Black Hebrew Isralites are cause of the Catholic boy/Native American

[Soupnazi630]

So, Debate Master, you think because there is no proof of something that doesn't mean it didn't happen?
Like the flying giraffe that landed on my front lawn last night that no one saw?

No, never said that. Read what I said. I'm not going to repeat it. I'm going by the chiefs version of events. He said he heard it. I have no reason to dispute his word. Doesn't mean he was telling the truth either, but I have no reason to believe he was lying. And what for? Nothing is going to change for his group either way.

So no, I never said if "there is no proof of something that it didn't happen".

Hes a Chief? hahahahahahahaha

He was never deployed to Vietnam, he is a liar and his words should not be taken serious.

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Phillips admitted openly to being an Vietnam ERA veteran. He expressed it as a Vietnam times veteran.

By definition this means he was in the military during the Vietnam war but not actually deployed to Vietnam and therefore not Vietnam veteran

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

 

[BWK]

No, never said that. Read what I said. I'm not going to repeat it. I'm going by the chiefs version of events. He said he heard it. I have no reason to dispute his word. Doesn't mean he was telling the truth either, but I have no reason to believe he was lying. And what for? Nothing is going to change for his group either way.

So no, I never said if "there is no proof of something that it didn't happen".

Hes a Chief? hahahahahahahaha

He was never deployed to Vietnam, he is a liar and his words should not be taken serious.

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Google it for yourself. There's an abundance of evidence stating he was never deployed to Vietnam. You claimed he was a chief. I've seen no evidence that supports your claim. Or do you simply call all native american's chief?

You google it and copy/paste it here. I'm not the one who gives a shit about that. You are the one still lying about it, because you haven't documented he lied about it. I asked you to prove it, and you did not. You're nothing but a liar.

Your chief is a liar. Deal with it!

Nathan Phillips Lied. The Media Bought It. | National Review

National Review: Leading conservative magazine. LOl! Are you kidding me? That's not proof. Sorry, try again.

Questions Are Being Raised About Native American Elder Nathan Phillips' Alleged USMC Service During The Vietnam War - The Clover Chronicle

What did they find? They said they raised questions. And you posted a link that doesn't come up.

HE LIED: Native American Activist Nathan Phillips Never Served in Vietnam -- But Raised Money By Saying He Did

Says who? You type this in bold red color and it is verified by no one, sourced by non one.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Seriously you do not see a problem with the indian banging his drum 12 inches from your face?

No more than the student getting in his. He could have easily walked off right?

^ And here it is

"white people must walk away when someone of color confronts them"

what a loser you are.

A better question remains, what sort of Catholic Christians are they?

Apparently very good ones. non-violent and forgiving

Did the blacks touch any of the students?

And their spirit chants trying to drown out the blacks shouting is a sign of forgiving? Lol! Yea right? Tell that to yourself then ask yourself how stupid am I.

No one touched anyone

The blacks and the Indian asswipe were the confrontational ones and the media lies.

You on the other hand are so childish you have to grasp at any straw possible to avoid blaming the punks who are proven to be responsible

 

[Soupnazi630]

Hes a Chief? hahahahahahahaha

He was never deployed to Vietnam, he is a liar and his words should not be taken serious.

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Google it for yourself. There's an abundance of evidence stating he was never deployed to Vietnam. You claimed he was a chief. I've seen no evidence that supports your claim. Or do you simply call all native american's chief?

You google it and copy/paste it here. I'm not the one who gives a shit about that. You are the one still lying about it, because you haven't documented he lied about it. I asked you to prove it, and you did not. You're nothing but a liar.

Your chief is a liar. Deal with it!

Nathan Phillips Lied. The Media Bought It. | National Review

National Review: Leading conservative magazine. LOl! Are you kidding me? That's not proof. Sorry, try again.

Questions Are Being Raised About Native American Elder Nathan Phillips' Alleged USMC Service During The Vietnam War - The Clover Chronicle

What did they find? They said they raised questions. And you posted a link that doesn't come up.

HE LIED: Native American Activist Nathan Phillips Never Served in Vietnam -- But Raised Money By Saying He Did

Says who? You type this in bold red color and it is verified by no one, sourced by non one.

Those are not red fonts you dumbass they are links.

 

[BWK]

No, never said that. Read what I said. I'm not going to repeat it. I'm going by the chiefs version of events. He said he heard it. I have no reason to dispute his word. Doesn't mean he was telling the truth either, but I have no reason to believe he was lying. And what for? Nothing is going to change for his group either way.

So no, I never said if "there is no proof of something that it didn't happen".

Hes a Chief? hahahahahahahaha

He was never deployed to Vietnam, he is a liar and his words should not be taken serious.

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Phillips admitted openly to being an Vietnam ERA veteran. He expressed it as a Vietnam times veteran.

By definition this means he was in the military during the Vietnam war but not actually deployed to Vietnam and therefore not Vietnam veteran

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?
We'll, if he was there anywhere from 61 to 75, then show me how he wasn't? Because you telling me he is a veteran versus a Vietnam veteran is telling me nothing.

 

[BWK]

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Google it for yourself. There's an abundance of evidence stating he was never deployed to Vietnam. You claimed he was a chief. I've seen no evidence that supports your claim. Or do you simply call all native american's chief?

You google it and copy/paste it here. I'm not the one who gives a shit about that. You are the one still lying about it, because you haven't documented he lied about it. I asked you to prove it, and you did not. You're nothing but a liar.

Your chief is a liar. Deal with it!

Nathan Phillips Lied. The Media Bought It. | National Review

National Review: Leading conservative magazine. LOl! Are you kidding me? That's not proof. Sorry, try again.

Questions Are Being Raised About Native American Elder Nathan Phillips' Alleged USMC Service During The Vietnam War - The Clover Chronicle

What did they find? They said they raised questions. And you posted a link that doesn't come up.

HE LIED: Native American Activist Nathan Phillips Never Served in Vietnam -- But Raised Money By Saying He Did

Says who? You type this in bold red color and it is verified by no one, sourced by non one.

Those are not red fonts you dumbass they are links.

And they don't come up. But no matter, because "National Review"? Damn son. For real? You can't get more conservative than that. They just spout off opinions just like you with no backing.

And the "Clover Chronicle" already gave itself away in your title. "Questions are being raised"? lol! That just means they don't know shit

And if he didn't serve, you never debunked the proof I presented that proves you wrong in my definition of an ERA veteran.

 

[BWK]

No more than the student getting in his. He could have easily walked off right?

^ And here it is

"white people must walk away when someone of color confronts them"

what a loser you are.

A better question remains, what sort of Catholic Christians are they?

Apparently very good ones. non-violent and forgiving

Did the blacks touch any of the students?

And their spirit chants trying to drown out the blacks shouting is a sign of forgiving? Lol! Yea right? Tell that to yourself then ask yourself how stupid am I.

No one touched anyone

Wow, what an idiot. Do you know the context of that statement? Exactly, you don't, because you weren't the one I was debating with, so you assume it means what you want it to mean. You're an idiot.

The blacks and the Indian asswipe were the confrontational ones and the media lies.

Good! Now produce the documentation that confirms blacks and whites weren't responsible.

You on the other hand are so childish you have to grasp at any straw possible to avoid blaming the punks who are proven to be responsible

Childish are those who claim others are, without documentation of the responsible party.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Hes a Chief? hahahahahahahaha

He was never deployed to Vietnam, he is a liar and his words should not be taken serious.

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Phillips admitted openly to being an Vietnam ERA veteran. He expressed it as a Vietnam times veteran.

By definition this means he was in the military during the Vietnam war but not actually deployed to Vietnam and therefore not Vietnam veteran

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?
We'll, if he was there anywhere from 61 to 75, then show me how he wasn't? Because you telling me he is a veteran versus a Vietnam veteran is telling me nothing.

By his own admission he is a Vietnam era veteran which by definition means not a Vietnam veteran

And I already answered you

 

[BWK]

Glad you can rebut his status and military experience. We will be waiting for the documented proof. Wait a minute. You didn't just lie about that did you?

Phillips admitted openly to being an Vietnam ERA veteran. He expressed it as a Vietnam times veteran.

By definition this means he was in the military during the Vietnam war but not actually deployed to Vietnam and therefore not Vietnam veteran

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?
We'll, if he was there anywhere from 61 to 75, then show me how he wasn't? Because you telling me he is a veteran versus a Vietnam veteran is telling me nothing.

By his own admission he is a Vietnam era veteran which by definition means not a Vietnam veteran

And I already answered you

The highlighted definition doesn't say that. You are wrong. Next!

 

[theHawk]

face off. Both were trying to diffuse the black Hebrew Israelites.

mirror of Shar Yaqataz Banyamyan facebook video

How was the professional protester trying to defuse it? He lied to the media about what happened afterwards. He claimed the “black Israelites” were just spouting history, and the white students didn’t like it.

Gee, maybe the white students didn’t like being cussed at, being called “white crackers”, and the black student with them was berated and called a n***** and an “Uncle Tom”.

Your Shitting Bull hero a piece of shit and a liar.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Phillips admitted openly to being an Vietnam ERA veteran. He expressed it as a Vietnam times veteran.

By definition this means he was in the military during the Vietnam war but not actually deployed to Vietnam and therefore not Vietnam veteran

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?
We'll, if he was there anywhere from 61 to 75, then show me how he wasn't? Because you telling me he is a veteran versus a Vietnam veteran is telling me nothing.

By his own admission he is a Vietnam era veteran which by definition means not a Vietnam veteran

And I already answered you

The highlighted definition doesn't say that. You are wrong. Next!

Jesus you are stupid

Your highlighted definition only defines one and does not explain the difference

 

[Soupnazi630]

That's not what I'm reading;
(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?

He is a veteran.

He is not a Vietnam veteran

Because the same media which lied to protect him and smeared those kids have been calling him a Vietnam veteran which hebis not.

(29) The term `Vietnam era' means the following: (A) The period beginning on February 28, 1961, and ending on May 7, 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam during that period. ... The definition also has legal meanings as well as determining access to Veterans benefits.Jul 28, 2009 So how is he not a veteran again? And why are we really giving a shit about that again?
We'll, if he was there anywhere from 61 to 75, then show me how he wasn't? Because you telling me he is a veteran versus a Vietnam veteran is telling me nothing.

By his own admission he is a Vietnam era veteran which by definition means not a Vietnam veteran

And I already answered you

The highlighted definition doesn't say that. You are wrong. Next!

Jesus you are stupid

Your highlighted definition only defines one and does not explain the difference

I am right and you are an ignorant liar.

Now you are corrected and may move on

 

[saveliberty]

"Rattled"? Hardly! The definition that no one seems to know how to read but me, keeps me steady as she goes.

You fear me, as it should be.

 

[Hellokitty]

face off. Both were trying to diffuse the black Hebrew Israelites.

mirror of Shar Yaqataz Banyamyan facebook video

It is telling that the NA drum man didn't have enough courage to confront the black Hebrew Israelites but choose to confront and went on to slander the white catholic teens.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

It is telling that the NA drum man didn't have enough courage to confront the black Hebrew Israelites but choose to confront and went on to slander the white catholic teens

He just wanted the exposure. These kids did nothing to him.

 

[Synthaholic]

All they did was sing school songs back at them.

Wait a minute. Where is your proof that’s all they did? Others say some of them yelled things back. That would be consistent with this:

Watch the video here: Koko on Twitter

 

[Synthaholic]

And it would be consistent with this:

You can watch that video here:

StanceGrounded on Twitter

 

[Synthaholic]

And it would be consistent with this:

☇RiotWomenn☇ on Twitter

 

[Synthaholic]

She sums it up perfectly:

 

[Synthaholic]

More truth:

So true, and America is waking up. People like AOC are going to help turn the page on wingnuts controlling the narrative.