Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Yes it did. I bet the teacher actually considers his choice of words next time.The student has a thug mentality. Using violence didn't resolve anything.
Other students also said they believe the teacher made a racist remark, not just the student who assaulted him.
And your point?
-Geaux
There was no excuse for the student to behave violently.Yes it did. I bet the teacher actually considers his choice of words next time.The student has a thug mentality. Using violence didn't resolve anything.
Report him. Then apologize when the definition of the word is explained.I'm not a fan of racial slurs but you shouldn't attack a teacher for that, just report him.
There may be no excuse but there was a reason. Both learned a lesson.There was no excuse for the student to behave violently.Yes it did. I bet the teacher actually considers his choice of words next time.The student has a thug mentality. Using violence didn't resolve anything.
It may have been a reason, but an inexcusable one.There may be no excuse but there was a reason. Both learned a lesson.There was no excuse for the student to behave violently.Yes it did. I bet the teacher actually considers his choice of words next time.The student has a thug mentality. Using violence didn't resolve anything.
Not to me. There was a reason. The teacher was the adult. The onus is on him.It may have been a reason, but an inexcusable one.There may be no excuse but there was a reason. Both learned a lesson.There was no excuse for the student to behave violently.Yes it did. I bet the teacher actually considers his choice of words next time.The student has a thug mentality. Using violence didn't resolve anything.
Who told you that it was a disagreement? To the child it appeared as an attack against him and other Blacks.It is wrong for anyone to believe they can or should respond to a disagreement with physical violence.
The student disagreed or wouldn't have attacked. Why does anyone think they can physically harm another?Who told you that it was a disagreement? To the child it appeared as an attack against him and other Blacks.It is wrong for anyone to believe they can or should respond to a disagreement with physical violence.
Who told you the student disagreed? How do you know he didnt agree but was mad about that?The student disagreed or wouldn't have attacked. Why does anyone think they can physically harm another?Who told you that it was a disagreement? To the child it appeared as an attack against him and other Blacks.It is wrong for anyone to believe they can or should respond to a disagreement with physical violence.
So do you. Hes a child. Whats your excuse?The child needs to be educated and have a better command of the language.
I know what niggardly means. This thug needs to have it explained to him.So do you. Hes a child. Whats your excuse?The child needs to be educated and have a better command of the language.
Where did I mention "student"? I just pointed out that the dumb ass teacher got what he deserved for not considering the impact of using that word around Black kids. You should actually have a point before you do something dumb like this again.One more time, for the slow kid: the post you quoted was NOT about any student! Again: you should REALLY read a post before responding to it. You might not look QUITE this stupid all the time if you do.
Maybe black students should have to take an ESL course. The language does not need to change to accommodate stupid blacks. They just need to become better educated.