This talking point is well established. Trying to poison the summary before anyone sees it.
The summary is a worthless pile of paper without the underlying evidence being provided with it. Without the evidence it is just one party's opinion, nothing more.
If the FBI verifies that it is accurate, as I believe they have, what more do you need?
The FBI has criticized the memo as fundamentally inaccurate.
Do you not grasp the concept that the memo calls into question the integrity of the FBI? Yet you seem to feel that the FBI's response...criticizing the memo...proves that the memo IS inaccurate? The only fair way to resolve this situation at this point is to release everything and let the public decide what took place and who should be held accountable for what took place.
But nobody is willing to release it all and nobody with the power to do it is even talking about it. All we will get is a useless memo that gives on sides opinion of the evidence.
It will be good for lining a birdcage and starting a fire, but that is about it
I see the taking point is firmly set. You don't even know what's in the summary, yet you're absolutely sure you know it's value.