Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or maybe it's a legal issue.clean your glasses.
it looks to me that he's taking issue with the times decision not to publish them because they're "stolen".Why is that a problem? And please don't make the same invalid comparison to the Pentagon Papers. The New York Times has no first amendment right to someone's emails at a university in England.
it's not a problem, it's just hypocritical.
You didnt seem to mind when Bush punished whistle blowers
No...that's not what I said. The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to (in this case we were talking about the pentagon papers)...wouldn't you agree? But they don't have a first amendment right to publish emails that were stolen from a university in another country.The first amendment grants rights to leaked e-mails under certain circumstances? WTF?The New York Times has no first amendment right to someone's emails at a university in England.
Or maybe it's a legal issue.
it's not a problem, it's just hypocritical.
No...that's not what I said. The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to (in this case we were talking about the pentagon papers)...wouldn't you agree? But they don't have a first amendment right to publish emails that were stolen from a university in another country.The first amendment grants rights to leaked e-mails under certain circumstances? WTF?The New York Times has no first amendment right to someone's emails at a university in England.
We're not going to go over each and every one of them with you and deal with your denial, Baghdad Bob.I just read 93915470 and I domt see any arbitrary changing of data. I see a discussing of how they can explain a veriation of the data from their thoeries. Typical science stuff guys
Has anyone tried to find these emails using a search engine? As I posted before, it appears there might be some bias among the search engines.
Please try, just for me, please do a search and see if you can find them that way.
I am simply curious if any of you can run a search on google, yahoo or any other search engine and find the actual emails.
the link is here- ( East Anglia Confirmed Emails from the Climate Research Unit - Searchable) I am not asking for a link, I have that.
I am asking if anyone can find it using a search engine.
We're not going to go over each and every one of them with you and deal with your denial, Baghdad Bob.I just read 93915470 and I domt see any arbitrary changing of data. I see a discussing of how they can explain a veriation of the data from their thoeries. Typical science stuff guys
That was last weeks thread. Guess he missed it.
I am not sorry I gave him the link, but I am sorry that he now sees fit to deflect from the issue itself by attempting to discuss each email.
I gave the thread, it was unintended consequences that cause each email to be posted with a defending argument.
No...that's not what I said. The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to (in this case we were talking about the pentagon papers)...wouldn't you agree? But they don't have a first amendment right to publish emails that were stolen from a university in another country.The first amendment grants rights to leaked e-mails under certain circumstances? WTF?
but it's okay to publish domestic stolen emails?
gotcha.
The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to
The New York Times has no first amendment right to someone's emails at a university in England.
They have no prohibition either.
Clearly it was their choice. The comparison is valid and they're hypocrites.
But I understand why you are arguing a losing point, AW.
Actually, Dud's been pulling your leg. The Times linked to the emails back on 11/20.
See my post above, dear. They did link to the emails. Did they publish Palins? I don't remember. But as she was a candidate for VP I'd go out on a limb and say that was their first amendment right.No...that's not what I said. The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to (in this case we were talking about the pentagon papers)...wouldn't you agree? But they don't have a first amendment right to publish emails that were stolen from a university in another country.The first amendment grants rights to leaked e-mails under certain circumstances? WTF?
but it's okay to publish domestic stolen emails?
gotcha.
See my post above, dear. They did link to the emails. Did they publish Palins? I don't remember. But as she was a candidate for VP I'd go out on a limb and say that was their first amendment right.No...that's not what I said. The press in our country has a first amendment right to report on what our government is up to (in this case we were talking about the pentagon papers)...wouldn't you agree? But they don't have a first amendment right to publish emails that were stolen from a university in another country.
but it's okay to publish domestic stolen emails?
gotcha.
That and $5 will get you a latte.Sure it does.
btw, they linked to palin's emails in the same way they linked to the climate emails.
no, it doesn't.
i'm delighted.
