Biden Endorses Trump's trade deal, 'Better than NAFTA'

[easyt65]

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Stop your lying - Obama admitted there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs, not that Republicans blocked his effort. Why can't you lying f*ers ever be honest?!

 

[danielpalos]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

 

[danielpalos]

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Stop your lying - Obama admitted there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs, not that Republicans blocked his effort. Why can't you lying f*ers ever be honest?!

I told you Why, right winger. Not bright enough to understand simple English.

 

[22lcidw]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

The waste of a lot of money which could have been used for a lot more hardware. But there are people who became rich on it and still do. Just like the social agendas in domestic terms. And the eco green movement will make some people into the richest of parasites while we get very little in return.

 

[danielpalos]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

The waste of a lot of money which could have been used for a lot more hardware. But there are people who became rich on it and still do. Just like the social agendas in domestic terms. And the eco green movement will make some people into the richest of parasites while we get very little in return.

Are you claiming a warfare-State is better than a welfare-State?

 

[easyt65]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

 

[danielpalos]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

Did you miss this too?

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

 

[easyt65]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

Did you miss this too?

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

' won support' - Trump successfully negotiated a deal, getting Democrats to join him, in creating a much better deal than before, despite all the claims by Democrats he would fail. Now even Biden has admitted Trump's deal is better ... Why can't YOU SNOWFLAKES agree with your Presidential nominee?

 

[esalla]

Joe Biden says Trump’s USMCA is ‘better than NAFTA’

Jake Tapper pressed Biden on whether he gives credit to the president for signing the new deal to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement.

nypost.com

You go Joe....

Whaaaaaaaaa

 

[esalla]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

I'll bet Biden votes for Trump!

Biden wants to fuck the deep state more than anyone

 

[ImAlwaysRight]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

This is why Joe's puppeteer's don't want him to answer questions off script and without a teleprompter.

 

[my2¢]

Seems to me the new deal didn't include anything monumental to change one's opinion on international trade. Trump did a good job in improving the trade agreement, but I'm not knocking the original NAFTA deal George HW Bush struck with Mexico and Canada. Sure it wasn't perfect but over the years the same will be said of USMCA.

 

[easyt65]

Seems to me the new deal didn't include anything monumental to change one's opinion on international trade. Trump did a good job in improving the trade agreement, but I'm not knocking the original NAFTA deal George HW Bush struck with Mexico and Canada. Sure it wasn't perfect but over the years the same will be said of USMCA.

The previous deal was not good for America, & Barry and the other Presidents were too weak / cowardly to stand up to China...or were taking money from China, like Feinstein, Pelosi, & Joe..

 

[my2¢]

Seems to me the new deal didn't include anything monumental to change one's opinion on international trade. Trump did a good job in improving the trade agreement, but I'm not knocking the original NAFTA deal George HW Bush struck with Mexico and Canada. Sure it wasn't perfect but over the years the same will be said of USMCA.

The previous deal was not good for America, & Barry and the other Presidents were too weak / cowardly to stand up to China...or were taking money from China, like Feinstein, Pelosi, & Joe..

Our trade imbalance with China hasn't improved under Trump. So I guess Trump must be offering it up carte blanche, unlike Feinstein, Pelosi and Joe.

 

[easyt65]

Seems to me the new deal didn't include anything monumental to change one's opinion on international trade. Trump did a good job in improving the trade agreement, but I'm not knocking the original NAFTA deal George HW Bush struck with Mexico and Canada. Sure it wasn't perfect but over the years the same will be said of USMCA.

The previous deal was not good for America, & Barry and the other Presidents were too weak / cowardly to stand up to China...or were taking money from China, like Feinstein, Pelosi, & Joe..

Our trade imbalance with China hasn't improved under Trump. So I guess Trump must be offering it up carte blanche, unlike Feinstein, Pelosi and Joe.

We have a better trade deal for AMERICANS under Trump - even Biden said so. Barry was either too much of a coward to stand up to China or he didn't want to 'rock the 'boat' and cost China Joe, Feinstein, Pelosi, Hunter, Schumer and other Democrats their payments from China. Barry gave sweet deals to Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, & Mexican Drug Cartels. He gave Iran a sweet deal. He gave Putin a very sweet deal - Uranium, Crimea, & 2 years of in-challenged 'interference'.

 

[my2¢]

We have a better trade deal for AMERICANS under Trump - even Biden said so.

You do know the "CA' in USMCA is for Canada and not China, don't you?

 

[easyt65]

We have a better trade deal for AMERICANS under Trump - even Biden said so.

You do know the "CA' in USMCA is for Canada and not China, don't you?

I'M talking about how ALL of the trade deals Trump has negotiated, not just the USMCA.

 

[danielpalos]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

Did you miss this too?

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

' won support' - Trump successfully negotiated a deal, getting Democrats to join him, in creating a much better deal than before, despite all the claims by Democrats he would fail. Now even Biden has admitted Trump's deal is better ... Why can't YOU SNOWFLAKES agree with your Presidential nominee?

Trump had to accept those points from the democrats.

 

[easyt65]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

Did you miss this too?

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

' won support' - Trump successfully negotiated a deal, getting Democrats to join him, in creating a much better deal than before, despite all the claims by Democrats he would fail. Now even Biden has admitted Trump's deal is better ... Why can't YOU SNOWFLAKES agree with your Presidential nominee?

Trump had to accept those points from the democrats.

Democrats needed the win far more than Trump needed them - he had been beating them on EVERYTHING!

And now your candidate is campaigning for Trump, telling everyone what everyone already knows - TRUMP'S deal is far better.

 

[danielpalos]

Way to go, Joe!

Biden Admits Trump's Trade Deal Better Than NAFTA

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Thursday the USMCA trade deal negotiated by Donald Trump is better than NAFTA, a deal Biden voted for.

freebeacon.com

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

Yes, Democrats recognized the value for America in Trump's new Trade Deal. Hungry for a WIN, democrats climbed onboard the Trump Train to get one.

Upgrading "trade infrastructure". The democrats also try to upgrade physical infrastructure despite right wing opposition.

Really? When Democrats controlled both Congress and the WH, how much of that did they get done? The closest they got was a promise from Obama to create 'shovel-ready job's which he later had to admit did not even exist.

Because right wingers had nothing but repeal. All Senate republicans voted against it:

The second of these bills, was the Rebuild America Jobs Act, S. 1769, a bill to put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America, would've spent $50 billion on transportation infrastructure projects and $10 billion to fund an "infrastructure bank."[26] The bill was introduced by Senator Amy Klobuchar on October 31, 2011 and failed in a 51–49 vote for cloture on November 3, 2011.[26][27] In the failed motion to proceed to consider the legislation, 51 Democrats voted in favor of opening debate on the legislation and 47 Republicans Senators, joined by 1 Democratic Senator Ben Nelson and 1 Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman, voted no.[26] The $60 billion bill investing in roads, bridges and infrastructure, would have been paid with a 0.7% tax on Americans earning more than $1 million per year.[28]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jobs_Act

Yet, right wingers are willing to blame that administration for the weakest of recoveries. Why is that, right wingers?

The only plan Democrats had to put Americans back to work was the non-existent 'Shovel-Ready' projects. Under Obama a record number of Americans joined the existing ranks of those on unemployment, welfare, & food stamps. Stop blaming others for Obama and Democrats failures.

It was non-existent Because of right wing en mass opposition.

The White House provided a fact sheet which summarizes the key provisions of the $447 billion bill.[15] Some of its elements include:

1. Cutting and suspending $245 billion worth of payroll taxes for qualifying employers and 160 million medium to low income employees.
2. Spending $62 billion for a Pathways Back to Work Program for expanding opportunities for low-income youth and adults.
   1. $49 billion - Extending unemployment benefits for up to 6 million long-term beneficiaries.
   2. $8 billion - Jobs tax credit for the long term unemployed.
   3. $5 billion - Pathways back to work fund.[15]
3. Spending $50 billion on both new & pre-existing infrastructure projects.
4. Spending $35 billion in additional funding to protect the jobs of teachers, police officers, and firefighters
5. Spending $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 public schools and community colleges.
6. Spending $15 billion on a program that would hire construction workers to help rehabilitate and refurbishing hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes and businesses.
7. Creating the National Infrastructure Bank (capitalized with $10 billion), originally introduced in 2007, to help fund infrastructure via private and public capital.
8. Creating a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety, while expanding accessibility to high-speed wireless services.
9. Prohibiting discrimination in hiring against persons who are unemployed because of their status as unemployed persons..
10. Loosening regulations on small businesses that wish to raise capital, including through crowdfunding, while retaining investor protections.

In total the legislation includes $253 billion in tax credits (56.6%) and $194 billion in spending and extension of unemployment benefits (43.4%).[15]

Seems like a lot of waste in there. On infrastructure...spend it on roads, bridges and hard things that are needed. But it has to be like the military/industrial complex. We need to get value. Instead we get waste.

What value are we getting from the military industrial complex besides wars they can't seem to win, even on a longitudinal basis?

The weakest war winnings in history not merely the weakest recovery.

Ask Biden - HE praised TRUMP'S new trade deal.

Did you miss this too?

In late 2019, the Trump administration won support from congressional Democrats for the USMCA after agreeing to incorporate stronger labor enforcement.

' won support' - Trump successfully negotiated a deal, getting Democrats to join him, in creating a much better deal than before, despite all the claims by Democrats he would fail. Now even Biden has admitted Trump's deal is better ... Why can't YOU SNOWFLAKES agree with your Presidential nominee?

Trump had to accept those points from the democrats.

Democrats needed the win far more than Trump needed them - he had been beating them on EVERYTHING!

And now your candidate is campaigning for Trump, telling everyone what everyone already knows - TRUMP'S deal is far better.

Democrats did not need to approve the deal without their input.