BREAKING: Donald Trump calls on the Supreme Court to step in before July 11 sentencing

[john doe 101]

Interesting.

Even though some here probably believe I'm some mindless "conservative" thug, I actually do prefer to call balls and strikes.

And I have to say, this one wasn't on my bingo card:

BREAKING: Donald Trump calls on the Supreme Court to step in before July 11 sentencing

Judge Merchan, who oversaw the case, is set to sentence President Trump on July 11, just days before the RNC Convention.

thepostmillennial.com

Does he really need to do this?

He's not going to serve a day in prison before November, any appeals process would ensure that with 100% certainty.

The only way it makes sense is remembering that Trump is, at his very heart and soul, a showman.

And the showman doesn't want the 2024 Republican National Convention to be remote COVID hidin' Biden basement-style bullshit. (Should he be placed on House arrest, for example.)

So he's literally calling on the Supreme Court to intervene so he can put on the best political spectacle possible in the lead up to the '24 apocalypse.

Are you not entertained?

He's not going to spend a day in jail anyway.

 

[The Duke]

Your opinion doesn’t trump facts. Gore was trying to steal Florida and SCOTUS stopped him.

I kinda like truth, and that's not truth.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

He's not going to spend a day in jail anyway.

Who are you?

 

[The Duke]

He's not going to spend a day in jail anyway.

Okay, where'd you get your law degree?

 

[otto105]

That's your story and you're stickin' to it? Fine by me.

Metinks you has teh dumb, but you do you.

Facts are what you think, right.

So, $15

 

[elektra]

The 34 convictions state otherwise

Oh, we are playing cards? I see your 34 convictions and raise you, "Dred Scott"
History disagrees with you, otto

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia​

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens. The decision is widely considered the worst in the Supreme Court's history, being widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal

 

[Zincwarrior]

Sounds like you're worried, maybe scared shitless that your fake trial will get blown up by the Supremes.

Hardly.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Hope he does not die in office.

One of them very likely will.

 

[otto105]

Oh, we are playing cards? I see your 34 convictions and raise you, "Dred Scott"
History disagrees with you, otto

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia​

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens. The decision is widely considered the worst in the Supreme Court's history, being widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal

The 34 convictions stand.

And three trials to go.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

The 34 convictions stand.

For now.

And three trials to go.

Nope.

See...there's a thing called:

"Self-Pardon".

 

[elektra]

The 34 convictions stand.
And three trials to go.

Yes, the Dred Scott ruling stood for years, as well. Democrats got the Dred Scott decision wrong. Again, history disagrees with you.

 

[The Duke]

Facts are what you think, right.

So, $15

Facts are what the FEC says Merchan's donations were.

$24 in this screen grab, but there's more!

You know, like the head of the FEC that Merchan didn't allow as a witness when the charge involved campaign contributions?

That stands for Federal Election Commission, btw, boogereater.

 

[Lastamender]

One of them very likely will.

One is already dead.

 

[MarathonMike]

Of course, there was no law broken. So there is that. This is no spectacle. It matters to all Americans. Freedom and Justice is being destroyed.

How'd you like those jury instructions? Reminds me of the old joke of the optimist kid who got a big box of poop for Christmas. "I know with all this horseshit, there has to be a pony in here somewhere!"

 

[john doe 101]

Okay, where'd you get your law degree?

Why would he go to jail? The only way he could possibly go to jail would be to say some real stupid shit before July 11th.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

How'd you like those jury instructions? Reminds me of the old joke of the optimist kid who got a big box of poop for Christmas. "I know with all this horseshit, there has to be a pony in here somewhere!"

Classic Aesop fable.

 

[john doe 101]

How'd you like those jury instructions? Reminds me of the old joke of the optimist kid who got a big box of poop for Christmas. "I know with all this horseshit, there has to be a pony in here somewhere!"

The basic problem with you dumb Red Hats is you dont know how things work. That is where all this stupid shit you say originates from. Your ignorance.

 

[elektra]

The basic problem with you dumb Red Hats is you dont know how things work. That is where all this stupid shit you say originates from. Your ignorance.

feel free to explain, the jury instructions, so that we can see you are not the dumb, calling everyone but yourself dumb

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Interesting.

Even though some here probably believe I'm some mindless "conservative" thug, I actually do prefer to call balls and strikes.

And I have to say, this one wasn't on my bingo card:

BREAKING: Donald Trump calls on the Supreme Court to step in before July 11 sentencing

Judge Merchan, who oversaw the case, is set to sentence President Trump on July 11, just days before the RNC Convention.

thepostmillennial.com

Does he really need to do this?

He's not going to serve a day in prison before November, any appeals process would ensure that with 100% certainty.

The only way it makes sense is remembering that Trump is, at his very heart and soul, a showman.

And the showman doesn't want the 2024 Republican National Convention to be remote COVID hidin' Biden basement-style bullshit. (Should he be placed on House arrest, for example.)

So he's literally calling on the Supreme Court to intervene so he can put on the best political spectacle possible in the lead up to the '24 apocalypse.

Are you not entertained?

Can't happen yet if at all.

How dumb can he be?

Wait!

He's playing to the fools in the crowd.

never mind

 

[The Duke]

The basic problem with you dumb Red Hats is you dont know how things work. That is where all this stupid shit you say originates from. Your ignorance.

STFU you Russo bot hole.