Harry Dresden
Adamantium Member
501(c)s aren't supposed to be political, or at least mainly political. Yet all these Tea Party groups were filing as 501(c)s. Also, prior to the Tea Party, groups that claimed that it was unconstitutional for the government to collect income taxes, the 16th Amendment was illegally passed, etc., that filed as tax-exempt non-profits often used the name "Patriots" in their title. It's not a stretch that they might also use the term "Tea Party," and many Tea Party groups also used the word "Patriots" in their title.
See how easy it is to rationalize government power? Just like you're doing for Latinos. When the broad and discriminatory application of government power happens to others, people rationalize it away. But when the broad and discriminatory application of government power happens to you, those same people - unsurprisingly - protest it as being unjust and unfair.
Pretty funny how you talk about rationalizing Media Matters has tax exempt status yet they are clearly political and liberal when there was talk of pulling their tax exempt status the left would hear none of it they had no problem with political groups be given tax exempt status as long as they were liberal. Wanting the federal government to secure the border and enforce the nations immigration laws or to let the states do it if they are unwilling to is not rationalizing it is a reasonable expectation of government to consider that being unfair or profiling is truly off the charts.
Let me make this really clear.
Profiling conservative groups is wrong.
Profiling Mexicans is wrong.
If one is OK with one but not the other, one is a hypocrite.
I hope that clears things up.
how about Canadians?....Ey.....
![eusa_angel :eusa_angel: :eusa_angel:](/styles/smilies/eusa_angel.gif)