Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 20,468
- 20,385
- 2,288
Yes, none of the protestors were armed.Look who has the guns. They do not appear to be in any danger. In fact they look like the danger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, none of the protestors were armed.Look who has the guns. They do not appear to be in any danger. In fact they look like the danger.
Liar.How was anyone deceived by the video? At no point in time did the Jan 6th committee attempt to make us believe that Hawley was the only one running.
Yes. Hawley was singled out in the video because only moments before he was giving the power fist to the very same rioters he was fleeing from.How was anyone deceived by the video? At no point in time did the Jan 6th committee attempt to make us believe that Hawley was the only one running.
Furthermore, if it is true that Hawley was running from the rioters, then it would not be the case that they lied about him running from the rioters as is claimed.
Go ahead and show me where that happened.Liar.
A danger? Of what being photographed in someone's selfie?
Staged photo. Look at everyone else sitting with hands folded.
Bullshit. The way the edited the video makes him look like he was the only one (or one of only a few) who “ran.” And try real hard to finally be honest for once:How was anyone deceived by the video? At no point in time did the Jan 6th committee attempt to make us believe that Hawley was the only one running.
And the lady who was responsible for security of the capitol dropped the ball, then ignored the rules and seated a committee of her choosing and wouldn't allow the media access to the video. It took Pelosi being kicked out of the speaker position and McCarthy stepping in to open the blinds and allow some sunlight in. Now we are getting the rest of the story.
Wrong.41 thousand hours of people being led around by cops?
I especially liked this part of Tucker's segment last night.But if this was a catastrophic violent insurrection worse than slavery, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11.. how could it be possible for the leader to calmly walk around with passive officers?
Given your (the lefts)narrative, that’s simply not possible.
You have to revise your story. The hyperbolic one you claimed no longer holds.
And yes, the guy was not violent, but then why is he in jail for 4 years?
Police needed to resort to lethal weapons to keep that violent mob out.
Capitol police arrested no one, there were too many for the police to ever have control enough to do arrests, without escalating the situation and lose complete control, and be harmed.Do you have that video? Please post it. I have not seen it.
If this is the case, why would Capitol Police
NOT arrest him and get him out of the Capitol - they had evety opportunity?
Escort him throughout th Capitol?
Atrempt to unlock locked doors for him, giving him access to parts of the Capitol he cpd not otherwise get into?
Escort him all the way onto the Senate floor?
Claim he was an 'extremely violent threat' and claim he was 'engaging in a violent Insurrection' when he was clearly, peacefully being escorted through the Capitol (a thoroughly debunked J6 Committee narrative)?
There is no logical explanation / defense.
If THIS was the US govt's and DC / Capitol / Federal law enforcement's idea of 'Security', an unruly mob of boy scouts could have made their way in, been escorted around, and charged with 'Insurrection'.
The mob posed no danger, it was part of the orchestrated movements that day. They never got within 50 yards of the chambers. The protestors did very little wrong so Dems and lib loons Pearl clutched to “what they might have done later if….if….if…”. Worst case supposition is not reality.