Breaking News: Trump fires Tomahawk Cruise Missles into Syria

[westwall]

Which kind of blows your lie that they didn't have them, out of the water, don't it....

Iraq was prohibited from having, chemical weapons not prohibited from had-ing them.
Proof they had weapons at one time, doesn't prove they had then when they were prohibited from having them. From the CIA report, we looked all over Iraq and didn't find any chemical weapons, except for abandoned ones.

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

 

[westwall]

Maybe you missed the part that THEY HAD THEM.

Had, as is past tense of to have. I had a dog too, but you don't see me buying kibble any more. HAD, means you no longer HAVE.

Nuance.

Had, as in they were still killing people, in Iraq, after the war was over. Thus, THEY HAD THEM WHILE THE WAR WAS GOING ON. Which means that they HAD THEM WHEN THEY WERE THE REASON FOR INVADING! Duh!

 

[westwall]

Are Americans not fed-up with all the badmouthing of his predecessor by Donald Trump. I have never heard an American president do that before no matter what political party any of them belonged to.

Hopefully, you're being facetious because, if you are not, you have had your head up...in the sand the past eight years.

I never heard President Obama badmouth George W Bush even once. In contrast, Donald trump continues to criticize his predecessor daily. Trump's supporters take his lead.

Then you must be deaf.

 

[Billo_Really]

Stupid here doesn't understand the meaning of "false flag"

Then why are you posting here?

 

[radical right]

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

WASHINGTON — In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

 

[westwall]

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

And guess what. That CIA report was proven wrong. Now run along junior. You don't seem to be able to tell the difference from a fact, and a fantasy.

 

[radical right]

And guess what. That CIA report was proven wrong. Now run along junior. You don't seem to be able to tell the difference from a fact, and a fantasy.

Both the 1,500 page report, and the 1,100 page final report?

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

Do you have a LINK?

 

[westwall]

And guess what. That CIA report was proven wrong. Now run along junior. You don't seem to be able to tell the difference from a fact, and a fantasy.

Both the 1,500 page report, and the 1,100 page final report?

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

Do you have a LINK?

I gave links to the news reports, from the NYT and CNN so that you couldn't claim bias, where they report the people being killed by chemical weapons, and the delivery of 500 tons of yellow cake. In other words, those are called facts. You can check on them. You CAN'T check on the CIA report.

See how that works.

 

[depotoo]

You are soooo full of it, or the people you listen to. Which is it?

CNN.com - U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq - Apr. 15, 2003

Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered


Chemical weapons WERE found in Iraq but Pentagon kept it secret | Daily Mail Online


http://nypost.com/2010/10/25/us-did-find-iraq-wmd/

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

WASHINGTON — In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Fort people that aren't supposed to have chemical weapons they sure seem to have a lot of them.

 

[radical right]

I gave links to the news reports, from the NYT and CNN so that you couldn't claim bias, where they report the people being killed by chemical weapons, and the delivery of 500 tons of yellow cake. In other words, those are called facts. You can check on them. You CAN'T check on the CIA report.

See how that works.

You know that Saddam Hussein reported the 500 tons of yellow cake in his UN declaration. He was allowed to have it. So finding it didn't put Iraq in violation of anything.

The CIA report stands. See how that works?

 

[Lakhota]

You are soooo full of it, or the people you listen to. Which is it?

CNN.com - U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq - Apr. 15, 2003

Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered


Chemical weapons WERE found in Iraq but Pentagon kept it secret | Daily Mail Online


http://nypost.com/2010/10/25/us-did-find-iraq-wmd/

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

WASHINGTON — In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

Anyone remember Judith Miller?

Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq | Mother Jones

 

[Faun]

You are soooo full of it, or the people you listen to. Which is it?

CNN.com - U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq - Apr. 15, 2003

Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered


Chemical weapons WERE found in Iraq but Pentagon kept it secret | Daily Mail Online


http://nypost.com/2010/10/25/us-did-find-iraq-wmd/

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

WASHINGTON — In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

This is what happens when conservatives post...

They lie. Profusely.

This one cites an article from when they first reported finding bio-labs, as though they actually found bio-labs.

This is a lie, of course, since after they checked out the "bio-labs," it turned out they weren't bio-labs at all...

CNN.com - Tests rule out suspect bio-labs

 

[westwall]

I gave links to the news reports, from the NYT and CNN so that you couldn't claim bias, where they report the people being killed by chemical weapons, and the delivery of 500 tons of yellow cake. In other words, those are called facts. You can check on them. You CAN'T check on the CIA report.

See how that works.

You know that Saddam Hussein reported the 500 tons of yellow cake in his UN declaration. He was allowed to have it. So finding it didn't put Iraq in violation of anything.

The CIA report stands. See how that works?

Oh? So he was allowed to have the means to create weapons of mass destruction. Is that what you're saying?

 

[radical right]

You know that Saddam Hussein reported the 500 tons of yellow cake in his UN declaration. He was allowed to have it. So finding it didn't put Iraq in violation of anything.

The CIA report stands. See how that works?

Oh? So he was allowed to have the means to create weapons of mass destruction. Is that what you're saying?

It's called duel use technology. Countries are allowed to have them. The same virus that can be used to make a biological weapon, can be used to make a vaccine. And because Iraq was a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, they had a right to have the means to produce nuclear fuel, hence the yellowcake being perfectly legal.

 

[westwall]

You know that Saddam Hussein reported the 500 tons of yellow cake in his UN declaration. He was allowed to have it. So finding it didn't put Iraq in violation of anything.

The CIA report stands. See how that works?

Oh? So he was allowed to have the means to create weapons of mass destruction. Is that what you're saying?

It's called duel use technology. Countries are allowed to have them. The same virus that can be used to make a biological weapon, can be used to make a vaccine. And because Iraq was a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, they had a right to have the means to produce nuclear fuel, hence the yellowcake being perfectly legal.

Yes, until it was shown that they WERE engaged in nuclear weapon research. Then they lost that privilege.

 

[depotoo]

I remember her well. And? Oh, you mean the fact it was Richard Armitage that leaked Plames name, rather than Libby, who got charged with it.
And motherjones? Really? Might as well be thinkprogress.

You are soooo full of it, or the people you listen to. Which is it?

CNN.com - U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq - Apr. 15, 2003

Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered


Chemical weapons WERE found in Iraq but Pentagon kept it secret | Daily Mail Online


http://nypost.com/2010/10/25/us-did-find-iraq-wmd/

And yet, they still DID have them. Face it dude, your claim that they didn't have them has been proven false so many times that your continued attempts to deflect, and lie,, are now just stupid.

To repeat, the CIA report, that cost $1 billion, said Iraq had no chemical weapons, or chemical weapons programs. The dozen or so munitions found, were old, abandoned, or lost.

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

WASHINGTON — In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

Anyone remember Judith Miller?

Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq | Mother Jones

 

[Lewdog]

Though some might not believe it...the U.S. has been destroying their own stuff too. There is an Army Depot in Richmond, Ky up the road from where I live that built brand new buildings with the sole purpose of burning up mustard gas.

 

[radical right]

Yes, until it was shown that they WERE engaged in nuclear weapon research. Then they lost that privilege.

The IAEA considers it a 'right' not a privilege, hence it can't be lost. Iraq retained and to this day retains the right to yellowcake.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Though some might not believe it...the U.S. has been destroying their own stuff too. There is an Army Depot in Richmond, Ky up the road from where I live that built brand new buildings with the sole purpose of burning up mustard gas.

Look up CMDS(Chemical Munitions Disposal Site) Tooele Army Depot South area (Tooele UT) It operated from 1983 to 2009 and destroyed over 77% of US chemical weapons stockpiles.

There is one now operating outside of Denver as well.. Were at the 96% completion level of removing them from our weapons stockpiles.