Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The issue should be 'Illegals ARE voting and everything that can be done to protect the process for electing US Presidents / politicians and prevent the law from being broken should be done....IMHO.
what was this deflection for?The issue should be 'Illegals ARE voting and everything that can be done to protect the process for electing US Presidents / politicians and prevent the law from being broken should be done....IMHO.
A guy stole an M1 abrams tank. Are they going spend millions and millions to put anti-theft systems onto them in order to stop that?
No. Because the cost is much higher than the likelihood it will happen again.
Toss in the punishment of immediately being deported and your personal info being placed in a database. If caught EVER again in the US you go to jail for a LONG time.
Yeah, where doe the US Constitution fit into that?If the poll included San Francisco, for local elections they're allowed to.
Easy Peasy...Oh and this applies just as easily as your statement, no?
"I'd knowed Jimmy ever since we was young-uns and Jimmy always voted straight ticket Republican, so's I voted for him, in his memory."
I personally never have heard a Republican say that while I have heard about half a dozen Democrats say things very similar.
So no, I don think that one can as easily say that at all.
Point being that the few people who vote illegally, are and will always be, BIPARTISAN.
Then why isnt the effort to validate and protect the validity of the voting process BIPARTISAN?
And just because it is in your view "only a few votes" does not make it OK, does it? Many elections are decided by a handful of votes, like a certain Senator from Minnesota can attest, finally having one when numerous recounts finally gave him a majority.
An extra thousand or so illegal votes can paper over that much faster dont you think?
well it would be funny if they both were in the same precinct right?Toss in the punishment of immediately being deported and your personal info being placed in a database. If caught EVER again in the US you go to jail for a LONG time.
And if they put Juan Ortiz into the database, and your name happens to be Juan Ortiz, born and raised in the USA.
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all....Easy Peasy...Oh and this applies just as easily as your statement, no?
"I'd knowed Jimmy ever since we was young-uns and Jimmy always voted straight ticket Republican, so's I voted for him, in his memory."
I personally never have heard a Republican say that while I have heard about half a dozen Democrats say things very similar.
So no, I don think that one can as easily say that at all.
Point being that the few people who vote illegally, are and will always be, BIPARTISAN.
Then why isnt the effort to validate and protect the validity of the voting process BIPARTISAN?
And just because it is in your view "only a few votes" does not make it OK, does it? Many elections are decided by a handful of votes, like a certain Senator from Minnesota can attest, finally having one when numerous recounts finally gave him a majority.
An extra thousand or so illegal votes can paper over that much faster dont you think?
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all....
When all the States need to do is check every person registered or registering to vote against e-verify, which identifies citizens vs non citizens.
As many judges have stated Republicans have purposely and with surgical precision developed these new id laws to specifically prevent CITIZENS from voting who primarily vote Democratic.
what was this deflection for?
dude, that is a spectacular post, thank you!!!!! I never went there, but I will now.No time to check out illegals voting, but those Russians that's different, what's the count up to now for illegal Russian votes?
Must be a huge number but I can't seem to find anything solid about that (proof).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all.....
the department already exists. It would be a quick enhancement in procedures already in place. It isn't rocket science.what was this deflection for?
Someone posted that voter ID laws cost nothing. You need the people to enforce the law, the people to investigate, the people to oversee the databases, people, people, people, to do a lot of things. And people cost money. For ten billion dollars you can guarantee that zero illegals will vote. For a million dollars some are going to sneak by. It's all about cost vs benefit. Perfect costs a lot of money.
Why didn't you answer my questions? are you afraid too? too fking funny you pieces of trash protecting illegals and dissing inner city children.Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all.....
There were probably thousands of citizens disenfranchised in Ohio, in an effort to stop 27 illegals from voting.
well it would be funny if they both were in the same precinct right?And if they put Juan Ortiz into the database, and your name happens to be Juan Ortiz, born and raised in the USA.
the department already exists. It would be a quick enhancement in procedures already in place. It isn't rocket science.
Easy Peasy...
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all....
all in the same precinct you think? they do have birth dates right?well it would be funny if they both were in the same precinct right?And if they put Juan Ortiz into the database, and your name happens to be Juan Ortiz, born and raised in the USA.
There are at least three George Bush's, registered to vote in Texas.
You would have to be intelligent enough to comprehend how the Russians are accused of interfering with the election. The cult defense talking points for the dopey cult followers doesn't do it.No time to check out illegals voting, but those Russians that's different, what's the count up to now for illegal Russian votes?
Must be a huge number but I can't seem to find anything solid about that (proof).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why didn't you answer my questions? are you afraid too? too fking funny you pieces of trash protecting illegals and dissing inner city children.
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all....Easy Peasy...Oh and this applies just as easily as your statement, no?
"I'd knowed Jimmy ever since we was young-uns and Jimmy always voted straight ticket Republican, so's I voted for him, in his memory."
I personally never have heard a Republican say that while I have heard about half a dozen Democrats say things very similar.
So no, I don think that one can as easily say that at all.
Point being that the few people who vote illegally, are and will always be, BIPARTISAN.
Then why isnt the effort to validate and protect the validity of the voting process BIPARTISAN?
And just because it is in your view "only a few votes" does not make it OK, does it? Many elections are decided by a handful of votes, like a certain Senator from Minnesota can attest, finally having one when numerous recounts finally gave him a majority.
An extra thousand or so illegal votes can paper over that much faster dont you think?
Th Republicans are simply trying to prevent CITIZENS from voting by requiring an GOVT ISSUED PHOTO ID which millions of the poorest, and disabled and elderly citizens do not have...while the wealthier who own cars and drivers licenses have to go through no hurdle at all....
When all the States need to do is check every person registered or registering to vote against e-verify, which identifies citizens vs non citizens.
As many judges have stated Republicans have purposely and with surgical precision developed these new id laws to specifically prevent CITIZENS from voting who primarily vote Democratic.
how do they buy cigarettes and liquor then? I'll also assume they can't travel cause you need an ID to board a plane. why isn't that of concern for you? Now they can't fly either.
