As of today

I intend to vote for

  • Ron Paul

    Votes: 15 16.9%
  • Mitt Romney

    Votes: 45 50.6%
  • Barack Obama

    Votes: 18 20.2%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 6 6.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 5.6%

  • Total voters
    89
We all can read your screaming online almost any given evening, bigrebnc.

Now post exactly where in the "flexibility" articel you get evidence for a gun ban.

Hint: you don't, you fail. Again.

Any post that bitch slaps you is screaming in your mind.


As I said you don't read the post you reply to, because if you did you would not have to ask a question such as What did obama mean when he was talking about flexibility. I covered that in that post you fucking moron.

OH I get it now you're the sensitive type and any criticism of you is like screaming.
 
The problem with the entire country is that the right sees Obama as you just stated, a Marxist, when in fact he is a moderate just like Bush. The right on this board does represent a respectable percentage of the populace, but the truth is the percentage is not that large in comparison to the rest of the country. Here on USMB, the vast majority are right leaning. Of course, nobody here is considered a moderate by the right. If you are not on the right, then you are obviously a left wing socialist marxist communist who believes that the nanny state is what is best for us all. But that is the way these types of forums usually go. Those in the middle just give up as the nutjobs from both extremes take over.

Obama is not even close to moderate.. that shows how much of a winger you are.. just as Bush II was not a conservative..

You should ask the true liberals/progressives if they believe Obama is a liberal/progressive. Just as you say Bush was no conservative, which he was not, liberals will tell you Obama is no liberal. Both are moderates. Only someone from the extreme far right would think Obama is a liberal just as only someone from the extreme far left would think GW was a conservative.

Just because Obama may be slightly to the right of an uber-winger, does not make him a moderate.... An uber winger being a left 10, and considering Obama to be a left 9 makes him right of the winger but still nowhere CLOSE to being a moderate
 
Given that no one is sure who Romney is at any given moment - check the Etch-A-Sketch anyone? Romney is nothing more than another republican do nothing for America, but do lots for corporations and the wealthy. If another wingnut gets in the scotus, we may as well change our calendars to 1910 or thereabouts. The battle for freedom and rights would need to start over. Women will have to go back in the kitchen and the horror of back alley operations will resume.

Republicans, aka conservatives, are perpetual losers but oddly they relish that position for in it they do their best to destroy progress. Any reading of history confirms that fact. Losers always ban together other losers. Sad that politics is that way in America today.

Add to the book below, Corey Robin's 'The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin,' and you will understand the failure that is the republican.


If anyone wants to understand political conservatism, I suggest Albert O. Hirschman's brilliant 'The Rhetoric of Reaction.' "He argues that a triplet of 'rhetorical' criticisms--perversity, futility, and jeopardy--'has been unfailingly leveled' by 'reactionaries' at each major progressive reform of the past 300 years--those T. H. Marshall identified with the advancement of civil, political and social rights of citizenship...Charmingly written, this book can benefit a diverse readership." The Rhetoric of Reaction - Albert O. Hirschman - Harvard University Press.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/219584-the-american-conservative-continuing-series.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/186726-republican-ideology-through-history-7.html#post4251322
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...es-of-midcans-insights-into-contemporary.html
 
50% Romney, 21% Barry. I wonder if this is a view into the future?
 
Obama is not even close to moderate.. that shows how much of a winger you are.. just as Bush II was not a conservative..

You should ask the true liberals/progressives if they believe Obama is a liberal/progressive. Just as you say Bush was no conservative, which he was not, liberals will tell you Obama is no liberal. Both are moderates. Only someone from the extreme far right would think Obama is a liberal just as only someone from the extreme far left would think GW was a conservative.

Just because Obama may be slightly to the right of an uber-winger, does not make him a moderate.... An uber winger being a left 10, and considering Obama to be a left 9 makes him right of the winger but still nowhere CLOSE to being a moderate

The only reason Obama did not put through the full monty of progressive agenda is that even the Dems in Congress won't go along with that crap. If he were dictator of the U.S. (c'v) his policies would make Hugo Chavez envious.
 
jokey never reads the comments he trolls the thread and makes a post that he thinks will cause someone to become upset.:lol:

You were screaming last night, pal. :lol: Now if you would post something of worth, I would be more than willing to discuss reasonable points. But you move from ideology to evidence, instead of evidence to ideology. Don't have time for your stupidity. Act normal and we can talk. KCW is so far loony all he does is pick fleas off himself and his buds most of the time.

I see that NeoBot is stalking. Come here, Neobot, come here, bub. :lol:

Once, just once I'd like to see you actually post something on topic and of value. You know, a real thought on the subject at hand. You are incapable of it. You pop in and post one or two sentences of meaningless drivel that is a veiled attack on the side you claim to be on and think you are clever enough to pull the wool over people's eyes. No one.....and I mean NO one falls for your shit JakeFakey. You're a troll. YOU are the price we pay for the blessing of a board free of heavy handed moderation. Anywhere else and your ass would most likely be toast.

Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.
 
Last edited:
You were screaming last night, pal. :lol: Now if you would post something of worth, I would be more than willing to discuss reasonable points. But you move from ideology to evidence, instead of evidence to ideology. Don't have time for your stupidity. Act normal and we can talk. KCW is so far loony all he does is pick fleas off himself and his buds most of the time.

I see that NeoBot is stalking. Come here, Neobot, come here, bub. :lol:

Once, just once I'd like to see you actually post something on topic and of value. You know, a real thought on the subject at hand. You are incapable of it. You pop in and post one or two sentences of meaningless drivel that is a veiled attack on the side you claim to be on and think you are clever enough to pull the wool over people's eyes. No one.....and I mean NO one falls for your shit JakeFakey. You're a troll. YOU are the price we pay for the blessing of a board free of heavy handed moderation. Anywhere else and your ass would most likely be toast.

Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

What the ever loving fuck are you babbling about assmunch? We've never had a discussion about gun bans and I could care less about your "flexibility". As impressive as it may be, I don't swing that way. BTW, you have a little spittle in the corner of your mouth.
 
Last edited:
Once, just once I'd like to see you actually post something on topic and of value. You know, a real thought on the subject at hand. You are incapable of it. You pop in and post one or two sentences of meaningless drivel that is a veiled attack on the side you claim to be on and think you are clever enough to pull the wool over people's eyes. No one.....and I mean NO one falls for your shit JakeFakey. You're a troll. YOU are the price we pay for the blessing of a board free of heavy handed moderation. Anywhere else and your ass would most likely be toast.

Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

What the ever loving fuck are you babbling about assmunch? We've had a discussion about gun bans and I could care less about your "flexibility". As impressive as it may be, I don't swing that way. BTW, you have a little spittle in the corner of your mouth.


More strange as the day goes on
:cuckoo:





Here boy, here boy

:eusa_whistle:
 
KCW57 What the ever loving fuck are you babbling about assmunch? We've had a discussion about gun bans and I could care less about your "flexibility". As impressive as it may be, I don't swing that way. BTW, you have a little spittle in the corner of your mouth

You prove my point, mentoid. The "flexibility" comment of Obama belongs to bigrebnc who wants to tie it to his wack gun ban mantra. I have asked him to show they relate.

He can't.

And you aren't reading, clearly, again.

None of you far righties can talk or argue clearly. That is the point. Ask TeaTroll and see if he understands.
 
You were screaming last night, pal. :lol: Now if you would post something of worth, I would be more than willing to discuss reasonable points. But you move from ideology to evidence, instead of evidence to ideology. Don't have time for your stupidity. Act normal and we can talk. KCW is so far loony all he does is pick fleas off himself and his buds most of the time.

I see that NeoBot is stalking. Come here, Neobot, come here, bub. :lol:

Once, just once I'd like to see you actually post something on topic and of value. You know, a real thought on the subject at hand. You are incapable of it. You pop in and post one or two sentences of meaningless drivel that is a veiled attack on the side you claim to be on and think you are clever enough to pull the wool over people's eyes. No one.....and I mean NO one falls for your shit JakeFakey. You're a troll. YOU are the price we pay for the blessing of a board free of heavy handed moderation. Anywhere else and your ass would most likely be toast.

Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

Wrong thread you fucking idiot and as far as I know kwc57 hasn't posted in that thread you're babbling about.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Not even in your wildest dream can you beat me, hell you can't beat your meat with directions and a dvd showing you how.:eusa_whistle:
 
Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

What the ever loving fuck are you babbling about assmunch? We've had a discussion about gun bans and I could care less about your "flexibility". As impressive as it may be, I don't swing that way. BTW, you have a little spittle in the corner of your mouth.


More strange as the day goes on
:cuckoo:





Here boy, here boy

:eusa_whistle:

He's drunk
 
Once, just once I'd like to see you actually post something on topic and of value. You know, a real thought on the subject at hand. You are incapable of it. You pop in and post one or two sentences of meaningless drivel that is a veiled attack on the side you claim to be on and think you are clever enough to pull the wool over people's eyes. No one.....and I mean NO one falls for your shit JakeFakey. You're a troll. YOU are the price we pay for the blessing of a board free of heavy handed moderation. Anywhere else and your ass would most likely be toast.

Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

Wrong thread you fucking idiot and as far as I know kwc57 hasn't posted in that thread you're babbling about.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Not even in your wildest dream can you beat me, hell you can't beat your meat with directions and a dvd showing you how.:eusa_whistle:

Driveling and sniveling, bigrebnc, and name calling like a four year old: that is all you are doing.

You will always lose to me when you do that. :lol:

You are more of a man than TeaBot, I will give you that. You don't back down, while the other stalks and squawks.
 
Last edited:
Quit melting, please. I will respond to topic and value if you show the support in your link on "flexibility" with a gun-ban legislation. You don't do that. You simply name call.

The trolls are you and NeoBot and the other far righties who offer nothing.

Tis what tis.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Now, post the connection between "flexibilty" and gun ban. You do that, and we can talk. Any of your bots want to jump in and offer concrete material, go for it.

Wrong thread you fucking idiot and as far as I know kwc57 hasn't posted in that thread you're babbling about.

You are mad because I deal with you far better in the mode than you tried to deal with me. I will always beat you down, bigreb, always.

Not even in your wildest dream can you beat me, hell you can't beat your meat with directions and a dvd showing you how.:eusa_whistle:

Driveling and sniveling, bigrebnc, and name calling like a four year old: that is all you are doing.

You will always lose to me when you do that. :lol:

You're an idiot because you talking about another thread in a thread it doesn't belong in and asking someone to identify what was meant in that thread who has not posted in that thread. That makes you an idiot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top