Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
It matters not if it was illegal or legal.
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Revealing the identity to the NY Times is a felony
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It was totally illegal. And now we have a direct line to your hero, obummer.
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.It matters not if it was illegal or legal.
It certainly does. Your fellow nutjubs were screeching over "illegal unmasking".
Now it's just, meh.
So what is the beef? What is the corruption?
No surveillance. No illegal unmasking.
So, yiou think that if we are wire tapping a Russian & a US cirizen calls & says " Got the nukes OK". We would ignore it. You're not too bright are you.Wow, You & El Rushbo are mental twins. Both of you dumbasses trying tio protewct your orange buddy pby placing blame with the Obama administration.And most likely, Obama gave her the authority to do it! The shit has hit the fan!
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/report-obama-nsa-advisor-susan-rice-requested-unmasking-incoming-trump-officials/
It is perfectly legal to request the names of those Russian Lovin Trumpettes as long has national security implications.
You think that if we are tapping some Russian official & Trump calls & wants to know where to send the payment that this would be ignored?
Actually it's not. If you weren't a political whore you would admit it too. But we know exactly what you are.
Oh, and I agree someone leaking the info is or was not legal,Thank you Boomberg! We now know it was done legally and for a REASON:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
And we now know it had NOTHING to do with Trump's lying tweets.
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
leaking information and names were not.
she obviously lied when she said she knew nothing of the surveillance.
Oh, and I agree someone leaking the info is or was not legal,Thank you Boomberg! We now know it was done legally and for a REASON:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
And we now know it had NOTHING to do with Trump's lying tweets.
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
leaking information and names were not.
she obviously lied when she said she knew nothing of the surveillance.
BUT THE SAME CAN BE SAID, for whomever leaked this info to Bloomberg....those unnamed sources are breaking the law by "leaking" as well.
Great , now we will see a million threads on this...
Rice was the national security advisor....BFD it was in her scope of practice..
It doesn't matter how it all is coming out.....
Her job as National Security Adviser was to spy on Trump?
Really?
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It was totally illegal. And now we have a direct line to your hero, obummer.
How is it illegal if she requested it through the appropriate process?
Thank you Boomberg! We now know it was done legally and for a REASON:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
And we now know it had NOTHING to do with Trump's lying tweets.
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
leaking information and names were not.
she obviously lied when she said she knew nothing of the surveillance.
Oh, and I agree someone leaking the info is or was not legal,Thank you Boomberg! We now know it was done legally and for a REASON:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
And we now know it had NOTHING to do with Trump's lying tweets.
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
leaking information and names were not.
she obviously lied when she said she knew nothing of the surveillance.
BUT THE SAME CAN BE SAID, for whomever leaked this info to Bloomberg....those unnamed sources are breaking the law by "leaking" as well.
Yes, however, based on the fact that they are exposing a continuing criminal enterprise they are protected by WHISTLEBLOWER laws.
How so?Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate
Um, YES IT DOES.
Rice used US taxpayer funded intelligence assets for 100% pure partisan politics.
The unmasking was no doubt part of the WH efforts to
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.It matters not if it was illegal or legal.
It certainly does. Your fellow nutjubs were screeching over "illegal unmasking".
Now it's just, meh.
So what is the beef? What is the corruption?
No surveillance. No illegal unmasking.
You also forgot
NO LEAKS TO THE MEDIA!
&
No, Obama Did Not Share Intelligence With Hillary Clinton!
So? A national security advisor is allowed to request the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports.And most likely, Obama gave her the authority to do it! The shit has hit the fan!
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/report-obama-nsa-advisor-susan-rice-requested-unmasking-incoming-trump-officials/
No leaker has been identified
