Are These Reasonable Regulations of Guns? or Harassment of Gun Owners?

Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.

Wait a minute now. I am confused. Both sides are calling the other side Communists. Life just doesn't make any sense anymore. And it's too cold to go fishing to iron things out.

Do you know what Communism is, or what it entails?

Only one party seeks an authoritarian dictatorship when the means of production are controlled by the central authority based on socialist redistribution of wealth.

Calling Republicans "Communist" is utterly stupid, the act of a moron. Which is an apt description for democrats.

A couple of points here.

It hasn't been only the Lefties (notice I didn't say Liberals) that want to use the Military for their own ends. You can't count foreign wars (police actions) in on this. But it's been primarily the Rightees (notice I didn't say Conservatives) that scream to high heave that when the time comes, the US Military will side with them. So we can discount that idea completely from this discussion.

You are right about what Communism is. What you are wrong about is that it can work as a Government for more than a tens of tens of population. Once you reach a certain number of population, it falls flat on it's face. The ONLY workable Commune or Communist system in the World is in Israel in the Kiosks. They have less than 100 people in the villages and Communes or Communism works fine for them. These do work. But the problem is, they are slowly dying out. The Children go off to the Universities and many times don't return. The Kiosk is frozen in time and it's a big and wonderful world out there. So you Communist label doesn't work.

Yes, Many claims that the old USSR and China are Communist nations but that would be a lie. Those always have been either Dicatorships (I.E. Stalin and Mao) or Oliarchies. And the only wealth they have "Redistributed" has gone to the Uber Rich who are the ones really in charge. When you dig deep, you will see many similarities to our System here where the Uber Rich are controlling things. The only real difference is, they are more honest about it and their people know better.

Then you scream to high heaven that Capitalism is the answer. Like Communism, Capitalism only works in it's pure form is a very small scale. A Capitalist Company can make it's own electricity, makes it own fuel, control the workforce and be completely self sufficient as long as it's very, very small. I believe you could find a couple or three tropical islands that would fit that bill. But you will also find Extreme Wealth in a few hands and abject poverty in most of the population that does not benefit from the Capitalism.

When Capitalism grows past a certain point, it becomes dependent on outside sources for things like water, fuel, electricity, safety, roads, etc.. Those things are NOT Capitalistic. Those are Social things hence they are Socialist. Now the Capitalists and the workers are going to have to pay taxes to pay for those services. And Taxes are always social in nature. The larger the Capitalists grow the more the Social Programs grow and the more the Taxes grow. Then something happens. The Capitalists need protections from the other Capitalists. Capitalists are noted for being more than a little blood thirsty. Enter a Social relief valve. Al Capone and Diamond Jim were Capitalists without that Social Relief and look how that worked out during their reign. Say hello to my Little Buddy cured all arguments, right?

Capitalism, Socialism and Communism cannot exist in large numbers. In fact, Capitalism and Socialism are actually Economic Models, not governments. Communism only works in groups of less than 100.

You leave out the Fascists. I don't have to wonder why. If you read the doctrine or writings of Mussolini of 1923 you will find similarities in our Current President. You will also see what made Spains Government survive all these years sine 1936. Reading up on Spanish History from 1930 to 1939 would explain things a lot to you and you would see Fascism that works. Then read up on Italian History from 1923 to 1943 and see where Fascism failed miserably even though it started out with them doctrines.

You would also learn where there isn't a whole hill of difference when the Left and the Right go wrong. They end up the same place. So we have Mussolini versus Lenin. Franco's Fascists against the Spanish Socialists. Opposition worked well and the other failed big time. Only Franco's Fascists succeeded and continue even today.
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~
You don't tell someone what is and is not to someone who has knowledge in Asymmetric Warfare
 
These are the new anti-gun laws that the Virginia Dimocrats are set to pass ASAP.

Here's the List of Bills Anti-Gunners Plan to Enact in Virginia - GunsAmerica Digest

The list from local news affiliate WSET:

  • Legislation requiring background checks on all firearms sales and transactions. The bill mandates that any person selling, renting, trading, or transferring a firearm must first obtain the results of a background check before completing the transaction.
  • Legislation banning dangerous weapons. This will include bans on assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, bump stocks and silencers.
  • Legislation to reinstate Virginia’s successful law allowing only one handgun purchase within a 30-day period.
  • Legislation requiring that lost and stolen firearms be reported to law enforcement within 24 hours.
  • Legislation creating an Extreme Risk Protective Order, allowing law enforcement and the courts to temporarily separate a person from firearms if the person exhibits dangerous behavior that presents an immediate threat to self or others.
  • Legislation prohibiting all individuals subject to final protective orders from possessing firearms. The bill expands Virginia law which currently prohibits individuals subject to final protective orders of family abuse from possessing firearms.
  • Legislation enhancing the punishment for allowing access to loaded, unsecured firearm by a child from a Class 3 Misdemeanor to a Class 6 felony. The bill also raises the age of the child from 14 to 18.
  • Legislation enabling localities to enact any firearms ordinances that are stricter than state law. This includes regulating firearms in municipal buildings, libraries and at permitted events.



It sounds reasonable to me.

My state has most of those laws.

The far right radical extremists who want to keep safety laws for weapons off the books have caused these laws to be needed.

If they had compromised, if they had tried to find things we can agree on and live with, maybe the new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

If they had not removed safety laws, if they had not passed laws that allow anyone to have a weapon, if they had not allowed laws that allows mass shootings to happen, maybe the new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

If the far right radical extremists had not forced their way or nothing at all, maybe those new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

And maybe, more people would still be alive today instead of dead from mass shootings.

They like to compare the Gun Laws to Prohibition. Actually, they are more right than they know. Before the Prohibition, laws were light for drinking and pretty much every common citizen knew they needed to be tightened up. But the dudes with the deep pockets bought the Congress Critters and kept those laws from happening. So the overreaction of Prohibition, they banned the Booze and created a huge mess. After Prohibition, the government compromized and created stricter laws to get rid of Prohibition. In the end, they probably had the laws that they should have had in the first place for the time and era. By each state adopting common sense gun regulations, we are trying to avoid the Prohibition of the Guns which would cause something very similar to the Prohibition of Booze.
 
Firearms FAQs

"If you are selling to a non-immediate family member, a background check must be done by an FFL (Federal Firearm Licensee). However, immediate family members do not need background checks done to transfer firearms between one another. The firearm should not be transferred to any family member who is prohibited from purchasing and/or possessing firearm. Immediate family is defined as spouses, parents, children, siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, first cousins, aunts, and uncles (in-laws do not apply). (CRS 18-12-112)"

If that is the only thing you can find in my post then I think I did a remarkable job in presenting it. Thanks for the a assist.
 
Repubtards steal money from citizens to build up the police & military to force citizens to obey their laws. They will never allow citizens to have a level of arms To prevent them from forcing their will on you
The largest stand army is the private citizens in the U.S. 150 million gun owners with over 500 million guns
Why have a military at all if we have the Walmart militia?

And exactly how did that work out in that Texas Walley World where there were at least 40 armed people in that Walmart. Prove it, you say? It's Texas for crying out loud.
Dude, there are less than 500 CCW's within a 50 mile circumference of El Passo good chance no one was armed but I do recall one-armed CCW was at the store. But like most, his only interest was getting his children to safety.
If I had been in the same situation I would have stayed in place until I either the shooter was in my line of sight or the police arrived. Just because you have a CCW doesn't give you the authority to seek out the shooter. It gives you the capability to defend yourself.
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.
VA Democrats believe VA National Guard troops will fire on their families and friends.

VA Democrats are morons.
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.

Wait a minute now. I am confused. Both sides are calling the other side Communists. Life just doesn't make any sense anymore. And it's too cold to go fishing to iron things out.
Rule of thumb:

If someone wants to deprive law-abiding citizens of their freedoms, they're Communists.

If someone wants law-abiding citizens to keep their Constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms, they're not Communists.

Simple, huh?
 
If you are living in an area that that is a true fear then I suggest you friggin move to an area it isn't.
I will live wherever I damned well want to if I can pay for it, jack ass.

You can take your suggestions and shove them up your Nazi keister.
My, oh, My, did I hit a nerve on that one? That's a real "You can't tell me what to do" and "You aren't my Daddy" moment for you.

Your problem is that he is 100% correct. You don't get to make those decisions for him, dumbass!
 
What is bad about a background check? Kinda like an I'd for voting.

We already have background checks. How well does that work?

Did the Saudi pilot in Pensacola pass his background check? Why yes, yes he did! Didn't work, did it?

Did the Pearl Harbor shooter? What, no background check was performed except when he entered the Navy in one of the highest security areas in the fleet and he used his service weapons? Didn't work, did it?

In almost every mass shooter case, the person passed the background check, or there was an error in allowing the purchase. That doesn't sound like background checks are the solution to our gun problem.
 
Unconstitutional of course.
You throw that term around haphazardly. Why is it Unconstitutional? Point out why?
Because it violates the Second Amendment, shit-faced boy.

The Second Amendment has little to do with States Rights. The 2nd Amendment deals with Federal. And there have been so many changes in our nation in the last 200 years of so, the 2nd amendment has lost much of it's meaning. But it still means that the Federals can't dictate whether you have the right or not to have firearms. But the State, through due process, does.

Just saying something is Unconstitutional or is against the 2nd amendment doesn't say a damned thing other than you are ignorant and can't back up your argument.

States are required to abide by the Second Amendment just like the feds, dumbass!
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.

Wait a minute now. I am confused. Both sides are calling the other side Communists. Life just doesn't make any sense anymore. And it's too cold to go fishing to iron things out.

Do you know what Communism is, or what it entails?

Only one party seeks an authoritarian dictatorship when the means of production are controlled by the central authority based on socialist redistribution of wealth.

Calling Republicans "Communist" is utterly stupid, the act of a moron. Which is an apt description for democrats.

A couple of points here.

It hasn't been only the Lefties (notice I didn't say Liberals) that want to use the Military for their own ends. You can't count foreign wars (police actions) in on this. But it's been primarily the Rightees (notice I didn't say Conservatives) that scream to high heave that when the time comes, the US Military will side with them. So we can discount that idea completely from this discussion.

You are right about what Communism is. What you are wrong about is that it can work as a Government for more than a tens of tens of population. Once you reach a certain number of population, it falls flat on it's face. The ONLY workable Commune or Communist system in the World is in Israel in the Kiosks. They have less than 100 people in the villages and Communes or Communism works fine for them. These do work. But the problem is, they are slowly dying out. The Children go off to the Universities and many times don't return. The Kiosk is frozen in time and it's a big and wonderful world out there. So you Communist label doesn't work.

Yes, Many claims that the old USSR and China are Communist nations but that would be a lie. Those always have been either Dicatorships (I.E. Stalin and Mao) or Oliarchies. And the only wealth they have "Redistributed" has gone to the Uber Rich who are the ones really in charge. When you dig deep, you will see many similarities to our System here where the Uber Rich are controlling things. The only real difference is, they are more honest about it and their people know better.

Then you scream to high heaven that Capitalism is the answer. Like Communism, Capitalism only works in it's pure form is a very small scale. A Capitalist Company can make it's own electricity, makes it own fuel, control the workforce and be completely self sufficient as long as it's very, very small. I believe you could find a couple or three tropical islands that would fit that bill. But you will also find Extreme Wealth in a few hands and abject poverty in most of the population that does not benefit from the Capitalism.

When Capitalism grows past a certain point, it becomes dependent on outside sources for things like water, fuel, electricity, safety, roads, etc.. Those things are NOT Capitalistic. Those are Social things hence they are Socialist. Now the Capitalists and the workers are going to have to pay taxes to pay for those services. And Taxes are always social in nature. The larger the Capitalists grow the more the Social Programs grow and the more the Taxes grow. Then something happens. The Capitalists need protections from the other Capitalists. Capitalists are noted for being more than a little blood thirsty. Enter a Social relief valve. Al Capone and Diamond Jim were Capitalists without that Social Relief and look how that worked out during their reign. Say hello to my Little Buddy cured all arguments, right?

Capitalism, Socialism and Communism cannot exist in large numbers. In fact, Capitalism and Socialism are actually Economic Models, not governments. Communism only works in groups of less than 100.

You leave out the Fascists. I don't have to wonder why. If you read the doctrine or writings of Mussolini of 1923 you will find similarities in our Current President. You will also see what made Spains Government survive all these years sine 1936. Reading up on Spanish History from 1930 to 1939 would explain things a lot to you and you would see Fascism that works. Then read up on Italian History from 1923 to 1943 and see where Fascism failed miserably even though it started out with them doctrines.

You would also learn where there isn't a whole hill of difference when the Left and the Right go wrong. They end up the same place. So we have Mussolini versus Lenin. Franco's Fascists against the Spanish Socialists. Opposition worked well and the other failed big time. Only Franco's Fascists succeeded and continue even today.

A very astute post Daryl

but you left out the one point i was trying for, although i can't really blame you

'end game tactics'

how do you make a populace living a failed system still believe in it?

~S~
 
We already have background checks. How well does that work?

>>>>

ASERXF7A4M34REPLRFRZS2QM2Q.gif

~S~
 
Repubtards steal money from citizens to build up the police & military to force citizens to obey their laws. They will never allow citizens to have a level of arms To prevent them from forcing their will on you
The largest stand army is the private citizens in the U.S. 150 million gun owners with over 500 million guns
Why have a military at all if we have the Walmart militia?

And exactly how did that work out in that Texas Walley World where there were at least 40 armed people in that Walmart. Prove it, you say? It's Texas for crying out loud.

How many of the armed people were killed?
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.

Wait a minute now. I am confused. Both sides are calling the other side Communists. Life just doesn't make any sense anymore. And it's too cold to go fishing to iron things out.

You should go fishing! Make sure your waders are filled with lead sinkers to make sure your feet don't slip on the bottom when your boat sinks.
 
Also #2 needs to ban any weapon with quick change magazines.
Yeah, because no one would ever need such a thing to fight off a home invasion.

:rolleyes:


If a person is such a bad shot that they need to use a whole magazine of bullets then change to a new one, they need to be at the firing range to practice.

If a person has not stopped a home invader with the amount of bullets they already have no amount of quick change of a magazine is going to do any good.

Any person who is that bad of a shot shouldn't be owning a weapon.

What if there is more than one home invader, dumbass?
 
These are the new anti-gun laws that the Virginia Dimocrats are set to pass ASAP.

Here's the List of Bills Anti-Gunners Plan to Enact in Virginia - GunsAmerica Digest

The list from local news affiliate WSET:

  • Legislation requiring background checks on all firearms sales and transactions. The bill mandates that any person selling, renting, trading, or transferring a firearm must first obtain the results of a background check before completing the transaction.
  • Legislation banning dangerous weapons. This will include bans on assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, bump stocks and silencers.
  • Legislation to reinstate Virginia’s successful law allowing only one handgun purchase within a 30-day period.
  • Legislation requiring that lost and stolen firearms be reported to law enforcement within 24 hours.
  • Legislation creating an Extreme Risk Protective Order, allowing law enforcement and the courts to temporarily separate a person from firearms if the person exhibits dangerous behavior that presents an immediate threat to self or others.
  • Legislation prohibiting all individuals subject to final protective orders from possessing firearms. The bill expands Virginia law which currently prohibits individuals subject to final protective orders of family abuse from possessing firearms.
  • Legislation enhancing the punishment for allowing access to loaded, unsecured firearm by a child from a Class 3 Misdemeanor to a Class 6 felony. The bill also raises the age of the child from 14 to 18.
  • Legislation enabling localities to enact any firearms ordinances that are stricter than state law. This includes regulating firearms in municipal buildings, libraries and at permitted events.



It sounds reasonable to me.

My state has most of those laws.

The far right radical extremists who want to keep safety laws for weapons off the books have caused these laws to be needed.

If they had compromised, if they had tried to find things we can agree on and live with, maybe the new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

If they had not removed safety laws, if they had not passed laws that allow anyone to have a weapon, if they had not allowed laws that allows mass shootings to happen, maybe the new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

If the far right radical extremists had not forced their way or nothing at all, maybe those new laws wouldn't have been necessary.

And maybe, more people would still be alive today instead of dead from mass shootings.
Is this the "just one more gun law" criminals will start obeying?

Seems to me the intent is to make every single gun owner a criminal.
 
Also #2 needs to ban any weapon with quick change magazines.
Yeah, because no one would ever need such a thing to fight off a home invasion.

:rolleyes:


If a person is such a bad shot that they need to use a whole magazine of bullets then change to a new one, they need to be at the firing range to practice.

If a person has not stopped a home invader with the amount of bullets they already have no amount of quick change of a magazine is going to do any good.

Any person who is that bad of a shot shouldn't be owning a weapon.
Lemme guess -- you've never handled a firearm in your life.
 
Dude I alone have over a thousand magazines with over 28,000 rounds of ammo stored in one of my places and just for one of my rifles triple that for the others located in different places. years and years of buying 2 magazines and three boxes of ammo will get you a lot.

which is fine if you're holding off the indians in 1840...

They believe that means we are in charge

Which is what they WANT you to believe

Also you didn't say you have any 81mm mortars stockpiled, so you lost already.

it's just one infringement after the next around here...

I only said what I said about me just imagine millions more out there

F16 Fodder.....

So once again, our 2nd is infringed in so many GubMit ways , you folks have a hard time seeing the forest from the constitutional sleeze

Further, you'd THINK the NRA would be taking a stand on the guttural evisceration that's happened to the 2nd..?

show me.....

Guess they're more interested in gun sales, the 2nd serving them no more than a catalyst .....

Welcome to the new Orwellian order

~S~

:rofl:

You communists, always so convinced that the military will violate their oath and help you overthrow the Constitution...

I fear when the time comes, you will be sorely, and fatally, disappointed.

Wait a minute now. I am confused. Both sides are calling the other side Communists. Life just doesn't make any sense anymore. And it's too cold to go fishing to iron things out.

Do you know what Communism is, or what it entails?

Only one party seeks an authoritarian dictatorship when the means of production are controlled by the central authority based on socialist redistribution of wealth.

Calling Republicans "Communist" is utterly stupid, the act of a moron. Which is an apt description for democrats.

A couple of points here.

It hasn't been only the Lefties (notice I didn't say Liberals) that want to use the Military for their own ends. You can't count foreign wars (police actions) in on this. But it's been primarily the Rightees (notice I didn't say Conservatives) that scream to high heave that when the time comes, the US Military will side with them. So we can discount that idea completely from this discussion.

You are right about what Communism is. What you are wrong about is that it can work as a Government for more than a tens of tens of population. Once you reach a certain number of population, it falls flat on it's face. The ONLY workable Commune or Communist system in the World is in Israel in the Kiosks. They have less than 100 people in the villages and Communes or Communism works fine for them. These do work. But the problem is, they are slowly dying out. The Children go off to the Universities and many times don't return. The Kiosk is frozen in time and it's a big and wonderful world out there. So you Communist label doesn't work.

Yes, Many claims that the old USSR and China are Communist nations but that would be a lie. Those always have been either Dicatorships (I.E. Stalin and Mao) or Oliarchies. And the only wealth they have "Redistributed" has gone to the Uber Rich who are the ones really in charge. When you dig deep, you will see many similarities to our System here where the Uber Rich are controlling things. The only real difference is, they are more honest about it and their people know better.

Then you scream to high heaven that Capitalism is the answer. Like Communism, Capitalism only works in it's pure form is a very small scale. A Capitalist Company can make it's own electricity, makes it own fuel, control the workforce and be completely self sufficient as long as it's very, very small. I believe you could find a couple or three tropical islands that would fit that bill. But you will also find Extreme Wealth in a few hands and abject poverty in most of the population that does not benefit from the Capitalism.

When Capitalism grows past a certain point, it becomes dependent on outside sources for things like water, fuel, electricity, safety, roads, etc.. Those things are NOT Capitalistic. Those are Social things hence they are Socialist. Now the Capitalists and the workers are going to have to pay taxes to pay for those services. And Taxes are always social in nature. The larger the Capitalists grow the more the Social Programs grow and the more the Taxes grow. Then something happens. The Capitalists need protections from the other Capitalists. Capitalists are noted for being more than a little blood thirsty. Enter a Social relief valve. Al Capone and Diamond Jim were Capitalists without that Social Relief and look how that worked out during their reign. Say hello to my Little Buddy cured all arguments, right?

Capitalism, Socialism and Communism cannot exist in large numbers. In fact, Capitalism and Socialism are actually Economic Models, not governments. Communism only works in groups of less than 100.

You leave out the Fascists. I don't have to wonder why. If you read the doctrine or writings of Mussolini of 1923 you will find similarities in our Current President. You will also see what made Spains Government survive all these years sine 1936. Reading up on Spanish History from 1930 to 1939 would explain things a lot to you and you would see Fascism that works. Then read up on Italian History from 1923 to 1943 and see where Fascism failed miserably even though it started out with them doctrines.

You would also learn where there isn't a whole hill of difference when the Left and the Right go wrong. They end up the same place. So we have Mussolini versus Lenin. Franco's Fascists against the Spanish Socialists. Opposition worked well and the other failed big time. Only Franco's Fascists succeeded and continue even today.

Kiosks?:dig::dig::dig::dig::dig::dig:

A kiosk is a small, stand-alone booth typically placed in high-traffic areas for business purposes. It typically provides information and applications on education, commerce, entertainment, and a variety of other topics.
What is a Kiosk? - Definition, Examples, and More

You have reached a new high in dumbass!

It's called a "kibbutz!"

That's a typical post from you, talking out of your ass again!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top