His brand has failed over and over, I'm pretty sure he's used to that. He just picks up the pieces, seeks legal protection from creditors, and moves on. So your reasoning doesn't really seem well thought out.If he hasn't earned your trust why do you believe he will do anything he claims he will do?Feel free to explain how Donald Trump has earned your trust.This thread was not my best. YOu gave me nothing to work with.
Predfan totally kicked your ass. There is no doubt about that.
My question stands.
If you have to lie so much, it means you need to reassess your positions as they are likely wrong.
He has not.
The other candidates have earned my active DISTRUST.
And then there are those that have positions on issues that are IMO, contrary to the interests of the US.
Trump is by far the best.
His entire political existence is built on this campaign. If he wants a successful Presidency and to "enhance his brand" he would have to satisfy his supporters.
Otherwise he will be considered a failure. This will hurt his brand.
This gives him motive to follow though.
And I have already explained that that is more than I can say for all the others.
There are no legal protections from a Failed Legacy.
And I have explained that the rest of the candidates either don't share my positions or have earned my active DISTRUST.
My reasoning is sound.
This is the point where you admit that, but still insist that my positions are NOT in the best interests of the nation, in your opinion.
And we move on.
Except that you and people like you CANNOT admit that other people can have any validity if they disagree with you.
You NEED to marginalize them, if only in your own mind.
Your blind insistence that all Trump supporters are not "intelligent" as per the op and this thread, is another good example of your inability to respect people who are different than you.