Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Just like Bill douldn't keep his shlong in his pants for > 5 mins at a time, hiLIARy couldn't keep classified mat'l where it belongs lol. Sad
Shouldn't be long now
FBI Obtains Warrant for More Emails in Clinton Probe
The FBI obtained a warrant to search emails related to the probe of Hillary Clinton's private server that were discovered on ex-congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop, law enforcement officials confirmed Sunday.
The warrant came two days after FBI Director James Comey revealed the existence of the emails, which law enforcement sources said were linked to Weiner's estranged wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The sources said Abedin used the same laptop to send thousands of emails to Clinton.
Lettuce hope that justice prevails and that no one, not even her royal highness is above the law.
Statistically it has vanished as it is well within the margin of error now.looks like hiLIARy's 12- point lead has all but vanished and for good reason
yep. Ravi , Jillian, and candycorn, and boedicca especially. Scandalous!!!
We need objective and well informed voters for the Republic to work.yep. Ravi , Jillian, and candycorn, and boedicca especially. Scandalous!!!
Oh so you were in the room when the FBI came across them and said "Don't open them!! We have to get a warrant first!!" "Can we look at a couple of them first?" "NO!! the law clearly states we have to get a warrant first!!" "But no one will know" "Well thats true but...but.." "But what?" "We need a warrant first! Close the top on the laptop!"Do you really believe the FBI who have been sitting on these emails for a few weeks didn't get a look at what was in there? Come on you don't believe that.How do you know?Comments?
BREAKING: FBI HAS NOT FOUND ANY NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST HILLARY.
FBI did not have a warrant to look at the emails. They don't know what they have yet or if it indeeed constitutes any new evidence against Hillary.
...I believe facts, not my, or your fantasies.
trueWe need objective and well informed voters for the Republic to work.yep. Ravi , Jillian, and candycorn, and boedicca especially. Scandalous!!!
IF we get more of these morons voting we will see a dictatorship sooner or later.
Comments?
BREAKING: FBI HAS NOT FOUND ANY NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST HILLARY.
Perhaps you fail to understand that Anthony Wiener was not cleared for the classified information, and as such, Ms Abedin is certainly in line for sharing classified information with an uncleared party. In addition, if the emails can be traced to Ms Clinton's private server, then she, too, is complicit.
Whether either faces charges will be a reflection of just how corrupt our government is.
But you just MADE THAT UP.
Just because something makes sense IN YOUR HEAD, doesn't make it so.
You THINK that just because Abedin shared her computer with her husband she therefore shared emails with him. But that is NOT A FACT. People have separate accounts with separate passwords.
You THINK that Abedin's actions are evidence against Clinton but THEY ARE NOT. Even if we take your musings to be true, there is not a single way to blame this on Clinton unless there is explicit evidence that she consented to Abedin's specific email handling on that computer.
Comments?
BREAKING: FBI HAS NOT FOUND ANY NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST HILLARY.
Perhaps you fail to understand that Anthony Wiener was not cleared for the classified information, and as such, Ms Abedin is certainly in line for sharing classified information with an uncleared party. In addition, if the emails can be traced to Ms Clinton's private server, then she, too, is complicit.
Whether either faces charges will be a reflection of just how corrupt our government is.
But you just MADE THAT UP.
Just because something makes sense IN YOUR HEAD, doesn't make it so.
You THINK that just because Abedin shared her computer with her husband she therefore shared emails with him. But that is NOT A FACT. People have separate accounts with separate passwords.
You THINK that Abedin's actions are evidence against Clinton but THEY ARE NOT. Even if we take your musings to be true, there is not a single way to blame this on Clinton unless there is explicit evidence that she consented to Abedin's specific email handling on that computer.
When I was a kid, we raised chickens. When it came time to butcher them, we would cut off their heads and watch them run all around the yard.
Why am I reminded of that while watching Democrats react to the latest of Clinton scandals?
Oh so you were in the room when the FBI came across them and said "Don't open them!! We have to get a warrant first!!" "Can we look at a couple of them first?" "NO!! the law clearly states we have to get a warrant first!!" "But no one will know" "Well thats true but...but.." "But what?" "We need a warrant first! Close the top on the laptop!"Do you really believe the FBI who have been sitting on these emails for a few weeks didn't get a look at what was in there? Come on you don't believe that.How do you know?BREAKING: FBI HAS NOT FOUND ANY NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST HILLARY.
FBI did not have a warrant to look at the emails. They don't know what they have yet or if it indeeed constitutes any new evidence against Hillary.
...I believe facts, not my, or your fantasies.
Thanks for keeping us updated Steve
My wild-ass guess is that this happened too close to the election for it to matter in terms of its outcome.
The chances of a constitutional crisis after the fact appear to be increasing, though.
.
I think it does matter.
There is exactly ZERO new evidence found against Clinton so far, but people assume that there is just because Comey reported there is new material in the case to be reviewed WITHOUT CLARIFYING THAT THERE IS NO NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST HILLARY THUS FAR and that they don't even have a warrant yet.
You talk to people who half listen to TV and they all have an impression that FBI has new evidence against Clinton based on which they re-opened a closed case. It is factually false and Comey is an ass for doing it that way, this close to election. I think there is a real argument that could be sustained that he broke the don't-meddle-in-election law in doing that way. But at very least he earned himself getting kicked out as soon as Hillary becomes President.
