Atheism; An Intellectual Dead End

[ding]

Your type always did try to force your will onto others. Thank God for the 2nd Amendment.

And, there it is. The last refuge of the theocrats. When they figure out that they are failing in their attempts to use the courts to legitimize their indoctination of children, they threaten violence. And you call me militant. I don't recall, even once, suggesting employing our "second amendment rights" to stop you from mentally abusing our children.

No. I don't threaten violence. I thank God I can defend myself from yours. You're like a fucking nazi.

There it is! Lol. You know the Nazis were Catholics right? Hitler used the church because it's a great vehicle for control.

The Nazi's were socialists.

A lot of socialist catholics in Europe.

Do you think only capitalists are Christians?

Yep, there is a distribution. The ones that are more emotional tend to be socialists.

 

[ding]

God you argue like a woman.

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Yes. Yes. I am a threat to your freedom, and liberty to mentally absue children.

No. You are a threat to freedom and liberty because you seek equality via uniformity.

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

 

[Czernobog]

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Yes. Yes. I am a threat to your freedom, and liberty to mentally absue children.

No. You are a threat to freedom and liberty because you seek equality via uniformity.

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you. And it certainly doesn't change the fact that it is an ad hominem. Since your illogical arguments are failing, you have resorted to attacking me, instead of disputing my position.

 

[sealybobo]

I never threatened violence. The only one here who brought up using guns is you. You really should just admit that you are a militint religionist.

God you argue like a woman.

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

 

[ding]

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Yes. Yes. I am a threat to your freedom, and liberty to mentally absue children.

No. You are a threat to freedom and liberty because you seek equality via uniformity.

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

 

[ding]

God you argue like a woman.

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

 

[Czernobog]

Yes. Yes. I am a threat to your freedom, and liberty to mentally absue children.

No. You are a threat to freedom and liberty because you seek equality via uniformity.

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

 

[ding]

No. You are a threat to freedom and liberty because you seek equality via uniformity.

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

 

[Czernobog]

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

And another ad hominem. Why don't you just give up when your irrational arguments fail, instead of personally attacking the people who have destroyed your arguments?

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

 

[Czernobog]

That's a lie, and an ad homenim. You're really on a roll.

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

 

[sealybobo]

And now the ad homemins. You're adorable. You are militant, and a theocrat, but it is adorable how you think that you are rational.

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

Why?

 

[sealybobo]

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

And another ad hominem. Why don't you just give up when your irrational arguments fail, instead of personally attacking the people who have destroyed your arguments?

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I thought we were all being honest here. Why would I lie? What part seemed like bs? I'm curious. I have challenged my dad but don't tell him I don't believe I just say "how can we be sure" but when he says there must be one too many times I snap and lay some science fact logic and reason on him.

I think my dad realizes it's wishful thinking but he chooses to wish it so who am I to tell him it's a scam.

But then they asked him and everyone to leave the church something in the will. If he gives 10℅ that's $70k screw that.

 

[sealybobo]

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

Or prevent stem cell. Or remember Terry shivo? Or to tell a woman you have to have a baby she doesn't want. Science says nonsense. It's a very simple proceedure

 

[ding]

No. It's my belief. It is based on reason and experience.

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't believe your kind will be happy until religion is abolished.

 

[ding]

I'm actually not that religious. I just see people like you as a serious threat to our freedom and liberty.

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

And another ad hominem. Why don't you just give up when your irrational arguments fail, instead of personally attacking the people who have destroyed your arguments?

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I hope you don't mind if I disagree. I really do believe people like you are dangerous. I'm not sure which argument you believe you won or why, but if you want to see it that way, more power to you.

 

[sealybobo]

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't believe your kind will be happy until religion is abolished.

I can't wait for the day voters won't vote for religious politicians

 

[ding]

Of course you aren't. You aren't trying this hard to convince me and czernobog. You're trying to convince yourself.

I'm not a coward for not walking up to people at church and telling them they are stupid. That would be rude.

And im not a coward when I let my dad talk about seeing his wife again. He insists there must be a God. I tried to explain why his evidence isn't evidence for a creator before my mom died but I don't argue it anymore. When you are dealing with death you give people their God.

I think you should tell your dad how stupid you believe he is. Don't just share that with us.

I've tried. Lol. We've got in heated arguments. He keeps making the same bad arguments. The body and planet ecosystem is too perfect to not have been created by something. Who did it he asks, and I tell him we don't know is the most logical explanation.

He doesn't try to defend virgin births but he gives to the church so he has cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and doesn't know it.

And that's why I keep it here. The internet has done wonders for freedom of mind and science and atheism. We realize we aren't crazy or alone. Czernobog has really owned you

Now I know you are lying about your parents.

And another ad hominem. Why don't you just give up when your irrational arguments fail, instead of personally attacking the people who have destroyed your arguments?

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I thought we were all being honest here. Why would I lie? What part seemed like bs? I'm curious. I have challenged my dad but don't tell him I don't believe I just say "how can we be sure" but when he says there must be one too many times I snap and lay some science fact logic and reason on him.

I think my dad realizes it's wishful thinking but he chooses to wish it so who am I to tell him it's a scam.

But then they asked him and everyone to leave the church something in the will. If he gives 10℅ that's $70k screw that.

Really? This was you being honest? That's why you spend your time blogging about religion and God. Because you are such an honest person? Sorry, that's bullshit.

 

[Czernobog]

Well, the first half of that statement is true. It is your belief. But you wouldn't know reason, if it came up and suffocated you.

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't believe your kind will be happy until religion is abolished.

Well...but you also believe in an invisible superman that is impooissible for science to ever discover is the architect of the universe, so, you know, we've already established that your beliefs are questionable.

 

[ding]

The Khmer Rouge abolished all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. These policies had been implemented in less severe forms for many years prior to the Khmer Rouge's taking power.

So, what? You thought I was a Cambodian totalitarian? Here's a news flash for you. I am just as disgusted with Cambodian totalitarianism, the failed communist experiment of the USSR, North Korea, and China as you are. Never once have I suggested that the government should be used to outlaw religion. Only that religion should not be allowed, as the Constitution guarantees, to use the government, and the public school system to indoctrinate children in religious dogma. It is you who wants the government to sanction your religion, not me.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course you don't. That's the problem.You religionists want your religion? I don't have a problem with that. Just keep it in your church where it belongs. But, when you try to insert your irrational religious dogma into our schools, and try to use the government to lend the illusion of legitimacy to your religion, so that children are never given the opportunity to hear the rational evidence that disputes your religion, then I have a problem, and will use the Constitutional protection at my disposal to stop you.

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

I don't believe your kind will be happy until religion is abolished.

I can't wait for the day voters won't vote for religious politicians

Now that was honest. And I can't wait for the day that moral relativists who practice normalization of deviance and have an external locus of control reap their predictable surprises. That was honest too.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
is that the same thing as having a Free Spirit, abolishing religion ...