Autopsy of a Dead Coup

[PoliticalChic]

Saying "Hi, how are you" at a cocktail party loaded with international diplomats is not "a meeting", therefore you did terribly, sorry.

It is important to see the scribbling of the indelibly indoctrinated, like that one.

We should never be allowed to forget the damage government schooling has done.

Wait for it...……. public schools have like a 70% grad rate. Great Job. If my work was only 70% successful I'd be out of business. When it comes to education, The Govt is not the problem or the Solution. Here's why! Funny but true. We didn't have snow days when I was in school. It was like a challenge to be at school on really bad snowy days. Schools were a reflection of the community. HMMMMM!

And far worse.....when American students are tested against other nation's kids......we can't compete.

Public education systems are run by elected officials in most areas I believe. School boards etc. Which means Political and ideological indoctrination can be infused systematically. ie; No school prayer (not even moments of silence or reflection) No Pledge of allegiance ( because someone added the word "god" to it.
Uniforms (like the Nazis'). Bussing to integrate schools Because some communities had better schools than others. Learning is no longer a goal and if you fail it's someone else's fault. The bar is so low it is almost impossible to not graduate from high school. yet only 70% do. Then most can't pass entry exams for college admission and get thrown into the world with what amounts to a 9th grade education in other country's. Vey few job opportunities desperation, poverty, drugs and crime are the fruits of public education today.

My grandma only had a 9th grade education. By my estimates, it would equal a bachelor's degree today.

Man, are you RIGHT!!!!


An 1895 8th Grade Final Exam: I Couldn't Pass It. Could You?
BY MARTIN PERETZ
November 28, 2010
An old pal from Brandeis—Sheldon Gray—has a knack for the ironic. He's very well educated, and so am I. But I don't know whether we could pass this test, from 1895 in what looks like a little red schoolhouse in Salina, Kansas, at all. Let alone with flying colors.

What it took to get an 8th grade education in 1895...

Remember when grandparents and great-grandparents stated that they only had an 8th grade education? Well, check this out. Could any of us have passed the 8th grade in 1895?

This is the eighth-grade final exam from 1895 in Salina , Kansas , USA .. It was taken from the original document on file at the Smokey Valley Genealogical Society and Library in Salina, and reprinted by the Salina Journal.

8th Grade Final Exam:

Salina , KS - 1895

Grammar (Time, one hour)

1. Give nine rules for the use of Capital Letters.
2. Name the Parts of Speech and define those that have no modifications.
3. Define Verse, Stanza and Paragraph.
4. What are the Principal Parts of a verb? Give Principal Parts of do, lie, lay and run.
5. Define Case, Illustrate each Case.
6. What is Punctuation? Give rules for principal marks of Punctuation.
7-10. Write a composition of about 150 words and show therein that you understand the practical use of the rules of grammar.

Arithmetic (Time, 1.25 hours)

1. Name and define the Fundamental Rules of Arithmetic.
2. A wagon box is 2 ft. deep, 10 feet long, and 3 ft. wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold?
3. If a load of wheat weighs 3942 lbs., what is it worth at 50 cts. per bu, deducting 1050 lbs. for tare?
4. District No. 33 has a valuation of $35,000. What is the necessary levy to carry on a school seven months at $50 per month, and have $104 for incidentals?
5. Find cost of 6720 lbs. coal at $6.00 per ton.
6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7 percent.
7. What is the cost of 40 boards 12 inches wide and 16 ft. long at $.20 per inch?
8. Find bank discount on $300 for 90 days (no grace) at 10 percent.
9. What is the cost of a square farm at $15 per acre, the distance around which is 640 rods?
10. Write a Bank Check, a Promissory Note, and a Receipt.

U.S. History (Time, 45 minutes)

1. Give the epochs into which U.S. History is divided.
2. Give an account of the discovery of America by Columbus.
3. Relate the causes and results of the Revolutionary War.
4. Show the territorial growth of the United States.
5. Tell what you can of the history of Kansas.
6. Describe three of the most prominent battles of the Rebellion.
7. Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton, Bell, Lincoln, Penn, and Howe?
8. Name events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1800, 1849, and 1865?

Orthography (Time, one hour)

1. What is meant by the following: Alphabet, phonetic orthography, etymology, syllabication?
2. What are elementary sounds? How classified?
3. What are the following, and give examples of each: Trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals?
4. Give four substitutes for caret 'u'.
5. Give two rules for spelling words with final 'e'. Name two exceptions under each rule.
6. Give two uses of silent letters in spelling. Illustrate each.
7. Define the following prefixes and use in connection with a word: Bi, dis, mis, pre, semi, post, non, inter, mono, super.
8. Mark diacritically and divide into syllables the following, and name the sign that indicates the sound: Card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last.
9. Use the following correctly in sentences, Cite, site, sight, fane, fain, feign, vane, vain, vein, raze, raise, rays.
10. Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks and by syllabication.

Geography (Time, one hour)

1. What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?
2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas?
3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?
4. Describe the mountains of N.A.
5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia, Odessa, Denver, Manitoba, Hecla, Yukon, St. Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco.
6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S.
7. Name all the republics of Europe and give capital of each.
8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?
9. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.
10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give inclination of the earth.




Before Liberals co-opted the system.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Someone put up what is probably an accurate review of education:

1. Teaching Math In 1950s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit ?


2. Teaching Math In 1960s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?


3. Teaching Math In 1970s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80. Did he make a profit ?


4. Teaching Math In 1980s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.


5. Teaching Math In 1990s

A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no wrong answers, and if you feel like crying, it's ok).



6. Teaching Math In 2010


Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la producciones es $80. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

ANSWER: His profit was $375,000 because his logging business is just a front for his marijuana farm.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Lyin’ McCabe: Former FBI Head Changes Story Regarding The Alleged DOJ Coup Attempt Against Trump
... McCabe can’t seem to get his story straight. McCabe has long been a center of controversy. From allegations that the FBI used the uncorroborated Trump dossier to secure a spy warrant against Trump campaign official Carter Page to a potential conflict of interest in his role in the Hillary Clinton probe, McCabe has become the poster child for all this is wrong at the Department of Justice for Republicans and the Trump White House. The stench that this man, along with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and Agent Peter Strzok, thought they were above the law, self-appointed defenders against the Trump presidency.

Scott Pelley: Rosenstein was actually openly talking about whether there was a majority of the cabinet who would vote to remove the president.

Andrew McCabe: That's correct. Counting votes or possible votes.

Scott Pelley: Did he assign specific votes to specific people?

Andrew McCabe: No, not that I recall.



Three days later, McCabe has changed this part of the story:

Replying to @tomselliott


PELLEY: "Rosenstein was actually openly talking about whether there was a majority of the cabinet who would vote to remove the president?”
McCABE: "That’s correct. Counting votes or possible votes.”@colbyhall



And no, the coup aspect isn’t overblown; even liberal Alan Dershowitz said you couldn’t spin what top DOJ officials tried to do here (via RCP):

"If [McCabe’s comments are] true, it is clearly an attempt at a coup d’état," Dershowitz said.

"Any Justice Department official who even mentioned the 25th amendment in the context of President Trump has committed a grievous offense against the Constitution…"
Lyin’ McCabe: Former FBI Head Changes Story Regarding The Alleged DOJ Coup Attempt Against Trump

 

[Care4all]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Maybe it was:
FOX NEWS is what changed it, and the courts.... Fox forced news journalists to lie, they sued FOX, the court ruled Fox can lie and force their journalists to lie...?

What year was that?

Didn't happen:

\FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'?

thank you! I usually fact check things before post! LOOK what happens when I don't take the time to fact check!

 

[Care4all]

McCabe brought it to the FBI legal team to vet the off hand idea, and the Lawyers nixed it, immediately.... there was no coup. There was no attempted coup.

It was nixed by the Legal advice they sought in less than a nano second.

No one planning a coup would bother asking for legal advice.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Maybe it was:
FOX NEWS is what changed it, and the courts.... Fox forced news journalists to lie, they sued FOX, the court ruled Fox can lie and force their journalists to lie...?

What year was that?

Didn't happen:

\FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'?

thank you! I usually fact check things before post! LOOK what happens when I don't take the time to fact check!

You should do a better job of checking.
The story from the liar is, of course, a lie.

Relying on that dunce makes you a moron.




"To begin with, the popular portrayal almost always omits the rather crucial fact that Akre and Wilson lost almost every one of their claims at the trial court. As the Florida Second District Court of Appeal noted in their ruling:

Akre and Wilson sued WTVT alleging... that their terminations had been in retaliation for their resisting WTVT's attempts to distort or suppress the BGH story and for threatening to report the alleged news distortion to the FCC. Akre also brought claims for declaratory relief and for breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. The trial court directed a verdict against Akre on her breach of contract claim, Akre abandoned her claim for declaratory relief, and the trial court let her whistle-blower claims go to the jury. The jury rejected all of Akre's claims except her claim that WTVT retaliated against her in response to her threat to disclose the alleged news distortion to the FCC.


It is also not correct to claim, as the Gaddy story quoted above states, that the jury ruled that the FOX affiliate had, in fact, found that the station had attempted to force Akre and Wilson to air "a false, distorted or slanted story..."

But the FCC does not share Akre's interpretation of the jury verdict. In a 2007 decision by the FCC denying a petition by Akre and Wilson demanding that WTVT's broadcast license not be renewed, the FCC includes the following footnote:

Although there has been much back-and-forth among the parties about whether the jury in the employment lawsuit found that Station WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, the verdict form did not ask the jury to determine whether WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, but rather to determine whether Station WTVT(TV) fired either employee for threatening to disclose what the Petitioners reasonably believed would be a violation of the news distortion policy.

So the trial jury never reached a conclusion on whether the FOX affiliate had violated the news distortion policy, nor did they have to in order to determine she had been fired in response to the threat by Akre and Wilson to file a complaint with the FCC.

More importantly, and more relevant to the examination of whether WTVT actually asserted a"right to lie"in its newscasts, is that there is nothing on record to show that this argument was ever advanced in court.

Whatever the truth of the dispute between the two reporters and WTVT, it seems clear that the station did not at the trial court level admit that it had attempted to distort the news story or assert the"right to lie"in its broadcasts.

It is also worth noting that of all the web sites, blog postings, and online commentary on the subject of the FOX "right to lie" argument, not a single one that I've seen links to anything that would substantiate the claim. Very few even bother to link to the actual 2nd District opinion overturning Akre's whistleblower verdict, or anything else related to the case itself.

Yet in all the claims and charges leveled directly by Akre and Wilson against the FOX affiliate across multiple venues and platforms, there is not a single mention of any "right to lie" argument allegedly offered by WTVT. They seemingly accuse the station of nearly every other sin imaginable in the world of journalism, but are completely silent on this charge.

FOX, Lies & Videotape: debunking an internet myth*»*Blog*»* Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2009/11/03/fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth/
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog...fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth




Poor baby...need a tissue to get that egg off your face?

 

[Care4all]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Maybe it was:
FOX NEWS is what changed it, and the courts.... Fox forced news journalists to lie, they sued FOX, the court ruled Fox can lie and force their journalists to lie...?

What year was that?

Didn't happen:

\FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'?

thank you! I usually fact check things before post! LOOK what happens when I don't take the time to fact check!

You should do a better job of checking.
The story from the liar is, of course, a lie.

Relying on that dunce makes you a moron.




"To begin with, the popular portrayal almost always omits the rather crucial fact that Akre and Wilson lost almost every one of their claims at the trial court. As the Florida Second District Court of Appeal noted in their ruling:

Akre and Wilson sued WTVT alleging... that their terminations had been in retaliation for their resisting WTVT's attempts to distort or suppress the BGH story and for threatening to report the alleged news distortion to the FCC. Akre also brought claims for declaratory relief and for breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. The trial court directed a verdict against Akre on her breach of contract claim, Akre abandoned her claim for declaratory relief, and the trial court let her whistle-blower claims go to the jury. The jury rejected all of Akre's claims except her claim that WTVT retaliated against her in response to her threat to disclose the alleged news distortion to the FCC.


It is also not correct to claim, as the Gaddy story quoted above states, that the jury ruled that the FOX affiliate had, in fact, found that the station had attempted to force Akre and Wilson to air "a false, distorted or slanted story..."

But the FCC does not share Akre's interpretation of the jury verdict. In a 2007 decision by the FCC denying a petition by Akre and Wilson demanding that WTVT's broadcast license not be renewed, the FCC includes the following footnote:

Although there has been much back-and-forth among the parties about whether the jury in the employment lawsuit found that Station WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, the verdict form did not ask the jury to determine whether WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, but rather to determine whether Station WTVT(TV) fired either employee for threatening to disclose what the Petitioners reasonably believed would be a violation of the news distortion policy.

So the trial jury never reached a conclusion on whether the FOX affiliate had violated the news distortion policy, nor did they have to in order to determine she had been fired in response to the threat by Akre and Wilson to file a complaint with the FCC.

More importantly, and more relevant to the examination of whether WTVT actually asserted a"right to lie"in its newscasts, is that there is nothing on record to show that this argument was ever advanced in court.

Whatever the truth of the dispute between the two reporters and WTVT, it seems clear that the station did not at the trial court level admit that it had attempted to distort the news story or assert the"right to lie"in its broadcasts.

It is also worth noting that of all the web sites, blog postings, and online commentary on the subject of the FOX "right to lie" argument, not a single one that I've seen links to anything that would substantiate the claim. Very few even bother to link to the actual 2nd District opinion overturning Akre's whistleblower verdict, or anything else related to the case itself.

Yet in all the claims and charges leveled directly by Akre and Wilson against the FOX affiliate across multiple venues and platforms, there is not a single mention of any "right to lie" argument allegedly offered by WTVT. They seemingly accuse the station of nearly every other sin imaginable in the world of journalism, but are completely silent on this charge.

FOX, Lies & Videotape: debunking an internet myth*»*Blog*»* Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2009/11/03/fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth/
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog...fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth




Poor baby...need a tissue to get that egg off your face?

Besides being a total wacky off the wall bitch, in your post...you should get in check, your reading comprehension problems too.

Dragonlady, posted a link to say that ''The FOX was allowed to lie case'' WAS NOT TRUE and she gave a link to the fact check that explained why it was FALSE, and I thanked her for the information and her correction of what I had said.

And from that I get your ridiculous and nasty, bitchy, nonsense reply??

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe it was:
FOX NEWS is what changed it, and the courts.... Fox forced news journalists to lie, they sued FOX, the court ruled Fox can lie and force their journalists to lie...?

What year was that?

Didn't happen:

\FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'?

thank you! I usually fact check things before post! LOOK what happens when I don't take the time to fact check!

You should do a better job of checking.
The story from the liar is, of course, a lie.

Relying on that dunce makes you a moron.




"To begin with, the popular portrayal almost always omits the rather crucial fact that Akre and Wilson lost almost every one of their claims at the trial court. As the Florida Second District Court of Appeal noted in their ruling:

Akre and Wilson sued WTVT alleging... that their terminations had been in retaliation for their resisting WTVT's attempts to distort or suppress the BGH story and for threatening to report the alleged news distortion to the FCC. Akre also brought claims for declaratory relief and for breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. The trial court directed a verdict against Akre on her breach of contract claim, Akre abandoned her claim for declaratory relief, and the trial court let her whistle-blower claims go to the jury. The jury rejected all of Akre's claims except her claim that WTVT retaliated against her in response to her threat to disclose the alleged news distortion to the FCC.


It is also not correct to claim, as the Gaddy story quoted above states, that the jury ruled that the FOX affiliate had, in fact, found that the station had attempted to force Akre and Wilson to air "a false, distorted or slanted story..."

But the FCC does not share Akre's interpretation of the jury verdict. In a 2007 decision by the FCC denying a petition by Akre and Wilson demanding that WTVT's broadcast license not be renewed, the FCC includes the following footnote:

Although there has been much back-and-forth among the parties about whether the jury in the employment lawsuit found that Station WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, the verdict form did not ask the jury to determine whether WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, but rather to determine whether Station WTVT(TV) fired either employee for threatening to disclose what the Petitioners reasonably believed would be a violation of the news distortion policy.

So the trial jury never reached a conclusion on whether the FOX affiliate had violated the news distortion policy, nor did they have to in order to determine she had been fired in response to the threat by Akre and Wilson to file a complaint with the FCC.

More importantly, and more relevant to the examination of whether WTVT actually asserted a"right to lie"in its newscasts, is that there is nothing on record to show that this argument was ever advanced in court.

Whatever the truth of the dispute between the two reporters and WTVT, it seems clear that the station did not at the trial court level admit that it had attempted to distort the news story or assert the"right to lie"in its broadcasts.

It is also worth noting that of all the web sites, blog postings, and online commentary on the subject of the FOX "right to lie" argument, not a single one that I've seen links to anything that would substantiate the claim. Very few even bother to link to the actual 2nd District opinion overturning Akre's whistleblower verdict, or anything else related to the case itself.

Yet in all the claims and charges leveled directly by Akre and Wilson against the FOX affiliate across multiple venues and platforms, there is not a single mention of any "right to lie" argument allegedly offered by WTVT. They seemingly accuse the station of nearly every other sin imaginable in the world of journalism, but are completely silent on this charge.

FOX, Lies & Videotape: debunking an internet myth*»*Blog*»* Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2009/11/03/fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth/
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog...fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth




Poor baby...need a tissue to get that egg off your face?

Besides being a total wacky off the wall bitch, in your post...you should get in check, your reading comprehension problems too.

Dragonlady, posted a link to say that ''The FOX was allowed to lie case'' WAS NOT TRUE and she gave a link to the fact check that explained why it was FALSE, and I thanked her for the information and her correction of what I had said.

And from that I get your ridiculous and nasty, bitchy, nonsense reply??

As miraculous as I am....even I can leap to contusions once in a while.

 

[Dragonlady]

Maybe it was:
FOX NEWS is what changed it, and the courts.... Fox forced news journalists to lie, they sued FOX, the court ruled Fox can lie and force their journalists to lie...?

What year was that?

Didn't happen:

\FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'?

thank you! I usually fact check things before post! LOOK what happens when I don't take the time to fact check!

You should do a better job of checking.
The story from the liar is, of course, a lie.

Relying on that dunce makes you a moron.




"To begin with, the popular portrayal almost always omits the rather crucial fact that Akre and Wilson lost almost every one of their claims at the trial court. As the Florida Second District Court of Appeal noted in their ruling:

Akre and Wilson sued WTVT alleging... that their terminations had been in retaliation for their resisting WTVT's attempts to distort or suppress the BGH story and for threatening to report the alleged news distortion to the FCC. Akre also brought claims for declaratory relief and for breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. The trial court directed a verdict against Akre on her breach of contract claim, Akre abandoned her claim for declaratory relief, and the trial court let her whistle-blower claims go to the jury. The jury rejected all of Akre's claims except her claim that WTVT retaliated against her in response to her threat to disclose the alleged news distortion to the FCC.


It is also not correct to claim, as the Gaddy story quoted above states, that the jury ruled that the FOX affiliate had, in fact, found that the station had attempted to force Akre and Wilson to air "a false, distorted or slanted story..."

But the FCC does not share Akre's interpretation of the jury verdict. In a 2007 decision by the FCC denying a petition by Akre and Wilson demanding that WTVT's broadcast license not be renewed, the FCC includes the following footnote:

Although there has been much back-and-forth among the parties about whether the jury in the employment lawsuit found that Station WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, the verdict form did not ask the jury to determine whether WTVT(TV) violated the news distortion policy, but rather to determine whether Station WTVT(TV) fired either employee for threatening to disclose what the Petitioners reasonably believed would be a violation of the news distortion policy.

So the trial jury never reached a conclusion on whether the FOX affiliate had violated the news distortion policy, nor did they have to in order to determine she had been fired in response to the threat by Akre and Wilson to file a complaint with the FCC.

More importantly, and more relevant to the examination of whether WTVT actually asserted a"right to lie"in its newscasts, is that there is nothing on record to show that this argument was ever advanced in court.

Whatever the truth of the dispute between the two reporters and WTVT, it seems clear that the station did not at the trial court level admit that it had attempted to distort the news story or assert the"right to lie"in its broadcasts.

It is also worth noting that of all the web sites, blog postings, and online commentary on the subject of the FOX "right to lie" argument, not a single one that I've seen links to anything that would substantiate the claim. Very few even bother to link to the actual 2nd District opinion overturning Akre's whistleblower verdict, or anything else related to the case itself.

Yet in all the claims and charges leveled directly by Akre and Wilson against the FOX affiliate across multiple venues and platforms, there is not a single mention of any "right to lie" argument allegedly offered by WTVT. They seemingly accuse the station of nearly every other sin imaginable in the world of journalism, but are completely silent on this charge.

FOX, Lies & Videotape: debunking an internet myth*»*Blog*»* Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2009/11/03/fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth/
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog...fox-lies-videotape-debunking-an-internet-myth




Poor baby...need a tissue to get that egg off your face?

Besides being a total wacky off the wall bitch, in your post...you should get in check, your reading comprehension problems too.

Dragonlady, posted a link to say that ''The FOX was allowed to lie case'' WAS NOT TRUE and she gave a link to the fact check that explained why it was FALSE, and I thanked her for the information and her correction of what I had said.

And from that I get your ridiculous and nasty, bitchy, nonsense reply??

I fact check as reflex before I post too, but the one time I don't, it always bites me in the ass, too. It happens to the best of us.

 

[jc456]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

thank god trump is a great president.

 

[jc456]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

To be clear.....are you so embarrassed at both the corrupt nature of your elites, and of the failure of their plan, that you are denying what is clear to all???


Really????


I can't tell you how pleased I am to have forced you to appear a fool.

Exploring Constitutional methods to place the VP in charge is not an attempted or illegal seizure of power.

I'm embarrassed alright. At Trumpublican's gullibility.

what else is there without evidence or a congressional review as per the real procedure of the 25th amendment.

 

[BlindBoo]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

thank god trump is a great president.

He is the father of all lies and has utterly deceived you with his wickedness.

 

[jc456]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

thank god trump is a great president.

He is the father of all lies and has utterly deceived you with his wickedness.

greatness to which you have never seen. and you are saddened your obammy slime was anti america.

 

[Meister]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

thank god trump is a great president.

He is the father of all lies and has utterly deceived you with his wickedness.

Trump is the father of his children.
"He is the father of all lies" ? Boy, how melodramatic can a person be.

 

[BlindBoo]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

To be clear.....are you so embarrassed at both the corrupt nature of your elites, and of the failure of their plan, that you are denying what is clear to all???


Really????


I can't tell you how pleased I am to have forced you to appear a fool.

Exploring Constitutional methods to place the VP in charge is not an attempted or illegal seizure of power.

I'm embarrassed alright. At Trumpublican's gullibility.

what else is there without evidence or a congressional review as per the real procedure of the 25th amendment.

Face it. Their plan (according to the PhonyCoupGaters) appears to be too incompetent to succeed. In the end Pence would be in charge. Brilliant plan! But wait, was Pence in on it? Is that what I'm missing?

 

[jc456]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

To be clear.....are you so embarrassed at both the corrupt nature of your elites, and of the failure of their plan, that you are denying what is clear to all???


Really????


I can't tell you how pleased I am to have forced you to appear a fool.

Exploring Constitutional methods to place the VP in charge is not an attempted or illegal seizure of power.

I'm embarrassed alright. At Trumpublican's gullibility.

what else is there without evidence or a congressional review as per the real procedure of the 25th amendment.

Face it. Their plan (according to the PhonyCoupGaters) appears to be too incompetent to succeed. In the end Pence would be in charge. Brilliant plan! But wait, was Pence in on it? Is that what I'm missing?

mccabe never said so. therefore since he wasn't, makes it illegal. It was done on the job at the facility owned by taxpayers. to death!!!

 

[BlindBoo]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

thank god trump is a great president.

He is the father of all lies and has utterly deceived you with his wickedness.

Trump is the father of his children.
"He is the father of all lies" ? Boy, how melodramatic can a person be.

Please, it's ridiculous sure, but no more ridiculous than the preceding line about old Trumpyberra.

 

[PoliticalChic]

More like the Coup that never was.....

PhonyCoupGate.

To be clear.....are you so embarrassed at both the corrupt nature of your elites, and of the failure of their plan, that you are denying what is clear to all???


Really????


I can't tell you how pleased I am to have forced you to appear a fool.

Exploring Constitutional methods to place the VP in charge is not an attempted or illegal seizure of power.

I'm embarrassed alright. At Trumpublican's gullibility.

what else is there without evidence or a congressional review as per the real procedure of the 25th amendment.

Face it. Their plan (according to the PhonyCoupGaters) appears to be too incompetent to succeed. In the end Pence would be in charge. Brilliant plan! But wait, was Pence in on it? Is that what I'm missing?

Whether it succeeds or not is not what makes it unconstitutional, you dope.




"... the coup aspect isn’t overblown; even liberal Alan Dershowitz said you couldn’t spin what top DOJ officials tried to do here (via RCP):

"If [McCabe’s comments are] true, it is clearly an attempt at a coup d’état," Dershowitz said.

"Any Justice Department official who even mentioned the 25th amendment in the context of President Trump has committed a grievous offense against the Constitution…"
Lyin’ McCabe: Former FBI Head Changes Story Regarding The Alleged DOJ Coup Attempt Against Trump




But....morons like you default to the usual "is not, issssss noootttttttt!!!!"

Neither morality nor rectitude are your strong points.

 

[BlindBoo]

Whether it succeeds or not is not what makes it unconstitutional, you dope.

Discussing instituting a Constitutional method of removing a President and putting the Vice President in charge cannot be unconstitutional. Nor is it an attempted coup.

But it does make for some frothy sound bites and pithy talking points.