Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 65,286
- 56,096
- 3,615
No need to selectively edit anything to show that, Dumbass.To show the violence and how they caused Congress to cease certifying the election because they had to evacuate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need to selectively edit anything to show that, Dumbass.To show the violence and how they caused Congress to cease certifying the election because they had to evacuate.
The press consortium sued the Capitol Police for the video and lost in court. (Pelosi had nothing to do with the suit, btw.)
J6 committee reviewed the CP video, and returned the video to the CP when done reviewing.
The DOJ has no power to release to the public, the Capitol Police security video, silly one! The Capitol Police has sole authority over the video release according to the courts.... until McCarthy did something unheard of.....
How much video of no crimes does it take to offset video of actual crimes?
There was no false narrative Easy.Then your problem is with the Capitol Police.
Perhaps after the J6 Committee proved how corrupt they are by cherry picking clips to suport their false narrative...
Pethaps after lib lawyers illegally withheld excupatory evidence (video) to ensure protestors went to prison...
The Capitol Police correctly no longer trusted the left, to include proven fake news MSM and refused to turn the viedeo over.
Sucks to be Democrats, the J6 Committee, and full-blown leftist snowflake Conspiracy Theorists right now.
You need a new mouthpiece.I've seen the same bullshit post from all the lefties on this board, you need new material.
There was no false narrative Easy.
the reason you keep seeing it is because its objectively true. There was an actual court case on it with real lawyers & judges.I've seen the same bullshit post from all the lefties on this board, you need new material.
Too fucking funny.
You were fine bleating LOCK THEM UP after being fed highly edited and selective videos by the J6 Clown Show, but now that that narrative is falling apart you all the sudden want to see all the videos.
Hypocrite much?![]()
What iif evidence was withheld to assist the prosecution? That certainly appears to be the case. We aren't talking about whether or not these people would still be found guilty but whether or not they received a fair trial.Well yes, I do not think that a defense lawyer would post videos on-line.
But again, if this is true then the appeal is a slam dunk and anyone denied access to them will be very rich soon.
If video is allowed of a particular incident in question, you can't cherry pick which parts of the video you want to show. No judge would allow such nonsense.Chansley didn’t go to trial. He pled guilty. The problem with these videos is that they’re not exculpatory.
If there is video of you robbing a bank, it’s not exculpatory to then show a video of you not robbing a bank later.
We all know he walked around after being heavily bear sprayed and the extinguisher was thrown.... he went back to his office or retreating area is what was reported... And if memory serves he might have passed out there or in a short time after leaving.... I will have to research that again and let you know...A police officer was reportedly killed by being hit with a fire extingiisher ... he was later seen walking around just fine!
L I A R!
I love it when you destroy your own credibility ... and it only took you 1 sentence to do it.
Quote me saying anyone needs to be exonerated, liar.LOL
Dumbfuck, they still deserve to be locked up. You're running around with your hair on fire as though these videos exonerate anyone who's been convicted.
![]()
If it went to trial, you might have had a point.If video is allowed of a particular incident in question, you can't cherry pick which parts of the video you want to show. No judge would allow such nonsense.
then why did schumer and mcconnell give a speech about it? reactions are fking everything commie boiPrediction: Tucker doesn't find anything of any note we don't already know.
what they need is access to a fair trial. That's all. That wasn't allowed by demofks. Trespassing is trespassing. withholding evidence is a felonyQuote me saying anyone needs to be exonerated, liar.
I just mentioned that he wanted Carlson's show banned. Do you think a government official should go after a journalist?
Then your problem is with the Capitol Police.
Perhaps after the J6 Committee proved how corrupt they are by cherry picking clips to support their false narrative...
Pethaps after lib lawyers illegally withheld excupatory evidence (video) to ensure protestors went to prison...
The Capitol Police correctly no longer trusted the left, to include proven fake news MSM and refused to turn the viedeo over.
Sucks to be Democrats, the J6 Committee, and full-blown leftist snowflake Conspiracy Theorists right now.
then why did schumer and mcconnell give a speech about it? reactions are fking everything commie boi
This is an article written on January 7th when nothing was truly known or investigated yet..We all know he walked around after being heavily bear sprayed and the extinguisher was thrown.... he went back to his office or retreating area is what was reported... And if memory serves he might have passed out there or in a short time after leaving.... I will have to research that again and let you know...
what's he lying about? post one lie.Because Carlson is lying, knows he lying and doesn't fucking care if people are killed or die because of his lies. So long as the stock price doesn't go down.