Breaking: NBC Caught Manipulating Poll Results Released Today

2 presidents have been impeached.

False...

Clintion isn't a felon [sic]

LOL! It's a plural tense... thus: 'The Clintons are felons' and ... False.

Sanders isn't a self professed Marxist.

Hysterically false.

Now you double down on your stupidity.

Enough of that, how is it in your genius that you can't understand a basic poll? You entered this thread, why not talk about the actual subject?

I'm betting this is one of the most bizarre conversations you've ever had online.

Expect your conversations with Where_r_my_PubliusInfinitum to get even more bizarre down the road.

I got to experience it yesterday. He's completely inconsistent with the reality the rest of us take for granted. He even changes the meaning of his past posts just to attempt to be right on something.

He's not a bad guy. You just have to know what's coming.
 
NBC/WSJ is the same tag-team that commissioned the poll that shows Carson - suddenly, out of nowhere - tied with Trump.


NBC Caught Manipulating Poll Results Released Today....

This was a poll of 256 dems and 230 reps. It would take a lot convincing of for me to believe that a miniscule number of people like that could have any scientific value at all. I know next to nothing about statistics but common sense militates against giving this poll any credence at all. I think you're all involved in much ado about nothing. They claim a margin of error of 6% or so. If it's less than 50% I'll eat a Big Mac.
 
OK--I see what Hjoy and NYcab are saying.

The general split between Hillary and Sanders(without Biden) is not the same as the split amongst Biden supporters. Assuming it is is unfounded.

In other words, the 53-38 split is not representative of those choosing Biden first.

LOL! Dude... it doesn't matter. It's a 'race' between a Felon, wife of the only Elected President in US History to be IMPEACHED and a self professed Marxist never was.


great choices huh --LOL

sad fact is a leftist sheeple would blindly pull the lever for any of the three

Yes, they would. Such is the nature of Food.
 
I miss the time when thread titles that were patently, provably false were banned.

Or am I thinking of somewhere else?

Well, it can't be here, because if it were, this site would be void of Liberal, Progressive, Socialists... and Relativists of all shades of yellow stripes, including the lowly Muslims.

And that would reduce the entertainment value of the site to roughly zilch. Which would be hard on ad revenue... so it's unlikely to happen.
 
OK--I see what Hjoy and NYcab are saying.

The general split between Hillary and Sanders(without Biden) is not the same as the split amongst Biden supporters. Assuming it is is unfounded.

In other words, the 53-38 split is not representative of those choosing Biden first.

LOL! Dude... it doesn't matter. It's a 'race' between a Felon, wife of the only Elected President in US History to be IMPEACHED and a self professed Marxist never was.

The thread is an accusation of the MSM manipulating polls, not about who is running.

Turns out that is not the case. The blogger made a mistake in his assumptions about Biden voters. The blogger is wrong. His example is a misunderstanding of the Poll

Yes... I agree. What I am saying is that the Democrat Party will be shut out of the '16 election. As the Democrat Party has lost the trust of Americans... they're bleeding constituents so severely that the Democrat administration in office is importing illegal aliens by the MILLIONS, and they have no one of any potential credibility to run.

That the Media is corrupt and wholly in the bag for the Democrats, is simply a self-evident fact, of the irrefutable variety. All democrat polls are corrupt. As there is no such thing as an Ethical Leftist and there is no such thing as a non-leftist Democrat operative.
Thanks miss melodrama.
 
I got to experience it yesterday. He's completely inconsistent with the reality the rest of us take for granted. He even changes the meaning of his past posts just to attempt to be right on something.

OH! So this is still on the table?

SUPER!

Reader, the would-be "Contributor", is referring to a debate she lost BIG yesterday, the day before that and the several days prior to that, wherein I merely noted that "THERE IS LITERALLY NO SUCH THING as a "HomoPhobe"".

Subsequently, I pointed out that the word is a colloquialism, meaning that such used in conversation to represent something, but has no literal basis; which is to say that "There is literally, NO SUCH THING AS A "HOMOPHOBE".

I then broke the word down, noted the meaning of the two words compounded to form "homophobe", referencing such from a respected unimpeachable reference text... further noting that there is literally no such thing as a person with an irrational fear of 'same'... and that where she was using the "Homo-" as slang for homosexual, that there remained no such thing as an irrational fear of homosexuals... asking her to provide evidence of a medical case where so much as one individual was diagnosed as presenting symptoms of such, which I pointed out was unlikely, given that there is no formal definition of such a psychosis.

It then posted a 'Dictionary Definition' which defined "phobia" is merely possessing 'fear', with no irrational component being attributable to such... thus effectively either rendering all angst, anxiety, or 'fear' equal to phobia, or ridding the human species of any irrational fear... OKA: Phobia.

The coolest part is the inability of the would-be 'Contributor' to find the strength of character to simply admit that she was unable to sustain a position that has no potential merit, thus is unsustainable. After all, there is no potential shame in being unable to defend the indefensible... .

There is however, the certainty that to admit such, is to admit that the entire Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality rest solely upon LIES.

And given it's investment in the "BELIEF" of those lies... her psychological foundation is simply incapable of sustaining R E A L I T Y . . . .

What's the definition of homophobe?
Keys picture is in the definition in Webster's
Right next to Willie Gohmert's.
 
NBC/WSJ is the same tag-team that commissioned the poll that shows Carson - suddenly, out of nowhere - tied with Trump.


NBC Caught Manipulating Poll Results Released Today....

This was a poll of 256 dems and 230 reps. It would take a lot convincing of for me to believe that a miniscule number of people like that could have any scientific value at all. I know next to nothing about statistics but common sense militates against giving this poll any credence at all. I think you're all involved in much ado about nothing. They claim a margin of error of 6% or so. If it's less than 50% I'll eat a Big Mac.

"I don't know what I'm talking about, but the results don't feel right".

"Common sense" is often just ignorance. Take a statistics class, and you'll understand how sampling works.
 
Last edited:
NBC/WSJ is the same tag-team that commissioned the poll that shows Carson - suddenly, out of nowhere - tied with Trump.


NBC Caught Manipulating Poll Results Released Today....

This was a poll of 256 dems and 230 reps. It would take a lot convincing of for me to believe that a miniscule number of people like that could have any scientific value at all. I know next to nothing about statistics but common sense militates against giving this poll any credence at all. I think you're all involved in much ado about nothing. They claim a margin of error of 6% or so. If it's less than 50% I'll eat a Big Mac.

"I don't know what I'm talking about, but the results doesn't feel right".

"Common sense" is often just ignorance. Take a statistics class, and you'll understand how sampling works.
If "common sense " is ignorance, that would explain why so ignorant people use the phrase.
 
A political trick by Republicans that did nothing.

Nothing? Oh NOT SO... Such resulted in William "The Bubba" Clinton becoming THE ONLY elected PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE IMPEACHED!
Oh my God. How horrible. Only it was a political stunt by the House. He didn't resign and was charged with nothing. FAIL!

You libtards are such moral midgets. Clinton committed perjury, and only to leftwing ideologues is that nothing but a 'political stunt' to hold him accountable for it.
 
A political trick by Republicans that did nothing.

Nothing? Oh NOT SO... Such resulted in William "The Bubba" Clinton becoming THE ONLY elected PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE IMPEACHED!
Oh my God. How horrible. Only it was a political stunt by the House. He didn't resign and was charged with nothing. FAIL!

You libtards are such moral midgets. Clinton committed perjury, and only to leftwing ideologues is that nothing but a 'political stunt' to hold him accountable for it.

Well, understand... They're Relativists...

Meaning that Leftists lack the means to reason OBJECTIVELY.

As a consequence, they've no means to consider the ramifications of a Chief Executive who undermines objective truth.

It is entirely beyond their intellectual means. The onset of the Ideological Left is; in every sense, the antithesis of enlightenment.

It is nothing short of humanity regressing back into lower understanding... which is to say such represents humanity slipping from the means to reason that defines us as human and back into a lower form of life; which is to say: Sub-human.
 

Forum List

Back
Top