Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. But when did "could" and "possible" become "was??" The moron I posted to said the Obama administration "was" spying on Trump.Possible.Can someone explain the meaning of the word, "could," to the above imbecile?“the Obama administration…was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump”
NSA could provide ‘smoking gun’ proof Obama admin was spying on Trump by Friday - Hot Air
NO Crime committed by Trump and team
NO Foreign Intelligence Value (Personal info collected)
NO reason to investigate Trump and team further
NO reason to illegally distribute personal information to Spy Agencies
'WATERGATE 2'
Is English your second language?
Oh, I didn't make it up.The standard of proof that was established for Hillary's escapades was, as long as there is no conviction in a court of law, the defendant is free and clear of taint and contamination. I see no reason to change that standard now.A fairy tale conspiracy theory asserting that a presidential candidate and the leader of Russia conspired to rig a presidential election: absolutely ZERO evidence; absurd; and politically motivated.
After a while you cant use the excuse of "1000 connections are just happy coincidences" anymore.
Ahh, it's just a coincidence that you agree with the standard you just made up? Very slick.
Duh. You don't think a criminal investigation should include investigating the criminal? Ridiculous.
It's an observation.Oh, I didn't make it up.The standard of proof that was established for Hillary's escapades was, as long as there is no conviction in a court of law, the defendant is free and clear of taint and contamination. I see no reason to change that standard now.A fairy tale conspiracy theory asserting that a presidential candidate and the leader of Russia conspired to rig a presidential election: absolutely ZERO evidence; absurd; and politically motivated.
After a while you cant use the excuse of "1000 connections are just happy coincidences" anymore.
Ahh, it's just a coincidence that you agree with the standard you just made up? Very slick.
Of course not, it's someone elses.
It's an observation.Oh, I didn't make it up.The standard of proof that was established for Hillary's escapades was, as long as there is no conviction in a court of law, the defendant is free and clear of taint and contamination. I see no reason to change that standard now.After a while you cant use the excuse of "1000 connections are just happy coincidences" anymore.
Ahh, it's just a coincidence that you agree with the standard you just made up? Very slick.
Of course not, it's someone elses.
You're not paying attention or reading, are you? AFTER the FBI and NSA revealed that their 'incidental collections' revealed NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - no crimes, no reason to investigate further - Obama still had Trump 'monitored' (according to NSA documents) and both the NSA and FBI began investigating Trump - for 9 months now...based on NO CRIME having been committed and NO foreign Intel value despite Obama claiming the continued surveillance was part of Foreign Intel collection.No. But when did "could" and "possible" become "was??" The moron I posted to said the Obama administration "was" spying on Trump.
The evidence gaps are a constant, because of the sensitive nature of those facts. Common-sense tells the open-minded to smell a rat.Bullshit.It's an oversight committee. He's the chairman.
They have oversight of the executive branch.
The committee is investigating Trump in relation to Russian efforts to influence our electoral process.
The chairman shared evidence with the guy they're investigating.
You wanna try again, dope?
They are investigating paranoid claims about Russia hacking the election. Trump isn't under indictment, you fucking jackass. Trump is legally authorized to see any material the committee is authorized to see.
He doesn't need to be under indictment to be investigated. The investigation always comes before an indictment, retard.
Trump and the Intel agencies are both in the executive branch. He can get that information any time he likes.
Until he gets rid of all of the lying Obama scumbags Trump will never get the whole story. As we speak the FBI refuses to cooperate. Now why is that????
Injecting conspiracy to cover your gaps in logic is never a good play. You simply cannot assume and state as fact that "lying Obama scumbags" is the reason for any of this while denying that Trump has the ability to get it himself. It only makes you look ridiculously dumb.
Only dishonest numbnuts like yourself refuse to face up to the truth.
The fact is not only is there a massive conspiracy to impeach Trump which was tipped off several times, but the media is in collusion with Democrats on this conspiracy and ironically in collusion with them to win elections. Only an idiot refuses to read the tea leaves or refuses to even pay fucking attention. The greatest threat Trump poses to the co-conspirators is when he finally replaces enough of Obama's people to bring it to light, some of the facts will be made public and the deniers will get egg on their faces. My guess is they will simply change their stories. What will be your story?
Common-sense tells the open-minded to smell a rat.
The evidence gaps are a constant, because of the sensitive nature of those facts. Common-sense tells the open-minded to smell a rat.Bullshit.It's an oversight committee. He's the chairman.
They have oversight of the executive branch.
The committee is investigating Trump in relation to Russian efforts to influence our electoral process.
The chairman shared evidence with the guy they're investigating.
You wanna try again, dope?
They are investigating paranoid claims about Russia hacking the election. Trump isn't under indictment, you fucking jackass. Trump is legally authorized to see any material the committee is authorized to see.
He doesn't need to be under indictment to be investigated. The investigation always comes before an indictment, retard.
Trump and the Intel agencies are both in the executive branch. He can get that information any time he likes.
Until he gets rid of all of the lying Obama scumbags Trump will never get the whole story. As we speak the FBI refuses to cooperate. Now why is that????
Injecting conspiracy to cover your gaps in logic is never a good play. You simply cannot assume and state as fact that "lying Obama scumbags" is the reason for any of this while denying that Trump has the ability to get it himself. It only makes you look ridiculously dumb.
Only dishonest numbnuts like yourself refuse to face up to the truth.
The fact is not only is there a massive conspiracy to impeach Trump which was tipped off several times, but the media is in collusion with Democrats on this conspiracy and ironically in collusion with them to win elections. Only an idiot refuses to read the tea leaves or refuses to even pay fucking attention. The greatest threat Trump poses to the co-conspirators is when he finally replaces enough of Obama's people to bring it to light, some of the facts will be made public and the deniers will get egg on their faces. My guess is they will simply change their stories. What will be your story?
'Could'....is that Obama's justification for illegal wire-taps/electronic surveillance/investigations?
OBAMA:
'Well your honor, the individual in this case COULD be conspiring with the Russians.'
JUDGE:
'And the individual COULD be smuggling nuclear weapons to North Korea, beating his wife, and mistreating his dog - do you have any evidence that leads you to this belief?'
OBAMA:
'Well.......no.'
View attachment 118347
Both the Directors of the FBI and NSA clearly declared their 'incidental collections' resulted in NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - no crime, no suspicion of crime, no need for further monitoring, no need for further investigations....but Barry did it anyway under the 'cover of legitimate foreign surveillance'. 'Foreign Surveillance'? AGAIN, both the FBI and NSA stated there was NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE in the initial information collected...
Hell, you could have won millions in the lottery...'Could'....is that Obama's justification for illegal wire-taps/electronic surveillance/investigations?
OBAMA:
'Well your honor, the individual in this case COULD be conspiring with the Russians.'
JUDGE:
'And the individual COULD be smuggling nuclear weapons to North Korea, beating his wife, and mistreating his dog - do you have any evidence that leads you to this belief?'
OBAMA:
'Well.......no.'
View attachment 118347
Both the Directors of the FBI and NSA clearly declared their 'incidental collections' resulted in NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - no crime, no suspicion of crime, no need for further monitoring, no need for further investigations....but Barry did it anyway under the 'cover of legitimate foreign surveillance'. 'Foreign Surveillance'? AGAIN, both the FBI and NSA stated there was NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE in the initial information collected...
Reality is THIS:Neither is addressing reality.
And YOU still posted how evidence could surface to show Obama spied on Trump.You're not paying attention or reading, are you? AFTER the FBI and NSA revealed that their 'incidental collections' revealed NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - no crimes, no reason to investigate further - Obama still had Trump 'monitored' (according to NSA documents) and both the NSA and FBI began investigating Trump - for 9 months now...based on NO CRIME having been committed and NO foreign Intel value despite Obama claiming the continued surveillance was part of Foreign Intel collection.No. But when did "could" and "possible" become "was??" The moron I posted to said the Obama administration "was" spying on Trump.
Moron? While inferring that it is someone else that is the moron, your argument reveals the opposite.
Neither of them claimed any crimes were committed. You truly are fucking deranged.Reality is THIS:Neither is addressing reality.
Both the Director of the FBI and the Head of the NSA declared before Congress that the only crimes that have been proven to have been committed are the Felony Crimes of ESPIONAGE committed by the Democrats - the Obama holdovers - and Obama, who illegally collected personal information on Trump and his team that had NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE (and thus was protected personal information), distributed that information to 16 Intel agencies, and then illegally leaked that information in an attempt to undermine / overthrow the newly elected President / administration.
You COULD have a valid thought / point....if you pulled your head out of your partisan arse and paid attention to the facts.Hell, you could have won millions in the lottery... you could have used your brain...but there's been no evidence released yet that either of those ever happened.
Who is he?He is holding a press conference right now and he categorically stated that TRUMP TOWER WAS NOT WIRETAPPED
Faun, I have respected your opinions...until now. You have just proven you are either mentally dain bramaged or a liar. Both Comey and the head of the NSA stated before Congress that the illegal leaks perpetrated by the Obama hold-overs in the Intel Agencies constitutes Felony Crimes of ESPIONAGE.Neither of them claimed any crimes were committed. You truly are fucking deranged.
Like fishing in a barrel, this is too easy....You COULD have a valid thought / point....if you pulled your head out of your partisan arse and paid attention to the facts.Hell, you could have won millions in the lottery... you could have used your brain...but there's been no evidence released yet that either of those ever happened.
Obama began 2 simultaneous investigations of Trump (FBI and NSA) under the justification the investigations were for the collection of foreign Intel.... THE PROBLEM WITH THAT is that both the FBI and NSA testified before Congress that their initial 'incidental collections' on Trump and his team revealed NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE! In other words, Obama's justification for starting up 2 investigations of Trump after that was BULLSHIT! There was no reason for them - NO CRIME, NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE!
Obama overstepped his legal authority to conduct illegal investigations / illegal electronic surveillance on the GOP Presidential Candidate during a Presidential election.
He illegally spied on Trump and his team JUST LIKE HE DID reporters, the media, and congress during his earlier time as President!
The only reason any logical person with any common sense refuses to see this - AFTER BOGH COMEY AND THE HEAD OF THE NSA DECLARED THE ONLY CRIMES PROVEN TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED SO FAR HAS BEEN THE FELONY CRIMES OF ESPIONAGE BY OBAMA LOYALISTS/OBAMA - is because they are so politically partisan that they refuse to acknowledge the facts / truth that have been revealed.
The person this thread is about, duhWho is he?He is holding a press conference right now and he categorically stated that TRUMP TOWER WAS NOT WIRETAPPED
I was listening to trump. For some reason, he decided to give a talk at the same time.The person this thread is about, duhWho is he?He is holding a press conference right now and he categorically stated that TRUMP TOWER WAS NOT WIRETAPPED
That has already been proven.And YOU still posted how evidence could surface to show Obama spied on Trump.
