Black Hebrew Isralites are cause of the Catholic boy/Native American

[Soupnazi630]

I stand behind my OP
Differing Narratives After Standoff Between Native American Man, High School Student

and the boy in the maga hat smiling is an instigator. He needs to have his white arse paddled to take that smirk off his face.

The video evidence proves your narrative absolutely wrong whether you like it or not.

The smiling white boyni instigated nothing.

Narrate all you like but what you are claiming ia proven fiction

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have had all manner of livtards call me racist. This kid is a saint for standing his ground!

Why does a teenage boy need to stand his ground against a slow-walking elderly man?

It seems a great way of making the aggressor look foolish, particularly when you smile too.

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

 

[Soupnazi630]

It seems a great way of making the aggressor look foolish, particularly when you smile too.

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

Not Believable. The injun was banging his drum was in the face of the white students with not a black face to be seen. The old guy did not want to enrage the black jews.

There were only four black guys there Mr. "Injun" racist.

And he avoided them and his narrative has been proven a lie he was out to confront and provoke not defuse.

 

[BWK]

Why does a teenage boy need to stand his ground against a slow-walking elderly man?

It seems a great way of making the aggressor look foolish, particularly when you smile too.

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

"His version"

How does walking up to a group of people from an event you are protesting and banging a drum right in front of them count as "diffusing"?

Because there was a crowd, according to him, who had surrounded the four black guys, What's complicated about that?

More "according to him"

What was there was a bunch of high school kids waiting for their bus and some good old fashioned civic discourse going on, assholes chanting racist crap on one side (black israelites) and some kids responding with school songs on the other.

Then this guy decided to enter the fray, for whatever purposes, and progressives decided to frame it as the kids confronting and insulting the veteran NA guy.

Waiting for the bus while calling out to "build the wall" according to Phillips. Isn't it strange that the boy who stood in front of Phillips never mentioned that part?

Because it has been proven false.

The longer video shows no such thing.

Phillips is a proven liar and the evidence is all on video his claims are worthless.

 

[BWK]

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

Not Believable. The injun was banging his drum was in the face of the white students with not a black face to be seen. The old guy did not want to enrage the black jews.

There were only four black guys there Mr. "Injun" racist.

And he avoided them and his narrative has been proven a lie he was out to confront and provoke not defuse.

Based on what evidence?

 

[saveliberty]

Nathan Phillips Was Playing Peacemaker as MAGA Teens Mocked Him – Rolling Stone

Wrong, he was an aggressor

 

[Soupnazi630]

It seems a great way of making the aggressor look foolish, particularly when you smile too.

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

Wrong being confrontational does not require physical contact as any intelligent person knows.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

Not Believable. The injun was banging his drum was in the face of the white students with not a black face to be seen. The old guy did not want to enrage the black jews.

There were only four black guys there Mr. "Injun" racist.

And he avoided them and his narrative has been proven a lie he was out to confront and provoke not defuse.

Based on what evidence?

By ALL of the videos which you either never viewed or are simply lying about

 

[Godboy]

It seems a great way of making the aggressor look foolish, particularly when you smile too.

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

You need to read a dictionary. That isnt what that word means.

confrontation
noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting

noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting
a confrontation between the suspect and the victim
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs


It appears that the word fits this situation perfectly.

 

[BWK]

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

"His version"

How does walking up to a group of people from an event you are protesting and banging a drum right in front of them count as "diffusing"?

Because there was a crowd, according to him, who had surrounded the four black guys, What's complicated about that?

More "according to him"

What was there was a bunch of high school kids waiting for their bus and some good old fashioned civic discourse going on, assholes chanting racist crap on one side (black israelites) and some kids responding with school songs on the other.

Then this guy decided to enter the fray, for whatever purposes, and progressives decided to frame it as the kids confronting and insulting the veteran NA guy.

Waiting for the bus while calling out to "build the wall" according to Phillips. Isn't it strange that the boy who stood in front of Phillips never mentioned that part?

Because it has been proven false.

The longer video shows no such thing.

Phillips is a proven liar and the evidence is all on video his claims are worthless.

Calling out to "build the wall" doesn't have to be on video for it not to have happened. So no, that part has not been proven false, and the student may not have heard it, seeing that he was focused on the chief. Your conclusions are busting at the seams with huge holes anyone can refute or argue.

 

[BWK]

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

You need to read a dictionary. That isnt what that word means.

confrontation
noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting

noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting
a confrontation between the suspect and the victim
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs


It appears that the word fits this situation perfectly.

"Clashing of forces"? Really?

 

[BWK]

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

Not Believable. The injun was banging his drum was in the face of the white students with not a black face to be seen. The old guy did not want to enrage the black jews.

There were only four black guys there Mr. "Injun" racist.

And he avoided them and his narrative has been proven a lie he was out to confront and provoke not defuse.

Based on what evidence?

By ALL of the videos which you either never viewed or are simply lying about

We'll, based on the videos I saw, I never saw many blacks. I think we can agree to that.As to the chief, nothing stands out in the video that suggests the chief provoked anyone. He walked into the crowd with his drum. And? What does that prove?

 

[Desperado]

Not Believable. The injun was banging his drum was in the face of the white students with not a black face to be seen. The old guy did not want to enrage the black jews.

There were only four black guys there Mr. "Injun" racist.

And he avoided them and his narrative has been proven a lie he was out to confront and provoke not defuse.

Based on what evidence?

By ALL of the videos which you either never viewed or are simply lying about

We'll, based on the videos I saw, I never saw many blacks. I think we can agree to that.As to the chief, nothing stands out in the video that suggests the chief provoked anyone. He walked into the crowd with his drum. And? What does that prove?

Seriously you do not see a problem with the indian banging his drum 12 inches from your face?

 

[saveliberty]

What’s aggressive about an elderly man walking slowly toward your group?

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

You need to read a dictionary. That isnt what that word means.

confrontation
noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting

noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting
a confrontation between the suspect and the victim
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs


It appears that the word fits this situation perfectly.

BWK's entire existence here is confrontation without reason. He has no concept he does it, nor grasp he is worthless here.

 

[Soupnazi630]

"His version"

How does walking up to a group of people from an event you are protesting and banging a drum right in front of them count as "diffusing"?

Because there was a crowd, according to him, who had surrounded the four black guys, What's complicated about that?

More "according to him"

What was there was a bunch of high school kids waiting for their bus and some good old fashioned civic discourse going on, assholes chanting racist crap on one side (black israelites) and some kids responding with school songs on the other.

Then this guy decided to enter the fray, for whatever purposes, and progressives decided to frame it as the kids confronting and insulting the veteran NA guy.

Waiting for the bus while calling out to "build the wall" according to Phillips. Isn't it strange that the boy who stood in front of Phillips never mentioned that part?

Because it has been proven false.

The longer video shows no such thing.

Phillips is a proven liar and the evidence is all on video his claims are worthless.

Calling out to "build the wall" doesn't have to be on video for it not to have happened. So no, that part has not been proven false, and the student may not have heard it, seeing that he was focused on the chief. Your conclusions are busting at the seams with huge holes anyone can refute or argue.

Yes it does actually because the Indians credibility has been shit by video evidence

The boys credibility has been proven

 

[BWK]

He was deliberately going to confront them as the video shows with a gang of his indian activists

Deliberately going to confront them? The chief was surrounded by them in the video from the beginning. Did he have a choice? Again, his version was to diffuse the situation with the black and white group. Did the student who gave his version mention that? No!

That is absolutely false

The video proves he was never surrounded and deliberately approached them in a confrontational manner


Why you have to out right lie about the video is a mystery but you are

If it was confrontational, there would have been physical contact.

You need to read a dictionary. That isnt what that word means.

confrontation
noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting

noun
con·fron·ta·tion | \ ˌkän-(ˌ)frən-ˈtā-shən \
Definition of confrontation


: the act of confronting : the state of being confronted: such as
a : a face-to-face meeting
a confrontation between the suspect and the victim
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs
b : the clashing of forces or ideas : CONFLICTa violent confrontation between rival gangs


It appears that the word fits this situation perfectly.

BWK's entire existence here is confrontation without reason. He has no concept he does it, nor grasp he is worthless here.

And you are showing your own idiocy, by using the word "confrontation" in an entirely different context for no apparent reason, that has nothing whatsoever to do with this debate. .

 

[saveliberty]

BWK's entire existence here is confrontation without reason. He has no concept he does it, nor grasp he is worthless here.

And you are showing your own idiocy, by using the word "confrontation" in an entirely different context for no apparent reason, that has nothing whatsoever to do with this debate. .[/QUOTE]

A debate would indicate you offered links and sources to defend your position. You just give partisan opinions of no value.

 

[BWK]

Because there was a crowd, according to him, who had surrounded the four black guys, What's complicated about that?

More "according to him"

What was there was a bunch of high school kids waiting for their bus and some good old fashioned civic discourse going on, assholes chanting racist crap on one side (black israelites) and some kids responding with school songs on the other.

Then this guy decided to enter the fray, for whatever purposes, and progressives decided to frame it as the kids confronting and insulting the veteran NA guy.

Waiting for the bus while calling out to "build the wall" according to Phillips. Isn't it strange that the boy who stood in front of Phillips never mentioned that part?

Because it has been proven false.

The longer video shows no such thing.

Phillips is a proven liar and the evidence is all on video his claims are worthless.

Calling out to "build the wall" doesn't have to be on video for it not to have happened. So no, that part has not been proven false, and the student may not have heard it, seeing that he was focused on the chief. Your conclusions are busting at the seams with huge holes anyone can refute or argue.

Yes it does actually because the Indians credibility has been shit by video evidence

It does? How so? Are you telling us there is no physical possibility to call out "build the wall" that couldn't be drowned out from other noise. Wow, that's a scientific fact that's new to me.

The boys credibility has been proven

Because you say so? Lol! Yea, we're all going to go by evidence off the seat of your pants. What a joke.

 

[BWK]

BWK's entire existence here is confrontation without reason. He has no concept he does it, nor grasp he is worthless here.

And you are showing your own idiocy, by using the word "confrontation" in an entirely different context for no apparent reason, that has nothing whatsoever to do with this debate. .

A debate would indicate you offered links and sources to defend your position. You just give partisan opinions of no value.

The posters own definition describes the word as I have. The word that is posted by definition that is written, proves I am right about my own description. There is nothing partisan about a written description defining words.