BREAKING! Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger's Testimony Blows Up Fani Willis’ Case

Bragg had stinky flop sweat. Fani's is likely to be even worse. Jack Smith? The stenchiest of them all.

They are beyond "getting worried" now....
 
Give us the excerpts. I'm not going to listen to an hour long phone conversation.
Do as you want, but the grand jury, HAD TO LISTEN to the WHOLE hour long conversation, in order to understand the entire context involved in the Willis indictment. YOU SHOULD ALSO.

It ALL is necessary, I would suggest You do the same if you actually want to be more informed....

The conversation included debunking of Trump stolen election claims one on one, threats of false criminality by trump to Raffensburger, and a whole bunch of stuff that connects the whole content of the conversation which enlightens the big picture....

Pulling out just a line or two of what Trump said, will tell you nothing, unless you've heard the entire phone call
 
Um...retard?

Raffensperger has not testified yet.


"According to George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley..."

That's his OPINION.

You're right. I started looking for transcripts yesterday evening.. nothing.
 
Doesn't make any any difference to you, does it?
The Prog Socialist African American woman is death. They seethe of hate, self-importance, being special. All of this because they were shit on. Over many years and decades. Attitude ruins things for us all. So, this lady despises white powerful men. Psychiatric studies need to understand relations between all races, cultures, ethnic and religious peoples.
 
Yes, he never said "create fraudulent votes".

The grand jury listened to the whole phone call. Trump lied all the way through it. One lie after another. Raffsperger corrected him and Trump repeated his lies.
 
The grand jury listened to the whole phone call. Trump lied all the way through it. One lie after another. Raffsperger corrected him and Trump repeated his lies.
Your response to my comment is a reason why the ghettos are forever. And of course, the resources will reduce at some point.
 
Trump claims thousands of dead people voted in Georgia. Two dead people voted.

So? That is what he believed at the time and maybe still believes. Many Democrats believed that Trump colluded with Russia and said it many times and, despite being proven wrong via a thorough investigation, many still believe it. Should we indict them all as well?
 
THE INDICTMENTS, is Trump's campaign.... Without the indictments to fuel his money grab grifting, there is no Trump campaign.

The campaign of Retribution and him, helps Americans NOT ONE IOTA.

That's right sweetheart. You tried to "kill the king" metaphorically, and you missed. Now he's stronger than ever.

For the first time I really, honestly think he has a very good chance of winning the general.

Congrats. Your TDS did this.
 
So? That is what he believed at the time and maybe still believes. Many Democrats believed that Trump colluded with Russia and said it many times and, despite being proven wrong via a thorough investigation, many still believe it. Should we indict them all as well?
Who are these Democrats?

Name names
 
So? That is what he believed at the time and maybe still believes. Many Democrats believed that Trump colluded with Russia and said it many times and, despite being proven wrong via a thorough investigation, many still believe it. Should we indict them all as well?

Trump told a string of vague lies during the phone call without evidence. He's a con man. Trump wanted a back channel to the Kremlin during his first campaign. He's too dumb to be a Russian agent and can't keep his mouth shut, so that accusation has no merit.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA

Forum List

Back
Top