Redfish
Diamond Member
Categories like the following:
access
efficiency
equity
healthy lives
don't measure the quality of healthcare. They measure how socialist it is, or they measure cultural issues that affect health.
The article doesn't explain how the other categories:
effective care
safe care
coordinated care
patient centered care
are measured. Furthermore, the last two sound like bogus measures that don't really measure the quality of the care.
The only thing that really measures the quality of healthcare: ie, how many people who go into the hospital with a health issue come out with a successful resolution. The United States beats every other country by far in that category - the only one that matters to the patient.
In short, your article is bullshit propaganda.
what it measures is ACCESS. if you can't OBTAIN health care, then it doesn't matter how effective, safe, coordinated or patient-centered the care is.
so yes, i'd choose columbia pres/ny hospital cornell over almost anything in the world if i needed a hospital (or mass general or johns hopkins, etc.) but if you earn $100,000 a year and your care is going to cost $300,000 then it doesn't matter how good the doctors are.
as for it meaning how many people who go to a doctor have a successful resolution, what else would you measure health care by some fantasmagircal make believe standard where you chant USA USA?
how about the right stop being defensive about the things we don't do well... and start solving problems?
oh right... that would mean thought, that a desire to solve those problems and actually govern.
never mind.
Very true. What the study really does is point out how many ticks and leaches there are in the American health care industry. I mean when was the last time you got your lab results before you got the bill?
Do you really think ACA wil change any of that?-----------can you say VA?
Do you really think that a govt beaurocracy will be better than the free market?