SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,939
- 73,285
- 3,605
Circumstantial evidence is pretty strong evidence the ACT HAPPENED, without the solid evidence of witnessing the act happen, or video of the act happening....or having the fingerprints to prove the act happened etc....that's my understandingExample of circumstantial evidence.When a goat farts in China and the sun rises in the East, you people will call for Impeachment of Trump. It is your Cry Wolf. Keep it up.
I know this is the official Republican position.....
Call it fake news...laugh it off.......it is just politics from butt hurt lefties
But it is growing......the evidence is building
If allegations are true....it is Treason
Even CNN admits it's circumstantial evidence...but I'll give them some credit, that's better than the no evidence they've had for four months.
Someone just told me all this is tiresome on this board....it's ridiculous in Washington...I couldn't agree more, a bunch of he said she said
you were outside late afternoon and it was a clear day and sunny with no snow on the ground up until you went to sleep for the night, you woke up the next morning and there was snow on the ground.
The circumstantial evidence shows it snowed overnight while you were sleeping.
Plain ole EVIDENCE would be, you saw/witnessed it snowed during the night.
This post shows you don't have a clue. With the snow on the ground in the morning it is hard evidence that it snowed over night. Circumstantial evidence would be wet ground in the morning in the winter WOULD SUGGEST that it snowed, or possibly rained, overnight.
Circumstantial only suggests an act happened.
That's also circumstantial, you need concrete proof of a crime, without it you may as well sit down. With that said if they had it we'd know it by now.