why yes I do..we have photos from outer space...we have eyewitnesses that have been in space and on the moon....but not sure what that has to do with your post? You are claiming the article i a lie...that the President isn't being investigated....can you support that?so do you have evidence to support your claim there isn’t a investigation?wait, but I thought the Dems in Congress said they had a job to hold the President accountable...do they no longer have to do that? what changed?But they are.Xiden and his admin think they are above the law..
How many laws does Biden and his gold standard of leadership Cuomo have to break with impunity before people realize this?
Biden isn't "breaking the law". Redstate.com is not a credible source, but then you knew that.
This is just another group of chimps fling shit at the humans passing by.
Do you have any evidence that the world is Flat?
Here are other sources that are claiming he is in fact under investigation for this potential illegal act: GAO investigating whether Biden administration illegally froze funding for border wall
Biden under fire for border wall cash freeze
An unfavorable ruling from GAO would bolster Republicans in branding Biden as a rule-breaker as they blame him for the surge of migrants and unaccompanied children at the southern border.www.politico.com
Biden Under Investigation by GAO for Border Wall Funds Freeze
President Joe Biden is reportedly under probe for allegedly freezing payments worth billions of dollars for the companies contracted to finish the border wall.www.latinpost.com
Under fire isn't an investigation. From your own Politico cite: The administration has also promised to release the money if the pause violated congressional intent. And the amount withheld is the 1.4 bil that is required by law (2006 bill) to be included in each annual budget. But there is also money that was taken from other financial programs that were also Congressional Mandated. this is headed for the Supreme Court where the money's going to be determined by what makes things right. Where it should have gone when Rump reappropriated the funds in the first place. I think the legal definition is "Make Whole" comes to mind.
Your second cite is an opinion piece. There are parts that are a bit off the wall and opinionated, parts of it are not. But it really didn't go to any lengths to prove anything other than the authors personal opinion.