Best Case Scenario

[rightwinger]

DENIED

Unanimous decision by the Supreme Court to Trumps ridiculous legal claim

Their way of saying.....FUCK YOU

Libs are whistling past the graveyard

The Texas lawsuit is alive and well

DOA

 

[Claudette]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No ballot real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

Uh..you are aware that the PA case was just kicked to the curb and today is Safe Harbor day...so, none of the above??

Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it. No do overs.

Do you really think the SC can't reverse it's own ruling when they hear the Texas lawsuit? It's been done many times.

The Texas lawsuit will go nowhere
It is a publicity stunt.

You wish. Texas has a damned good case. Those states disenfranchised the entire election.

Really?

What are they alleging...specifically?

You don't know....do you.

I surely do know. I'm betting you don't.

Amazing...you're not listing anything....

Listen...I understand you're the dumbest person you know...and I'm sure it's frustrating...having such low self esteem. You should really re-think your life choices and you'll stop getting slapped down every morning for being so well...dumb.

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Really...do try to be brighter.

Amazing. If you want to know look it up yourself. Its on another thread on the board. Lazy ass.

 

[Claudette]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No ballot real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

Uh..you are aware that the PA case was just kicked to the curb and today is Safe Harbor day...so, none of the above??

Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it. No do overs.

Do you really think the SC can't reverse it's own ruling when they hear the Texas lawsuit? It's been done many times.

The Texas lawsuit will go nowhere
It is a publicity stunt.

You wish. Texas has a damned good case. Those states disenfranchised the entire election.

The Supreme Court just sent Trump packing due to shoddy evidence.
The Texas case is laughably bad.

Texas case if very good. The SC is looking at it now.

 

[rightwinger]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

 

[rightwinger]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No ballot real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

Uh..you are aware that the PA case was just kicked to the curb and today is Safe Harbor day...so, none of the above??

Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it. No do overs.

Do you really think the SC can't reverse it's own ruling when they hear the Texas lawsuit? It's been done many times.

The Texas lawsuit will go nowhere
It is a publicity stunt.

You wish. Texas has a damned good case. Those states disenfranchised the entire election.

The Supreme Court just sent Trump packing due to shoddy evidence.
The Texas case is laughably bad.

Texas case if very good. The SC is looking at it now.

You keep saying that

It only shows how gullible you are

 

[Claudette]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

 

[rightwinger]

Simple explanation of the TX lawsuit:

The Texas case is strictly about the Constitution. The states being sued violated the Constitution with rule changes not being legislated into law. Since Texas ( and the joining states) did follow the Constitution, then the voters in these states were disenfranchised, by the states who did not follow the Constitution

The Constitution says that each state gets to set the parameters for voting.
Another state has no legal standing. A voter in that state has standing to protest the process......NOT another state

 

[Claudette]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No ballot real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

Uh..you are aware that the PA case was just kicked to the curb and today is Safe Harbor day...so, none of the above??

Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it. No do overs.

Do you really think the SC can't reverse it's own ruling when they hear the Texas lawsuit? It's been done many times.

The Texas lawsuit will go nowhere
It is a publicity stunt.

You wish. Texas has a damned good case. Those states disenfranchised the entire election.

The Supreme Court just sent Trump packing due to shoddy evidence.
The Texas case is laughably bad.

Texas case if very good. The SC is looking at it now.

You keep saying that

It only shows how gullible you are

No just shows how right I am. You're the gullible one.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Except Bush v Gore was about the inclusion of a small number of contested votes in one state. Not the systematic discarding of millions of legitimate ballots over six states...designed to change the outcome of the election.

 

[rightwinger]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Exactly

Gore/Bush had a legitimate legal issue. The counting of ballots in a recount.
It did not change the results of the election
It never requested ballots be discarded as a remedy

Trump has yet to raise a legitimate legal issue

 

[Claudette]

Simple explanation of the TX lawsuit:

The Texas case is strictly about the Constitution. The states being sued violated the Constitution with rule changes not being legislated into law. Since Texas ( and the joining states) did follow the Constitution, then the voters in these states were disenfranchised, by the states who did not follow the Constitution

The Constitution says that each state gets to set the parameters for voting.
Another state has no legal standing. A voter in that state has standing to protest the process......NOT another state

Not if the State violates the constitution which those States did. Pretty cut and dried.

The Texas case is strictly about the Constitution. The states being sued violated the Constitution with rule changes not being legislated into law. Since Texas ( and the joining states) did follow the Constitution, then the voters in these states were disenfranchised, by the states who did not follow the Constitution
[/QUOTE]

Texas has every right to sue and I hope more states jump on the band wagon.

 

[Claudette]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Except Bush v Gore was about the inclusion of a small number of contested votes in one state. Not the systematic discarding of millions of legitimate ballots over six states...designed to change the outcome of the election.

The Texas case is strictly about the Constitution. The states being sued violated the Constitution with rule changes not being legislated into law. Since Texas ( and the joining states) did follow the Constitution, then the voters in these states were disenfranchised, by the states who did not follow the Constitution
[/QUOTE]

Pretty cut and dried there buddy.

 

[bendog]

It's easy to see how Trump makes money. LOL

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Except Bush v Gore was about the inclusion of a small number of contested votes in one state. Not the systematic discarding of millions of legitimate ballots over six states...designed to change the outcome of the election.

The Texas case is strictly about the Constitution. The states being sued violated the Constitution with rule changes not being legislated into law. Since Texas ( and the joining states) did follow the Constitution, then the voters in these states were disenfranchised, by the states who did not follow the Constitution

Again, unless you are revoking your belief in the individual states rights to hold their own free and fair election and make their election laws, Texas has no standing to claim another state did or did not follow the same rules they did. This is a political stunt by the Texas AG to curry favor with Trump to beg for a pardon of the almost certain conviction on securities charges that are coming.

 

[bendog]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Exactly

Gore/Bush had a legitimate legal issue. The counting of ballots in a recount.
It did not change the results of the election
It never requested ballots be discarded as a remedy

Trump has yet to raise a legitimate legal issueI

I really don't see any positive coming from discussing bullshit political stunts like the Texas AG's. It's just about stirring up Trump's base to further a sense of white person's grievance of something being stolen from them.

That said, there was something fishy in the DOJ's pursuit of Russiagate. Not in Mueller's bipartisan approved investigation which found no collusion, but that's another story

 

[Cellblock2429]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

/---/ Or they will look the other way in dire fear of the Left anarchists.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They're alleging that the states they are suing changed voting laws. Its exactly what Texas did. Which makes it so hilarious.

Even if they did change the laws, the remedy they are seeking......Invalidate all votes and throw it to the State Legislatures

Is an extreme reaction that the courts would NEVER endorse

You can always hope. Gore/Bush was a prime example of what the SC can do.

Exactly

Gore/Bush had a legitimate legal issue. The counting of ballots in a recount.
It did not change the results of the election
It never requested ballots be discarded as a remedy

Trump has yet to raise a legitimate legal issueI

I really don't see any positive coming from discussing bullshit political stunts like the Texas AG's. It's just about stirring up Trump's base to further a sense of white person's grievance of something being stolen from them.

That said, there was something fishy in the DOJ's pursuit of Russiagate. Not in Mueller's bipartisan approved investigation which found no collusion, but that's another story

As far as the Russia investigation goes, my belief still holds to this day. If Trump hadn't demanded an Omerta pledge of loyalty out of Comey and then fired him, my guess is that Comey's investigation would have ended quietly with a silly report synopsis like Barr put out. Sessions would have not been forced to recuse, no Special Counsel would have been implemented, and it all would have died right there in the late Spring of 2017.

But..Trump has and always will be his own worst enemy. He did all this to himself. It's what happens when you elect a corrupt, incompetent noob as President. He is what he is.

 

[Mac-7]

DOA

You hope

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The number 1 legislative priority for the next Congress is to fix the Democrat Mass Voter Fraud problem.
The Dems will fight against it and look as guilty as they are.

 

[martybegan]

The USSC rules that the 5 states broke the law.(which they did)
Those states have to revote with total supervision.
No mail-in ballots.
No counting in secrecy.
No late ballots.
No date changing.
No ballot real ballots thrown out.
No fake ballots counted.
Voter ID required.
Every ballot must have a real person who only voting once.

Uh..you are aware that the PA case was just kicked to the curb and today is Safe Harbor day...so, none of the above??

Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it. No do overs.

Safe Harbor day is meaningless due to the ability of States and people to challenge the results and procedures in Court.

Even RGB said the first real deadline is January 6th, when Congress Certifies the election.