At last, Obama reveals the truth about Benghazi attacks in an interview

[Little-Acorn]

 

[OnePercenter]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

 

[Clementine]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

The Republicans didn't do jack shit by themselves. It's already been proven that cuts had no effect on the security in Benghazi, much of which was supposed to be provided by Libya. We could have gotten our people out of harm's way prior to the anniversary of 9/11, as other countries did, or left the current security in place. Security was removed just before the attack, after pleas for more help were requested. The anniversary of 9/11 should have meant elevated security or evacuation because threat levels are always higher on that day. Again, we knew threats were being made and there is no excuse in the world for not acting. Maybe no one is this administration is smart enough to handle such threats.

There is no way those threats were not known, as they had been made public in the months prior to 9/11. Even family members worried about their loved ones in Benghazi before the attack. I can't believe anyone is so damn stupid that they believe the State Dept said, "Sorry, you'll have to deal with terrorists on your own because we can't afford to help you." That would have to be the way it went for the budget cuts to used as an excuse and even the least sophisticated liberal must understand how lame that is.

The cuts don't explain why the threat was ignored, why stand down orders were issued or why a lie was told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

 

[Jarhead]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

lol. Simply sweep it under the rug.

Listen up sparky...at the hearings the chick under Clinton admitted that she received the requests for extra security but opted to deny them without asking Clinton.

It had nothing to do with budget. An extra 1 million a year for extra security wouldn't make a dent in the overall security budget.

Dam....fools like you are why....awww...heck.....fuck it. You are lost already.

 

[OnePercenter]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

The Republicans didn't do jack shit by themselves. It's already been proven that cuts had no effect on the security in Benghazi, which was supposed to be provided by Libya. We could have removed people or left the current security in place.

There is NO WAY threats were not known, as they had been made public in the months prior to 9/11. Even family members worried about their loved ones in Benghazi before the attack. I can't believe anyone is so damn stupid that they believe the State Dept said, "Sorry, you'll have to deal with terrorists on your own because we can't afford to help you." That would have to be the way it went for the budget cuts to used as an excuse and even the least sophisticated liberal must understand how lame that is.

The cuts don't explain why the threat was ignored, why stand down orders were issued or why a lie was told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

And the reason that security was supposed to be provided by Libya? Could it be security budget cuts?

 

[Jarhead]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

The Republicans didn't do jack shit by themselves. It's already been proven that cuts had no effect on the security in Benghazi, which was supposed to be provided by Libya. We could have removed people or left the current security in place.

There is NO WAY threats were not known, as they had been made public in the months prior to 9/11. Even family members worried about their loved ones in Benghazi before the attack. I can't believe anyone is so damn stupid that they believe the State Dept said, "Sorry, you'll have to deal with terrorists on your own because we can't afford to help you." That would have to be the way it went for the budget cuts to used as an excuse and even the least sophisticated liberal must understand how lame that is.

The cuts don't explain why the threat was ignored, why stand down orders were issued or why a lie was told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

And the reason that security was supposed to be provided by Libya? Could it be security budget cuts?

No.

Gullible asshole.

 

[Jarhead]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

The Republicans didn't do jack shit by themselves. It's already been proven that cuts had no effect on the security in Benghazi, much of which was supposed to be provided by Libya. We could have gotten our people out of harm's way prior to the anniversary of 9/11, as other countries did, or left the current security in place. Security was removed just before the attack, after pleas for more help were requested. The anniversary of 9/11 should have meant elevated security or evacuation because threat levels are always higher on that day. Again, we knew threats were being made and there is no excuse in the world for not acting. Maybe no one is this administration is smart enough to handle such threats.

There is no way those threats were not known, as they had been made public in the months prior to 9/11. Even family members worried about their loved ones in Benghazi before the attack. I can't believe anyone is so damn stupid that they believe the State Dept said, "Sorry, you'll have to deal with terrorists on your own because we can't afford to help you." That would have to be the way it went for the budget cuts to used as an excuse and even the least sophisticated liberal must understand how lame that is.

The cuts don't explain why the threat was ignored, why stand down orders were issued or why a lie was told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

the lie was not told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

The lie was told to protect the campaign mantra of "al-quaeda is on the run"....and it also gave reason for Obama not to cancel his all important fundraiser the next day.

 

[kwc57]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

The Republicans didn't do jack shit by themselves. It's already been proven that cuts had no effect on the security in Benghazi, which was supposed to be provided by Libya. We could have removed people or left the current security in place.

There is NO WAY threats were not known, as they had been made public in the months prior to 9/11. Even family members worried about their loved ones in Benghazi before the attack. I can't believe anyone is so damn stupid that they believe the State Dept said, "Sorry, you'll have to deal with terrorists on your own because we can't afford to help you." That would have to be the way it went for the budget cuts to used as an excuse and even the least sophisticated liberal must understand how lame that is.

The cuts don't explain why the threat was ignored, why stand down orders were issued or why a lie was told to protect the radical Muslims behind it.

And the reason that security was supposed to be provided by Libya? Could it be security budget cuts?

More likely an inept President and Sec of State.

 

[blackhawk]

The Republicans have not controlled the Senate since 2006 so any cuts the Democrats could have undone.

 

[Oldstyle]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

So why did the State Department official in charge of Libya state that was not the case when she testified under oath in front of Congress. When asked if budget cuts caused security to be withdrawn she answered "No."

Don't embarrass yourself rehashing the desperate talking points that the Obama Administration attempted to use following the deaths of our people in Benghazi...they didn't hold up to scrutiny then and they won't now.

 

[OnePercenter]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

lol. Simply sweep it under the rug.

Listen up sparky...at the hearings the chick under Clinton admitted that she received the requests for extra security but opted to deny them without asking Clinton.

It had nothing to do with budget. An extra 1 million a year for extra security wouldn't make a dent in the overall security budget.

Dam....fools like you are why....awww...heck.....fuck it. You are lost already.

Try to focus. The thread is about Benghazi and $360M.

 

[HenryBHough]

The greats myth being perpetuated is that Hillary Rodham (sometimes she actually remember say "Clinton") recalls anything about Benghazi at all.

Still, the left wants as president, someone who upon hearing the red phone ringing in the night will wonder who's at the door and why the servants aren't running down to check.

 

[OnePercenter]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

So why did the State Department official in charge of Libya state that was not the case when she testified under oath in front of Congress. When asked if budget cuts caused security to be withdrawn she answered "No."

Don't embarrass yourself rehashing the desperate talking points that the Obama Administration attempted to use following the deaths of our people in Benghazi...they didn't hold up to scrutiny then and they won't now.

Then why was the CIA involved?

 

[OnePercenter]

The greats myth being perpetuated is that Hillary Rodham (sometimes she actually remember say "Clinton") recalls anything about Benghazi at all.

Still, the left wants as president, someone who upon hearing the red phone ringing in the night will wonder who's at the door and why the servants aren't running down to check.

You're Canadian aren't you?

 

[tinydancer]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

Really? How did you afford the fucking budget to pay Libyan Militias as security for Ambassador Stevens?

You had the money to pay them asswipe.

Now mother fucker let's get down and dirty. Because I hate lying pieces of shit like you. Where did you get the money to pay Libyan Militias to provide security for Ambassador Stevens?

Now if that isn't good enough for you you piece of vile shit trying to blame Republicans for your fucking D fiasco that cost these men their lives, why didn't anyone in your wank job State Department go...........gee I guess we don't need 40 marines in Ottawa, in London, in Belgium maybe we can ship a few to Libya.

BUT NO. You had to let Ambassador Stevens because of optics hang out in the wind.

 

[tinydancer]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

So why did the State Department official in charge of Libya state that was not the case when she testified under oath in front of Congress. When asked if budget cuts caused security to be withdrawn she answered "No."

Don't embarrass yourself rehashing the desperate talking points that the Obama Administration attempted to use following the deaths of our people in Benghazi...they didn't hold up to scrutiny then and they won't now.

Then why was the CIA involved?

Don't you know? One gentleman gave an interview to ABC before returning telling the sad tale of how the idiots in Washington didn't think about all of GADAFFI'S weapons before they turned Libya over to wild cards.

Your President is such a stupid man surrounded by even more stupid people.

 

[Jarhead]

We already know the reason. The Republican Senate reduced the security budget $360M, which is the reason CIA operatives were killed in the attack.

lol. Simply sweep it under the rug.

Listen up sparky...at the hearings the chick under Clinton admitted that she received the requests for extra security but opted to deny them without asking Clinton.

It had nothing to do with budget. An extra 1 million a year for extra security wouldn't make a dent in the overall security budget.

Dam....fools like you are why....awww...heck.....fuck it. You are lost already.

Try to focus. The thread is about Benghazi and $360M.

nice diversion...gullible asshole.

 

[tinydancer]

I'm so sick of this bullshit that it's the Republican's fault. I thought it was a video.

 

[tinydancer]

How did you pay the Benghazi security then? You paid Libyan militias to be security for Ambassador Stevens.

Now you are saying there was no money to pay for security because of Republicans. But you were paying Libyan militias for Stevens security.

Which is it?

You liars kill me.

 

[tinydancer]

Cripes I've been getting conservatives elected in by elections up here so I haven't been in as much. Tell me you people know about Glen. I've put up the interview before.