candycorn
Diamond Member
Another win for the good guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The courts and the DOJ are essentially being forced to act. I'll guarantee you Garland doesn't want to step into this.Very good confirmation of the legitimacy and necessity of the January 6 Committee..
He sure was loud and confident on his podcast and in front of the cameras.
"This will be the misdemeanor from HELL!" he screamed.
Get them in court, WHERE THEY'RE UNDER OATH, or FACING A JUDGE, and they become quiet little bunnies.
The courts and the DOJ are essentially being forced to act. I'll guarantee you Garland doesn't want to step into this.
These nuts have essentially suspended regard to laws, courts, elections and the Constitution in their fucking "war".
The Deep State will use the conviction to squeeze bannon into singing for themDepends on what the judge decides. Each charge is a misdemeanor and can be served consecutively or concurrently.
So, the judge can give Bannon up to two years or 30 days, plus.
Sweet. Put the political opposition in the gulags already!
He sure was loud and confident on his podcast and in front of the cameras.
"This will be the misdemeanor from HELL!" he screamed.
Get them in court, WHERE THEY'RE UNDER OATH, or FACING A JUDGE, and they become quiet little bunnies.
When you make $9.50 an hour posting on a message board.Anything to avoid talking about the 10% inflation you voted for, right?
lol
Gateway Pendent = Mike Davis didn't really say that.Update!
Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court — Case Will End Up at Supreme Court
![]()
Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court -- Case Will End Up at Supreme Court | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Since Monday morning former Chief Strategist for President Trump faced a one-sided and biased court in Washington DC. He was charged with not honoring a subpoena from the January 6 Committee.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Yeah. I've come to the conclusion that it's true that none of this matters to them, no matter what comes out, no matter what happens regarding the law or trials or sworn testimony or clear evidence.The recording of Bannon bragging about the Big Lie Trump was going to create on Election Night and the days which followed is the smoking gun that the rubes have been completely hoaxed.
I maintained this right here at USMB before the trial started. And I believe it’s the correct legal analysis. That said, as a matter of practicality, it may not matter. Here’s why:Update!
Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court — Case Will End Up at Supreme Court
![]()
Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court -- Case Will End Up at Supreme Court | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Since Monday morning former Chief Strategist for President Trump faced a one-sided and biased court in Washington DC. He was charged with not honoring a subpoena from the January 6 Committee.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Oh gawd, that explains a lot.I'm a teacher for 37 years