JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,522
- 2,165
- Banned
- #101
Because it is on federal land, and the government cannot provide services for which it is liable?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it is on federal land, and the government cannot provide services for which it is liable?
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
The only tantrum here is yours, OKTexas.
Obama's fault?!?! It's the fault of anyone that thought it was a good idea to vote for a Republican.
Because it is on federal land, and the government cannot provide services for which it is liable?
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
So you're saying the park service is violating an existing contract? I see a law suit the tax payers will be on the hook for. Thank you dear fucking leader.
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
Because it is on federal land, and the government cannot provide services for which it is liable?
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
So you're saying the park service is violating an existing contract? I see a law suit the tax payers will be on the hook for. Thank you dear fucking leader.
I'm not your dear fucking leader, thanks anyway.
I'm just telling you the NPS owns the place. And they're shorted by the shutdown.
Isn't it interesting that the Moonie Times lied about that?
Meanwhile, you actually think the President of the United States takes time out of his day to see that the Pisgah Inn closes? Really?
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
How did they leave that out when they said the inn was on federal land?
So you're saying the park service is violating an existing contract? I see a law suit the tax payers will be on the hook for. Thank you dear fucking leader.
I'm not your dear fucking leader, thanks anyway.
I'm just telling you the NPS owns the place. And they're shorted by the shutdown.
Isn't it interesting that the Moonie Times lied about that?
Meanwhile, you actually think the President of the United States takes time out of his day to see that the Pisgah Inn closes? Really?
If you don't you haven't been paying attention.
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
So you're saying the park service is violating an existing contract? I see a law suit the tax payers will be on the hook for. Thank you dear fucking leader.
I'm not your dear fucking leader, thanks anyway.
I'm just telling you the NPS owns the place. And they're shorted by the shutdown.
Isn't it interesting that the Moonie Times lied about that?
Meanwhile, you actually think the President of the United States takes time out of his day to see that the Pisgah Inn closes? Really?
What the Moonie Times left out:
Bruce O'Connell, described in the article as the "owner" of the Inn, isn't the owner after all. He leases the place from the National Park Service.
How did they leave that out when they said the inn was on federal land?
"Left out" as in "misled and then failed to clarify". Here's the wording in the article:
>> Inn owner Bruce O'Connell confirmed to The Washington Times that rangers were parked at the entrance to his inn... <<
Except it ain't his inn; it's the gummint's. What Bruce owns is the business of running the inn, for the term of his lease.
As to whether the gummint's in violation of that lease, I don't have a copy of it so I don't know what provision might be in there for gumint shutdowns, but what I read did mention that they told O'Connell he was in violation.
I'm not your dear fucking leader, thanks anyway.
I'm just telling you the NPS owns the place. And they're shorted by the shutdown.
Isn't it interesting that the Moonie Times lied about that?
Meanwhile, you actually think the President of the United States takes time out of his day to see that the Pisgah Inn closes? Really?
If you don't you haven't been paying attention.
Or maybe just haven't been drinking the Kool-Aid. How is it today?
Sorry, I just can't fuel on assumptions.