Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will don't worry. We just like helping the poor racist GOP dupes. Plus their poor Dem and minority victims. Do you like Unemployment, SS, pensions, food that isn't poisonous, work safety, integration, disability, progress etc etc? You're welcome, fool.The problem is how much care COSTS. Go after that ferchrissake- give the free market time and stop GOP sabotage of it. This IS the free market, with no scams for a change. The STATES suq, especially red ones DUHHHHH....BS, it sucked, like all the Pubs do. WTF kind of logic is that. The freedom caucus was right, but Dems were wrong. Brainwashed idiocy...ALL Pubs do is cut taxes on the rich and start moronic wars and corrupt depressions.Spoken like a simpleton... It takes a bigger man not to punch back and be the bigger person. The Dems used the nuclear option and now the Reps are doubling down to use it for SCOTUS. The Dems passed rushed and pushed through Obamcare. The Reps tried to do the same thing with the AHCA but way faster and way more carelessly that they couldn't even get it through with their majority. Both sides seem to be getting dumber and dumber.
Funny, Democrats never used that analogy when they were bigger party of the two, did they? And now they want to lecture everyone about decency and doing the right thing.
In regards the AHCA, the only reason Democrats opposed it because it came from Republicans. It turns out, the only people with principles are from "freedom caucus", they opposed it because it was right thing to do.
Exactly, Democrats were wrong, Republicans were wrong, IMHO only freedom caucus got it right. We don't need CommiceCare in any shape or form, it has to be completely repealed, then come up with new plan based on free market and without government bureaucracy. Of course, there need to be little oversight, but health care (and not just health care) should go where it belong, to the states.
Why not to go back to states?
Think about it, leftist will get what they're dreaming about, so will right. If California or New York wants universal health care, let them have it within their state, on their own dime. If let's say Alabama or Texas want no health care, let them have it, on their own expense. One shoe doesn't fit all and it's time for federal government to get out of it.
You're absolutely clueless. Read that AGAIN. The GOP is the party of the greedy idiot rich, DUHHHHHHHH. And racists DUHHHH....Can you read? You vote for the party of the rich because you're a brainwashed (70% chance racist) moron. Get it?Brainwashed functional idiot. The truth is Dem DUH. Obama got NOTHING. ACA when he had 60 votes for 3 weeks, MORON.There you go... no argument, so lets turn to deception.
Party of the rich. Riiiiigt.
Propaganda? How many media outlets are pushing Democrats agenda, again?
Obstruction? Barry got everything he wanted, one way or another, because... racism?
Biden rule?
Squeal like a pig, boy.
Can you spot the giveaway to the rich, DUNCE?:
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didnāt notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Laborās share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% ā Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% ā Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% ā Reagan
1982 = 11.2% ā Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% ā Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 ā http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release - Financial Accounts of the United States - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
What any of this has to do with filibuster?
I know you don't get paid unless you post, but at least put it where it belongs.
You don't know for whom I voted.
You live by slogans, therefore you don't even think who is the party of the rich, but I think you got the idea.
Race card? What, run out of arguments? Nah, you didn't have any to begin with.
By Dems, you mean the Southern Conservative branch of the party before 1980 or so. Now Southern conservatives are all GOP DUHHHHHH, dupe.You're absolutely clueless. Read that AGAIN. The GOP is the party of the greedy idiot rich, DUHHHHHHHH. And racists DUHHHH....Can you read? You vote for the party of the rich because you're a brainwashed (70% chance racist) moron. Get it?Brainwashed functional idiot. The truth is Dem DUH. Obama got NOTHING. ACA when he had 60 votes for 3 weeks, MORON.
Can you spot the giveaway to the rich, DUNCE?:
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didnāt notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Laborās share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% ā Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% ā Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% ā Reagan
1982 = 11.2% ā Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% ā Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 ā http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release - Financial Accounts of the United States - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
What any of this has to do with filibuster?
I know you don't get paid unless you post, but at least put it where it belongs.
You don't know for whom I voted.
You live by slogans, therefore you don't even think who is the party of the rich, but I think you got the idea.
Race card? What, run out of arguments? Nah, you didn't have any to begin with.
Slavery - Democrats.
Lynching - Democrats.
KKK - Democrats.
Segregation - Democrats.
Jim Crow - Democrats.
Opposition to CRA - Democrats.
You were saying...?
Too late. Harry Reid already did it.Agreed, its a sad day if we change the rules to cater to a completely partisan senate. Its bad enough as it is. The 60 rule at least makes each party work with each other and build consensus... With that out the door its going to be one party rules, how lazy and worthless is our leadership? It wasn't right when Harry did it and its not right if the Republicans do it.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
By Dems, you mean the Southern Conservative branch of the party before 1980 or so. Now Southern conservatives are all GOP DUHHHHHH, dupe.You're absolutely clueless. Read that AGAIN. The GOP is the party of the greedy idiot rich, DUHHHHHHHH. And racists DUHHHH....Can you read? You vote for the party of the rich because you're a brainwashed (70% chance racist) moron. Get it?What any of this has to do with filibuster?
I know you don't get paid unless you post, but at least put it where it belongs.
You don't know for whom I voted.
You live by slogans, therefore you don't even think who is the party of the rich, but I think you got the idea.
Race card? What, run out of arguments? Nah, you didn't have any to begin with.
Slavery - Democrats.
Lynching - Democrats.
KKK - Democrats.
Segregation - Democrats.
Jim Crow - Democrats.
Opposition to CRA - Democrats.
You were saying...?
BTW, CRA was Dem.
CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!BTW, CRA was Dem.
Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!BTW, CRA was Dem.
Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
Oh, THAT CRA. And of course LBJ and the Dem CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives over to the New BS GOP where they are today. Read some history ferchissake...CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!BTW, CRA was Dem.
Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
That's what you get if your main source of information is Comedy Central. Republicans were fighting for Civil Rights since Republican party, while Democrats were always on opposite side).
Every single CRA proposed by Republicans was to eliminate racist Democrat's policies (slavery, segregation, lynching, voting rights, Jim Crow laws).
Civil Rights Act of 1866 - proposed by republicans, vetoed by Andrew Johnson (D).
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - proposed by republicans, signed by Ulysses Grant (R). Overturned by SCOTUS in 1883 and led to Jim Crow laws enforced by democrats.
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 167ā19, Democrats 118ā107; Senate vote: Republicans 43ā0, Democrats 29ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 132ā15, Democrats 179ā93; Senate vote: Republicans 35ā0, Democrats 47ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - proposed by Kennedy (D) (extension of CRA from 1957 and 1960), signed by Lyndon Johnson (D) who opposed every previous CRA act. (House vote: Republicans 136ā35, Democrats 153ā91; Senate vote: Republicans 27ā6, Democrats 46ā21).
Oh, THAT CRA. And of course LBJ and the Dem CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives over to the New BS GOP where they are today. Read some history ferchissake...CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!BTW, CRA was Dem.
Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
That's what you get if your main source of information is Comedy Central. Republicans were fighting for Civil Rights since Republican party, while Democrats were always on opposite side).
Every single CRA proposed by Republicans was to eliminate racist Democrat's policies (slavery, segregation, lynching, voting rights, Jim Crow laws).
Civil Rights Act of 1866 - proposed by republicans, vetoed by Andrew Johnson (D).
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - proposed by republicans, signed by Ulysses Grant (R). Overturned by SCOTUS in 1883 and led to Jim Crow laws enforced by democrats.
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 167ā19, Democrats 118ā107; Senate vote: Republicans 43ā0, Democrats 29ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 132ā15, Democrats 179ā93; Senate vote: Republicans 35ā0, Democrats 47ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - proposed by Kennedy (D) (extension of CRA from 1957 and 1960), signed by Lyndon Johnson (D) who opposed every previous CRA act. (House vote: Republicans 136ā35, Democrats 153ā91; Senate vote: Republicans 27ā6, Democrats 46ā21).
They died off and/or were replaced by racist GOPers DUHHHH. 1966-1980....Oh, THAT CRA. And of course LBJ and the Dem CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives over to the New BS GOP where they are today. Read some history ferchissake...CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!BTW, CRA was Dem.
Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
That's what you get if your main source of information is Comedy Central. Republicans were fighting for Civil Rights since Republican party, while Democrats were always on opposite side).
Every single CRA proposed by Republicans was to eliminate racist Democrat's policies (slavery, segregation, lynching, voting rights, Jim Crow laws).
Civil Rights Act of 1866 - proposed by republicans, vetoed by Andrew Johnson (D).
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - proposed by republicans, signed by Ulysses Grant (R). Overturned by SCOTUS in 1883 and led to Jim Crow laws enforced by democrats.
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 167ā19, Democrats 118ā107; Senate vote: Republicans 43ā0, Democrats 29ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 132ā15, Democrats 179ā93; Senate vote: Republicans 35ā0, Democrats 47ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - proposed by Kennedy (D) (extension of CRA from 1957 and 1960), signed by Lyndon Johnson (D) who opposed every previous CRA act. (House vote: Republicans 136ā35, Democrats 153ā91; Senate vote: Republicans 27ā6, Democrats 46ā21).
Since you know history, it wont be a problem for you to name five racist Democrats who switched the side to racist Republican party.
I asked you that earlier, but you either ignored it, or you can't find five names. Which one is it?
They died off and/or were replaced by racist GOPers DUHHHH. 1966-1980....Oh, THAT CRA. And of course LBJ and the Dem CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives over to the New BS GOP where they are today. Read some history ferchissake...CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!Of course, after resisting CRA for 50 years, they find the way to get black vote by not blocking it anymore.
I bet it feels good to take a credit for something that other people did. That's pretty much how Democrat politics works.
That's what you get if your main source of information is Comedy Central. Republicans were fighting for Civil Rights since Republican party, while Democrats were always on opposite side).
Every single CRA proposed by Republicans was to eliminate racist Democrat's policies (slavery, segregation, lynching, voting rights, Jim Crow laws).
Civil Rights Act of 1866 - proposed by republicans, vetoed by Andrew Johnson (D).
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - proposed by republicans, signed by Ulysses Grant (R). Overturned by SCOTUS in 1883 and led to Jim Crow laws enforced by democrats.
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 167ā19, Democrats 118ā107; Senate vote: Republicans 43ā0, Democrats 29ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 132ā15, Democrats 179ā93; Senate vote: Republicans 35ā0, Democrats 47ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - proposed by Kennedy (D) (extension of CRA from 1957 and 1960), signed by Lyndon Johnson (D) who opposed every previous CRA act. (House vote: Republicans 136ā35, Democrats 153ā91; Senate vote: Republicans 27ā6, Democrats 46ā21).
Since you know history, it wont be a problem for you to name five racist Democrats who switched the side to racist Republican party.
I asked you that earlier, but you either ignored it, or you can't find five names. Which one is it?
They died off and/or were replaced by racist GOPers DUHHHH. 1966-1980....Oh, THAT CRA. And of course LBJ and the Dem CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives over to the New BS GOP where they are today. Read some history ferchissake...CRA was proposed by Dems and signed by Carter. It tried to end redlining by banks so WORTHY minorities in bad areas could get mortgages. It wasn't until 2003 that unworthy clients were able to get loans from corrupt GOP crony private lenders under corrupt crony Booooshie regulators. Great job!
That's what you get if your main source of information is Comedy Central. Republicans were fighting for Civil Rights since Republican party, while Democrats were always on opposite side).
Every single CRA proposed by Republicans was to eliminate racist Democrat's policies (slavery, segregation, lynching, voting rights, Jim Crow laws).
Civil Rights Act of 1866 - proposed by republicans, vetoed by Andrew Johnson (D).
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - proposed by republicans, signed by Ulysses Grant (R). Overturned by SCOTUS in 1883 and led to Jim Crow laws enforced by democrats.
Civil Rights Act of 1957 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 167ā19, Democrats 118ā107; Senate vote: Republicans 43ā0, Democrats 29ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1960 - proposed by republicans, signed by Dwight Eisenhower (R). (House vote: Republicans 132ā15, Democrats 179ā93; Senate vote: Republicans 35ā0, Democrats 47ā18)
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - proposed by Kennedy (D) (extension of CRA from 1957 and 1960), signed by Lyndon Johnson (D) who opposed every previous CRA act. (House vote: Republicans 136ā35, Democrats 153ā91; Senate vote: Republicans 27ā6, Democrats 46ā21).
Since you know history, it wont be a problem for you to name five racist Democrats who switched the side to racist Republican party.
I asked you that earlier, but you either ignored it, or you can't find five names. Which one is it?
You said: "CRA of 1964 was what sent all the racist Southern conservatives (democrats) over to the New BS GOP where they are today."
"sent all"
Provide five names of those who switched the party. Let me help you:
1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.
Fill the blanks.
Sure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Sure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Republicans are wusses.Sure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Steamroll the Democrats properly now, and they won't get a majority back,
Republicans are wusses.Sure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Steamroll the Democrats properly now, and they won't get a majority back,
They would never do anything like that.
Conservatives are losers when it comes to the real cultural matters, and that makes them as useless and as weak as any other Republican.Republicans are wusses.Sure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Steamroll the Democrats properly now, and they won't get a majority back,
They would never do anything like that.
Republicans are incapable of governing. Bunch of pussies. We need to replace them with conservatives, as many we can.
You're a fool if you think that is realistic. Read a history bookSure, but if the dems get the majority back, they can simply institute new rules and steamroll everything they want. Sauce for the gander.R's will regret it if they use the nuclear option...
Shrug. Possibly.
In the meantime they should steamroll everything they've ever wanted right through Congress, and tie up the Senate rules with such convolutions the Dems would be paralyzed should they regain the majority.
I really don't know what they're waiting for.
Steamroll the Democrats properly now, and they won't get a majority back,
