BREAKING: Trump's July 11th sentencing likely to be delayed indefinitely

[marvin martian]

I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.

LOL



New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.

"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."

 

[marvin martian]

It's looking like the "34 fELoniES!!!" the left fought so hard to manufacture may be tossed altogether.

 

[Votto]

I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.

LOL



New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.

"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."

Even judge Merchant seems to know it is better to have Trump than dementia man

 

[Donald H]

The Scotus has spoken. Cancelling the sentencing is a GIMME!

At least until America creates a government official 'Office of the Executioner'.

 

[toobfreak]

I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.

Won't help. In the end, the Leftist Bidenzoids will all kill each other with their bare hands for walking blindly into this blunder.

They went in just three months from thinking they had Trump nailed dead to rights to a cross, to having no party, no campaign and no president.

But then, we all knew they never had a real president at all four years ago--- just someone else's sock puppet.

 

[White 6]

It has nothing to do with presidential actions. Sentencing should go forth.

 

[berg80]

I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.

LOL



New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.

"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."

Because falsifying financial statements while paying for the silence of a pornographic film star in order to defraud the voting public is an "official duty?"

 

[berg80]

I thought Bragg was part of a deep state Dem cabal who are out to get Trump.

 

[Donald H]

It has nothing to do with presidential actions. Sentencing should go forth.

Keep the faith!
Nothing is set in stone anymore now that the Scotus has rightfully restored the absolute power of a president.

How could this have been left unattended to for over 350 years?

 

[Donald H]

Possible solution: Make all future presidents symbolic and to only be called upon for ceremonial purposes. That shouldn't have any effects on the traditional powers of the military or the MIC.

 

[White 6]

Keep the faith!
Nothing is set in stone anymore now that the Scotus has rightfully restored the absolute power of a president.

How could this have been left unattended to for over 350 years?

It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.

 

[Lesh]

I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.

LOL



New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.

"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."

“Based partly on his time in the White House”

1. This will not be a drawn out motion. The judge will rule pretty quickly

2. Just being in the White House in no way means these acts were on any way “official”.

This will go nowhere and take very little time

 

[Donald H]

It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.

You miss the point completely my friend. The questions was left unanswered by the fouthers and all it needed was for a Scotus that would complete the task.

Do you question the powers granted to the president? Take the question to the highest court in the land! ]/b]

Or at least support AOC for trying to do just that!

Ya can't make this sh-t up my friend. This is how America's rubber meets the road!

 

[White 6]

You miss the point completely my friend. The questions was left unanswered by the fouthers and all it needed was for a Scotus that would complete the task.

Do you question the powers granted to the president? Take the question to the highest court in the land! ]/b]

Or at least support AOC for trying to do just that!

Ya can't make this sh-t up my friend. This is how America's rubber meets the road!

It is a crock and will last (at best), no longer than Trump.
You do not get to just make up law, not based on the Constitution, and it stay.

 

[Donald H]

And now everybody must understand at least, the reason why the leader of an attempted coup against a democracy, can't be permitted to walk away from what he nearly accomplished.

(see examples throughout history for how other democracies took care of business)

 

[Donald H]

It is a crock and will last (at best), no longer than Trump.

Now you get it!

You do not get to just make up law, not based on the Constitution, and it stay.

Yes, you get it completely!

And the question can't be left unattended to, until November 4!

Start by telling us how the Constitution hasn't been considered?

The Scotus has an argument against your opinion!

Now we've come full circle my friend!

 

[Seymour Flops]

And now everybody must understand at least, the reason why the leader of an attempted coup against a democracy, can't be permitted to walk away from what he nearly accomplished.

(see examples throughout history for how other democracies took care of business)

Are you serious? “Everybody” thinks Trump should go to jail?

The growing majority who think Trump should go back into the Oval Office isn’t “everybody” but it’s much closer than the few hardcore Bidenites who think he should go to jail.

 

[Donald H]

Are you serious? “Everybody” thinks Trump should go to jail?

Yes I'm being very serious. Trump may have a majority of support that will ensure the standing of the Scotus.

The growing majority who think Trump should go back into the Oval Office isn’t “everybody” but it’s much closer than the few hardcore Bidenites who think he should go to jail.

You state the obvious. Biden's support is minority.

And the Scotus has ruled!

 

[White 6]

Now you get it!


Yes, you get it completely!

And the question can't be left unattended to, until November 4!

Start by telling us how the Constitution hasn't been considered?

The Scotus has an argument against your opinion!

Now we've come full circle my friend!

Roe lasted over 50 years. I do not see this one lasting as long.

 

[jbrownson0831]

It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.

Ba
lo
ney
As usual.