said was right, I haven't seen you take on the right, you're hiding something CG, but at least you have courage, unlike that bootlicking coward sodomite Oddball, who refuses to state his positions.

Just because you have not seen something does not mean it does not exist, Charlie. So fuck you, mmmmk?

Whats with you and those f-bombs CG? The f-word really annoys the hell out of me because its very disrespectful, have I ever cussed at you like that? Please refrain from using profanity at me.

 

[sangha]

Also, I openly disagree with many of my fellow Lefties on religion and on matters of homosexuality. However, I don't get attacked or "bitched it" by my fellow Lefties for any particular subject, because we do not operate that way. We realize that we're all individuals with common goals and aspirations and that its OK to disagree with on another from time to time.

The fact that your fellow Righties feel the need to "bitch at you" whenever you divulge from the day's talking point, to me, speaks volumes about that side of the fence.

the thing that gets me Marc is when a Jerk like Dean will throw a blanket over ALL Conservatives/Republicans only a few on the left call him on it....like Ez or Sallow....the rest of you guys say he is way to Left and kinda out of there but never tell him that.....you just let him talk dis-honest Bullshit......and as far as im concerned he is the worst of the lefties here.....Pubis In. and Namvet were the worst on the Right....this guy named Revere seems to be taking their spots.....

Fair enough, let's do this. Going forward you point out when you see it going on. There's no feasible or logical way to backtrack and check who did what and when. However, going forward we can point it out as it goes on.

When you see some "Far Radical Left Wing" posting going on and me supporting it and perhaps say, bashing a rightie for their RW radical extremism while giving a pass to my fellow Leftie's radical positions, please point it out and we'll go from there.

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

For instance, I'll ask a question in a thread or OP like "Should We Start Testing People's Mental Capacity Before Allowing Them To Own Guns"

And IMMEDIATELY some Far RW radical extremist will chime in something like, "NO! We don't believe in abolishing the 2nd amendment!"

It's like that BS question..."Did you stop beating your wife?" No answer is good, because its based on a false premise...then they argue from their false premise onward, not what we said, but what they want us to have said, or believe we have said for those that are slightly more honest in their debates.

Will you call that out when you see it too?

He's already failed to do that in this thread. I already posted a few for Harry to comment on, and like a True Wingnut, Harry said nothing.

 

[sangha]

thats the 257th time that you've used the f-word CG, I've been keeping track and you know what I said was right, I haven't seen you take on the right, you're hiding something CG, but at least you have courage, unlike that bootlicking coward sodomite Oddball, who refuses to state his positions.

Just because you have not seen something does not mean it does not exist, Charlie. So fuck you, mmmmk?

Whats with you and those f-bombs CG? The f-word really annoys the hell out of me because its very disrespectful, have I ever cussed at you like that? Please refrain from using profanity at me.

Cut her a break. Cursing is all she has

 

[Oddball]

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

Probably because the vast bulk of your beliefs are based in false premises, such as the completely arrogant notion that people --well, those beside arrogant socialist elites-- are too stupid, selfish and/or (your favorite human failing here) to be able to live their own lives, raise their own children, run their businesses, feed themselves, know what car to drive, how much salt or trans fats to consume, or be there for their neighbor when they are truly in need.

 

[sangha]

the thing that gets me Marc is when a Jerk like Dean will throw a blanket over ALL Conservatives/Republicans only a few on the left call him on it....like Ez or Sallow....the rest of you guys say he is way to Left and kinda out of there but never tell him that.....you just let him talk dis-honest Bullshit......and as far as im concerned he is the worst of the lefties here.....Pubis In. and Namvet were the worst on the Right....this guy named Revere seems to be taking their spots.....

Fair enough, let's do this. Going forward you point out when you see it going on. There's no feasible or logical way to backtrack and check who did what and when. However, going forward we can point it out as it goes on.

When you see some "Far Radical Left Wing" posting going on and me supporting it and perhaps say, bashing a rightie for their RW radical extremism while giving a pass to my fellow Leftie's radical positions, please point it out and we'll go from there.

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

For instance, I'll ask a question in a thread or OP like "Should We Start Testing People's Mental Capacity Before Allowing Them To Own Guns"

And IMMEDIATELY some Far RW radical extremist will chime in something like, "NO! We don't believe in abolishing the 2nd amendment!"

It's like that BS question..."Did you stop beating your wife?" No answer is good, because its based on a false premise...then they argue from their false premise onward, not what we said, but what they want us to have said, or believe we have said for those that are slightly more honest in their debates.

Will you call that out when you see it too?

Lead by example, Marc. Stop thanking people who name call and pretend you have the moral highground.

Wingnuts never take responsibility for their own behavior

CG wants to blame Marc for her childish behavior

 

[sangha]

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

Probably because the vast bulk of your beliefs are based in false premises, such as the completely arrogant notion that people --well, those beside arrogant socialist elites-- are too stupid, selfish and/or (your favorite human failing here) to be able to live their own lives, raise their own children, run their businesses, feed themselves, know what car to drive, how much salt or trans fats to consume, or be there for their neighbor when they are truly in need.

I'm sure Harry will want to comment on this post

I'll wait

 

[Meister]

Fair enough, let's do this. Going forward you point out when you see it going on. There's no feasible or logical way to backtrack and check who did what and when. However, going forward we can point it out as it goes on.

When you see some "Far Radical Left Wing" posting going on and me supporting it and perhaps say, bashing a rightie for their RW radical extremism while giving a pass to my fellow Leftie's radical positions, please point it out and we'll go from there.

I'll tell you what I've observed though. It seems that many of the Far RWers on this board, don't argue what us Lefties say, but what they have ascribed to our beliefs.

For instance, I'll ask a question in a thread or OP like "Should We Start Testing People's Mental Capacity Before Allowing Them To Own Guns"

And IMMEDIATELY some Far RW radical extremist will chime in something like, "NO! We don't believe in abolishing the 2nd amendment!"

It's like that BS question..."Did you stop beating your wife?" No answer is good, because its based on a false premise...then they argue from their false premise onward, not what we said, but what they want us to have said, or believe we have said for those that are slightly more honest in their debates.

Will you call that out when you see it too?

Lead by example, Marc. Stop thanking people who name call and pretend you have the moral highground.

Wingnuts never take responsibility for their own behavior

CG wants to blame Marc for her childish behavior

Lord knows that you will never take the high road.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

I have been attacked for not truly being a real "conservative" because I don't ride the bandwagon of the far right and the GOP who like to pretend they're conservatives yet they are not true conservatives themselves. True conservatives believe in lower taxes and smaller government that ultimately benefits *ALL* people not just the rich so when GOP Republitards ask for lower taxes and advocate supply side voodoo trickle down economics they're going against what real conservatives stand for. The best example of a true conservative is Colin Powell, someone who didn't mind giving more to all people and not just the rich and elite that fake conservative GOP Republitards stand for.

No, the GOP is basically made up of social conservatives and disgruntled and bitter objectivists.

The evangelical, hysterical right have pervaded the the GOP driving it far right, those nutters who hold a shotgun in one hand and a Bible in the other marching with signs asking for birth certificates, they're one step from being like their militia brethern in Idaho and Montana back woods.

 

[Oddball]

I have been attacked for not truly being a real "conservative" because I don't ride the bandwagon of the far right and the GOP who like to pretend they're conservatives yet they are not true conservatives themselves. True conservatives believe in lower taxes and smaller government that ultimately benefits *ALL* people not just the rich so when GOP Republitards ask for lower taxes and advocate supply side voodoo trickle down economics they're going against what real conservatives stand for. The best example of a true conservative is Colin Powell, someone who didn't mind giving more to all people and not just the rich and elite that fake conservative GOP Republitards stand for.

No, the GOP is basically made up of social conservatives and disgruntled and bitter objectivists.

The evangelical, hysterical right have pervaded the the GOP driving it far right, those nutters who hold a shotgun in one hand and a Bible in the other marching with signs asking for birth certificates, they're one step from being like their militia brethern in Idaho and Montana back woods.

Good thing leftists don't stereotype......Much.

 

[MarcATL]

He's already failed to do that in this thread. I already posted a few for Harry to comment on, and like a True Wingnut, Harry said nothing.

I think we should attempt to understand each other's viewpoints and positions vs. bashing them outright.

I've observed that Harry isn't a Wingnut. If we can foster better communication the board will be better off for it.

Otherwise its just us coming to insult the other side for their perceived madness...aka give him a chance.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No, the GOP is basically made up of social conservatives and disgruntled and bitter objectivists.

The evangelical, hysterical right have pervaded the the GOP driving it far right, those nutters who hold a shotgun in one hand and a Bible in the other marching with signs asking for birth certificates, they're one step from being like their militia brethern in Idaho and Montana back woods.

Good thing leftists don't stereotype......Much.

Ask a lefty, why ask me, a true conservative?

 

[sangha]

He's already failed to do that in this thread. I already posted a few for Harry to comment on, and like a True Wingnut, Harry said nothing.

I think we should attempt to understand each other's viewpoints and positions vs. bashing them outright.

I've observed that Harry isn't a Wingnut. If we can foster better communication the board will be better off for it.

Otherwise its just us coming to insult the other side for their perceived madness...aka give him a chance.

That is as foolish as Obamas' call to reach across the aisle

There's a word for someone who tries the same thing over and over, always getting the same result, but thinking "This time, it's going to work!"

Harry has had his chance. There are several wingnut posts for him to criticize. Harry has chosen to remain silent