Harry Dresden
Adamantium Member
- Dec 15, 2008
- 94,226
- 27,132
I would normally agree but right now, we can do without Republican obstruction.
yea so lets let the Dems run UNOBSTRUCTED through our society
...another brilliant remark by Sara....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would normally agree but right now, we can do without Republican obstruction.
Well, the Republicans had almost total power in Washington, and they completely failed. Now it looks like the Dems are going to get total power in Washington and we'll see how they do....
But if they turn out as bad as the Republicans, I'll guess we'll have to give the socialists a chance next....
![]()
Well the sentiment in that position rests wholly in how you're defining 'bad'... If runaway irresponsible spending is at the root of 'bad' then the Dems have already destroyed the level of 'bad' the idiot 'centrists' of the GOP did...
So how are YOU defining 'bad'?
It may be that the Dems have a record of 'tax and spend', to some degree, but the programs that the dems spend the tax payers money on recycle the money back into the economy stimulating markets and maintaining a healthy economic cycle.
The Republicans have a policy of NOT taxing, but spending even more then the dems do. Most of which goes to a few select cronies and has almost no positive effect on the overall economy.
Now, I understand, that in your fervour of endless greed and selfishness, you feel that you have no responsibilty to the society that you live in, that has provided you with the freedoms that you enjoy, and therefore resent having to pay taxes for things like the wars that you supported or children's education or anything else that doesn't directly benefit you.
But can you at least understand that while 'tax and spend' may not be something that you like, NOT taxing and spending is PLAIN FUCKING IDIOTIC? That is one of many reasons why the Republicans under Bush were the worst governement this nation has had in recent history.
Of course you'll blame it all on Bush. No doubt that you, like almost all the other wingnuts, were a fanatic supporter of the Bush Republicans until they started losing elections, and then all you wingnuts abandoned them like rats from a sinking ship.
Where were your criticisms of the Bush Republicans before the 2006 elections? He was your baby.
But, if you still don't get it, let me try to explain it in language that you and the other wingnuts will understand:
Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...Oink...Oink, oink... Oink, Oink, Oink...Oink...
Got it?!?!?!?
Good!
![]()
Maybe, just maybe, this will inspire the Republicans to find some non right-wing-bible-thumping-torturers to represent their party.
We can always dream.
I hope so. It's getting tiring listening to their antiquated nonsense.
I guess the Torture Party isn't so popular anymore
Well, this is what the Small Tent Republicans wanted.
Let's see how relevant they can be in a filibuster-proof Senate.
The bigger concern is how long will we continue to have a Republic with one party in control and no one to stop them.
The Republican Party is dying, thankfully, so until the conservatives get a 3rd party for themselves and/or until the Democratic Party becomes too centrist and the Liberals create a 3rd party for themselves.
The war is over. Coke won. Ford won. And now the Democrats have won.
he's got some shit to eat,, and lots of it, you don't sell your soul to the devil without eating lots of shit. he's come out publicly against the "free voter act" the unions are gonna shove that shit right down his pansy throat..
Spector would do anything within his means to keep his seat, a man with no backbone.
Does he speak for his constituents or for the Grand Obstructionist Party?
You Republicans will do much better when you learn to govern as well as you play politics.
And your game lately has been weak too.
why shouldn't he keep his seat?
the repub party wants everyone to be a radical right winger.... and they were going to stick it to him by giving him a primary.
Quite the false assumption there, jill
you presume both that it's false and that i'm making an assumption.
2. Pennsylvania (R-Specter)
There's been some contradictory polling in Pennsylvania, with Quinnipiac placing conservative challenger Pat Toomey, who would be a heavy underdog in the general election, 14 points ahead of Arlen Specter. Franklin and Marshall, meanwhile, gives Specter a 15-point lead. I don't know that there's any a priori way to say which poll is correct. Polling primaries is intrinsically pretty difficult, and polling races more than a year in advance is intrinsically pretty difficult, which means that polling primaries a year in advance is really difficult. If you simply average the two numbers, you get the Republican primary being a toss-up. Each of these polls, it should be noted, were taken before Specter's intention to vote against the Employee Free Choice Act became known to voters, a position which will presumably help him the primaries while probably harming him with Pennsylvania's fairly union-friendly general electorate.
Let's do some fuzzy math here. Assume that there is a 80 percent chance that Specter's health is such that he chooses to run for re-election. If Specter runs for re-election, there is a50 percent chance that he survives the primary. If he survives the primary, there is a 80 percent chance that he wins the general election, where the Democratic opposition has been a bit disorganized. If he loses the primary, however, or chooses not to run, the Republican nominee (presumably Toomey) will probably only have about a 10 percent chance of retaining the seat for the Republicans. Run all the numbers, and that yields a 62 percent chance that the Democrats pick up the seat. Granted, it's fairly dubious to imply any sort of precision when we're dealing with guesstimates like these. But my impression is that the Democrats' odds in New Hampshire, with Hodes now having the primary field to himself, are a just a touch better than that. Also, Specter's nay vote on EFCA probably eliminates the chances of the Democrats picking this seat up through a party switch.
FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right: Senate Rankings, April 2009 Edition
plus, the dems will then owe him H-U-G-E... because it gets rid of the filibuster.
and he won't have to vote against the Employee Free Choice Act just to win a primary.
brilliant political strategy.
oh it is?.....geezus Sara are you that foolish to think the Dems have your back?...that they care about anyone BUT THEMSELVES?....dam...read Pelosi 101....you might open your eyes....well with you i dont know....Yeah, but this time it's much more serious.![]()
This is just a distraction to distract us from the other distracting distractions.
"On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate."
LOLOL What a freakin' coward. He didn't seem to mind when the Pennsylvania Republican primary elctorate gave him his seat in the first place. The man has no real convictions as he said just a few weeks ago that he wouldn't switch parties. This man's only concern is for his personal career. LOLOL Dems are welcome to him.
It's not surprising. The Republican party has made it very clear that it will tolerate no dissent from the party line.
You Republicans will do much better when you learn to govern as well as you play politics.
I've always voted for the man, this will make it easier now that he's come over from the dark side party. I heard only 21% claim to be republicans today, amazing how a party that had so much power sank so fast. Best thing republicans can do is stay on the fringes and pretend they know a bit about governance, just don't let them govern.![]()
Sore loser. Why can't you have class and say "You guys won - but we still have valid ideas and I think it's time the Republicans stopped being the party of NO and the party of working together."
Of course, because you have no class.
The party that once claimed to be the "moral majority" has no morals.
--Yeah that's right, there is no difference between the Dems and the Repubs, just look at how the Repubs have agreed with everything the Dems are doing. Right?
Oh that's right the Repubs don't agree with anything that the Dems want to do, nevermind...
With the exceptions of Arlan Spector, Susan Collins, Olympia Snow & John McCain-who was all for closing GITMO & against enhanced interrogation technics.
I am sick & tired of wooosy Republicans--Get rid of all of them-& get someone in there--& I could care less if they're republican or democrat I just want some conservatives on capital hill that have some COMMON SENSE for a change!
There used to be Eisenhower Republicans. Good sane conservative men with consciences, and a sense of duty. Todays Rupublican has a sense of duty only to Mammon.
The bigger concern is how long will we continue to have a Republic with one party in control and no one to stop them.
The Republican Party is dying, thankfully, so until the conservatives get a 3rd party for themselves and/or until the Democratic Party becomes too centrist and the Liberals create a 3rd party for themselves.
The war is over. Coke won. Ford won. And now the Democrats have won.
for now....sooner or later they will fuck up again....they cant help it...they are politicians,and politicians,no matter what their party WILL FUCK UP EVENTUALLY...