Bombshell claims in Jack Smith's new filing

[Nostra]

Ah, that is so sad.
Poor poster Nostra, despite given the link to the 165-page filing by Jack Smith, he still hasn't read it.

I dunno why.
Multi-syllable words?
Enumerated paragraphs?
English text?
Undereducation?
Dyslexic?

I honestly don't know why he is unable to read it.

It's so sad.

Read it. Nothing new.

Prove me wrong, Simp.

GO!

 

[postman]

Read it. Nothing new.

Prove me wrong, Simp.

GO!

I know you didn't read all 165 pages. You don't even read supreme court opinions in full. And they're half as long. Even less if you only read the main opinion.

 

[Nostra]

I know you didn't read all 165 pages. You don't even read supreme court opinions in full. And they're half as long. Even less if you only read the main opinion.

Read every word. Nothing new in it.

What is the BOMBSHELL, SIMP1

 

[postman]

Read every word. Nothing new in it.

What is the BOMBSHELL, SIMP1

tell me about page 142, second paragraph

 

[BackAgain]

Ummm, mi amigo, you are trying too hard to be a pedant.
Try this instead: The term 'Bombshell' is subjective. It is what the author wants it to be.

Duh!!

Duds aren’t bombshells.

 

[postman]

Duds aren’t bombshells.

197 documents aren't Duds.